Author Topic: Lack Of Civility and Good Manners (Read 2945 times)

Marcelino · « **on:** October 14, 2012, 03:58:56 PM »

October of this year, seems to be the month when Catholiic Info lost civlity and good manners. Personally, I'm sad to see it go and I hope it returns someday.

guitarplucker · « **Reply #1 on:** October 14, 2012, 04:07:15 PM »

As long as I can remember this forum has had its share of combativeness, which is true of all forums with a healthy amount of activity.

I think maybe you're thin-skinned.

Marcelino · « **Reply #2 on:** October 14, 2012, 04:13:49 PM »

Quote from: guitarplucker

As long as I can remember this forum has had its share of combativeness, which is true of all forums with a healthy amount of activity.

I think maybe you're thin-skinned.

Nope, I think it is much worse than that and I'm not unique.

Marcelino · « **Reply #3 on:** October 14, 2012, 07:49:45 PM »

now, how many down thumbs will this post get :roll-laugh1:

Daegus · « **Reply #4 on:** October 14, 2012, 08:14:43 PM »

Why would your post be thumbed down?

Marcelino · « **Reply #5 on:** October 14, 2012, 08:21:48 PM »

Quote from: Daegus

Why would your post be thumbed down?

Good question. Now, look at the ones before it.

Daegus · « **Reply #6 on:** October 14, 2012, 08:28:13 PM »

Quote from: Marcelino

Quote from: Daegus
Why would your post be thumbed down?

Good question. Now, look at the ones before it.

I know that you were thumbed down.

The question of WHY still remains. :gandalf:

Marcelino · « **Reply #7 on:** October 14, 2012, 09:31:59 PM »

Quote from: Daegus

Quote from: Marcelino
Quote from: Daegus
Why would your post be thumbed down?

Good question. Now, look at the ones before it.

I know that you were thumbed down.

The question of WHY still remains. :gandalf:

I'd say, because they're just rude.

Marcelino · « **Reply #8 on:** October 15, 2012, 12:39:24 AM »

Bad manners often proves: it is easier to stir up vice, than virtue. Just watch how it spreads!

Potiphera · « **Reply #9 on:** October 15, 2012, 03:12:27 AM »

''Sedes non opus est determinare.''

My understanding of the above, means, Sedes are not defined by their works.
It could also mean, What makes a Sedevacantist cannot be defined.

Can you verify for me please?

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #10 on:** October 15, 2012, 01:36:04 PM »

This forum has remarkable good manners...

A few days ago I visited a forum that I used to frequent (secular) and was astonished at how shallow, vulgar, mean and spiritually valueless it all was.

I'm not discounted the occasional fights here but they are, by comparison, on the polite side.

Daegus · « **Reply #11 on:** October 15, 2012, 04:00:33 PM »

Quote from: Potiphera

''Sedes non opus est determinare.''

My understanding of the above, means, Sedes are not defined by their works.
It could also mean, What makes a Sedevacantist cannot be defined.

Can you verify for me please?

It's quite clear what's meant by my signature if you actually read it. All it means is that the seat can not be determined and shouldn't be determined because there is no real need to do so.

Marcelino · « **Reply #12 on:** October 15, 2012, 04:44:57 PM »

Quote from: Capt McQuigg

This forum has remarkable good manners...

A few days ago I visited a forum that I used to frequent (secular) and was astonished at how shallow, vulgar, mean and spiritually valueless it all was.

I'm not discounted the occasional fights here but they are, by comparison, on the polite side.

Fine, then explain why so many people are leaving.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #13 on:** October 15, 2012, 04:50:57 PM »

Quote from: Marcelino

Quote from: Capt McQuigg
This forum has remarkable good manners...

A few days ago I visited a forum that I used to frequent (secular) and was astonished at how shallow, vulgar, mean and spiritually valueless it all was.

I'm not discounted the occasional fights here but they are, by comparison, on the polite side.

Fine, then explain why so many people are leaving.

It's not because of rudeness.

And I'm not sure a lot of people are actually leaving. One very prolific one left (with fanfare...)

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #14 on:** October 15, 2012, 05:00:37 PM »

Quote from: Daegus

Hi Daegus,

You started a thread a while back explaining why you could no longer call yourself a sedevacantist and that you thought the post-1968 consecrations were valid.

Could you provide me the full text of each rite? I'd like to do a side by side comparison. Or you could just refer me to a specific website that has this information.