I thought I was too cynical to get overly bent out of shape anymore over what is going on in the world.. but I was outraged to see yet another far left loon (what other kind is there?) rule against Trump's “travel ban,” which ought to be called instead his Protect the People Plan (to protect us from murderers/jihadists.. other anti-American knuckleheads).
About time for a rhyme (ha ha):
The Travel Ban should be called The Nation's Safety Plan
This goofy judge in Hawaii (figures) based his decision on one of Trump's comments during the campaign, about banning Muslims from entering our country.
Gee... can't figure out why anyone would want to do THAT... Can you? Hmmm... go figure...
Could it be bc all terrorists are Muslims? Hmmm.. I don’t know… it’s a thought. But I guess we can all afford to ignore reality sometimes, eh? I mean, you know.. for the sake of that most lovely of all values that “trumps” all other values, known as “being [insert derisive tone here] inclusive”?
But what if a “religion” (so- called) is anti-USA..? Anti-Constitutional? What if said “religion” results in death to many Americans?
I guess the liberals will learn some day exactly what the Islamic terrorists are up to.. They’re kind of slow… But some day they might learn what ISIS’s agenda really entails.. when they get their own heads cut off..
I would think that would be a little late to be learning..?
But in any case, the Trump “ban” mentions “religion” a whopping total of
ZERO times.
8 US Code 1182 was not mentioned by these so-called judges, I hear…
If justices are allowed to arbitrarily base their decisions on “miscellaneous,” extrinsic, political, subjective (personal) factors, justice is dead. There would literally be no end to the number of factors, valid or otherwise, objective or otherwise.. that would be.. could be used to make court decisions, which means theoretically there could end up being no conclusions made… on any case at all... no decisions rendered whatsoever
I mean, really... you have to follow logic where it leads... you just have to do that, like it or not. No decisions would be rendered bc there are endless “considerations” which must be considered… (my head is hurting)
and how ironic that all is... considering how power-hungry these political leftist justices are. They are rendering themselves irrelevant. (Of course some of us have already rendered them that).
Also, how utterly short-sighted they are (as are all far-lefties). They can't see how they are eroding their own perceived (by the public) integrity (assuming there's any integrity left to erode).
No wonder there is so much societal lawlessness today... It trickles down from “above.” There is an overall perception in society that our laws are an entirely subjective and optional thing, always subject to the “interpretations” of the individual.. and it doesn't matter if said individual is 15 years old, or 30.. on drugs or not. He is the one to decide.
These days, if a person does not happen to like a particular law, seems he is free to disregard it (see stories on window-breaking, trash-dumping rioters or “protesters”).
I am not talking about laws that are obviously, objectively wrong (evil). Those should be vigorously fought by all of us. But nowadays it seems that every single law, regardless of how wise it may be, or how needed.. or how time-tested.. is up for questioning
Well, fine... question away, but in the meantime, you have to follow it (until it is changed). And as you question any given law, you might also want to consider:
questioning exactly why you are questioning it
may want to question what would happen if that law were not there
may want to question if maybe there is some other law you could better spend your precious, limited time questioning instead (or even better: seeking to change).
Word for the day: Priorities.
I could be wrong, but it seems that laws concerning life and death (Roe v Wade being the prime example) may be a good place to start in this pursuit of priorities thing
Topic: Justices Put Politics over the People (their safety) (Read 317 times)