Quote from: Bishop Williamson, bumpy on-the-fly translated by me (Ethelred)

When one day the Germans learn how they've been lied to -- let's take care! And that's why from now on the Catholics in Germany must distinguish between truth and lie, so that the reaction doesn't go from one extreme to the other. When the truth shines up then the Catholics will have to say: »Hey, this is true and that was wrong. This side of Hitler was good, and this was bad.« There was a lot of wrong with Hitler. His main problem was his apostasy. […] He was not Catholic. […]
Anyway, not everything in his time was wrong, and by far not everything of the Allies was right. […]
World War II ended with the victory of liberalism, not with the victory of the truth. But from a political view it's very delicate to say this, of course. Still the Catholics must separate the truth from the lie. Again and again. So that one day they can present the right thing. And in order to prevent a reaction too hard. […]

This is an inaccurate statement of bishop Williamson.

[..]
Of course every leader and individual has good and bad characterics. Hitler however [..]

Yet, the 'historical truth' of Bp. Williamson is one-sided, biased by a slightly 'pro-neofascist' view of history, blurs out the nαzι crimes too much and to a too large extent (whereas the extend of Allied crimes are rightly estimated by most 'neofascists'  indeed, but no American feels collective guilt for 500,000 cremated alive Japanese non-combattants in Hiroshima/Nagasaki).

Bp. Williamson is corrected by his Roman Catholic Faith and morals, but as a human person and in emotion holds too much of admiration for Hitler, nαzι Germany's pomp.

Since Israel refused the true Messiah, it would give itself another messianism that is temporal and earthbound, dominating the world by money, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, Revolution, and social democracy.

We must not, however, forget that those Jєωs who were disciples of the true Messiah founded the true Israel, the spiritual kingdom, which prepares the heavenly kingdom.

The worldwide designs of the Jєωs are being brought about in our time, but they started with the foundation of Masonry and the Revolution which has decapitated the Church and set up worldwide socialist democracy.

The nαzι regime is long gone.

The Zionists seek the extirpation of Christianity.

Of course they have set their sights on the SSPX, and they use their vicious propaganda smear of "nαzι" to try to destroy the reputation of Bishop Williamson and his supporters.

The Zionists are against the Catholic Faith.  They support miniskirts and a Jєωιѕн-Christian identity.  (Needless to say such an "identity" has nothing to do with the Catholic religion.)  And pro-abortion political parties like the CDU.  Who defends these people?  

Whoever they are, they can't possibly believe in the mission of the Archbishop or in the preservation of integral Catholicism.

1. The racialist and Marcionist heresies and apostatical myths still flourish at this forum, if one reads 'SaintBasil' alleging Our Lord was not from the Jєωιѕн people, not from the Tribe of Judah, not even from the descendants of Sem! This formed the core of apostatical-liberal 'spirit of time' Positive 'Christianity' of some nαzι theoreticists.

2. Zionism as such (as original theory of Herzl)

never saught the extirpation of Christianity (it is secular in fact),

but most Zionists cherish hatred towards Christendom in general and the Catholic Church especially.

Still again, not all of them (Golda Meir admired the Church on a natural level).

Catholic churches are allowed, even if sometimes treated unfairly, in Zionist (Israeli) territory.

3. The "Judaeo-Christian" identity is a post-1965 politically correct concept, trying to incorporate the (migrant) Jєωιѕн immigrant populations since Antique Europe until present Europe, as part of Christian civilization (which they hardly were until the French Revolution emancipation which destroyed Christendom or harmed it). Hardline Zionists do not support ʝʊdɛօ-Christian identity at all. They want a separate national Jєωιѕн identity (though secular, still not Christian of course).

4. The mission of the Archbishop of blessed memory was not to 'combat Zionism' at all. And still in the CDU some people remain who are pro-life, would not go with the official majority line, but seek to promote '1950s' Christian Democracy as of Don Luigi Sturzo (a friend of Pope Pius XII) and Konrad Adenauer (who back then even publicly abhorred from ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, 'So lange er mich nit anfasst...').

