I think the temptation for women in this regard is more a vanity issue than physical unchastity. Sure, we can see a good looking man and think to ourselves: "wow, what a handsome man". But from that point of simple awareness, to actually "undressing the man in our minds and imagining"... I just don't think it naturally happens. Or maybe it is just me.

What I do remember happening back in my early youth is me instantaneously trying to appear more pretty or even flirtatous, this is, actively seeking attention, when the mentioned good looking young man appeared in the room. It is really an ego issue. If left unchecked, this could lead to sins of vanity or even immodesty.

A lady here on CI, who I respect, said that"male immodesty tempts  feminine women".

In the context of the subject we were discussing: female immodesty in dress, I would answer that women are not tempted to sin in the same way as men are. I would say that male immodesty may attract some women, but I would not say it tempts them to sin.

I'll be blunt, when a man of the world sees a young good looking well figured girl dressed provocatively, they immediately mentally strip her of her clothes  and fantisize or begin to plan on how to have relations with them. That is a mortal sin.

"Whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart" (Matthew 5:28).

For a Catholic man, when they sees such a girl, a temptation, they must turn away and try to get the image out of their minds in order not to sin.

I do not think women have the same problem. I think that women might be attracted by a "a young good looking well figured man dressed provocatively", but they are not tempted to sin as a man is.

Most women are, more or less, sɛҳuąƖ deviants. It's due to their fallen "nature", hence their Jezebel and Asmodeus spirit.

That's not because those girls have an intrinsic default to virtue which makes them realize their error, rather, it's because they realize the guys with whom they slept were either beta males and/or scuм bags, which left the girls feeling low about themselves, hence, as a defense mechanism, they convince themselves that they weren't guilty of using the guys, and only they were the ones being used.  

If the guys had been alpha or sigma males, those girls would have been satisfied with their own "conquest".

That's not because those girls have an intrinsic default to virtue which makes them realize their error, rather, it's because they realize the guys with whom they slept were either beta males and/or scuм bags, which left the girls feeling low about themselves, hence, as a defense mechanism, they convince themselves that they weren't guilty of using the guys, and only they were the ones being used.  

If the guys had been alpha or sigma males, those girls would have been satisfied with their own "conquest".

Firstly, your entire post is much too graphic for me and should be removed.

Secondly, I wonder how you are able to communicate with women at ALL in real life, considering your condescending attitude towards them.
I feel for you.

How do people survive, spiritually, when they are so vicious to God's creation?