-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xjMWv4PbEY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xjMWv4PbEY)
-
Mercy seasons justice (the greatest of all Shakespearean speeches):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAZDKiZMpwo&t=31s (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAZDKiZMpwo&t=31s)
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1R7cakY_Xw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1R7cakY_Xw)
-
Commentaries by Dr. White: Worth much more than you will pay for them
http://stmarcelinitiative.com/bookstore/products/The-Christian-Comedy-of-Shakespeare%27s-The-Merchant-of-Venice-%252d-Part-I.html (http://stmarcelinitiative.com/bookstore/products/The-Christian-Comedy-of-Shakespeare%27s-The-Merchant-of-Venice-%252d-Part-I.html)
-
The Merchant of Venice, Act IV, Scene I
[The quality of mercy is not strained]
The quality of mercy is not strained;
It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
Upon the place beneath. It is twice blest;
It blesseth him that gives and him that takes:
'T is mightiest in the mightiest; it becomes
The throned monarch better than his crown:
His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,
The attribute to awe and majesty,
Wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings;
But mercy is above this sceptred sway;
It is enthronèd in the hearts of kings,
It is an attribute to God himself;
And earthly power doth then show likest God's
When mercy seasons justice. Therefore, Jєω,
Though justice be thy plea, consider this,
That, in the course of justice, none of us
Should see salvation: we do pray for mercy;
And that same prayer doth teach us all to render
The deeds of mercy. I have spoke thus much
To mitigate the justice of thy plea;
Which if thou follow, this strict court of Venice
Must needs give sentence 'gainst the merchant there.
-
Mercy seasons justice (the greatest of all Shakespearean speeches):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAZDKiZMpwo&t=31s (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAZDKiZMpwo&t=31s)
Rather pertinent in view of the manufactured controversy surrounding Cardinal Newman:
Note that at 8:04, Antonio asks for Bessario's hand, as he is about to receive the Jєω's knife.
They profess their love for eachother.
Not in foul sodomite fαɢɢօtry, but in the highest Platonic sense (Recall Bessario is, in the play, engaged to marry his beloved lady/fiance), according to elevated Christian charity, which is one of the primary sub-plots of the entire play.
Dr. White, in his conferences on the play, notes that once again, Jєωιѕн Hollywood contrived a different version of The Merchant of Venice (i.e., not the version posted above) where in fact the two are queer, which Dr. White rightly describes as either miserable or disgusting, and adding, "who can stand it!"
This kind of chaste, pure, Platonic charity has more or less passed from the modern world, and when examples of it are encountered by the modern, sullied mind, quite naturally, the basest rash suspicions become firm judgments of condemnation (and given the prevalence of the sodomite infestation in the modern world, that is almost understandable).
Nevertheless, I could not let Shakespeare's example pass without drawing attention to the equally and perfectly chaste and pure case of Cardinal Newman (whom also had a similar friendship).
-
"A pound of flesh the Jєω doth seek?
Grant him bacon each Sabbath eve.
Such a portion give each week.
to he whose perfidy makes him deceive."
And now to bedlam to obtain some rest,
for mine bowels do fiercely protest. :)
-
Read "ѕуηαgσgυє Rising" by Hugh Akins or "The Plot Against the Church" by Maurice Pinay and all of your questions will be answered.
-
I guess the Jєωιѕн spirit is where you control the media and financial system and yet claim to be the most oppressed people on earth
-
I guess the Jєωιѕн spirit is where you control the media and financial system and yet claim to be the most oppressed people on earth
“Jєωs are the most oppressed people in history and I know this because they used their extraordinary wealth, their near monopoly of mass media, their massive political influence, and their censorship of alternative viewpoints to make sure I got the message.”
Thoughts on the Protected Race
by Andrew Joyce • April 11, 2019
http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/ (http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/)
-
Thoughts on the Protected Race
Andrew Joyce (http://www.unz.com/author/andrew-joyce/) • April 11, 2019
(https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Jєωs-protected.jpg) (http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/)
“Know that we have taken into our hand, custody, and protection Leo the Jєω our goldsmith and all his affairs. And therefore we command that you keep ward and defend the said Leo and all his affairs, doing no hurt or injury to him.”
Proclamation of King John of England, 10 Nov. 1199
“My office was created by law and designed to protect the Jєωιѕн people throughout the world. Think about that. The world’s greatest power is focused, by law and design, on protecting the Jєωs.”
Elan Carr, U.S. State Department Envoy on Anti-Semitism, February 2019
By almost every metric, Jєωs are the most protected ethnic group on earth. At the frontline of this protection, Jєωιѕн institutional security is heavily subsidised by taxpayers throughout the West. In Germany, the government provides an annual stipend of $15 million (https://www.jta.org/2018/07/06/global/germany-boosts-funding-Jєωιѕн-community-fight-anti-semitism) to the Central Council of Jєωs. In the UK, the government spends around $20 million annually on both security for Jєωιѕн institutions (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/30/amber-rudd-pledges-134million-guard-every-Jєωιѕн-school-college/) and “h0Ɩ0cαųst education (https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/autumn-budget-philip-hammond-chancellor-funding-h0Ɩ0cαųst-education-schools-1.471529)” designed to combat “anti-Semitic ideas.” This is in addition to the UK pledging almost $70 million (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/georgeosborne/11371958/George-Osborne-pledges-50m-for-new-h0Ɩ0cαųst-memorial.html) for a new h0Ɩ0cαųst memorial designed to achieve the same ends. Hungary has promised $3.4 million to “fight anti-Semitism in Europe,” and Sweden has handed over 2 million kronor (https://www.thelocal.se/20140808/sweden-earmarks-millions-for-Jєωιѕн-security-israel) for increasing security at Jєωιѕн institutions.
France has invested $107 million (https://www.haaretz.com/Jєωιѕн/france-to-invest-107m-in-fighting-anti-semitism-racism-1.5352416) in “fighting anti-Semitism” since 2015. This brings us to a grand total of over $215 million in “protecting Jєωs” and “fighting anti-Semitism,” and doesn’t even take into account spending in the United States (somewhere between $20 million and $50 million (https://www.jta.org/2017/04/04/politics/house-lawmakers-urge-increased-security-funding-for-Jєωιѕн-institutions) annually for frontline security at Jєωιѕн institutions), or the spending of Jєωs on their own defense (the ADL’s annual budget alone is in the region of $58 million (https://www.algemeiner.com/2016/06/28/why-does-the-adl-continue-to-hinder-anti-bds-efforts/)). One gets the distinct and remarkable impression that, globally, diaspora Judaism probably requires something approaching $1 billion simply in order to feel safe.
Jєωs are protected in other ways. Since mid-2018, resolutions and other legal measures against anti-Semitism have been gathering in pace and increasing in spread. In May 2018, South Carolina became the first US state (https://www.thefire.org/problematic-anti-semitism-bill-passes-in-south-carolina/) to pass the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act (https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/2940), which effectively shuts down speech against Israel on college campuses by requiring South Carolina’s public institutions of higher education to “take into consideration the [State Department’s] definition of anti-Semitism for purposes of determining whether the alleged practice was motivated by anti-Semitic intent” when “investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of a college or university policy prohibiting discriminatory practices on the basis of religion.”
In February 2019, President Macron of France announced a “crackdown on anti-Semitism (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-47313725)” that would involve dissolving three pro-White organizations, defining anti-Zionism as a form of anti-Semitism, and introducing new laws against “hate speech” targeting Jєωs on social media. Just a few weeks ago, Florida passed legislation (https://www.apnews.com/ce49e5ab912b44c69170faa0d9622f52) defining anti-Semitism and making it illegal under state law. Tennessee has attempted to pass (https://eu.tennessean.com/story/opinion/2017/05/02/time-stop-anti-semitism-tennessee/100885062/) an Anti-Semitism Awareness Bill, and recently passed a resolution “fighting anti-Semitism” by declaring unequivocal support (https://israelpalestinenews.org/tennessee-fights-anti-semitism-by-passing-resolution-supporting-israel/) for Israel. This, of course, follows hot on the heels of the House resolution (https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/05/politics/read-house-resolution-condemn-anti-semitism/index.html) “condemning anti-Semitism” in the aftermath of Ilhan Omar’s now notorious remarks on the Israel lobby.
There simply isn’t another ethnic group elsewhere on earth that enjoys the same level of financial and legal protections enjoyed by Jєωs. Of course, the uninformed, when confronted with such a fact, might reply that this level of support is both needed and deserved. According to the received narrative, recent history suggests that Jєωs are the West’s most vulnerable and victimised group. All of these laws, and all of this funding, is therefore merely a response to an acute need. But recent history has nothing to do with Jєωιѕн protection, and nor are these measures responsive to any real immediate threat. In order to gain a full appreciation for what exactly is going on, we need to go much further back in time.
Should you ever happen to visit the English town of Lincoln, I recommend you pay a visit to the Jєω’s House restaurant. As well as enjoying some fairly good cuisine, it will give you an opportunity to look inside one of the five surviving houses of Medieval England. The building was once, as the name suggests, a Jєω’s house from the middle of the twelfth century until the expulsion of the Jєωs from England in 1290. Its last Jєωιѕн owner is said to have been Belaset, daughter of the moneylender Solomon of Wallingford. Belaset was hanged in 1279 for coin-clipping, a 13th century practice whereby (predominantly Jєωιѕн) money dealers would lightly shave gold and silver coins, eventually accuмulating enough shavings to create new, illicit money. Jєω’s House is not the only medieval home still standing in Lincoln. A short walk away is Norman House (https://www.visitlincoln.com/things-to-do/norman-house). Like Jєω’s House, it was built around 1170 for a Jєωιѕн moneylender, Aaron of Lincoln, and also housed Jєωs until the expulsion.
(https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Jєωs-house.jpg) (https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Jєωs-house.jpg)
‘Jєω’s House’ Lincoln, England: This 12th century home is one of the oldest surviving town houses in England, due largely to the fact it was built for maximum security and durability.
The fact that England’s oldest houses are almost all Jєωιѕн in origin, and that two of them are in Lincoln, is no accident. Lincoln Jєωry was both the most affluent and the most numerous of all medieval Jєωιѕн communities in England, and the survival of these dwellings owes much to two factors – Jєωιѕн wealth and the Jєωιѕн need for security. Jєωs had the money to build homes with expensive local limestone, and they had a desire to build very strong, almost impregnable, homes that could withstand the onslaught of both Man and Time. A key architectural feature is asemi-sunken undercroft that would have provided secure storage for the wealth of those residing in the living accommodation above. This relatively luxurious style of living was pioneered by the Jєωs who moved to Lincoln as part of the Norman conquest, and was based on the Jєωιѕн experience of living closely with Norman elites in the ducal halls of Normandy. The construction of such homes in 12th century England thus sent a clear message: Jєωs were an intimate part of the new elite; Jєωs were arriving predominantly as dealers in money; and, Jєωs expected to be hated and to require high levels of protection. One thousand years has now passed, and yet it is one of the remarkable features of world history that these three aspects of Jєωιѕн life haven’t changed at all. Jєωs remain an intimate part of the elite, Jєωs retain a ‘special’ relationship with money, and the facts outlined at the beginning of this essay suggest that Jєωs fully expect to be hated and require high levels of protection.
The Jєωιѕн strategy among Europeans has always been predicated upon high-risk, high-reward ventures. For much of the last thousand years, this primarily involved exploitative financial relationships that were incredibly lucrative but contributed to tremendous hostility among non-elite European populations. The standard method of balancing profit and danger was to form a relationship with very strong elites, and to implicate those elites in the sharing of profits (thus also ensuring they would suffer a loss from any attack against Jєωs). Throughout European history, when attempts to forge or maintain such relationships failed, the results of high risk ventures were disastrous for Jєωs, as resentment from below was finally allowed to fully vent. This can be seen in instances where the power of the monarch weakened (e.g. the expulsions of Jєωs by Edward I as a response to the rise of the barons), where there was a break between the death of a king and the coronation of another (e.g. killings of Jєωs around the coronation of Richard I), where the monarch was immovably hostile to Jєωs and their interests (e.g. the creation of the Pale of Settlement by Catherine the Great), and where popular support for government elites and their authority collapsed rapidly (e.g. Weimar Germany and the subsequent rise of Adolf Hitler).
Very high levels of elite protection are thus seen by Jєωs, not entirely without reason, as absolutely essential to the continuance of Jєωιѕн communities and their behaviors among European populations.
Writing on Jєωs and the State in medieval Europe, Robert Chazan writes that “the Jєωs were normally accorded substantial protection by the secular authorities. This meant warnings against violence when passions were inflamed, efforts to put down violence when it did flare up, and finally the imposition of penalties when the attempts at protection failed and Jєωs suffered loss of life and property. The basic thrust of governmental policy towards the Jєωs was protection.”[1] (http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/#footnote_1) [emphasis added]
Kevin MacDonald has argued that Jєωs have excelled as flexible strategizers, and this ability to adapt to circuмstances is certainly in evidence in relation to the need to secure privileges in the form of elite protection. Jєωιѕн historian Yosef H. Yerushalmi has pointed out that wherever Jєωs lived they tended to establish liaisons with “the highest governmental power available, whether that of emperor or caliph, count, duke, or king, bishop, archbishop or pope.”[2] (http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/#footnote_2) Yerushalmi described such relationships as a “direct vertical alliance.” Magda Teter has laid emphasis on the flexible manner in which Jєωs approach the establishment of direct vertical alliances:
At the beginning of their settlement in Poland, Jєωs forged a strong relationship with monarchs, who issued privileges and assured the Jєωs’ protection. When Poland’s balance of power shifted from a strong monarchy to a decentralised nobles’ republic, the Jєωιѕн relationship with the king was transformed into a symbiotic relationship with the powerful nobles. Jєωs’ reliance on royal protection was transferred to reliance on the nobles. First kings, and then the nobles, often placed Jєωs in positions that often gave them authority over Christians.[3] (http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/#footnote_3)
(http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/#footnote_3)
As well as blending financial interests with the nobles, another feature of the early modern period through to the nineteenth century was intermarriage between Jєωs and the European aristocracy (https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/10/15/reflections-on-Jєωιѕн-intermarriage-into-native-elites-2/). This was quite literally the physical joining of interests, perhaps the ultimate protection against suffering a backlash from the elite. By the early 20th century, the scale of Jєωιѕн intermarriage with the British aristocracy was such that it led L.G. Pine, editor of Burke’s Peerage from 1949–1959, to write in 1956 that “the Jєωs have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual.” Given the trends of history in the centuries prior to the 1950s, it’s extremely difficult to imagine that this occurred by accident, or without some level of conscious or unconscious design.
As flexible strategizers, Jєωs were more than capable of handling the transformation from aristocratic rule to social democracy that occurred between the 19th and 20th centuries. As an interregnum of sorts, however, there were early problems with Jєωιѕн security while the new form of direct vertical alliance was established. A general rule worth operating by is that where the elite is pro-Jєωιѕн or tied to Jєωιѕн interests, Jєωs are likely to be reliable supporters of the governmental status quo, to support strong government, and to be against the freedom of the individual (e.g. see overwhelming contemporary Jєωιѕн support for gun control). Conversely, when elites are perceived as less inclined to support Jєωιѕн interests, Jєωs are likely to be vastly over-represented among anti-elite elements, as radical socialists, and as regicidal revolutionaries (e.g. the Bolshevik Revolution).
Where the form of government merely weakens, Jєωs are forced to reconfigure their strategies in a more time-consuming, but no less pressing, manner. Indeed, a key feature of 19th century socialism was a strong anti-Semitism that rejected Jєωιѕн claims to being part of “the people,” and many anti-Jєωιѕн socialists portrayed such claims as opportunistic and cryptic strategies to secure power anew under the new form of government.
One of the most memorable statements of the era in this regard is the French socialist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon’s remark that far from being a genuine socialist, Karl Marx was “the tapeworm of socialism.” Proudhon (1809-1865), seen by many as the father of anarchism, regarded apparently socialist Jєωιѕн “allies” like Heinrich Heine as “nothing but secret spies” whose hidden agenda was merely to secure Jєωιѕн privileges and protections under the guise of social justice – a perspective apparently lost on the ignorant hordes who today believe themselves to be anarchist “Antifa” while striving to protect similar “tapeworms” in their midst.
(https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/marx.jpg) (https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/marx.jpg)
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon: “Marx is the tapeworm of socialism.”
As social democracy became ascendant, Jєωιѕн strategies to maintain privileges and security had to make significant adaptations. Most obviously, social democracy was ostensibly the move to protect mass interests over those of an elite. Since Jєωs were an intimate part of the elite, this would necessarily lead to a decline in power, unless Jєωs could undergo a transformation in the popular mind into a more generic “mercantile elite,” “bourgeois elite,” or even most audaciously, masquerade as part of the proletariat (https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/08/07/on-the-left-and-the-myth-of-the-Jєωιѕн-proletariat/). It was in eastern Europe that the clash between Jєωs and the interests of the masses became most acute. Faced with increased calls for freedom and democratic representation, the Tsars sided with the masses rather than the Jєωs, freeing the serfs and withdrawing protections and privileges from Jєωs. I would argue that this move, rather than the specific content of Bolshevism or Communism, was the most decisive factor in the eventual rise of the Jєωs against the Tsar and the Russian aristocracy during the Bolshevik revolution.
The apparently incongruous position of Jєωs fighting alongside the peasant class against the elite wasn’t altogether lost on contemporaries. As one Ukrainian Communist put it in 1876, “The weight of the Jєωs’exploitation is great and their harmfulness unlimited … If we find it possible to preach revolution, and only revolution against the nobles, how can we defend the Jєωs?”[4] (http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/#footnote_4) But Jєωs did want to be defended, and if they weren’t going to be defended by the Tsar, and they couldn’t trust the masses, then they would simply disguise themselves as part of the proletariat (Proudhon’s “secret spies”) and establish their protections and privileges themselves.
The perceptivity of figures like Proudhon and the Ukrainian Communist was lacking in the overall movement, where Jєωs were dominant in intellectual and activist roles. Within weeks of the revolution, Jєωs were able to cancel all restrictions imposed on them by earlier Tsarist regimes and abolish the Pale of Settlement initiated by Catherine the Great. Between 1918 and 1930, anti-Semitism was legislated against and massive amounts of literature purporting to debunk anti-Semitic attitudes were disseminated as part of a society-wide “education” campaign. Plays and films were made portraying Jєωs and anti-Semitism is a strongly philo-Semitic manner, and trials of individuals convicted of “anti-Semitic crimes” were made very public. It was the 20th century equivalent of building the Jєω’s House of Lincoln, now constructed not of heavy limestone, but of slick lies and oppressive legislation.
Today, Jєωs still reside safely, if a little paranoid, in a house built with lies and legislation. They have established “direct vertical alliances” with every Western elite, including the most “populist.” I smile wryly at the theatre of Viktor Orbán toying with George Soros, while he pumps millions (https://www.france24.com/en/20181129-hungary-pledges-15-mln-euros-fight-anti-semitism) into Jєωιѕн education programs throughout Europe educating people on the “dangers of anti-Semitism” and provides a European “hotline” for concerned Jєωs to call in the event that they feel a little insecure. The same situation prevails with the “populist” boy wonder Sebastian Kurz in Austria. Kurz recently unveiled a “Catalogue of Policies to Combat Antisemitism.”
The policies, endorsed by Kurz and later to be introduced to the entire European Union, include (https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Antisemitism/Austrian-Kurz-We-cant-undo-history-but-we-can-do-justice-to-our-history-572444):
- a commitment of a percentage of GDP annually to fighting antisemitism;
- barring antisemites from political parties and public office;
- committing financial and other resources to guaranteeing security for Jєωιѕн communities in Europe;
- making Internet companies liable for antisemitic content on their platforms;
- and advising companies not to do business with countries or organizations that support antisemitism in any way.
(https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Kurz.jpg) (https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Kurz.jpg)
Sebastian Kurz receives award from the European Jєωιѕн Committee’s Moshe Kantor for his compliance in a modern day “Direct Vertical Alliance”
These measures reach a level of protection for Jєωs not seen since the immediate aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution, and only contribute to the growing reality that much of our politics now seems to exclusively revolve around the issue of anti-Semitism. It used to be the case that Jєωs considered everything within the framework “Is this good for the Jєωs?” Today, it seems that our governments, media, and academia are preoccupied with the same question. This reality, of course, clashes dramatically with the narrative that Jєωs have no overarching influence in our politics and society.
On this note, I might add that I was recently axed from Twitter for the ninth time. On my last two Twitter accounts, I pursued a strategy of presenting such glaring contradictions in short, witty comments – just enough information to make the point clearly, and just enough humor to make it stick in the mind. In very short periods of time, I amassed many thousands of followers before the accounts were invariably suspended for “targeted harassment” even though I never interacted with other users, and merely presented facts or witticisms. I don’t think I will now return to Twitter, but one of my last parting shots, before being reported by a delusional neurotic named Gabe Hoffman (who apparently claimed I insulted him personally, without evidence, despite the fact I never interacted with other users), was:
Jєωs are the most oppressed people in history and I know this because they used their extraordinary wealth, their near monopoly of mass media, their massive political influence, and their censorship of alternative viewpoints to make sure I got the message.
This is the central paradox of our time. Jєωs enjoy extraordinary privileges while presenting themselves as the most oppressed people in history. Were they oppressed when they lived in the fortress in Lincoln? When they received the personal protection of King John? When they received charters and special protections to live in the German principalities, complete with reinforced walls for the streets in which they lived? When they intermarried with the aristocracy? Were they oppressed when the Tsar and his family were butchered? Were they oppressed when they made anti-Semitism illegal, had show trials against αnтι-ѕємιтєs around Russia, and flooded the schools and universities with information on how marvellous they truly are? Are they oppressed when they produce legislation for the European Union and have it imposed at their will? Are they oppressed when they dictate to Big Tech what is and isn’t allowed on their platforms, under legal penalty? Are they oppressed when they demand a percentage of the GDP of each one of our nations to protect them? Are they oppressed when a leading figure at the U.S. State Department says (https://www.jta.org/2019/02/21/united-states/trumps-anti-semitism-envoy-assures-american-Jєωιѕн-leaders-that-president-is-committed-to-protecting-Jєωs): “The world’s greatest power is focused, by law and design, on protecting the Jєωs.”
No. They are not oppressed. Oppression is having your hands cut off by the King’s men because you refused to pay your debt to Aaron the Jєω. Oppression is being told what you can’t say in your country, your own land that your fathers sweat and bled on in the hope that you could one day walk on that soil a free man. Oppression is being made to hand over your taxes and a percentage of your GDP, without any vote taking place on the matter, so that it can be passed to a population already influential and extraordinarily wealthy. Oppression is being banned from participating in politics because you happen to object to the influence of foreign actors in the business of your own people and country. Oppression is when the wealthy and powerful use their influence to starve you financially into submission to their interests. Oppression is when you go to prison because you disagree with something written in the history books.
The situation, I will admit, doesn’t look hopeful. But just as history relates a tale of direct vertical alliances, and all that they entail, it also relates the stories of collapsing elites, uneasy interregnums, and the rise of figures who side with their people and reject such alliances. One day in 1290, the Jєω’s House of Lincoln stood silent, cold, and unoccupied, its money vaults emptied, its past residents hanged or exiled. It stands today, to my mind, not as a testament to durability, but as a monument to hubris and a mockery of pretensions to invulnerability. I see a time when our contemporary hubristic constructions are hollowed out and left vacant by the sweeping rush of history.
Notes
[1] (http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/#footnoteref_1) R. Chazan, Church, State, and Jєω in the Middle Ages (New Jersey: Behrman,1980), 11.
[2] (http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/#footnoteref_2) Quoted in M. Teter, Jєωs and Heretics in Catholic Poland: A Beleaguered Church in the Post-Reformation Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 28.
[3] (http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/#footnoteref_3) Ibid.
[4] (http://www.unz.com/article/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/#footnoteref_4) R. Wistrich, From Ambivalence to Betrayal: The Left, The Jєωs and Israel (University of Nebraska Press, 2012), 187.
(Republished from The Occidental Observer (https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/04/11/thoughts-on-the-protected-race/) by permission of author or representative)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBFeMWPXUAEpy_9.jpg:large)
-
"The Jєωιѕн religion was the foundation of our own;" Pope Pius X
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
-
"The Jєωιѕн religion was the foundation of our own;" Pope Pius X
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
"The Jєωs are the enemies of Jesus Christ and our Holy religion."
(https://duckduckgo.com/i/de4202ae.jpg)
Saint Pio of Pietrelcina, O.F.M. Cap
-
"The Jєωιѕн religion was the foundation of our own;" Pope Pius X
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
How typically dishonest of Poche to elide the full quote without indicating the elision.
"… but it was superseded by the teachings of Christ, and we cannot concede it any further validity."
Damnable Judaizers have a penchant for conflating Mosaic Judaism with Pharisaism and its post-Christian offshoot, тαℓмυdic Judaism.
Pope Pius X inferred the distinction. The damnable Judaizer omitted the distinction. Our own religion is not founded upon Pharisaism or тαℓмυdic Judaism… no matter how hard Poche and the Great Rabbi Bergoglio (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2014/10/rabbi-francis.html) insist otherwise.
-
Douay-Rheims Bible (https://www.biblehub.com/drb/romans/10.htm)
For there is no distinction of the Jєω and the Greek: for the same is Lord over all, rich unto all that call upon him.
-
Douay-Rheims Bible (https://www.biblehub.com/drb/romans/10.htm)
For there is no distinction of the Jєω and the Greek: for the same is Lord over all, rich unto all that call upon him.
Here is the context of that verse:
[8] (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=52&ch=10&l=8-#x)But what saith the scripture? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart. This is the word of faith, which we preach. [9] (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=52&ch=10&l=9-#x) For if thou confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in thy heart that God hath raised him up from the dead, thou shalt be saved. [10] (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=52&ch=10&l=10-#x) For, with the heart, we believe unto justice; but, with the mouth, confession is made unto salvation.
[9] "Thou shalt be saved": To confess the Lord Jesus, and to call upon the name of the Lord (ver. 13) is not barely the professing a belief in the person of Christ; but moreover, implies a belief of his whole doctrine, and an obedience to his law; without which, the calling him Lord will save no man. St. Matt. 7. 21.
[11] (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=52&ch=10&l=11-#x) For the scripture saith: Whosoever believeth in him, shall not be confounded. [12] (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=52&ch=10&l=12-#x) For there is no distinction of the Jєω and the Greek: for the same is Lord over all, rich unto all that call upon him. [13] (http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=52&ch=10&l=13-#x) For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord, shall be saved.
So this specifies that Jєωs and Greeks have specific conditions placed upon them. If Jєωs and likewise Greeks do not embrace the salvation offered to them by Our Lord Jesus Christ they are damned. They don't get a free pass - an false teaching being propagated in conciliar times.
-
How typically dishonest of Poche to elide the full quote without indicating the elision.
"… but it was superseded by the teachings of Christ, and we cannot concede it any further validity."
Damnable Judaizers have a penchant for conflating Mosaic Judaism with Pharisaism and its post-Christian offshoot, тαℓмυdic Judaism.
Pope Pius X inferred the distinction. The damnable Judaizer omitted the distinction. Our own religion is not founded upon Pharisaism or тαℓмυdic Judaism… no matter how hard Poche and the Great Rabbi Bergoglio (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2014/10/rabbi-francis.html) insist otherwise.
That the Jєωιѕн religion is the foundation of our own is affirmed by Pope St Pius X. The true spirit of the Jєωιѕн religion reaches its fulfillment in the coming of Jesus Christ. Jesus said, "I did not come to abolish the Law. I came to fulfill it."
There was a Jєωιѕн convert who before his conversion visited a Carthusian monastery. He he listened as they prayed the psalms. He said that he thought to himself, "These people must want to become Jєωιѕн."
-
That the Jєωιѕн religion is the foundation of our own is affirmed by Pope St Pius X. The true spirit of the Jєωιѕн religion reaches its fulfillment in the coming of Jesus Christ. Jesus said, "I did not come to abolish the Law. I came to fulfill it."
There was a Jєωιѕн convert who before his conversion visited a Carthusian monastery. He he listened as they prayed the psalms. He said that he thought to himself, "These people must want to become Jєωιѕн."
And, once again, the damnable Judaizer conflates тαℓмυdic Judaism with the roots of the one, true Faith.
-
That the Jєωιѕн religion is the foundation of our own is affirmed by Pope St Pius X. The true spirit of the Jєωιѕн religion reaches its fulfillment in the coming of Jesus Christ. Jesus said, "I did not come to abolish the Law. I came to fulfill it."
There was a Jєωιѕн convert who before his conversion visited a Carthusian monastery. He he listened as they prayed the psalms. He said that he thought to himself, "These people must want to become Jєωιѕн."
So his conversion was fake. I'm sorry, but anyone with that much attachment to his old religion only got splashed with water and had Latin mumbled at him — he did not actually convert, he is a marrano.
-
That the Jєωιѕн religion is the foundation of our own is affirmed by Pope St Pius X. The true spirit of the Jєωιѕн religion reaches its fulfillment in the coming of Jesus Christ. Jesus said, "I did not come to abolish the Law. I came to fulfill it."
Interesting. St. Paul, apparently, did not consult the “Jєωιѕн religion.” even if, as alleged, that religion is the “foundation” of our own. Paul seems to have bypassed it. For he writes quite clearly that he did not receive our religion, i.e. the Gospel, from man, Jєωιѕн or otherwise. He was not taught it.
So how did Paul get it:
“(B)ut I received it by a (direct) revelation of Jesus Christ.”
He who had zealously pursued the tradition of his fathers, i.e. his Mosaic forefathers, did not take counsel with that tradition. He got it directly from Jesus Christ Himself- or so I read. (Galatians1:11-16). Perhaps, Paul should have consulted with at least a few Jєωιѕн rabbis and scholars before setting off on this new course. But a reading of his letter to the Galatians reveals that he consciously avoided them, even refusing to consult with the apostles in Jerusalem who had gone before him. Not a very agreeable fellow, was he?
Elsewhere, in the letter to the Philippians, St. Paul shows himself to be a rather hard-nosed individual. We have a “Hebrew of the Hebrews,”steeped in the tenets of the old religion, telling the gentile believers that of all that now is just so much “dung.” I mean, Paul, please show some respect for the religion of your forefathers! (Phillippians 3: 5-) Please try to get along.
I’m afraid, subject to correction, of course, that CI has a few resident Judaizers like Posche lurking about. Hey, if some of you wish to become good ‘ol Christian Zionists, maybe Posche and his ilk are the guys for you. I think, though, I’ll stick with that one time “Pharisee of the Pharisees,” St. Paul, who counted his old religion as useless refuse.
-
I agree, either Posche has a little Ashenαzι swirling around in the ol' gene pool or they've never actually met any Jєωs. The Jєωιѕн тαℓмυd calls Our Blessed Mother a whore and asserts that Our Lord is burning in His own excrement. Wake up already!
-
The тαℓмυd Unmasked:
THE SECRET RABBINICAL TEACHINGS CONCERNING CHRISTIANS
By
Rev. I. B. Pranaitis
(Roman Catholic Priest)
With Ecclesiastical Imprimatur
http://www.тαℓмυdunmasked.com/appendix.htm (http://www.тαℓмυdunmasked.com/appendix.htm)
HOW THE POPE TREATED THE JєωS
Pope Innocent III decreed as follows:
Quote "As Cain was a wanderer and an outcast, not to be killed by anyone but marked with the sign of fear on his forehead, so the Jєωs . . . against whom the voice of the blood of Christ cries out . . . although they are not to be killed they must always be dispersed as wanderers upon the face of the earth."(1)
(1) Migne, Patrologia, CCXV, 1291.
"Although Christian piety tolerates the Jєωs . . . whose own fault commits them to perpetual slavery . . . and allows them to continue with us (even though the Moors will not tolerate them), they must not be allowed to remain ungrateful to us in such a way as to repay us with contumely for favors and contempt for our familiarity. They are admitted to our familiarity only through our mercy; but they are to us dangerous as the insect in the apple, as the serpent in the breast * * * Since, therefore, they have already begun to gnaw like the rat, and to stink like the serpent, it is to our shame that the fire in our breast which is being eaten into by them, does not consume them * * * As they are reprobate slaves of the Lord, in whose death they evilly conspired (at least by the effect of the deed), let them acknowledge themselves as slaves of those whom the death of Christ has made free."(2)
(2) Ibid., p.694.
Under this same pope, Innocent III, the Fourth Lateran Council, in 1215, adopted canons Nos. 67-70, decreeing the Roman Catholic attitude towards the Jєωs:(3)
Quote (3) cf. Binius, Concilia Generalia, Vol. II, Tom. 3, p.695.
The first is financial, containing protective measures for Christians against the rapacity of Jєωs as userers. Only Jєωs were permitted to lend money at interest.
The second decrees that all Jєωs be distinguished for all time from Christians by color of dress and distinctive badge.
The third forbids Jєωs to have Christians as nurses, tutors, and domestic servants and forbids Christians to cohabit with Jєωs and Jєωesses. Legal marriage with them was impossible.
The fourth forbids the acceptance of legal testimony of Jєωs against Christians and orders preference for the testimony of a Christian against a Jєω. An order is also added that all in authority in Church and State must watch continually lest converted and baptized Jєωs continue to practice the rites of their former faith.
A few years later Pope Innocent III reiterates and confirms these edicts of the Lateran Council as follows:
"TO THE KING OF FRANCE THAT HE MUST CRUSH THE INSOLENCE OF THE JєωS RESIDING IN HIS KINGDOM,
Quote "Although it be not displeasing to the Lord, but rather acceptable to Him, that the Jєωιѕн Dispersion should live and serve under Christian princes * * * they greatly offend in the sight of God's Divine Majesty who prefer the offspring of the Crucifiers before those who are the heirs of Christ. * * * It has come to our knowledge that in the kingdom of France Jєωs have so much liberty that, under a species of usury—by which they not only extort interest, but interest from interest—they obtain control of the goods of the churches and the possessions of the Christians. * * * Furthermore, although it was decreed in the Lateran Council that Jєωs be not permitted to have Christian servants in their homes, either as tutors for their children or for domestic service, or for any reason whatsoever, they still persist in having Christians as servants and nurses, with whom they commit abominations of a kind which it rather becomes you to punish than us to explain. And again, although the same Council laid it down that the testimony of Christians against Jєωs is to be admitted, even when the former use Jєωιѕн witnesses against Christians, and decreed that in a case of this kind anyone who would prefer Jєωs before Christians is to be condemned as anathema, yet up to the present time things are so carried on in the kingdom of France, that the testimony of Christians against Jєωs is not believed, whereas Jєωs are admitted as witnesses against Christians. And at times, when they to whom Jєωs have loaned money with usury produce Christian witnesses about the facts of payment, THE DEED WHICH THE CHRISTIAN DEBTOR THROUGH NEGLIGENCE INDISCREETLY LEFT WITH THEM IS BELIEVED RATHER THAN THE WITNESSES WHOM THEY BRING FORWARD. On Good Friday also, contrary to the law of old, they walk through the streets and public squares, and meeting Christians who everywhere according to custom go to adore the Crucifix, they deride them and strive to prevent them from this duty of adoration. We warn and exhort Your Serene Majesty in the Lord (adding the remission of your sins) that you force the Jєωs from their presumption * * * and see to it that due punishment be meted out to all such blasphemers, and that an easy pardon be not given to delinquents!"(4)
(4) Migne, op.cit., CCXV, 501.
In 1567, Pope Pius V revoked the small concession, granted to Jєωs by Pius IV, enabling them to possess immovable property up to the value of 1,500 gold ducats. He ordered the Jєωs to sell all their properties to Christians. Two years later he ordered all Jєωs expelled from the States of the Church:
Quote "By authority of these present Letters, We order that each and every Jєω of both sexes in Our Temporal Dominions, and in all the cities, lands, places and baronies subject to them, shall depart completely out of the confines thereof within the space of three months after the present Letters shall have been made public. They shall be despoiled of all their goods, and be prosecuted according to the due process of law. They shall become bondsmen of the Roman Church, and shall be subjected to perpetual servitude. And the said Church shall claim the same right over them as other dominions over their slaves and bondsmen."(5)
(5) Bull. Rom. Pont., VII, 741.
In 1244, Pope Innocent IV also ordered the burning of Jєωιѕн books. He exhorted the King of France as follows:
Quote "Our dear Son, the Chancellor of Paris, and the Doctors, before the clergy and people, publicly burned by fire the aforesaid books (The тαℓмυd) with all their appendices. We beg and beseech your Celestial Majesty in the Lord Jesus, that, having begun laudably and piously to prosecute those who perpetuate these detestable excesses, that you continue with due severity. And that you command throughout your whole kingdom that the aforesaid books with all their glossaries, already condemned by the Doctors, be committed to the flames. Firmly prohibiting Jєωs from having Christians as servants and nurses. * * *(6)
(6) Bull. Rom. Pont., IV, 509.
Pope Gregory IX sent the following to the archbishops of Germany:
Quote "The Jєωs, who are admitted to our acquaintance only through our mercy, should never forget their yoke of perpetual slavery, which they bear through their own fault. In the Council of Toledo it was decreed that Jєωs of both sexes, and for all time, should be distinguished from others by their mode of dress. We therefore command that each and every one of you to have all the excesses of the Jєωs completely repressed, lest they should presume to raise their necks from the yoke of servitude in contumely of the Redeemer; forbidding them to discuss in any way concerning their faith or rites with Christians. In this matter calling to your aid the help of the civil power, inflicting upon Christians, who offer opposition, due ecclesiastical punishment ***"(7)
(7) Bull. Rom. Pont., III, 497.
Pope Eugenius IV, in 1442, issued the following decree:
Quote "We decree and order that from now on, and for all time, Christians shall not eat or drink with Jєωs; nor admit them to feasts, nor cohabit with them, nor bathe with them. Christians shall not allow Jєωs to hold civil honors over Christians, or to exercise public offices in the State. Jєωs cannot be merchants, Tax Collectors, or agents in the buying and selling of the produce and goods of Christians, nor their Procurators, Computers or Lawyers in matrimonial matters, nor Obstetricians; nor can they have association or partnership with Christians. No Christian can leave or bequeath anything in his last Will and Testament to Jєωs or their congregations. Jєωs are prohibited from erecting new ѕуηαgσgυєs. They are obliged to pay annually a tenth part of their goods and holdings. Against them Christians can testify, but the testimony of Jєωs against Christians in no case is of any value. All and every single Jєω, of whatever sex and age, must everywhere wear the distinct dress and known marks by which they can be evidently distinguished from Christians. They cannot live among Christians, but in a certain street, separated and segregated from Christians, and outside which they cannot under any pretext have houses * * *"(8)
(8) Bull. Rom. Pont., V, 67.
In 1555, Pope Paul IV reiterated these restrictions against the Jєωs and added some new ones. He ordered Jєωs to pay an annual amount for every ѕуηαgσgυє, "even those that have been demolished," and said: "Jєωs can only engage themselves in the work of street sweepers and rag pickers, and cannot be produce merchants or in things necessary for human use."(9) For contravening these regulations Jєωs are to be punished "as rebels and criminals laesae majestatis rei (high treason), held as outlaws by all Christian people, by the judgment of our Vicars, Deputies and Magistrates * * *"
Quote (9) Bull. Rom. Pont., VI, 499.
The present attitude of the Roman Catholic Church toward the Jєω, as well as that of Mussolini, is of much interest for the latter has revived the age old disabilities of the Church against the Jєωs. All Jєωιѕн literature is forbidden and no book by a foreign Jєω can be translated into Italian. No play by a foreign Jєω can be produced. No Jєω is allowed to broadcast over the radio. Jєωιѕн professors are barred from Italian universities and textbooks of 114 Jєωιѕн writers have been withdrawn from the schools. Jєωs have been expelled from all administrative posts. Marriage is again illegal between Jєωs and Christians. A third anti-Semitic newspaper, Giornalissimo, has joined forces with the already existing anti-Jєωιѕн Regime Fascista and Il Tevere.
The Vatican's semiofficial organ, L'Osservatore Romano, of August 13, 1938, in an article headed "The Jєωs and the Vatican Council" (1870) speaks of the Catholic Church's PROTECTIVE measures for Jєωs, and then goes on to say:
Quote "But—in order to set things straight—by this it was not intended that Jєωs should be allowed to abuse the hospitality of Christian countries. Along with these protective ordinances, there existed restrictive and precautionary decrees with regard to them. The civil power was in accord with the Church in this, since, as Delassus says, 'they both had the same interest in preventing the nations from being invaded by the Jєωιѕн element and thereby losing control of society.' But if Christians were forbidden to force Jєωs to embrace the Catholic religion, to disturb their ѕуηαgσgυєs, their Sabbath and their festivals, the Jєωs, on the other hand, were forbidden to hold public office, civil or military; and this prohibition extended even to the children of converted Jєωs. The precautionary decrees concerned the professions, education, and business positions."(10)
(10) cf. Il Messagero, Rome, August 17, 1938; La Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno, Bari, August 18, 1938; Corriere della Sera and others. All have the same caption: "How the Popes Treated the Jєωs."
-
"The Jєωιѕн religion was the foundation of our own;" Pope Pius X
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
Poche, I was just wondering. do you work hard at being an assclown or does it come natural?
-
I agree, either Posche has a little Ashenαzι swirling around in the ol' gene pool or they've never actually met any Jєωs. The Jєωιѕн тαℓмυd calls Our Blessed Mother a whore and asserts that Our Lord is burning in His own excrement. Wake up already!
Nah, ol pooch isn't a Jєω yet.
But he's saving up to be one.
-
(https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/007/765/376/original/a213bcccd3c0896e.jpg?1564884537)
-
The тαℓмυd Unmasked:
THE SECRET RABBINICAL TEACHINGS CONCERNING CHRISTIANS
By
Rev. I. B. Pranaitis
(Roman Catholic Priest)
With Ecclesiastical Imprimatur
http://www.тαℓмυdunmasked.com/appendix.htm (http://www.тαℓмυdunmasked.com/appendix.htm)
HOW THE POPE TREATED THE JєωS
Pope Innocent III decreed as follows:
Under this same pope, Innocent III, the Fourth Lateran Council, in 1215, adopted canons Nos. 67-70, decreeing the Roman Catholic attitude towards the Jєωs:(3)
The first is financial, containing protective measures for Christians against the rapacity of Jєωs as userers. Only Jєωs were permitted to lend money at interest.
The second decrees that all Jєωs be distinguished for all time from Christians by color of dress and distinctive badge.
The third forbids Jєωs to have Christians as nurses, tutors, and domestic servants and forbids Christians to cohabit with Jєωs and Jєωesses. Legal marriage with them was impossible.
The fourth forbids the acceptance of legal testimony of Jєωs against Christians and orders preference for the testimony of a Christian against a Jєω. An order is also added that all in authority in Church and State must watch continually lest converted and baptized Jєωs continue to practice the rites of their former faith.
A few years later Pope Innocent III reiterates and confirms these edicts of the Lateran Council as follows:
"TO THE KING OF FRANCE THAT HE MUST CRUSH THE INSOLENCE OF THE JєωS RESIDING IN HIS KINGDOM,
In 1567, Pope Pius V revoked the small concession, granted to Jєωs by Pius IV, enabling them to possess immovable property up to the value of 1,500 gold ducats. He ordered the Jєωs to sell all their properties to Christians. Two years later he ordered all Jєωs expelled from the States of the Church:
In 1244, Pope Innocent IV also ordered the burning of Jєωιѕн books. He exhorted the King of France as follows:
Pope Gregory IX sent the following to the archbishops of Germany:
Pope Eugenius IV, in 1442, issued the following decree:
In 1555, Pope Paul IV reiterated these restrictions against the Jєωs and added some new ones. He ordered Jєωs to pay an annual amount for every ѕуηαgσgυє, "even those that have been demolished," and said: "Jєωs can only engage themselves in the work of street sweepers and rag pickers, and cannot be produce merchants or in things necessary for human use."(9) For contravening these regulations Jєωs are to be punished "as rebels and criminals laesae majestatis rei (high treason), held as outlaws by all Christian people, by the judgment of our Vicars, Deputies and Magistrates * * *"
The present attitude of the Roman Catholic Church toward the Jєω, as well as that of Mussolini, is of much interest for the latter has revived the age old disabilities of the Church against the Jєωs. All Jєωιѕн literature is forbidden and no book by a foreign Jєω can be translated into Italian. No play by a foreign Jєω can be produced. No Jєω is allowed to broadcast over the radio. Jєωιѕн professors are barred from Italian universities and textbooks of 114 Jєωιѕн writers have been withdrawn from the schools. Jєωs have been expelled from all administrative posts. Marriage is again illegal between Jєωs and Christians. A third anti-Semitic newspaper, Giornalissimo, has joined forces with the already existing anti-Jєωιѕн Regime Fascista and Il Tevere.
The Vatican's semiofficial organ, L'Osservatore Romano, of August 13, 1938, in an article headed "The Jєωs and the Vatican Council" (1870) speaks of the Catholic Church's PROTECTIVE measures for Jєωs, and then goes on to say:
"The тαℓмυd Exposed" is a great book. All Catholics should read it or risk falling prey.
-
He [St. Paul] who had zealously pursued the tradition of his fathers, i.e. his Mosaic forefathers, did not take counsel with that tradition. …
Until his conversion, St. Paul was a Pharisee, hence he was NOT in the tradition of Moses, but in the tradition of those Jesus denounced and damned for voiding the Mosaic Covenant and making up their own traditions. The Pharisees were defectors from the Mosaic Covenant and that is precisely why practicing Catholics are NOT in their lineage. тαℓмυdic Judaism, not Catholicism, is in the Pharisees' lineage. http://judaism.is/covenants.html (http://judaism.is/covenants.html)
(((Poche))) conflates Mosaic Judaism with pre-Christian Pharisaism and post-Christian тαℓмυdic Judaism and simply lumps it all together as "Judaism." Consider it a "tell." Just as the Pharisees were defectors from the Mosaic Covenant, Poche is revealing that he is in the lineage of the Pharisees, among the neo-Pharisees, the defectors from the New Covenant, the Novus Ordo.
The monster "subsisting in" the Chair of Peter does the same—and worse! The monster evangelizes not Catholicism, but Chasidic/Kabbalistic Judaism, the most explicitly occult sects of the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan. Find numerous examples in the embedded links here: https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-rebbe-explains-hasidic-stratagem-of.html (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-rebbe-explains-hasidic-stratagem-of.html)
-
The тαℓмυd Unmasked:
THE SECRET RABBINICAL TEACHINGS CONCERNING CHRISTIANS
By
Rev. I. B. Pranaitis
(Roman Catholic Priest)
With Ecclesiastical Imprimatur
http://www.тαℓмυdunmasked.com/appendix.htm (http://www.тαℓмυdunmasked.com/appendix.htm)
HOW THE POPE TREATED THE JєωS
Pope Innocent III decreed as follows:
Under this same pope, Innocent III, the Fourth Lateran Council, in 1215, adopted canons Nos. 67-70, decreeing the Roman Catholic attitude towards the Jєωs:(3)
The first is financial, containing protective measures for Christians against the rapacity of Jєωs as userers. Only Jєωs were permitted to lend money at interest.
The second decrees that all Jєωs be distinguished for all time from Christians by color of dress and distinctive badge.
The third forbids Jєωs to have Christians as nurses, tutors, and domestic servants and forbids Christians to cohabit with Jєωs and Jєωesses. Legal marriage with them was impossible.
The fourth forbids the acceptance of legal testimony of Jєωs against Christians and orders preference for the testimony of a Christian against a Jєω. An order is also added that all in authority in Church and State must watch continually lest converted and baptized Jєωs continue to practice the rites of their former faith.
A few years later Pope Innocent III reiterates and confirms these edicts of the Lateran Council as follows:
"TO THE KING OF FRANCE THAT HE MUST CRUSH THE INSOLENCE OF THE JєωS RESIDING IN HIS KINGDOM,
In 1567, Pope Pius V revoked the small concession, granted to Jєωs by Pius IV, enabling them to possess immovable property up to the value of 1,500 gold ducats. He ordered the Jєωs to sell all their properties to Christians. Two years later he ordered all Jєωs expelled from the States of the Church:
In 1244, Pope Innocent IV also ordered the burning of Jєωιѕн books. He exhorted the King of France as follows:
Pope Gregory IX sent the following to the archbishops of Germany:
Pope Eugenius IV, in 1442, issued the following decree:
In 1555, Pope Paul IV reiterated these restrictions against the Jєωs and added some new ones. He ordered Jєωs to pay an annual amount for every ѕуηαgσgυє, "even those that have been demolished," and said: "Jєωs can only engage themselves in the work of street sweepers and rag pickers, and cannot be produce merchants or in things necessary for human use."(9) For contravening these regulations Jєωs are to be punished "as rebels and criminals laesae majestatis rei (high treason), held as outlaws by all Christian people, by the judgment of our Vicars, Deputies and Magistrates * * *"
The present attitude of the Roman Catholic Church toward the Jєω, as well as that of Mussolini, is of much interest for the latter has revived the age old disabilities of the Church against the Jєωs. All Jєωιѕн literature is forbidden and no book by a foreign Jєω can be translated into Italian. No play by a foreign Jєω can be produced. No Jєω is allowed to broadcast over the radio. Jєωιѕн professors are barred from Italian universities and textbooks of 114 Jєωιѕн writers have been withdrawn from the schools. Jєωs have been expelled from all administrative posts. Marriage is again illegal between Jєωs and Christians. A third anti-Semitic newspaper, Giornalissimo, has joined forces with the already existing anti-Jєωιѕн Regime Fascista and Il Tevere.
The Vatican's semiofficial organ, L'Osservatore Romano, of August 13, 1938, in an article headed "The Jєωs and the Vatican Council" (1870) speaks of the Catholic Church's PROTECTIVE measures for Jєωs, and then goes on to say:
Isn't this the same Innocent III who was destined to spend centuries in Purgatory were it not for the prayers of St Lutgarde?
-
"The тαℓмυd Exposed" is a great book. All Catholics should read it or risk falling prey.
By preventing Christians from being nurses, tutors, and domestic servants and preventing Christians from cohabiting with Jєωs doesn't that prevent Christians from bringing the Gospel to the Jєωs? After all, if the Jєωs don't see Christianity as it is lived and only see a hostility and hatred when they encounter Christianity then how do you expect them to convert? This goes contrary to Christ's mandate to go out to all the world and preach the Gospel.
-
By preventing Christians from being nurses, tutors, and domestic servants and preventing Christians from cohabiting with Jєωs doesn't that prevent Christians from bringing the Gospel to the Jєωs? After all, if the Jєωs don't see Christianity as it is lived and only see a hostility and hatred when they encounter Christianity then how do you expect them to convert? This goes contrary to Christ's mandate to go out to all the world and preach the Gospel.
Defense of innocent lives and souls is not "hatred." It is our Catholic duty to prevent God's most organized earthly opposition from occupying positions of influence. Sicut judaeis non.
The Church does not preach the Gospel of (((Poche))): http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html (http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html)
(http://judaism.is/images/truth%20sounds%20like%20hate%20to%20Jєωs.jpg)
-
"I have always been on good terms with Jєωs." - Pope St Pius X.
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
-
Defense of innocent lives and souls is not "hatred." It is our Catholic duty to prevent God's most organized earthly opposition from occupying positions of influence. Sicut judaeis non.
The Church does not preach the Gospel of (((Poche))): http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html (http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html)
(http://judaism.is/images/truth%20sounds%20like%20hate%20to%20Jєωs.jpg)
There is no such thing as the Gospel according to Poche. There is the Gospel according to Matthew, the Gospel according to Mark, the Gospel according to Luke, and the Gospel according to John.
-
There is no such thing as the Gospel according to Poche. There is the Gospel according to Matthew, the Gospel according to Mark, the Gospel according to Luke, and the Gospel according to John.
And yet you consistently denigrate and misrepresent infallible unchangeable Magisterium on God's most organized earthly opposition.
Defense of innocent lives and souls is not "hate."
(http://judaism.is/images/we%20catholics.jpg)
-
The two most fundamental precepts of Judaism are:
(1) Only Jєωs are human
and
(2) Kill even the best of the Gentiles… in a time when Jєωs have control over the Gentiles.
http://judaism.is/who-is-human.html (http://judaism.is/who-is-human.html)
Note Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai’s ruling: “…only ‘you,’ the members of the Jєωιѕн people, are called men, but non-Jєωs are not called men.” Bava Metzia 114b:
(http://judaism.is/images/bava%20metzia%20114b.jpg)
“…although our Sages declared, ‘Kill even the best of the gentiles,’ and that, as mentioned above, the Rambam [Maimonides] states in Hilchot Melachim 8:10 that any gentile who does not accept the seven universal laws commanded to Noah (http://judaism.is/noahide-deceit.html) and his descendants should be slain. These directives, however. can be interpreted to apply only in a time of war or in a time when the Jєωs have control over the gentiles.”
(http://judaism.is/images/full%20size%20kill550x648.jpg)
-
By preventing Christians from being nurses, tutors, and domestic servants and preventing Christians from cohabiting with Jєωs doesn't that prevent Christians from bringing the Gospel to the Jєωs? After all, if the Jєωs don't see Christianity as it is lived and only see a hostility and hatred when they encounter Christianity then how do you expect them to convert? This goes contrary to Christ's mandate to go out to all the world and preach the Gospel.
Oh, dear St. Patrick!!!! Poshe, I believe you are a kind man and not ill intentioned at all; however, you are proving yourself to be naive. The Jєωs know our Jesus. They truly do. They openly reject Him just as they did when they crucified Him 2,000 years ago. No one should ever underestimate Jєωs nor question their intelligence because they are very cunning.
-
Oh, dear St. Patrick!!!! Poshe, I believe you are a kind man and not ill intentioned at all; however, you are proving yourself to be naive. The Jєωs know our Jesus. They truly do. They openly reject Him just as they did when they crucified Him 2,000 years ago. No one should ever underestimate Jєωs nor question their intelligence because they are very cunning.
It is by contact with good Catholics that brings about conversion. For example St Elizabeth Ann Seton's conversion was brought about by the good example of a Catholic family in Italy. Then there is Edith Stein. Her conversion to the Catholic Faith was brought about by the example of the Catholic widow of a colleague of hers. If we live the holiness that God calls us to live then we can convert the whole world.
-
It is by contact with good Catholics that brings about conversion.
"Contact" emptied of truth accomplishes no good.
St. Thomas Aquinas:
Article 2. Whether Christ should have preached to the Jєωs without offending them? (http://www.newadvent.org/summa/4042.htm)
“… On the contrary, It was foretold (Isaiah 8:14) that Christ would be ‘for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offense to the two houses of Israel.’
“I answer that, The salvation of the multitude is to be preferred to the peace of any individuals whatsoever. Consequently, when certain ones, by their perverseness, hinder the salvation of the multitude, the preacher and the teacher should not fear to offend those men, in order that he may insure the salvation of the multitude. Now the Scribes and Pharisees and the princes of the Jєωs were by their malice a considerable hindrance to the salvation of the people, both because they opposed themselves to Christ’s doctrine, which was the only way to salvation, and because their evil ways corrupted the morals of the people. For which reason our Lord, undeterred by their taking offense, publicly taught the truth which they hated, and condemned their vices. Hence we read (Matthew 15:12,14) that when the disciples of our Lord said: ‘Dost Thou know that the Pharisees, when they heard this word, were scandalized?’ He answered: ‘Let them alone: they are blind and leaders of the blind; and if the blind lead the blind, both fall into the pit.’
“… By publicly reproving the Scribes and Pharisees, Christ promoted rather than hindered the effect of His teaching. Because when the people came to know the vices of those men, they were less inclined to be prejudiced against Christ by hearing what was said of Him by the Scribes and Pharisees, who were ever withstanding His doctrine.”
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/4042.htm (http://www.newadvent.org/summa/4042.htm)
-
"Contact" emptied of truth accomplishes no good.
St. Thomas Aquinas:
Article 2. Whether Christ should have preached to the Jєωs without offending them? (http://www.newadvent.org/summa/4042.htm)
“… On the contrary, It was foretold (Isaiah 8:14) that Christ would be ‘for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offense to the two houses of Israel.’
“I answer that, The salvation of the multitude is to be preferred to the peace of any individuals whatsoever. Consequently, when certain ones, by their perverseness, hinder the salvation of the multitude, the preacher and the teacher should not fear to offend those men, in order that he may insure the salvation of the multitude. Now the Scribes and Pharisees and the princes of the Jєωs were by their malice a considerable hindrance to the salvation of the people, both because they opposed themselves to Christ’s doctrine, which was the only way to salvation, and because their evil ways corrupted the morals of the people. For which reason our Lord, undeterred by their taking offense, publicly taught the truth which they hated, and condemned their vices. Hence we read (Matthew 15:12,14) that when the disciples of our Lord said: ‘Dost Thou know that the Pharisees, when they heard this word, were scandalized?’ He answered: ‘Let them alone: they are blind and leaders of the blind; and if the blind lead the blind, both fall into the pit.’
“… By publicly reproving the Scribes and Pharisees, Christ promoted rather than hindered the effect of His teaching. Because when the people came to know the vices of those men, they were less inclined to be prejudiced against Christ by hearing what was said of Him by the Scribes and Pharisees, who were ever withstanding His doctrine.”
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/4042.htm (http://www.newadvent.org/summa/4042.htm)
The Catholic Faith is full of Truth.
-
Poche - How about you go down the local ѕуηαgσgυє and ask them if they'd like to learn about the truths of the Catholic Faith. At the very least, you will will get no reply other than being told to get off their property. At the most, you will have the cops called on you and you will be charged with a hate crime.
-
I imagine some of the more Orthodox Jєωs might.
A decent number of more liberal Jєωs don't even believe in a God, period, so they wouldn't care.
-
Since you are speaking about Jєωs, can someone here explain to me their apparent collaboration with the moslems? They are uncharacteristically silent when the moslem congressmen and women say anything against them or their beloved Israel.
-
Since you are speaking about Jєωs, can someone here explain to me their apparent collaboration with the moslems? They are uncharacteristically silent when the moslem congressmen and women say anything against them or their beloved Israel.
Anti-Israel sentiments are primarily a liberal thing. You'll never find a conservative against Israel or pro-BDS, because they want that cozy $178k Washington salary.
That's why many people were railing on Ilhan Omar. The congresswoman from the most Jєωιѕн district of Minnesota couldn't win if she were anti-Jєωιѕн.
-
Since you are speaking about Jєωs, can someone here explain to me their apparent collaboration with the moslems? They are uncharacteristically silent when the moslem congressmen and women say anything against them or their beloved Israel.
In Satan's war against God, his ѕуηαgσgυє has taken every measure to destroy God's Church and new Chosen People, body and soul. To this day the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan uses not only false-coverts to Christianity, Marranos, but has also been at the root of every major heresy, including Protestantism: Jєωιѕн Influence on Christian Reform Movements
by Rabbi Louis I. Newman,
http://www.amazon.com/Jєωιѕн-Influence-Christian-Reform-Movements/dp/0404505139 (http://www.amazon.com/Jєωιѕн-Influence-Christian-Reform-Movements/dp/0404505139) (http://www.amazon.com/Jєωιѕн-Influence-Christian-Reform-Movements/dp/0404505139)
http://www.questia.com/library/book/Jєωιѕн-influence-on-christian-reform-movements-by-louis-i-newman.jsp (http://www.questia.com/library/book/Jєωιѕн-influence-on-christian-reform-movements-by-louis-i-newman.jsp)
The ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan was also pivotal is attempting to use Islam as their golem against the Church. That plan back-fired on them, but even to this day they use false-converts to Islam, dönmeh, to continue Satan's war against God, His Church, and His People.
The Jєωιѕн Origins of Islam
Edouard-Marie Gallez, Le Messie et son prophète: aux origines de l’Islam. Paris: Studia Arabica, dirigée par Marie-Thérèse Urvoy. Tome I: De Qumran à Muhammad (https://amzn.to/2tmzlSK). 4th edition, 2012. 523 pp. 35 Euros. Tome II: Du Muhammad des Califes au Muhammad de l’histoire (https://amzn.to/2tiOpBz). 2010. Pp 574. 39 Euros.
Reviewed by Anne Barbeau Gardine, Culture Wars, February 2018.
http://culturewars.com/2018/Gardinerreview.htm (http://culturewars.com/2018/Gardinerreview.htm)
See also:
The Dönmeh: The Middle East’s Most Whispered Secret (Parts I & II)
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2011/10/25/the-doenmeh-the-middle-easts-most-whispered-secret-part-i.html (http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2011/10/25/the-doenmeh-the-middle-easts-most-whispered-secret-part-i.html)
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2011/10/26/the-doenmeh-the-middle-easts-most-whispered-secret-part-ii.html (http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2011/10/26/the-doenmeh-the-middle-easts-most-whispered-secret-part-ii.html)
(http://judaism.is/images/donmeh331x247.jpg)
-
Poche - How about you go down the local ѕуηαgσgυє and ask them if they'd like to learn about the truths of the Catholic Faith. At the very least, you will will get no reply other than being told to get off their property. At the most, you will have the cops called on you and you will be charged with a hate crime.
I know of a certain priest who did likewise to a certain rabbi who asked "if anybody would like to learn the truths of the Jєωιѕн Faith" at a local church. We don't just teach the Faith at the Church or by invading a ѕуηαgσgυє. We teach the faith every day by how we live it. Edith Stein, while she was a catechumen, used to go to the Catholic cathedral in Berlin to pray and meditate. She wrote that she saw a certain humble flower peddler come in to pray in the back of the cathedral. She said that the way that that woman prayed said more to her than a hundred sermons ever could. We have to live the Faith 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. That will do more than invading any ѕуηαgσgυє or Protestant church ever would.
-
Since you are speaking about Jєωs, can someone here explain to me their apparent collaboration with the moslems? They are uncharacteristically silent when the moslem congressmen and women say anything against them or their beloved Israel.
I think they expect it.
-
Since you are speaking about Jєωs, can someone here explain to me their apparent collaboration with the moslems? They are uncharacteristically silent when the moslem congressmen and women say anything against them or their beloved Israel.
About a generation before the Islamic conquest of Egypt there was a great panic. There was a credible private revelation that they were going to be conquered and ruled over by the Jєωs.
-
I imagine some of the more Orthodox Jєωs might.
A decent number of more liberal Jєωs don't even believe in a God, period, so they wouldn't care.
That also means that they don't believe in that тαℓмυdic nonsense that some of the other posters keep spouting about.
-
That also means that they don't believe in that тαℓмυdic nonsense that some of the other posters keep spouting about.
And yet… even the "non-observant" Jєωs have "inculturated" self-worshipping "тαℓмυdic nonsense," genocidal Master Race supremacism, subvert Christianity, and promote perversion, and ʝʊdɛօ-Zionist exceptionalism. The multitude of conversions attest to the advice of the Apostles, Saints, Doctors, Popes, and Councils (http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html). Meanwhile the adversaries to all men "spout about" and put into action all manner of тαℓмυdic evils. I have placed the Gospel of Poche in the trash with the Zohar and Gospel of Judas.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jxWjkMBmh14v/ (https://www.bitchute.com/video/jxWjkMBmh14v/)
(http://judaism.is/images/Jєω%20bitch%20mocks%20crucifixion.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/goldstein-009.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/genocide%20permissible.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/fetus%20head%20shot.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/rabbi%20yitzak%20shapira%20guide560x419.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/epstein%20mossad%20younggirl.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/pedophiles%20in%20israel-crop-u75085.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/mezizah%20page%20copy.jpg)
-
And yet… even the "non-observant" Jєωs have "inculturated" self-worshipping "тαℓмυdic nonsense," genocidal Master Race supremacism, subvert Christianity, and promote perversion, and ʝʊdɛօ-Zionist exceptionalism.
Yes, I don't buy that "non-observant" Jєωs aren't influenced by the rabbis. "Non-observant" Jєωs are in some ways more in the vanguard of Judaism than observant Jєωs. By their fruits you shall know them. All Jєωs are filth.
-
Yes, I don't buy that "non-observant" Jєωs aren't influenced by the rabbis. "Non-observant" Jєωs are in some ways more in the vanguard of Judaism than observant Jєωs. By their fruits you shall know them. All Jєωs are filth.
Exactly. It's because of their racial curse for rejecting the only true Messiah and orchestrating His murder. It's not dependent upon whether or not they're observant to their false religion.
-
I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt, but if he can't get it even after all of the proof shown him on this post then Poche is clearly just a head-n-the-sand Jєω lover. Maybe Poche should openly deny Jesus as the Messiah on this post and get it over with. Come out of you Jєω closet, Poche! :fryingpan: The Jєωs will take you with open arms and when you are nice and cozy within their fold they will stab you squarely in the back since to them you are nothing more than a goy heretic and can never really be one of them.
-
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-15/ronald-mcdonald-mcjesus-statue-sparks-protests-in-israel/10715544 (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-15/ronald-mcdonald-mcjesus-statue-sparks-protests-in-israel/10715544)
Maybe Poche has a McJesus crucifix in his house!
-
I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt, but if he can't get it even after all of the proof shown him on this post then Poche is clearly just a head-n-the-sand Jєω lover. Maybe Poche should openly deny Jesus as the Messiah on this post and get it over with. Come out of you Jєω closet, Poche! :fryingpan: The Jєωs will take you with open arms and when you are nice and cozy within their fold they will stab you squarely in the back since to them you are nothing more than a goy heretic and can never really be one of them.
I think that what you are saying goes contrary to the spirit of Pope St Pius X. Pope St Pius X said, "And I have always been on good terms with Jєωs. Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. These we do not deny to the Jєωs. Indeed, we also pray for them: that their minds be enlightened."
Rather than spitting out hatred and calling them bad names we should be following the example of Pope St Pius X and praying for them that their minds might be enlightened.
After all this is called the Society of St Pius X. I think that we should be following his example.
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
-
There must be a reason why "poche" has not been banned. Matthew knows best. He is our leader. :)
-
I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt, but if he can't get it even after all of the proof shown him on this post then Poche is clearly just a head-n-the-sand Jєω lover. Maybe Poche should openly deny Jesus as the Messiah on this post and get it over with. Come out of you Jєω closet, Poche! :fryingpan: The Jєωs will take you with open arms and when you are nice and cozy within their fold they will stab you squarely in the back since to them you are nothing more than a goy heretic and can never really be one of them.
Yes, "they will stab you squarely in the back …and can never really be one of them."
Even if Poche and Simple Man convert and let them go mezizah (http://judaism.is/pedophilia-and-sodomy.html#mezizah) on them!
Saved by race: A convert to Judaism "cannot be equal to a Jєω by birth"
https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2017/07/saved-by-race-convert-to-judaism-cannot.html (https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2017/07/saved-by-race-convert-to-judaism-cannot.html)
The Jєωs as a Chosen People: Tradition and Transformation
By S. Leyla Gurkan
https://books.google.ca/books?id=9nN8AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA43&dq=maimonides+neshama+Jєωs+soul+non-Jєωs&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (https://books.google.ca/books?id=9nN8AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA43&dq=maimonides+neshama+Jєωs+soul+non-Jєωs&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false)
(https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-1mUVKGZy580/WWG5z6C72pI/AAAAAAAACEY/mvyqaNYvZAIhK6vPH3aU9OyCEYVMh9JhQCLcBGAs/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2017-07-09%2Bat%2B12.52.40%2BAM.png)
-
I think that what you are saying goes contrary to the spirit of Pope St Pius X. Pope St Pius X said, "And I have always been on good terms with Jєωs. Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. These we do not deny to the Jєωs. Indeed, we also pray for them: that their minds be enlightened."
Rather than spitting out hatred and calling them bad names we should be following the example of Pope St Pius X and praying for them that their minds might be enlightened.
After all this is called the Society of St Pius X. I think that we should be following his example.
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
The eighth sacrament of the Novus Ordo is "dialog," a.v., "submission to the narratives and doctrines of God’s enemies."
It is revealing that Poche cherry-picks a couple of smarmy nugatory phrases while concealing the gravamen of Pope St. Pius X's theological and political conclusion, namely, "…“we are unable to favor this [ʝʊdɛօ-Zionist] movement. We cannot prevent the Jєωs from going to Jerusalem but we could never sanction it. The Jєωs have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot recognize the Jєωιѕн people. If you come to Palestine and settle your people there, we will have churches and priests ready to baptize all of you.”
Judaizers like Poche prompted me to pen this meme:
(http://judaism.is/images/magisterium%20defeats%20misrepresentation.jpg)
-
Yes, "they will stab you squarely in the back …and can never really be one of them."
Even if Poche and Simple Man convert and let them go mezizah (http://judaism.is/pedophilia-and-sodomy.html#mezizah) on them!
Saved by race: A convert to Judaism "cannot be equal to a Jєω by birth"
https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2017/07/saved-by-race-convert-to-judaism-cannot.html (https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2017/07/saved-by-race-convert-to-judaism-cannot.html)
The Jєωs as a Chosen People: Tradition and Transformation
By S. Leyla Gurkan
https://books.google.ca/books?id=9nN8AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA43&dq=maimonides+neshama+Jєωs+soul+non-Jєωs&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (https://books.google.ca/books?id=9nN8AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA43&dq=maimonides+neshama+Jєωs+soul+non-Jєωs&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false)
(https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-1mUVKGZy580/WWG5z6C72pI/AAAAAAAACEY/mvyqaNYvZAIhK6vPH3aU9OyCEYVMh9JhQCLcBGAs/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2017-07-09%2Bat%2B12.52.40%2BAM.png)
I think we should focus our energy on getting people to convert to the Catholic Faith rather than anything else.
-
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-15/ronald-mcdonald-mcjesus-statue-sparks-protests-in-israel/10715544 (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-15/ronald-mcdonald-mcjesus-statue-sparks-protests-in-israel/10715544)
Maybe Poche has a McJesus crucifix in his house!
Truly vile.
(https://www.abc.net.au/news/image/10715546-3x2-940x627.jpg)
Consider the caption penned by the AP's (((Oded Bality))): "The exhibit intended to criticise what many view as society's cult-like worship of capitalism."
As if Jesus Christ who whipped the money-changers is a legitimate symbol of capitalism.
Such are Satan's Chosen.
-
I think we should focus our energy on getting people to convert to the Catholic Faith rather than anything else.
I recommend learning the Faith so that you may accurately proselytize the Faith: http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html (http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html)
-
The eighth sacrament of the Novus Ordo is "dialog," a.v., "submission to the narratives and doctrines of God’s enemies."
It is revealing that Poche cherry-picks a couple of smarmy nugatory phrases while concealing the gravamen of Pope St. Pius X's theological and political conclusion, namely, "…“we are unable to favor this [ʝʊdɛօ-Zionist] movement. We cannot prevent the Jєωs from going to Jerusalem but we could never sanction it. The Jєωs have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot recognize the Jєωιѕн people. If you come to Palestine and settle your people there, we will have churches and priests ready to baptize all of you.”
Judaizers like Poche prompted me to pen this meme:
(http://judaism.is/images/magisterium%20defeats%20misrepresentation.jpg)
I don't speak in favor of the false theological propositions of the Jєωs. I join you in your disagreement with the тαℓмυd and with the Jєωs rejection of the Christ. I join Pope St Pius X in his 1904 rejection of Zionism. Pope St Pius X also said, "If you come to Palestine and settle your people there, we shall have churches and priests ready to baptize all of you."
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
-
Poche, maybe it's time to concede. You're not winning this thing.
I admire your tenacity, but find another topic.
-
By preventing Christians from being nurses, tutors, and domestic servants and preventing Christians from cohabiting with Jєωs doesn't that prevent Christians from bringing the Gospel to the Jєωs? After all, if the Jєωs don't see Christianity as it is lived and only see a hostility and hatred when they encounter Christianity then how do you expect them to convert? This goes contrary to Christ's mandate to go out to all the world and preach the Gospel.
Christ also said don't waste your time on fools who have no intention of listening to you.
Matter of fact, they will probably attack you for speaking truth to them.
Have you ever actually opened a bible pooche?
"Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces." (Matthew 7:6).
-
Poche, maybe it's time to concede. You're not winning this thing.
I admire your tenacity, but find another topic.
You understand that you all are in contradiction to Pope St Pius X himself.
-
There must be a reason why "poche" has not been banned. Matthew knows best. He is our leader. :)
Perhaps the forum strategy is to use Poche as a "comic relief" and to attract more hits?
-
You understand that you all are in contradiction to Pope St Pius X himself.
It is you who oppose the Magisterium.
Pope St. Pius was polite, but he unequivocally opposed the ʝʊdɛօ-Zionists.
Perennial infallible unchangeable Magisterium
Council of Florence
“§ 712 It [the Holy Catholic Church] firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to Divine worship at that time, after our Lord’s coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the Sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally. Yet it does not deny that after the passion of Christ up to the promulgation of the Gospel they could have been observed until they were believed to be in no way necessary for salvation; but after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation. All, therefore, who after that time observe circuмcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors….
“§714 The Most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jєωs, and heretics, and schismatics, can ever be partakers of eternal life, but that they are to go into the eternal fire ‘which was prepared for the devil, and his angels,’ (Matthew 25:41) unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this Ecclesiastical Body, that only those remaining within this unity can profit from the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and that they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, alms deeds, and other works of Christian piety and duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved unless they abide within the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”
Cantate Domino, from the infallible ecuмenical Council of Florence under His Holiness Pope Eugene IV defining the Solemn Doctrine: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (“Outside the Church, there is no salvation.”), promulgated by papal bull, February 4, 1444 [Florentine calendar] in Denziger, Enchiridion Symbolorum, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, § 712-714
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Doctors of the Church
St. Alphonsus Maria Liguori The Passion and Death of Jesus Christ, page 444: “Poor Jєωs! You invoked a dreadful curse upon your own heads in saying: ‘His blood be upon us and our children’; and that curse, miserable race, you carry upon you to this day, and to the End of Time you shall endure the chastisement of that innocent blood.”
St. Jerome, Epist. 151, ad Algasiam, question II: “The Jєωs, after having despised the truth in person, will receive lies in receiving the Antichrist.”
St. Ambrose, Sermo 37, The Two Ships: “The faithlessness of the ѕуηαgσgυє is an insult to the Savior. Therefore He chose the barque of Peter, and deserted that of Moses; that is, He rejected the faithless ѕуηαgσgυє, and adopts the believing Church.”
St. Ambrose, in The Great Commentary of Cornelius a Lapide, Vol. 3, page 311: “O Jєωιѕн hearts, harder than rocks!”
St. Ambrose, Enarratio on Psalms XLIII: “This shows that the Jєωs, who did not want to believe in Jesus Christ, will believe in the Antichrist.”
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Letter #363: “The Jєωs must not be persecuted or chased like beasts....They are living signs that remind us of the Passion of our Lord. Besides, they are scattered through the world so that, while they pay for such a crime, they can be the witnesses of our redemption.”
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, SS: “O intelligence coarse, dense, and cow-like, which did not recognize God even in His own works! Perhaps the Jєω will complain that I call his intelligence bovine, but his intelligence is less than bovine: ‘The ox knows his Owner, and the ass knows his Master's crib, but Israel has not known Me, and My people have not understood’ (Isaias 1:3). You see, O Jєω, I am easier on you than your own prophet!”
St. Cyril of Alexandria: “It has come to pass that the last state of Israel is worse than the first for, as the Savior's disciples says (II Peter 2:21, 22), it would be better for them not to have known the way of justice than, after they have known it, to turn back from that holy commandment which was delivered to them. For that of the true proverb has happened to them: the dog has returned to his vomit, and the sow that was washed has returned to wallowing in the mire (Proverbs 26:11). And from what they afterwards dared to do, it is plain to see that they have swallowed their vomit and have turned again to wallow in their ancient mire and have lapsed into the errors of Egypt, for the evil spirit has again entered into them, and their last state has become worse than their first.”
St. Ephrem: “What is your iniquity, O daughter of Jacob, that your chastisement is so severe? You have dishonored the King and the King's Son, you shameless one, you harlot!”
St. Gregory nαzιanzen: “If anyone does not worship the Crucified One, let him be anathema and numbered among the deicides.”
St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Romans, 6:12: “Yet surely Paul’s object everywhere is to annul this Law… And with much reason; for it was through a fear and a horror of this that the Jєωs obstinately opposed grace.”
St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Galatians, Ch 3: “And so while no one annuls a man's covenant, the covenant of God after four hundred and thirty years is annulled; for if not that covenant but another instead of it bestows what is promised, then is it set aside, which is most unreasonable” … “How dare Christians have the slightest intercourse with Jєωs, those most miserable of all men who are lustful, rapacious, greedy, perfidious bandits, pests of the universe! Indeed, an entire day would not suffice to tell of all their huckstering. Are they not inveterate murderers, destroyers, men possessed by the devil? They are impure and impious, and their ѕуηαgσgυє is a house of prostitution, a lair of beasts, a place of shame and ridicule, the domicile of the devil, as also the soul of the Jєω. As a matter of fact, Jєωs worship the devil: their rites are criminal and impure; their religion a disease; their ѕуηαgσgυє an assembly of crooks, a den of thieves, a cavern of devils, an abyss of perdition. Why are the Jєωs degenerated? Because of their hateful assassination of Christ. This supreme crime lies at the root of their degradation and their woes. The rejection and dispersion of the Jєωs was the work of God, not of emperors. It was done by the wrath of God and because of His absolute abandonment of the Jєωs. Thus the Jєωs will live under the yoke of slavery without end. God hates the Jєωs, and on Judgment Day He will say to those who sympathize with them: ‘Depart from Me, for you had intercourse with My murderers!’ Flee, then, from their assemblies, fly from their houses, and, far from venerating the ѕуηαgσgυє, hold it in hatred and aversion.”
St. John Chrysostom, First Homily Adversus Judaeos: “Many, I know, respect the Jєωs and think that their present way of life is a venerable one. This is why I hasten to uproot and tear out this deadly opinion. I said that the ѕуηαgσgυє is no better than a theater and I bring forward a prophet as my witness. Surely the Jєωs are not more deserving of belief than their prophets. ‘You had a harlot's brow; you became shameless before all.’ Where a harlot has set herself up, that place is a brothel. But the ѕуηαgσgυє is not only a brothel and a theater; it also is a den of robbers and a lodging for wild beasts. Jeremiah said: ‘Your house has become for me the den of a hyena.’ He does not simply say ‘of wild beast,’ but ‘of a filthy wild beast,’ and again: ‘I have abandoned my house, I have cast off my inheritance.’ But when God forsakes a people, what hope of salvation is left? When God forsakes a place, that place becomes the dwelling of demons.”
St. John Chrysostom, Catena Aurea, Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 27: “Observe here the infatuation of the Jєωs; their headlong haste, and destructive passions will not let them see what they ought to see, and they curse themselves, saying, ‘His blood be upon us,’ and even entail the curse upon their children. Yet a merciful God did not ratify this sentence, but accepted such of them and of their children as repented; for Paul was of them, and many thousands of those who in Jerusalem believed.”
St. John Chrysostom, Homily II:
“…(6) I have spoken these words to you. You will speak them to those Judaizers, and they to their wives. ‘Fortify one another.’ If a catechumen is sick with this disease, let him be kept outside the church doors. If the sick one be a believer and already initiated, let him be driven from the holy table. For not all sins need exhortation and counsel; some sins, of their very nature, demand cure by a quick and sharp excision. The wounds we can tolerate respond to more gentle cures; those which have festered and cannot be cured, those which are feeding on the rest of the body, need cauterization with a point of steel. So is it with sins. Some need long exhortation; others need sharp rebuke.
“(7) This is why Paul did not enjoin us to exhort in every case but also to rebuke sharply: ‘Wherefore rebuke them sharply.’ Therefore, I will now rebuke them sharply, so that they may accuse themselves and feel shame for what they have done. Then they will never again be hurt by that sinful fast.
“(8 So I shall put aside exhortation henceforth as I testify and exclaim: ‘If any man does not love the Lord Jesus Christ, let a curse be upon him.’ What greater evidence could there be that a man does not love our Lord than when he participates in the festival with those who slew Christ? It was not I who hurled the curse at them, but Paul. Rather, it was not Paul but Christ, who spoke through him and said earlier: ‘Those who are justified in the law have fallen away from grace.’
“(9) So speak these words to them, read aloud to them these texts. Show all your zeal in saving them. When you have snatched them from the devil’s jaws, bring them to me on the day of the Jєωιѕн fast. Then, after I have kept the rest of my promise to you, let us, with one accord and with one voice, join our brothers in giving glory to God and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, for to Him is glory forever. Amen.”
St. Augustine, Letters, 74, 4: “Instead of the grace of the law which has passed away, we have received the grace of the gospel which is abiding; and instead of the shadows and types of the old dispensation, the truth has come by Jesus Christ. Jeremiah also prophesied thus in God’s name: ‘Behold, the days come, says the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah...’ Observe what the prophet says, not to Gentiles, who had not been partakers in any former covenant, but to the Jєωιѕн nation. He who has given them the law by Moses, promises in place of it the New Covenant of the gospel, that they might no longer live in the oldness of the letter, but in the newness of the spirit.”
St. Augustine, in The Anguish of the Jєωs by Fr Edward Flannery, Macmillan, 1954 (cf), and in The Faith of the Early Fathers by Fr Jurgens, Collegeville, 1979: “Judaism, since Christ, is a corruption; indeed, Judas is the image of the Jєωιѕн people: their understanding of Scripture is carnal; they bear the guilt for the death of the Savior, for through their fathers they have killed Christ. The Jєωs held Him; the Jєωs insulted Him; the Jєωs bound Him; they crowned Him with thorns and dishonored Him by spitting upon Him; they scourged Him; they heaped abuses on Him; they hung Him upon a tree.”
St. Augustine, Sermon 91, PL38:567: “Our Lord Jesus Christ referred to Himself as ‘the Stone’ (Mt. 21:44). Lying on the ground, it shakes whoever falls over it; coming from on high, it crushes the proud. The Jєωs have already been shaken by their previous stumble. What awaits them is to be crushed by His Coming.”
St. Augustine, “Against the Jєωs,” PL 42:51: “The Jєωs wander over the entire earth, their backs bent over and their eyes cast downward, forever calling to our minds the curse they carry with them.”
St. Basil the Great, “On Prayer,” Sermon IX, PG 32; SS vol.II p.384: “If someone should kill the beloved son of a man, and then stretch forth their hands still stained with blood to the afflicted father, asking for fellowship, would not the blood of his son, visible on the hand of his murderer, provoke him to just anger instead? And such are the prayers of the Jєωs, for when they stretch forth their hands in prayer, they only remind God the Father of their sin against His Son. And at every stretching-forth of their hands, they only make it obvious that they are stained with the blood of Christ. For they who persevere in their blindness inherit the blood-guilt of their fathers; for they cried out: ‘His blood be upon us, and upon our children’ (Matthew xxvii.25).”
St. Thomas Aquinas, De Regimine Judaeorum: “It would be licit, according to custom, to hold Jєωs in perpetual servitude because of their crime.”
Saints
Pope St. Pius V, Hebraeorum gens: “The Jєωιѕн people fell from the heights because of their faithlessness and condemned their Redeemer to a shameful death. Their godlessness has assumed such forms that, for the salvation of our own people, it becomes necessary to prevent their disease. Besides usury, through which Jєωs everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians, they are accomplices of thieves and robbers; and the most damaging aspect of the matter is that they allure the unsuspecting through magical incantations, superstition, and witchcraft to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan and boast of being able to predict the future. We have carefully investigated how this revolting sect abuses the name of Christ and how harmful they are to those whose life is threatened by their deceit. On account of these and other serious matters, and because of the gravity of their crimes which increase day to day more and more, We order that, within 90 days, all Jєωs in our entire earthly realm of justice -- in all towns, districts, and places -- must depart these regions.”
St. Padre Pio, in the Calvary of Padre Pio by Joseph Pagnossin, 1978 Padua, Italy, page 91: “The Jєωs are enemies of God and foes of our holy religion.”
St. Gregory of Nyssa: “Jєωs are slayers of the Lord, murderers of the prophets, enemies and haters of God, adversaries of grace, enemies of their father's faith, advocates of the devil, a brood of vipers, slanderers, scoffers, men of darkened minds, the leaven of Pharisees, a congregation of demons, sinners, wicked men, haters of goodness!”
St. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, Ch 11: Now, law placed against law has abrogated that which is before it, and a covenant which comes after in like manner has put an end to the previous one; and an eternal and final law – namely, Christ – has been given to us, and the covenant is trustworthy…Have you not read…by Jeremiah, concerning this same new covenant, He thus speaks: ‘Behold, the days come,’ says the Lord, ‘that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah…’”
St. Justin Martyr, Florilegium Patristicuм, Rauschen, 1911: “Those of the seed of Abraham who live according to the Law of Moses and who do not believe in Christ before death shall not be saved; especially they who curse this very Christ in the ѕуηαgσgυєs; who curse everything by which they might obtain salvation and escape the vengeance of fire.”
St.Vincent Ferrer, himself a convert from Judaism: “One who dies a Jєω will be damned!”
St. Vincent Ferrer, ACS p.82; “Since His spouse, the ѕуηαgσgυє, refused to receive Him, Christ answered: ‘This is a harlot!’ and gave her a bill of divorce.”
St. Felix of Toledo, On the Condemnation of the Jєωs, Council XVII of Toledo, Spain, Canon No. 8: “It is known that the Jєωιѕн people are polluted with wickedness, blasphemy, and the shedding of the blood of Jesus Christ so that their wickedness has no limit.”
St. Barnabas, attributed: “Do not add to your sins by saying that the Covenant is both theirs and ours. Yes, it is ours, but they lost it forever.”
St. Hippolytus, Against the Jєωs, God’s condemnation upon the Deicide of Perfidious Judaism is eternal:
“…5. Listen with understanding, O Jєω, to what the Christ says: ‘They gave me gall for my meat; and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.’ And these things He did indeed endure from you. Hear the Holy Ghost tell you also what return He made to you for that little portion of vinegar. For the prophet says, as in the person of God, ‘Let their table become a snare and retribution.’ Of what retribution does He speak? Manifestly, of the misery which has now got hold of thee.
“6. And then hear what follows: ‘Let their eyes be darkened, that they see not.’ And surely ye have been darkened in the eyes of your soul with a darkness utter and everlasting. For now that the true light has arisen, ye wander as in the night, and stumble on places with no roads, and fall headlong, as having forsaken the way that saith, ‘I am the way.” - John xiv. 6. Furthermore, hear this yet more serious word: ‘And their back do thou bend always’; that means, in order that they may be slaves to the nations, not four hundred and thirty years as in Egypt, nor seventy as in Babylon, but bend them to servitude, he says, ‘always.’ In fine, then, how dost thou indulge vain hopes, expecting to be delivered from the misery which holdeth thee? For that is somewhat strange. And not unjustly has he imprecated this blindness of eyes upon thee. But because thou didst cover the eyes of Christ, (and) thus thou didst beat Him, for this reason, too, bend thou thy back for servitude always. And whereas thou didst pour out His blood in indignation, hear what thy recompense shall be: ‘Pour out Thine indignation upon them, and let Thy wrathful anger take hold of them’; and, ‘Let their habitation be desolate,’ to wit, their celebrated temple.
“7. But why… was the temple made desolate? … but it was because they killed the Son of their Benefactor, for He is coeternal with the Father. Whence He saith, ‘Father, let their temple be made desolate’; Cf. Matt. xxiii. 38. for they have persecuted Him whom Thou didst of Thine own will smite for the salvation of the world; that is, they have persecuted me with a violent and unjust death, ‘and they have added to the pain of my wounds.’ In former time, as the Lover of man, I had pain on account of the straying of the Gentiles; but to this pain they have added another, by going also themselves astray. Wherefore ‘add iniquity to their iniquity, and tribulation to tribulation, and let them not enter into Thy righteousness,’ that is, into Thy kingdom; but ‘let them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous,’ that is, with their holy fathers and patriarchs.
“8. What sayest thou to this, O Jєω? It is neither Matthew nor Paul that saith these things, but David, thine anointed, who awards and declares these terrible sentences on account of Christ. And like the great Job, addressing you who speak against the righteous and true, he says, ‘Thou didst barter the Christ like a slave, thou didst go to Him like a robber in the garden.’
“9. I produce now the prophecy of Solomon, which speaketh of Christ, and announces clearly and perspicuously things concerning the Jєωs; and those which not only are befalling them at the present time, but those, too, which shall befall them in the future age, on account of the contumacy and audacity which they exhibited toward the Prince of Life; for the prophet says, The ungodly said, … about Christ, ‘Let us lie in wait for the righteous, because he is not for our turn, and he is clean contrary to our doings and words, and upbraideth us with our offending the law, and professeth to have knowledge of God; and he calleth himself the Child of God.’ Wisd. ii. 1, 12, 13. And then he says, ‘He is grievous to us even to behold; for his life is not like other men’s, and his ways are of another fashion. We are esteemed of him as counterfeits, and he abstaineth from our ways as from filthiness, and pronounceth the end of the just to be blessed.’- Wisd. ii. 15, 16.”
St. Agobard, attributed: “Jєωs are cursed and covered with malediction. The curse has penetrated them like water in their bowels and oil in their bones. They are cursed in the city and cursed in the country, cursed in their coming in and cursed in their going out. Cursed are the fruits of their loins, of their lands, of their flocks; cursed are their cellars, their granaries, their shops, their food, the very crumbs off their tables!”
St. John Capistrano: “Christ is King, and Christ’s Church is the kingdom of God. The Jєωs are the descendants of those who killed this king. They have inherited hatred against Christ from their ancestors, and they give it full vent wherever they can do so with impunity. Therefore, we are justified in suspecting them. They are now simply our enemies and are known as such. They have crucified our Lord Jesus Christ.’
Popes
The Holy See and the Jєωs, published by the Ligue Franc-Catholique (the League of the French Catholic) at 11 bis, rue Portalis, Paris, France. The League is a lay group of Catholics for patriotic and social defense, founded by Monseigneur Jouin, Apostolic Prothonotary, Cure of St. Augustine parish, Paris in 1913. The magazine was founded March 23, 1918, with the approval of the Holy See. Monseigneur Jouin was a recognized authority on Jєωιѕн history and objectives and the necessity for exposing the facts in defense of Christianity. The Vatican formally praised him for this work of enlightenment as far back as June 20, 1919, in a letter signed by Cardinal Gasparri, Papal Secretary of State. Monseigneur Jouin died in 1932.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020819175303/http://www.endofman.com/False_Religion/holysee.htm (http://web.archive.org/web/20020819175303/http://www.endofman.com/False_Religion/holysee.htm)
Pope Gregory IX, “Epistle to the Hierarchy of Germany,” in 1233 A.D., Annales Ecclesiastici, Cardinal Caesar Baronius, ed. August Theiner, 1864, vol.I: “Ungrateful for favors and forgetful of benefits, the Jєωs return insult for kindness and impious contempt for goodness. They ought to know the yoke of perpetual enslavement because of their guilt. See to it that the perfidious Jєωs never in the future grow insolent, but that they always suffer publicly the shame of their sin in servile fear.”
Pope St. Leo the Great, Sermon CLXVIII; BVM vol.II, p.119: “So clearly was the transition then made from the ѕуηαgσgυє to the Church that, when the Lord gave up His soul, the veil of the Temple was rent in two.”
Pope Innocent IV, Letter to King Louis IX of France, May 9, 1244: “The ... Jєωs ... omitting or scorning the Mosaic law and the prophets, follow certain traditions of their seniors concerning which the Lord rebukes them in the Gospel, saying: ‘Why do you transgress the mandate of God and irritate Him by your traditions, teaching human doctrines and mandates?’ [Matthew 15;9] Upon this sort of traditions, which in Hebrew are called the тαℓмυd--and there is a great book among them exceeding the text of the Bible in length, in which are manifest blasphemies against God and Christ and the blessed Virgin, intricate fables, erroneous abuses, and unheard-of stupidities--they nourish and teach their sons and render them utterly alien from the doctrine of the law and the prophets ...”
Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, para. 29: “…the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished…but on the gibbet of His death Jesus made void the Law with its decrees fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the Cross.”
Pope Innocent III, “Epistle to the Hierarchy of France,” July 15, 1205, PL 215: “Crucifiers of Christ ought to be held in continual subjection.”
Pope St. Pius V, Hebraeorum gens: “The Jєωιѕн people fell from the heights because of their faithlessness and condemned their Redeemer to a shameful death. Their godlessness has assumed such forms that, for the salvation of our own people, it becomes necessary to prevent their disease. Besides usury, through which Jєωs everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians, they are accomplices of thieves and robbers; and the most damaging aspect of the matter is that they allure the unsuspecting through magical incantations, superstition, and witchcraft to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan and boast of being able to predict the future. We have carefully investigated how this revolting sect abuses the name of Christ and how harmful they are to those whose life is threatened by their deceit. On account of these and other serious matters, and because of the gravity of their crimes which increase day to day more and more, We order that, within 90 days, all Jєωs in our entire earthly realm of justice -- in all towns, districts, and places -- must depart these regions.”
Pope Pius VII: “For when the liberty of all ‘religions’ is indiscriminately asserted, by this very fact truth is confounded with error and the holy and immaculate Spouse of Christ, the Church, outside of which there can be no salvation, is set on a par with the sects of heretics and with Judaic perfidy itself.”
Pope Paul IV, cuм Nimis Absurdum: “Desiring firstly, as much as we can with [the help of] God, to beneficially provide, by this [our decree] that will forever be in force, we ordain that for the rest of time, in the City as well as in other states, territories and domains of the Church of Rome itself, all Jєωs are to live in only one [quarter] to which there is only one entrance and from which there is but one exit, and if there is not that capacity [in one such quarter, then], in two or three or however many may be enough; [in any case] they should reside entirely side by side in designated streets and be thoroughly separate from the residences of Christians... Moreover, concerning the matter that Jєωs should be recognizable everywhere: [to this end] men must wear a hat, women, indeed, some other evident sign, yellow in color... Moreover, these Jєωs are to be limited to the trade of rag-picking, and they cannot trade in grain, barley or any other commodity essential to human welfare.”
Pope Leo VII, REG. PONTIF., vol.I:3597, Jaffe, Leipzig: 1888: “Let the Gospel be preached to them and, if they remain obstinate, let them be expelled.”[/font][/size]
-
(https://i.imgflip.com/37rxfy.jpg)
-
(http://judaism.is/images/israeli%20public%20relations729x593.jpg)
-
(http://judaism.is/images/habitual%20lies.jpg)
-
(http://judaism.is/images/big%20Jєωιѕн%20lies.jpg)
-
(http://judaism.is/images/6%20types%20of%20lies.jpg)
Many more memes at http://judaism.is/memes.html (http://judaism.is/memes.html)
-
:popcorn:
(https://www.rnz.co.nz/assets/news_crops/10760/eight_col_Q-POC_%28Supplied%29.jpg?1463709593)
HAND HELD DNA ANALYZER
-
It is you who oppose the Magisterium.
Pope St. Pius was polite, but he unequivocally opposed the ʝʊdɛօ-Zionists.
Perennial infallible unchangeable Magisterium
Council of Florence
“§ 712 It [the Holy Catholic Church] firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to Divine worship at that time, after our Lord’s coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the Sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally. Yet it does not deny that after the passion of Christ up to the promulgation of the Gospel they could have been observed until they were believed to be in no way necessary for salvation; but after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation. All, therefore, who after that time observe circuмcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors….
“§714 The Most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jєωs, and heretics, and schismatics, can ever be partakers of eternal life, but that they are to go into the eternal fire ‘which was prepared for the devil, and his angels,’ (Matthew 25:41) unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this Ecclesiastical Body, that only those remaining within this unity can profit from the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and that they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, alms deeds, and other works of Christian piety and duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved unless they abide within the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”
Cantate Domino, from the infallible ecuмenical Council of Florence under His Holiness Pope Eugene IV defining the Solemn Doctrine: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (“Outside the Church, there is no salvation.”), promulgated by papal bull, February 4, 1444 [Florentine calendar] in Denziger, Enchiridion Symbolorum, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, § 712-714
[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
Doctors of the Church
St. Alphonsus Maria Liguori The Passion and Death of Jesus Christ, page 444: “Poor Jєωs! You invoked a dreadful curse upon your own heads in saying: ‘His blood be upon us and our children’; and that curse, miserable race, you carry upon you to this day, and to the End of Time you shall endure the chastisement of that innocent blood.”
St. Jerome, Epist. 151, ad Algasiam, question II: “The Jєωs, after having despised the truth in person, will receive lies in receiving the Antichrist.”
St. Ambrose, Sermo 37, The Two Ships: “The faithlessness of the ѕуηαgσgυє is an insult to the Savior. Therefore He chose the barque of Peter, and deserted that of Moses; that is, He rejected the faithless ѕуηαgσgυє, and adopts the believing Church.”
St. Ambrose, in The Great Commentary of Cornelius a Lapide, Vol. 3, page 311: “O Jєωιѕн hearts, harder than rocks!”
St. Ambrose, Enarratio on Psalms XLIII: “This shows that the Jєωs, who did not want to believe in Jesus Christ, will believe in the Antichrist.”
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Letter #363: “The Jєωs must not be persecuted or chased like beasts....They are living signs that remind us of the Passion of our Lord. Besides, they are scattered through the world so that, while they pay for such a crime, they can be the witnesses of our redemption.”
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, SS: “O intelligence coarse, dense, and cow-like, which did not recognize God even in His own works! Perhaps the Jєω will complain that I call his intelligence bovine, but his intelligence is less than bovine: ‘The ox knows his Owner, and the ass knows his Master's crib, but Israel has not known Me, and My people have not understood’ (Isaias 1:3). You see, O Jєω, I am easier on you than your own prophet!”
St. Cyril of Alexandria: “It has come to pass that the last state of Israel is worse than the first for, as the Savior's disciples says (II Peter 2:21, 22), it would be better for them not to have known the way of justice than, after they have known it, to turn back from that holy commandment which was delivered to them. For that of the true proverb has happened to them: the dog has returned to his vomit, and the sow that was washed has returned to wallowing in the mire (Proverbs 26:11). And from what they afterwards dared to do, it is plain to see that they have swallowed their vomit and have turned again to wallow in their ancient mire and have lapsed into the errors of Egypt, for the evil spirit has again entered into them, and their last state has become worse than their first.”
St. Ephrem: “What is your iniquity, O daughter of Jacob, that your chastisement is so severe? You have dishonored the King and the King's Son, you shameless one, you harlot!”
St. Gregory nαzιanzen: “If anyone does not worship the Crucified One, let him be anathema and numbered among the deicides.”
St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Romans, 6:12: “Yet surely Paul’s object everywhere is to annul this Law… And with much reason; for it was through a fear and a horror of this that the Jєωs obstinately opposed grace.”
St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Galatians, Ch 3: “And so while no one annuls a man's covenant, the covenant of God after four hundred and thirty years is annulled; for if not that covenant but another instead of it bestows what is promised, then is it set aside, which is most unreasonable” … “How dare Christians have the slightest intercourse with Jєωs, those most miserable of all men who are lustful, rapacious, greedy, perfidious bandits, pests of the universe! Indeed, an entire day would not suffice to tell of all their huckstering. Are they not inveterate murderers, destroyers, men possessed by the devil? They are impure and impious, and their ѕуηαgσgυє is a house of prostitution, a lair of beasts, a place of shame and ridicule, the domicile of the devil, as also the soul of the Jєω. As a matter of fact, Jєωs worship the devil: their rites are criminal and impure; their religion a disease; their ѕуηαgσgυє an assembly of crooks, a den of thieves, a cavern of devils, an abyss of perdition. Why are the Jєωs degenerated? Because of their hateful assassination of Christ. This supreme crime lies at the root of their degradation and their woes. The rejection and dispersion of the Jєωs was the work of God, not of emperors. It was done by the wrath of God and because of His absolute abandonment of the Jєωs. Thus the Jєωs will live under the yoke of slavery without end. God hates the Jєωs, and on Judgment Day He will say to those who sympathize with them: ‘Depart from Me, for you had intercourse with My murderers!’ Flee, then, from their assemblies, fly from their houses, and, far from venerating the ѕуηαgσgυє, hold it in hatred and aversion.”
St. John Chrysostom, First Homily Adversus Judaeos: “Many, I know, respect the Jєωs and think that their present way of life is a venerable one. This is why I hasten to uproot and tear out this deadly opinion. I said that the ѕуηαgσgυє is no better than a theater and I bring forward a prophet as my witness. Surely the Jєωs are not more deserving of belief than their prophets. ‘You had a harlot's brow; you became shameless before all.’ Where a harlot has set herself up, that place is a brothel. But the ѕуηαgσgυє is not only a brothel and a theater; it also is a den of robbers and a lodging for wild beasts. Jeremiah said: ‘Your house has become for me the den of a hyena.’ He does not simply say ‘of wild beast,’ but ‘of a filthy wild beast,’ and again: ‘I have abandoned my house, I have cast off my inheritance.’ But when God forsakes a people, what hope of salvation is left? When God forsakes a place, that place becomes the dwelling of demons.”
St. John Chrysostom, Catena Aurea, Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 27: “Observe here the infatuation of the Jєωs; their headlong haste, and destructive passions will not let them see what they ought to see, and they curse themselves, saying, ‘His blood be upon us,’ and even entail the curse upon their children. Yet a merciful God did not ratify this sentence, but accepted such of them and of their children as repented; for Paul was of them, and many thousands of those who in Jerusalem believed.”
St. John Chrysostom, Homily II:
“…(6) I have spoken these words to you. You will speak them to those Judaizers, and they to their wives. ‘Fortify one another.’ If a catechumen is sick with this disease, let him be kept outside the church doors. If the sick one be a believer and already initiated, let him be driven from the holy table. For not all sins need exhortation and counsel; some sins, of their very nature, demand cure by a quick and sharp excision. The wounds we can tolerate respond to more gentle cures; those which have festered and cannot be cured, those which are feeding on the rest of the body, need cauterization with a point of steel. So is it with sins. Some need long exhortation; others need sharp rebuke.
“(7) This is why Paul did not enjoin us to exhort in every case but also to rebuke sharply: ‘Wherefore rebuke them sharply.’ Therefore, I will now rebuke them sharply, so that they may accuse themselves and feel shame for what they have done. Then they will never again be hurt by that sinful fast.
“(8 So I shall put aside exhortation henceforth as I testify and exclaim: ‘If any man does not love the Lord Jesus Christ, let a curse be upon him.’ What greater evidence could there be that a man does not love our Lord than when he participates in the festival with those who slew Christ? It was not I who hurled the curse at them, but Paul. Rather, it was not Paul but Christ, who spoke through him and said earlier: ‘Those who are justified in the law have fallen away from grace.’
“(9) So speak these words to them, read aloud to them these texts. Show all your zeal in saving them. When you have snatched them from the devil’s jaws, bring them to me on the day of the Jєωιѕн fast. Then, after I have kept the rest of my promise to you, let us, with one accord and with one voice, join our brothers in giving glory to God and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, for to Him is glory forever. Amen.”
St. Augustine, Letters, 74, 4: “Instead of the grace of the law which has passed away, we have received the grace of the gospel which is abiding; and instead of the shadows and types of the old dispensation, the truth has come by Jesus Christ. Jeremiah also prophesied thus in God’s name: ‘Behold, the days come, says the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah...’ Observe what the prophet says, not to Gentiles, who had not been partakers in any former covenant, but to the Jєωιѕн nation. He who has given them the law by Moses, promises in place of it the New Covenant of the gospel, that they might no longer live in the oldness of the letter, but in the newness of the spirit.”
St. Augustine, in The Anguish of the Jєωs by Fr Edward Flannery, Macmillan, 1954 (cf), and in The Faith of the Early Fathers by Fr Jurgens, Collegeville, 1979: “Judaism, since Christ, is a corruption; indeed, Judas is the image of the Jєωιѕн people: their understanding of Scripture is carnal; they bear the guilt for the death of the Savior, for through their fathers they have killed Christ. The Jєωs held Him; the Jєωs insulted Him; the Jєωs bound Him; they crowned Him with thorns and dishonored Him by spitting upon Him; they scourged Him; they heaped abuses on Him; they hung Him upon a tree.”
St. Augustine, Sermon 91, PL38:567: “Our Lord Jesus Christ referred to Himself as ‘the Stone’ (Mt. 21:44). Lying on the ground, it shakes whoever falls over it; coming from on high, it crushes the proud. The Jєωs have already been shaken by their previous stumble. What awaits them is to be crushed by His Coming.”
St. Augustine, “Against the Jєωs,” PL 42:51: “The Jєωs wander over the entire earth, their backs bent over and their eyes cast downward, forever calling to our minds the curse they carry with them.”
St. Basil the Great, “On Prayer,” Sermon IX, PG 32; SS vol.II p.384: “If someone should kill the beloved son of a man, and then stretch forth their hands still stained with blood to the afflicted father, asking for fellowship, would not the blood of his son, visible on the hand of his murderer, provoke him to just anger instead? And such are the prayers of the Jєωs, for when they stretch forth their hands in prayer, they only remind God the Father of their sin against His Son. And at every stretching-forth of their hands, they only make it obvious that they are stained with the blood of Christ. For they who persevere in their blindness inherit the blood-guilt of their fathers; for they cried out: ‘His blood be upon us, and upon our children’ (Matthew xxvii.25).”
St. Thomas Aquinas, De Regimine Judaeorum: “It would be licit, according to custom, to hold Jєωs in perpetual servitude because of their crime.”
Saints
Pope St. Pius V, Hebraeorum gens: “The Jєωιѕн people fell from the heights because of their faithlessness and condemned their Redeemer to a shameful death. Their godlessness has assumed such forms that, for the salvation of our own people, it becomes necessary to prevent their disease. Besides usury, through which Jєωs everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians, they are accomplices of thieves and robbers; and the most damaging aspect of the matter is that they allure the unsuspecting through magical incantations, superstition, and witchcraft to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan and boast of being able to predict the future. We have carefully investigated how this revolting sect abuses the name of Christ and how harmful they are to those whose life is threatened by their deceit. On account of these and other serious matters, and because of the gravity of their crimes which increase day to day more and more, We order that, within 90 days, all Jєωs in our entire earthly realm of justice -- in all towns, districts, and places -- must depart these regions.”
St. Padre Pio, in the Calvary of Padre Pio by Joseph Pagnossin, 1978 Padua, Italy, page 91: “The Jєωs are enemies of God and foes of our holy religion.”
St. Gregory of Nyssa: “Jєωs are slayers of the Lord, murderers of the prophets, enemies and haters of God, adversaries of grace, enemies of their father's faith, advocates of the devil, a brood of vipers, slanderers, scoffers, men of darkened minds, the leaven of Pharisees, a congregation of demons, sinners, wicked men, haters of goodness!”
St. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, Ch 11: Now, law placed against law has abrogated that which is before it, and a covenant which comes after in like manner has put an end to the previous one; and an eternal and final law – namely, Christ – has been given to us, and the covenant is trustworthy…Have you not read…by Jeremiah, concerning this same new covenant, He thus speaks: ‘Behold, the days come,’ says the Lord, ‘that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah…’”
St. Justin Martyr, Florilegium Patristicuм, Rauschen, 1911: “Those of the seed of Abraham who live according to the Law of Moses and who do not believe in Christ before death shall not be saved; especially they who curse this very Christ in the ѕуηαgσgυєs; who curse everything by which they might obtain salvation and escape the vengeance of fire.”
