Maybe it slipped the attention of the friends of Bishop Williamson: Yesterday our dear British Bishop got bashed and slandered here on Cathinfo by the newcomer InstaurareEcclesiam who within one day showed his true colours of being a Krah buddy and hence "naturally" a fanatic opponent of Bishop Williamson.
I pointed out his slander yesterday evening, see copy of it in the next post please.
The same day we heard the
sad news from PereJoseph that the SSPX general chapter voted ~ 3:1 pro Bishop Fellay's fatal course and against Bishop Williamson. PereJoseph said this is the end of the SSPX founded by Archbishop Lefebvre, which is true.
So yesterday was a sad day in several aspects and for sure the Devil was having a field-day!
Bishop Williamson did everything he could in order to prevent Bp Fellay's Betrayal which now happened finally (insofar that Bp. Fellay's clerics now took over the SSPX officially). Blessings from God for that to the brave Bishop.
If you don't know yet, you can ask several priests from the resistance who will tell you it was Bishop Williamson who co-ordinated the important letter of the three bishops to Menzingen, and with his Eleison Comments for years prepared the Catholics (good priests and laypeople) for the battle, and advised them personally. Several of the publicly opposing priests like brave Fr. Pfeiffer, Fr. Chazal, the German ones etc. were deeply inspired by the important words and actions of our Bishop Williamson
for years. Clearly Bishop Williamson is the truth-loving leader of the followers of Archbishop Lefebvre who still today oppose any corruption of the Faith.
Because the good Bishop Williamson knows well that the natural truths here on earth are directly connected to the supernatural truth, in 2009 he again stroke a blow for the historical truth by unmasking the h0Ɩ0cαųst lie (*), and finally incurred the wrath of seemingly all the world's liberals, Novus Ordo modernists and of course the Judaizers and their helpers like Krah, Fr Pfluger, Bp Fellay, etc.
The Bishop always stands for truth and justice. When on seldom occasions he said that a certain German non-Catholic dictator had some good sides and lot of wrong sides because he was an apostate, then this is pure common sense of course. The Bishop is only doing justice to historical persons, no matter if they're apostates.
However only a vicious person will abuse these clear-sighted words of Bishop Williamson to defame him having "
too much of admiration for Hitler" (sic!), being "
one-sided", being "
biased slighty pro-neofascist" (sic!), and blurring "
out the nαzι crimes too much" (sic!), etc.
These are very perfidious words and and put into a post by a real adder's tongue. And it's only the tip of the Iceberg, see
InstaurareEcclesiam's other posts where he attacks the Bishop in a more subtle way. But the direction is clear, and also his downplaying of the Zionist and modernist Krah.
Well, we know the same old song from the hordes of Judaizers and leftists for many years now. Yes, we also heard such bad words in 2009 and afterwards from many SSPX leaders influenced by Krah and his mentor Fr Pfluger.
In short: I ask all friends of Bishop Williamson, in particular the brave forum owners Matthew and MaterDominici, to not allow such slander against our Bishop Williamson in our direct neighbourhood. Please end it. So that the fine motto of this forum may shine also in future for all the friends of the Bishop :
Please pray for Bishop Richard Williamson, a noble prelate whose wisdom and zeal for the truth have inspired many.
Several months ago, the good Bishop was taken from the public eye, and de-facto forced into early retirement.(*) Some even today don't understand the impact of this massive lie on the entire world. So let's quote again Mr. Q quoting the good Bishop Williamson, a copy of which was posted on Cathinfo, 23 December 2010 :
One may object: but Revisionism is not the battle of the SSPX. No-one with sense disputes that. But one can and one must inform oneself sufficiently in private to avoid saying in public those things such as (were) said in „Der Spiegel“, for example, that the historicity of the Six Millions „is obvious.“ That is, unless one is ready to lie, consciously or unconsciously, to the general public. As for myself, when I made that response on Swedish television, it is obvious that I was not trying to make Revisionism the battle of the SSPX; I was only trying to give a true answer to a question which is very important for western civilization. Has not an entire post-war world order been constructed on the Six Millions? In the head of Mr. Average Citizen, have they not become the measure of evil (nαzιsm) and of good (Judaism)? Yet to say that I want to make of this the battle of the SSPX is a caricature. I don’t even make it my own personal combat. I am not the „Revisionist bishop“ any more than Mgr. Lefebvre was the „rebel archbishop.“