I have had two dreams in particular that deal with the time frame starting on August 25th, 2018 and moving forward into 2019.

*Disclaimer*

What I am about to say is in no way DOGMA ... It is my best interpretation of two separate dreams that I am quite sure are from Almighty God. As with Prophecy, us humans do not fully understand its fulfillment until it comes to pass. My point is: I am doing my best to understand and share what God has said to me. My belief that these dreams are from God is based on hundreds of fulfilled dreams and years of experience in this realm.

One dream involves the Blessed Virgin Mary telling me when I will die and God showing me how I will die.

The other dream has to do with the year 2019 (That is all I will divulge about this).

If others have heard from the true God (Deuteronomy 18:21-22), please share.

If ya'll think I am a foolish, deluded heretic ..... let the insults fly !!

LOL

 :geezer:

 :roll-laugh2:

As I pointed out in another thread:

Quote from: Baltimore Catechism

Q. 1155. What are dreams and why is it forbidden to believe in them?

A. Dreams are the thoughts we have in sleep, when our will is unable to guide them. It is forbidden to believe in them, because they are often ridiculous, unreasonable, or wicked, and are not governed by either reason or faith.

Q. 1156. Are bad dreams sinful in themselves?

A. Bad dreams are not sinful in themselves, because we cannot prevent them, but we may make them sinful: 1.(1) By taking pleasure in them when we awake, and 2.(2) By bad reading or immodest looks, thoughts, word or actions before going to sleep; for by any of these things we may make ourselves responsible for the bad dreams.

Q. 1157. Did not God frequently in the Old Law make use of dreams as a means of making known His will?

A. God did frequently in the Old Law make use of dreams as a means of making known His Will; but on such occasions He always gave proof that what He made known was not a mere dream, but rather a revelation or inspiration. He no longer makes use of such means, for He now makes known His will through the inspiration of His Church.

I guess the Pope that had the dream where he saw Saint Francis holding up the RCC was from the devil ... or should have been ignored. And Saint John Bosco should never have written that book of dreams ... just rubbish anyways.

And I guess we need to forget about Saint Phillip Neri's mother, who had a dream about how here son would be a holy man and a great Saint.

And maybe the 3-Wise Men should have ignored that dream and returned to Herod, so Herod could have found Jesus, Mary and Joseph ?

It would be better to use our time and join the Resistance against Rome and Pope Francis !!!

:applause:

Yes, what a good way to spend our time ... resisting a corpse of a V-2 Church.

Dolores, do you really think that all dreams are to be ignored ?

If so, what are we to say about what I posted above ?

I guess the Pope that had the dream where he saw Saint Francis holding up the RCC was from the devil ... or should have been ignored. And Saint John Bosco should never have written that book of dreams ... just rubbish anyways.

And I guess we need to forget about Saint Phillip Neri's mother, who had a dream about how here son would be a holy man and a great Saint.

And maybe the 3-Wise Men should have ignored that dream and returned to Herod, so Herod could have found Jesus, Mary and Joseph ?

The fact that you were so easily deceived by antipope David Bawden in the very recent past should be more than sufficient evidence that you ought not to be treating your dreams as oracles.

Pray for an increase in the Virtue of Humility.

Then perhaps you will stop bristling pridefully and indulging in melancholic self-pity when fraternally corrected. Then perhaps too you will stop comparing yourself to the aforementioned persons, and you will not think yourself above your station - namely that of a layman who ought to submit with humble docility to the traitional teaching for laymen regarding the interpretation of dreams, as expressed in the Baltimore Catechism passage quoted above.

I think the Baltimore Catechism is wrong here in saying that God no longer gives people prophetic dreams and that it is wrong to interpret dreams as meaningful. Many saints have had prophetic dreams, most famously John Bosco, so God does still sometimes give people prophetic dreams. I am not saying the poster here is receiving prophetic dreams, only that I think it is possible.

The Baltimore Catechism is written as a guide for laymen and is not concerned with qualifying its admonitions with exceptions that might serve only to further confuse the reader or confirm him in his errors. The guidelines the Church gives to laymen in this area must be based on what is normative for laymen, and not based on exceptions and dispensations granted to saints and mystics.

Exceptions don't nullify rules, they prove them. A layman like 62myer who has, as recently as a few months ago, exhibited such poor judgment and discernment that he actually accepted and actively sought to serve an American layman "elected" by five other laymen (including his parents) as Supreme Pontiff of the Catholic Church, is precisely the kind of person to whom the Baltimore Catechism's admonishments against dream interpretation were designed.

