Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Matthews reason for banning Lua  (Read 2705 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8017
  • Reputation: +2452/-1105
  • Gender: Male
Matthews reason for banning Lua
« Reply #15 on: June 17, 2011, 08:14:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Elizabeth
    Implicit in your critique of Tele is the threat of him going ape-#hit...


    He has already gone ape, many times during the last few days alone, on this very site.

    Now, your idea of going ape and mine might be different, but there is little doubt that he has a tendency to overreact at the drop of a hat.  While that is no crime, the evidence supports the assertion (and he'd probably readily admit he has quite the temper).

    As for the rest, that is your idea, not mine.

    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."


    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8017
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #16 on: June 17, 2011, 08:18:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Elizabeth
    ...in keeping with the FE trolls who were mobbing him.


    Shall I pretend that you are implying I am an FE troll, too?  Perhaps I am taking orders from Vox or Iolanthe?
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."


    Offline wallflower

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1866
    • Reputation: +1983/-96
    • Gender: Female
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #17 on: June 17, 2011, 08:24:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You guys are going to get another senseless thread locked!  :fryingpan:

    Is the he said/she said done yet?  

    The Private Messages thread WAS Tele's initial fault. He was an aggressor when she asked a simple question, however Lua was admittedly enjoying the conflict and had repeatedly provoked him in the prior thread. I don't understand that. To me those types of threads are overall more agitating than enjoyable and it shows a certain sense of disregard for the discomfort of others. I don't know if it's enough to be banned but the conflict was never ending and CI loyalty goes to Tele, so the first, although not only, instigator is banned.

    Maybe Lua can be unbanned at some point down the road when she wants to participate in other more constructive threads. It's not up to me of course but I'm throwing that out there as a possibility. For now, it's better they be separated, no matter how it went down. Tele wins by default because she is in his territory now. When he went to her territory, he got banned. To me it all evens out in the big picture.

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8017
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #18 on: June 17, 2011, 08:28:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: wallflower
    The Private Messages thread WAS Tele's initial fault.


    You know that's heresy in these parts, right?  LOL!

    One was banned; many contributed...and I readily concede that I am part of the list.  Ciao
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +825/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #19 on: June 17, 2011, 08:33:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Lua deserved to be banned as did every FE troll who registered or resurrected their account here just to publicly slander a regular CI poster. Neither her nor any of the FE trolls on that thread are capable of a fruitful and truly Traditional discussion as they are not Traditional Catholics but worldling liberals who, in their desire to be unique, say they prefer the TLM.

    As MANY of us have attested countless times, these types are swine, so better to cut them off at the pass. I mean "spork"? Give me a break. Is this kindergarten?

    Thank the Lord that Matthew keeps the forum running with a vast majority of truly Traditional posters.


    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2194/-15
    • Gender: Female
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #20 on: June 17, 2011, 08:44:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: gladius_veritatis
    Quote from: Elizabeth
    ...in keeping with the FE trolls who were mobbing him.


    Shall I pretend that you are implying I am an FE troll, too?  Perhaps I am taking orders from Vox or Iolanthe?


    No, you shan't.   :geezer:

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8017
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #21 on: June 17, 2011, 08:49:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well, where' the fun in refraining, Izzy-belle???  I mean, you never know... :laugh2:
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #22 on: June 17, 2011, 09:16:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: wallflower
    The Private Messages thread WAS Tele's initial fault.


    No, the problem is that that woman shouldn't have been posting here, which is what I was pointing out from the beginning.


    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #23 on: June 18, 2011, 05:49:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Those fishies can rile even the best up with their putrid sewage that they vomit from their orifice above their neck. I am usually calm and rarely post, but fishies get under my skin with their sick understanding of Catholic morality.

    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #24 on: June 18, 2011, 05:52:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • When i read antiCatholic crud written from a fishie, I imagine the vomit spewing from his or her mouth and it lightens my mood.
    Quote
    I said they can rile even the best. I do not consider myself best or even close to best. I had to clarify that.

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8017
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #25 on: June 18, 2011, 06:00:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well, what has happened cannot be changed.

    For my part in disturbing the local peace, I beg everyone's pardon.

    Tele, I am truly sorry for whatever pain and hardship you have had to endure as a result of the unfortunate situation at your former chapel.  As one who has been through something of a similar nature, I should have been more understanding and patient with you as you work through the various stages of the recovery process, if we may call it such.

    My brother, may God grant you abundant grace to find and, over time, augment the peace you desire.  Pax tecuм, amigo.
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."


    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #26 on: June 18, 2011, 07:53:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So... this is the end right...? Everyone's happy... Right?  :cool:

    Offline Sigismund

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5386
    • Reputation: +3121/-44
    • Gender: Male
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #27 on: June 18, 2011, 09:23:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It seems we all CAN just get along.
    Stir up within Thy Church, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the Spirit with which blessed Josaphat, Thy Martyr and Bishop, was filled, when he laid down his life for his sheep: so that, through his intercession, we too may be moved and strengthen by the same Spir

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #28 on: June 18, 2011, 09:54:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Lua deserved to be banned, simple as that. We should all just move on and stop talking about the people from FE before they start swarming in here again.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Matthews reason for banning Lua
    « Reply #29 on: June 18, 2011, 01:21:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Lua deserved to be banned as did every FE troll who registered or resurrected their account here just to publicly slander a regular CI poster. Neither her nor any of the FE trolls on that thread are capable of a fruitful and truly Traditional discussion as they are not Traditional Catholics but worldling liberals who, in their desire to be unique, say they prefer the TLM.


    Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    We should all just move on and stop talking about the people from FE before they start swarming in here again.


    Guys!  I swear, I honestly found this place in the midst of a search of Catherine Anne Emmerich quotiations of Hell!

    The fact I came in right as a half dozen other Fisheaters has gotta be coincidental!  (If not a coincidence, why would God allow me to witness the broo-ha-ha?  I wonder.  I dunno.)  

    In any event, I'm hoping that reading material over here will be even further stimulating and hopefully edifying as I try to reach out to other Catholics.

    I wonder why Catholic Answers Forum seems boring to me.


    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle