Sadly, I regret the money I wasted on this book, which was
1. written at an amateur level and
2. so "softball" as to make me suspect that the author was actually an apologist for Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.
I have several excellent books on Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ on my bookshelf. Some of them are written by former Freemasons, while others are written by researchers. All of these books, going back to the 1800s are available to any newbie who decides to write a book on the topic. Salza chose to remain ignorant of the rich treasure trove of information on the evil of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.
Salza claims to be a former Freemason, but his book betrays a complete ignorance of the docuмented facts on the evil nature of the group and the extent of their anti-Catholicism.
Is it possible for someone of average or above-average intelligence to write a book which so thoroughly demonstrates a complete lack of ignorance on the topic?