I am not going to judge the subjective culpability of those who are manifestly enemies, but I do think it is quite absurd to presume that an enemy is not trying to destroy you, that his evil intentions should not be gauged, that his word should be doubted as a matter of course.

When someone like Hans Urs von Balthasar writes a book called Razing the Bastions - that he means to destroy the means by which Catholics shield themselves from a world that is ruled by the Prince of this World - then we have to see that intention for what it is.  The evil intention to destroy the safeguards of our Faith.  That which is derided as  "Baroque Theology"

I'm not going to judge his subjective culpability for this manifestly anti-Christian spirit.  I'm not going to pretend it isn't manifestly anti-Christian.

Now, when someone goes back again and again to deal with people who are manifestly anti-Christian, and then justifies it on the basis that we mustn't judge intentions, there's a problem.  A serious problem.  At first we might have hopes for it.  We might put some stock in apparent signs of good faith.  In time though, when one recognizes what is being set up - it's time to sound the alarm.  

A manifestly anti-Christian spirit is guided by evil intentions towards Tradition.  We must doubt the good faith of those who pretend otherwise, against all evidence.  

The sort of people who want to tear down your defensive walls, your bastions, it is not Christian charity to pretend we must forever consult them in the hopes that they will appreciate and see a place for our defensive engineering.  It's flat-out crazy to do so.