prompted by today's post on the Maurice Pinay blog http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2011/11/don-curzio-nitoglia-ʝʊdɛօ-christian-lie.html

“ʝʊdɛօ-CHRISTIANITY”—OXYMORON AND LIE

Whether from the Judaic or the Christian perspective, "ʝʊdɛօ-Christian" is an oxymoron in the vein of "defector-believer." From the Judaic perspective, Christians are “idolaters” (and so deserve death) because Christians worship “that man” (the тαℓмυdic epithet for Jesus Christ) as God, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity. From the Christian perspective Judaics, as proselytes in the line of the Pharisees, defected from the Mosaic Covenant and rejected the New Covenant, so are not faithful, but apostate. Notwithstanding smarmy flattery from "Popes" about “Elder Brothers” and notwithstanding the rabbis retailing their authority by “Noahide Laws,” the pretense of continuity is a lie.  Recall that, as freely stipulated by the rabbis, Judaism is a post-Christian religion, a reaction against Christianity.

“The thesis of this book is that Judaism and Christianity do not form a common tradition, ‘the ʝʊdɛօ-Christian tradition.’ They are not compatible ... only now, for reasons of politics and sociology, have some representatives of Judaism maintained otherwise....”
Jєωs and Christians: the myth of a common tradition, Rabbi Jacob Neusner, ISBN 1-586841-08-4, Binghamton NY: Classics in Judaic Syudies
http://books.google.no/books?id=qDdoHV9sPsAC&lpg=PP1&dq=Jєωs%20and%20Christians%3A%20the%20myth%20of%20a%20common%20tradition&hl=no&pg=PR11#v=onepage&q&f=false

See also: Don Curzio Nitoglia: The "ʝʊdɛօ-Christian" Lie

http://www.doncurzionitoglia.com/menzogna_del_giudeocristianesimo.htm
Google translate: http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.doncurzionitoglia.com%2Fmenzogna_del_giudeocristianesimo.htm

“The complex of rabbinically ordained practices ... including most of the rules for the treatment of Scripture itself--do not derive from Scripture at all. Rabbinic Judaism's initial concern was with the elaboration and refinement of it's own system. Attaching the system to scripture was secondary. It therefore is misleading to depict rabbinic Judaism primarily as a consequence of an exegetical process or the organic unfolding of Scripture. Rather, rabbinic Judaism began as the work of a small, ambitious, and homogeneous group of pseudo-priests ...By the third century (A.D.) the rabbis expressed their self-conception in the ideology of "oral Torah" which held that a comprehensive body of teachings and practices (halachot) not included in Scripture had been given by God and through Moses only to the rabbinic establishment.” Rabbinic Judaism: Structure and System, Rabbi Jacob Nuesner, pp. 31-34