5. There is only orthodox Roman Catholicism.

'Integralism' and 'integral' are terms from Cardinal Suhard from 1947 (in an entirely other politicized context), do not apply as such anymore, but were abused by some neoconned Conciliar critics of the '####s' and other orthodox resistance Roman Catholics.

I am a Roman Catholic. Not an 'integralist' Catholic,

nothing to do with any political form of opposition to Zionism

- apart from Holy Mother Church's condemnation of the plight of the civilian Palestinians and other moral principles valid for all people

(but also the same rights for Jєωs, our fellow humans however hostile to HaMashiach).

In fact, on a theological theoretical level, Our Blessed Savior is the creator of the Jєωιѕн Torah.

The Key to the Enigma: The Pastoral Vatican II Council

[/size]

    The world believes that John XXIII, the good Pope, was the one who convoked the Pastoral Vatican II Council. The truth is, as León de Poincins has told us in his book "Judaism in the Vatican," that numerous Jєωιѕн organizations and personalities have for a long time sought to introduce into the Church the reforms proposed and realized in that Council, with the intention of modifying its attitude and its teaching regarding Judaism. It was these Jєωs who, from without and within the Church, compelled the incredible reforms, proposed and realized in that lamentable Council, and who, with satanic and non-dissimulated satisfaction, now make merry of having been the ones who planned, and convoked, and directed Vatican II. In particular, the French Jєω Jules Isaac, representative of international Judaism, was the one who, by his writings and by his secret audiences at the Vatican, patronized by his blood brother and active member of the conspiracy, the lamentably celebrated Cardinal Augustine Bea, S.J., compelled the weak and compromised Pope Roncalli to that reformist adventure, which has efficaciously brought about the "auto-demolition" of the Church of Christ.

I. Three Jєωιѕн Attempts to Destroy Christendom

     Judaism, a religion, sect and activist movement of permanent intrigue, has been fighting constantly against Jesus Christ, the Son of the living God, the promised Messias; but, not to be doubted, it is now five centuries since their infiltration, their attacks, and their successes have been for them more spectacular, more audacious, and, for us, more bitter, more nefarious and more lamentable. The Jєωιѕн writer and historian Joshua Jehouda, in his book "L'ANTISEMITISME, MIROIR DE MONDE" ("Antisemitism: The Mirror of the World"), boasts unabashedly that in the last centuries Judaism had made three powerful attempts to "rectify Christendom;" three attempts "aimed at purging the Christian conscience;" three attempts to "correct, suffocate and paralyze the effects of Christian theology;" and three have been the breaches that have been made against the stronghold of the Church. They are three important victories, obtained in the fight against Christendom by its mortal enemies, the Jєωs.

     1) The Renaissance (faith and science against the faith); 2) the Reformation (fifty years after the Renaissance; the revolt against the Church); 3) the revolution of 1789 (which the Communist Jєωs continue to our own days). To those attempts, there is to be added another three: 4) Modernism, propagated throughout the Church by the infiltrations of the marranos; 5) false philosophies such as those of Marx, Nietzsche, Voltaire, Freud, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin; 6) Vatican II, the Great Jєωιѕн Conspiracy, directed by the Jєωιѕн infiltrator Giovanni B. Montini.

     Jehouda admists that Judaism, the kabbala and the тαℓмυd, are the root of all the attacks suffered by the Catholic Church, within the stronghold of Christendom. And he concludes: "The reform signals the revolution against the Catholic Church, which is in turn a revolution against the religion of Israel."

     Lord Seiff, vice president of the Jєωιѕн World Congress, in his article "The Meaning of Survival" writes: "It is not an accident that it has been the Jєωs who have been the precursors and directors of many revolutions of thought and of spirit."
     
    One hundred years ago, the Jєωιѕн infiltrators attempted to alter the traditional doctrine in the Catholic Church, during the Vatican I Council (1870). During that Council, the "marranos" renewed their ancient attempts to compel the Church to exonerate the Jєωs from the crime of deicide and then accept amicable ʝʊdɛօ-Christian relations. In a clever move they attempted to influence the congregated Fathers so that they would sign "a proposition in favor of the Jєωs." There was first talk of a requirement to convert the Israelites, but later there were added affirmations that were in open contradiction with the doctrines that Holy Church has taught regarding these matters.[/size]