Therefore I would strongly advise against running the risk of confirming him in his desire to treat his dreams like divine oracles by bringing up the examples you cite. Better to advise him to submit to the Church's wisdom and defer to the Catechism's normative admonishments against dream interpretations.

Quote from: 62myer

I guess the Pope that had the dream where he saw Saint Francis holding up the RCC was from the devil ... or should have been ignored. And Saint John Bosco should never have written that book of dreams ... just rubbish anyways.

And I guess we need to forget about Saint Phillip Neri's mother, who had a dream about how here son would be a holy man and a great Saint.

And maybe the 3-Wise Men should have ignored that dream and returned to Herod, so Herod could have found Jesus, Mary and Joseph ?

The fact that you were so easily deceived by antipope David Bawden in the very recent past should be more than sufficient evidence that you ought not to be treating your dreams as oracles.

Pray for an increase in the Virtue of Humility.

Then perhaps you will stop bristling pridefully and indulging in melancholic self-pity when fraternally corrected. Then perhaps too you will stop comparing yourself to the aforementioned persons, and you will not think yourself above your station - namely that of a layman who ought to submit with humble docility to the traitional teaching for laymen regarding the interpretation of dreams, as expressed in the Baltimore Catechism passage quoted above.

I understood David's plight -- But, I never believed that he was Pope.

In the past, I made mistakes by posting certain things that were human.

What comes from God is Divine and Lasts Forever.

Quote from: BTNYC

Quote from: Matto

I think the Baltimore Catechism is wrong here in saying that God no longer gives people prophetic dreams and that it is wrong to interpret dreams as meaningful. Many saints have had prophetic dreams, most famously John Bosco, so God does still sometimes give people prophetic dreams. I am not saying the poster here is receiving prophetic dreams, only that I think it is possible.

The Baltimore Catechism is written as a guide for laymen and is not concerned with qualifying its admonitions with exceptions that might serve only to further confuse the reader or confirm him in his errors. The guidelines the Church gives to laymen in this area must be based on what is normative for laymen, and not based on exceptions and dispensations granted to saints and mystics.

Exceptions don't nullify rules, they prove them. A layman like 62myer who has, as recently as a few months ago, exhibited such poor judgment and discernment that he actually accepted and actively sought to serve an American layman "elected" by five other laymen (including his parents) as Supreme Pontiff of the Catholic Church, is precisely the kind of person to whom the Baltimore Catechism's admonishments against dream interpretation were designed.

Therefore I would strongly advise against running the risk of confirming him in his desire to treat his dreams like divine oracles by bringing up the examples you cite. Better to advise him to submit to the Church's wisdom and defer to the Catechism's normative admonishments against dream interpretations.

Amen !!

You sound just like Davey and Bobby.

"Davey?" As in "David Bawden?"

Not a particularly reverent manner in which to refer to the man who called "Pope" not seven months ago.

And effeminate, churlish outbursts like that aren't doing a whole heck of a lot to refute what I've said thus far in this thread.

Pray for an increase in humility.

Quote from: Matto

I think the Baltimore Catechism is wrong here in saying that God no longer gives people prophetic dreams and that it is wrong to interpret dreams as meaningful. Many saints have had prophetic dreams, most famously John Bosco, so God does still sometimes give people prophetic dreams. I am not saying the poster here is receiving prophetic dreams, only that I think it is possible.

You are correct, Matto.

Those who idolize that section of the Baltimore Catechism reject the workings of the Spirit of Truth, in those regards.

Matto, if you want more of the dreams that God has given me, let me know and I will e-mail them to you. Then, you could share them with the GENUISES AND SPIRITUAL GIANTS that roam this web-site.

 

Well, looks like I was something of a prophet myself in this thread:

The Baltimore Catechism is written as a guide for laymen and is not concerned with qualifying its admonitions with exceptions that might serve only to further confuse the reader or confirm him in his errors. The guidelines the Church gives to laymen in this area must be based on what is normative for laymen, and not based on exceptions and dispensations granted to saints and mystics.

Exceptions don't nullify rules, they prove them. A layman like 62myer who has, as recently as a few months ago, exhibited such poor judgment and discernment that he actually accepted and actively sought to serve an American layman "elected" by five other laymen (including his parents) as Supreme Pontiff of the Catholic Church, is precisely the kind of person to whom the Baltimore Catechism's admonishments against dream interpretation were designed.

Therefore I would strongly advise against running the risk of confirming him in his desire to treat his dreams like divine oracles by bringing up the examples you cite. Better to advise him to submit to the Church's wisdom and defer to the Catechism's normative admonishments against dream interpretations.

See what I mean, Matto?

PLEASE BAN THE SORCERER.