Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Ladislaus St Thomas  (Read 1983 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline roscoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7610
  • Reputation: +617/-404
  • Gender: Male
Ladislaus St Thomas
« on: August 18, 2015, 05:04:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Sorry about typo but the topic should read Ladislaus And St Thomas

     Lad apparently  objects to my citing his remarks about St Thomas in another topic.

    Therefore, another one  seems appropriate.

    We have been informed by Lad that the Doc of Holy Church was 'wrong about the IC of Mary and a few other things'.

    The IC of Mary comment seems to have been resolved but the question of the 'few other things' has not.

    In fact, Lad has doubled down and is now citing a 'study' where allegedly '40 some material errors' in addition to the unnamed 3 are also cited.

    No specifics have been forthcoming, nor has the author of the 'study' been identified.

    Am I the only one who detects an attack on this foremost Doc of Holy Church?  :confused1:


    Logged
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #1 on: August 18, 2015, 07:08:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • St Augustine published a book of corrections when he realised his mistakes.

    I am not aware of any such work that St Thomas has written.

    If there are 40+ 'material errors' in addition to a 'few wrongs'   to be found in his philosophy then they are apparently still there--- at least acc to Lad.

    The Forum await his comment :ready-to-eat:
    Logged
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #2 on: August 18, 2015, 08:10:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • What this forum awaits is your ejection for heresy, roscoe.
    Logged

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #3 on: August 18, 2015, 08:18:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote
    over thirty years ago, Dr. Andre Daignes, Professor of Philosophy in Buenos Aires, Argentina, pointed out twenty-four formal errors in the Summa of St. Thomas.
    -- Michael Malone, The Only-Begotten, p. 70.

    Quote
    One scholar noted that the book St. Thomas was writing when he died was called The Compendium of Theology, in which are found at least nine explicit errors.
    --  Michael Malone, The Only-Begotten, p. 395.

    That adds up to 33 in those two works.

    But roscoe has no problem stating that there's error in Holy Scripture and yet acts all scandalized about error in St. Thomas.

    Run along now.





    Logged

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #4 on: August 18, 2015, 08:21:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: roscoe
    St Augustine published a book of corrections when he realised his mistakes.


    Oh, I do declare, roscoe is attacking this great "Doc of Holy Church."

    I agree with BTNYC that this drug-addled heretic needs to be banned once and for all.

    Logged

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #5 on: August 18, 2015, 09:05:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote
    over thirty years ago, Dr. Andre Daignes, Professor of Philosophy in Buenos Aires, Argentina, pointed out twenty-four formal errors in the Summa of St. Thomas.
    -- Michael Malone, The Only-Begotten, p. 70.

    Quote
    One scholar noted that the book St. Thomas was writing when he died was called The Compendium of Theology, in which are found at least nine explicit errors.
    --  Michael Malone, The Only-Begotten, p. 395.

    That adds up to 33 in those two works.

    But roscoe has no problem stating that there's error in Holy Scripture and yet acts all scandalized about error in St. Thomas.

    Run along now.








    No specific error, mistake or wrong  of St Thomas( acc to Lad) has yet been presented.

    Pls give a specific example of an 'error' acc to 'Dr' Daignes..... or one acc to the other unnamed 'scholar'...

     :confused1:


    Logged
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline Disputaciones

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1667
    • Reputation: +472/-178
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #6 on: August 18, 2015, 09:58:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote
    over thirty years ago, Dr. Andre Daignes, Professor of Philosophy in Buenos Aires, Argentina, pointed out twenty-four formal errors in the Summa of St. Thomas.
    -- Michael Malone, The Only-Begotten, p. 70.

    Quote
    One scholar noted that the book St. Thomas was writing when he died was called The Compendium of Theology, in which are found at least nine explicit errors.
    --  Michael Malone, The Only-Begotten, p. 395.

    That adds up to 33 in those two works.


    Straight out of Bob Dimond's book. He did this to impugn St. Thomas' authority and credibility.

    Who are these genius theologians Dr. Andre Daignes and the unnamed (LOL) "scholar"?
    Logged

    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3473
    • Reputation: +1816/-233
    • Gender: Female
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #7 on: August 18, 2015, 11:18:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Disputaciones
    Who are these genius theologians Dr. Andre Daignes ...?


    No Daignes shows up on google.
    Logged

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #8 on: August 19, 2015, 09:28:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: roscoe
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote
    over thirty years ago, Dr. Andre Daignes, Professor of Philosophy in Buenos Aires, Argentina, pointed out twenty-four formal errors in the Summa of St. Thomas.
    -- Michael Malone, The Only-Begotten, p. 70.

    Quote
    One scholar noted that the book St. Thomas was writing when he died was called The Compendium of Theology, in which are found at least nine explicit errors.
    --  Michael Malone, The Only-Begotten, p. 395.

