Author Topic: Crisis Forum is Under Siege... please ban the moles, Matthew (Read 934 times)

PartyIsOver221 · « **on:** October 30, 2011, 07:05:24 PM »

Yeah, I'll say it again, as I know Raoul, SS, and numerous others have chimed in on this.

Help the Crisis forum, primarily, in banning or restricting posting privileges to romanthelogy and aquinaq and a few of the other guys that are spamming the Crisis section with inflammatory threads and comments.

Yeah its a long shot, you helping the designated "Sede" forum out, but I feel impelled to make a response to them publicly.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #1 on:** October 30, 2011, 08:26:26 PM »

Why has tradition1987 not been banned yet? It's obvious that he's tomas on another account. You know, the guy who came on here and posted satanic pictures? He posted a picture of lucifer the other day, he should be banned for that.

I haven't seen enough evidence to ban aquinas yet, but romantheology is very odd. He says he likes the SSPX, but then praises JPII and tries to paint ABL as someone who denied Church doctrine.

PartyIsOver221 · « **Reply #2 on:** November 04, 2011, 09:33:52 PM »

Another call for romantheology to be heavily moderated, better yet banned.

He's doing another carpet-bombing in the Crisis forum, with blasphemes to God's servants and to Catholics entirely.

Stephen Francis · « **Reply #3 on:** November 04, 2011, 10:15:15 PM »

I can't even be bothered to respond to what RT posts, and obviously, neither can a lot of others.

His posts remind me of a rag, tabloid newspaper's front page:

MAN BITES DOG!!!

...only to open to page 2 and find a photo of a guy happily munching on a Nathan's frankfurter.

Seriously... while I have been accused (and sometimes fairly) of overly-emotional language, RT and several others are simply using hate-filled polemical phraseology to try and get people riled up.

It's precisely FOR THAT REASON that I decided to start a discussion about something as simple and plain to understand as the venerable Sign of the Cross.

It's really just because I am sick of the flame-throwers being brought out by people who have NO interest in constructive dialogue.

Even Caminus and I have had decent, mature exchanges (at least one or two) lately; I think that shows that there are people here of what I perceive to be generally good will (albeit with agendas, no doubt), and then there are people who are here to disrupt any sense of community that we might possibly engender by our sharing with one another.

I am not going to ask for banning or moderating anyone, but I will say that I will respect whatever decisions Matthew comes to.

Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon.

Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us.