    That adds up to 33 in those two works.

    But roscoe has no problem stating that there's error in Holy Scripture and yet acts all scandalized about error in St. Thomas.

    Run along now.








    No specific error, mistake or wrong  of St Thomas( acc to Lad) has yet been presented.

    Pls give a specific example of an 'error' acc to 'Dr' Daignes..... or one acc to the other unnamed 'scholar'...

     :confused1:




    You're the one who's obsessed with this issue, roscoe, so I gave you the source where you can look it up.

    I don't have to convince myself that St. Thomas is not infallible, and I'm not going to waste my time digging up the sources to prove that to the likes of you.

    Conversely, while you yourself uphold the infallibility of St. Thomas, you have repeatedly and pertinaciously asserted that there's error in Sacred Scripture.
    Logged

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #9 on: August 19, 2015, 09:29:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Disputaciones
    Straight out of Bob Dimond's book. He did this to impugn St. Thomas' authority and credibility.

    Who are these genius theologians Dr. Andre Daignes and the unnamed (LOL) "scholar"?


    Again, if you're that obsessed with this issue, nitwit, go look up the primary sources.  Or do you too, like roscoe, claim that St. Thomas is infallible?  That book referenced is available on Amazon.  Go buy it.
    Logged

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #10 on: August 19, 2015, 08:53:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: roscoe
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote
    over thirty years ago, Dr. Andre Daignes, Professor of Philosophy in Buenos Aires, Argentina, pointed out twenty-four formal errors in the Summa of St. Thomas.
    -- Michael Malone, The Only-Begotten, p. 70.

    Quote
    One scholar noted that the book St. Thomas was writing when he died was called The Compendium of Theology, in which are found at least nine explicit errors.
    --  Michael Malone, The Only-Begotten, p. 395.

    That adds up to 33 in those two works.

    But roscoe has no problem stating that there's error in Holy Scripture and yet acts all scandalized about error in St. Thomas.

    Run along now.








    No specific error, mistake or wrong  of St Thomas( acc to Lad) has yet been presented.

    Pls give a specific example of an 'error' acc to 'Dr' Daignes..... or one acc to the other unnamed 'scholar'...

     :confused1:




    You're the one who's obsessed with this issue, roscoe, so I gave you the source where you can look it up.

    I don't have to convince myself that St. Thomas is not infallible, and I'm not going to waste my time digging up the sources to prove that to the likes of you.

    Conversely, while you yourself uphold the infallibility of St. Thomas, you have repeatedly and pertinaciously asserted that there's error in Sacred Scripture.


    Pls show where I have said that St Thomas is 'infallible'...... :smirk:
    Logged
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #11 on: August 20, 2015, 07:19:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: roscoe
    Pls show where I have said that St Thomas is 'infallible'...... :smirk:


    Would you prefer that I show where you said that there's error in Sacred Scripture?

    You imply it by claiming that pointing out that St. Thomas is not infallible constitutes a vicious attack on St. Thomas.
    Logged

    Offline BTNYC

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2777
    • Reputation: +3122/-97
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #12 on: August 20, 2015, 07:39:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: roscoe
    Pls show where I have said that St Thomas is 'infallible'...... :smirk:


    Would you prefer that I show where you said that there's error in Sacred Scripture?

    You imply it by claiming that pointing out that St. Thomas is not infallible constitutes a vicious attack on St. Thomas.


    I think you're underestimating what a THC-addled, utterly clouded intellect you're dealing with here.

    If Matthew won't ban him, I hope he at least takes his stupid, infantile emoticons away from him some (hopefully very near) day.
    Logged

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #13 on: August 20, 2015, 09:19:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Yes, this entire thread was nothing but a distraction from his heresy ... rooted in an irrelevant ad hominem carried over from the other thread.  I had mentioned in passing quite some time ago that there are known errors in the works of St. Thomas, the point of which was not to attack St. Thomas but rather to show that he's not infallible.   roscoe also gets bent out of shape if anyone mentions anything negative about any Jesuit ... because that's an attack on St. Ignatius.  He also has some bizarre obsession with Cardinal Rampolla ... who was no friend of orthodox Catholicism at the very least.
    Logged

    Offline BTNYC

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2777
    • Reputation: +3122/-97
    • Gender: Male
    Ladislaus St Thomas
    « Reply #14 on: August 20, 2015, 12:23:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus
    He also has some bizarre obsession with Cardinal Rampolla ... who was no friend of orthodox Catholicism at the very least.


    Yes, speaking of a Freemason, that is putting it very mildly. Well, Roscoe adores the Beatles, so obsession with Illuminists is nothing new to him.

    I'm sure saying that makes me a "Sola Scriptura prot  :laugh2:" or some such stupidity in his bloodshot, glassy eyes.
    Logged
    Pages: [1] 2
    « previous next »