St.Vincent Ferrer, himself a convert from Judaism: “One who dies a Jєω will be damned!”
St. Vincent Ferrer, ACS p.82; “Since His spouse, the ѕуηαgσgυє, refused to receive Him, Christ answered: ‘This is a harlot!’ and gave her a bill of divorce.”
St. Felix of Toledo, On the Condemnation of the Jєωs, Council XVII of Toledo, Spain, Canon No. 8: “It is known that the Jєωιѕн people are polluted with wickedness, blasphemy, and the shedding of the blood of Jesus Christ so that their wickedness has no limit.”
St. Barnabas, attributed: “Do not add to your sins by saying that the Covenant is both theirs and ours. Yes, it is ours, but they lost it forever.”
St. Hippolytus, Against the Jєωs, God’s condemnation upon the Deicide of Perfidious Judaism is eternal:
“…5. Listen with understanding, O Jєω, to what the Christ says: ‘They gave me gall for my meat; and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.’ And these things He did indeed endure from you. Hear the Holy Ghost tell you also what return He made to you for that little portion of vinegar. For the prophet says, as in the person of God, ‘Let their table become a snare and retribution.’ Of what retribution does He speak? Manifestly, of the misery which has now got hold of thee.
“6. And then hear what follows: ‘Let their eyes be darkened, that they see not.’ And surely ye have been darkened in the eyes of your soul with a darkness utter and everlasting. For now that the true light has arisen, ye wander as in the night, and stumble on places with no roads, and fall headlong, as having forsaken the way that saith, ‘I am the way.” - John xiv. 6. Furthermore, hear this yet more serious word: ‘And their back do thou bend always’; that means, in order that they may be slaves to the nations, not four hundred and thirty years as in Egypt, nor seventy as in Babylon, but bend them to servitude, he says, ‘always.’ In fine, then, how dost thou indulge vain hopes, expecting to be delivered from the misery which holdeth thee? For that is somewhat strange. And not unjustly has he imprecated this blindness of eyes upon thee. But because thou didst cover the eyes of Christ, (and) thus thou didst beat Him, for this reason, too, bend thou thy back for servitude always. And whereas thou didst pour out His blood in indignation, hear what thy recompense shall be: ‘Pour out Thine indignation upon them, and let Thy wrathful anger take hold of them’; and, ‘Let their habitation be desolate,’ to wit, their celebrated temple.
“7. But why… was the temple made desolate? … but it was because they killed the Son of their Benefactor, for He is coeternal with the Father. Whence He saith, ‘Father, let their temple be made desolate’; Cf. Matt. xxiii. 38. for they have persecuted Him whom Thou didst of Thine own will smite for the salvation of the world; that is, they have persecuted me with a violent and unjust death, ‘and they have added to the pain of my wounds.’ In former time, as the Lover of man, I had pain on account of the straying of the Gentiles; but to this pain they have added another, by going also themselves astray. Wherefore ‘add iniquity to their iniquity, and tribulation to tribulation, and let them not enter into Thy righteousness,’ that is, into Thy kingdom; but ‘let them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous,’ that is, with their holy fathers and patriarchs.
“8. What sayest thou to this, O Jєω? It is neither Matthew nor Paul that saith these things, but David, thine anointed, who awards and declares these terrible sentences on account of Christ. And like the great Job, addressing you who speak against the righteous and true, he says, ‘Thou didst barter the Christ like a slave, thou didst go to Him like a robber in the garden.’
“9. I produce now the prophecy of Solomon, which speaketh of Christ, and announces clearly and perspicuously things concerning the Jєωs; and those which not only are befalling them at the present time, but those, too, which shall befall them in the future age, on account of the contumacy and audacity which they exhibited toward the Prince of Life; for the prophet says, The ungodly said, … about Christ, ‘Let us lie in wait for the righteous, because he is not for our turn, and he is clean contrary to our doings and words, and upbraideth us with our offending the law, and professeth to have knowledge of God; and he calleth himself the Child of God.’ Wisd. ii. 1, 12, 13. And then he says, ‘He is grievous to us even to behold; for his life is not like other men’s, and his ways are of another fashion. We are esteemed of him as counterfeits, and he abstaineth from our ways as from filthiness, and pronounceth the end of the just to be blessed.’- Wisd. ii. 15, 16.”
St. Agobard, attributed: “Jєωs are cursed and covered with malediction. The curse has penetrated them like water in their bowels and oil in their bones. They are cursed in the city and cursed in the country, cursed in their coming in and cursed in their going out. Cursed are the fruits of their loins, of their lands, of their flocks; cursed are their cellars, their granaries, their shops, their food, the very crumbs off their tables!”
St. John Capistrano: “Christ is King, and Christ’s Church is the kingdom of God. The Jєωs are the descendants of those who killed this king. They have inherited hatred against Christ from their ancestors, and they give it full vent wherever they can do so with impunity. Therefore, we are justified in suspecting them. They are now simply our enemies and are known as such. They have crucified our Lord Jesus Christ.’
Popes
The Holy See and the Jєωs, published by the Ligue Franc-Catholique (the League of the French Catholic) at 11 bis, rue Portalis, Paris, France. The League is a lay group of Catholics for patriotic and social defense, founded by Monseigneur Jouin, Apostolic Prothonotary, Cure of St. Augustine parish, Paris in 1913. The magazine was founded March 23, 1918, with the approval of the Holy See. Monseigneur Jouin was a recognized authority on Jєωιѕн history and objectives and the necessity for exposing the facts in defense of Christianity. The Vatican formally praised him for this work of enlightenment as far back as June 20, 1919, in a letter signed by Cardinal Gasparri, Papal Secretary of State. Monseigneur Jouin died in 1932.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020819175303/http://www.endofman.com/False_Religion/holysee.htm (http://web.archive.org/web/20020819175303/http://www.endofman.com/False_Religion/holysee.htm)
Pope Gregory IX, “Epistle to the Hierarchy of Germany,” in 1233 A.D., Annales Ecclesiastici, Cardinal Caesar Baronius, ed. August Theiner, 1864, vol.I: “Ungrateful for favors and forgetful of benefits, the Jєωs return insult for kindness and impious contempt for goodness. They ought to know the yoke of perpetual enslavement because of their guilt. See to it that the perfidious Jєωs never in the future grow insolent, but that they always suffer publicly the shame of their sin in servile fear.”
Pope St. Leo the Great, Sermon CLXVIII; BVM vol.II, p.119: “So clearly was the transition then made from the ѕуηαgσgυє to the Church that, when the Lord gave up His soul, the veil of the Temple was rent in two.”
Pope Innocent IV, Letter to King Louis IX of France, May 9, 1244: “The ... Jєωs ... omitting or scorning the Mosaic law and the prophets, follow certain traditions of their seniors concerning which the Lord rebukes them in the Gospel, saying: ‘Why do you transgress the mandate of God and irritate Him by your traditions, teaching human doctrines and mandates?’ [Matthew 15;9] Upon this sort of traditions, which in Hebrew are called the тαℓмυd--and there is a great book among them exceeding the text of the Bible in length, in which are manifest blasphemies against God and Christ and the blessed Virgin, intricate fables, erroneous abuses, and unheard-of stupidities--they nourish and teach their sons and render them utterly alien from the doctrine of the law and the prophets ...”
Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, para. 29: “…the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished…but on the gibbet of His death Jesus made void the Law with its decrees fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the Cross.”
Pope Innocent III, “Epistle to the Hierarchy of France,” July 15, 1205, PL 215: “Crucifiers of Christ ought to be held in continual subjection.”
Pope St. Pius V, Hebraeorum gens: “The Jєωιѕн people fell from the heights because of their faithlessness and condemned their Redeemer to a shameful death. Their godlessness has assumed such forms that, for the salvation of our own people, it becomes necessary to prevent their disease. Besides usury, through which Jєωs everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians, they are accomplices of thieves and robbers; and the most damaging aspect of the matter is that they allure the unsuspecting through magical incantations, superstition, and witchcraft to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan and boast of being able to predict the future. We have carefully investigated how this revolting sect abuses the name of Christ and how harmful they are to those whose life is threatened by their deceit. On account of these and other serious matters, and because of the gravity of their crimes which increase day to day more and more, We order that, within 90 days, all Jєωs in our entire earthly realm of justice -- in all towns, districts, and places -- must depart these regions.”
Pope Pius VII: “For when the liberty of all ‘religions’ is indiscriminately asserted, by this very fact truth is confounded with error and the holy and immaculate Spouse of Christ, the Church, outside of which there can be no salvation, is set on a par with the sects of heretics and with Judaic perfidy itself.”
Pope Paul IV, cuм Nimis Absurdum: “Desiring firstly, as much as we can with [the help of] God, to beneficially provide, by this [our decree] that will forever be in force, we ordain that for the rest of time, in the City as well as in other states, territories and domains of the Church of Rome itself, all Jєωs are to live in only one [quarter] to which there is only one entrance and from which there is but one exit, and if there is not that capacity [in one such quarter, then], in two or three or however many may be enough; [in any case] they should reside entirely side by side in designated streets and be thoroughly separate from the residences of Christians... Moreover, concerning the matter that Jєωs should be recognizable everywhere: [to this end] men must wear a hat, women, indeed, some other evident sign, yellow in color... Moreover, these Jєωs are to be limited to the trade of rag-picking, and they cannot trade in grain, barley or any other commodity essential to human welfare.”
Pope Leo VII, REG. PONTIF., vol.I:3597, Jaffe, Leipzig: 1888: “Let the Gospel be preached to them and, if they remain obstinate, let them be expelled.”[/font][/size]
I also try to be polite as I oppose heresy.
-
I also try to be polite as I oppose heresy.
Where have you opposed Judaizing?
You haven't.
You have run interference for the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan, e.g., "they don't believe in that тαℓмυdic nonsense that some of the other posters keep spouting about."
In that single sentence, you absolve the "non-observant" Jєωs despite their anti-Christianity, usury, and other crimes against humanity and you insult Catholics who draw attention to the satanic roots of тαℓмυdic Judaism.
You have also repeatedly and deceptively half-quoted Pope St. Pius X's nugatory preface while censoring his opposition to ʝʊdɛօ-Zionism.
You would do well to agree with God and the Church once in a while.
(http://judaism.is/images/god-s%20judgments.jpg)
-
Let's review;
In response to Herzl's Zionism, Pope St Pius X said, "Noi non possiamo favorire questo movimento. Non potremo impedire gli Ebrei di andare a Gerusalemme—ma favorire non possiamo mai. La terra di Gerusalemme se non era sempre santa, è santificata per la vita di Jesu Christo (he did not pronounce it Gesu, but Yesu, in the Venetian fashion). Io come capo della chiesa non posso dirle altra cosa. Gli Ebrei non hanno riconosciuto nostro Signore, perciò non possiamo riconoscere il popolo ebreo [We cannot give approval to this movement. We cannot prevent the Jєωs from going to Jerusalem—but we could never sanction it. The soil of Jerusalem, if it was not always sacred, has been sanctified by the life of Jesus Christ. As the head of the Church I cannot tell you anything different. The Jєωs have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot recognize the Jєωιѕн people]."
However, in response to relations with the Jєωιѕн people this is what he said, "I have always been on good terms with Jєωs. Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. These we do not deny to the Jєωs. Indeed, we also pray for them: that their minds be enlightened."
This is the mind and thinking of Pope St Pius X. Marcel Lefebvre founded the Society of St Pius X. I think if we are going to move fore ward we should study the thinking and holiness of this Pope. I think it is a waste of time to spend it studying the beliefs and nonsense of the unbeliever unless of course you want to befriend them and work for their conversion. After all Pope St Pius X also said, "And so, if you come to Palestine and settle your people there, we shall have churches and priests ready to baptize all of you."
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
By the way, Pope St Pius X had Herzl's respect, "At this the Pope made une tête [a long face], for I hadn't even kissed his hand. Lippay went on to say that I had expressed myself appreciatively on Jesus Christ's noble qualities. The Pope listened, now and then took a pinch of snuff, and sneezed into a big red cotton handkerchief. Actually, these peasant touches are what I like best about him and what compels my respect.'
-
Let's review;
blah, blah, blah….
You remind me of the Novus Ordinarians (and their ʝʊdɛօ-Luciferian co-religionists) who get stuck on a phrase in a biblical verse, but ignore the full sentence, paragraph, and chapter. You are like the "Judge not" crowd.
-
Protestants, the biggest cheerleaders for Israel, are as bad if not worse.
-
Protestants, the biggest cheerleaders for Israel, are as bad if not worse.
Amen to that, brother! American Protestant Evangelicals love the Jєωs!
-
You remind me of the Novus Ordinarians (and their ʝʊdɛօ-Luciferian co-religionists) who get stuck on a phrase in a biblical verse, but ignore the full sentence, paragraph, and chapter. You are like the "Judge not" crowd.
Pope St Pius X was no Novus Ordinarian. He said, "I have always been on good terms with Jєωs." If he who was the inspiration of Archbishop Lefebvre could be on good terms with the Jєωs then why not you?
-
Pope St Pius X was no Novus Ordinarian. He said, "I have always been on good terms with Jєωs." If he who was the inspiration of Archbishop Lefebvre could be on good terms with the Jєωs then why not you?
Listening is not one of your strong suits, it seems.
-
Protestants, the biggest cheerleaders for Israel, are as bad if not worse.
Amen to that, brother! American Protestant Evangelicals love the Jєωs!
You two are obviously not following Trunews. Rick Wiles & Co are Evangelicals to the core. They are totally against Jєωry, and never let them up for air. Tell me, fellas, what Catholic news agency or blog, or Catholic social media platform attack the Jєωs and the Jєωιѕн agenda with the thoroughness displayed by Trunews?
Do Fellay & Co. (sspx) ever go after Jєωιѕн intrigue and mischief? I’ll say not! Fellay will tell you that Catholics and Jєωs share the Old Covenant together. The Jєωs are our “elder brothers” in that covenant
Then there’s that old dinosaur called the Novus Ordo. My goodness, the post-conciliar church, along with its ѕуηαgσgυє-visiting popes, have slobbered all over the Jєωs and Israel for decades. While it is true that many American Evangelicals love the Jєωs, the NO church provides a pretty good facsimile of love for the Jєωs in its own right.
I would say that many Protestant Evangelicals are waking up. I don’t think the same can be said for many Catholics.
-
Poche, Why not quote an even smaller fragment from Pope St. Pius X? You could simply quote that he said, "I have always been" and continue to dishonestly wonder aloud for weeks why we are not on board with that.
-
You two are obviously not following Trunews. Rick Wiles & Co are Evangelicals to the core. They are totally against Jєωry, and never let them up for air. Tell me, fellas, what Catholic news agency or blog, or Catholic social media platform attack the Jєωs and the Jєωιѕн agenda with the thoroughness displayed by Trunews?
Do Fellay & Co. (sspx) ever go after Jєωιѕн intrigue and mischief? I’ll say not! Fellay will tell you that Catholics and Jєωs share the Old Covenant together. The Jєωs are our “elder brothers” in that covenant
Then there’s that old dinosaur called the Novus Ordo. My goodness, the post-conciliar church, along with its ѕуηαgσgυє-visiting popes, have slobbered all over the Jєωs and Israel for decades. While it is true that many American Evangelicals love the Jєωs, the NO church provides a pretty good facsimile of love for the Jєωs in its own right.
I would say that many Protestant Evangelicals are waking up. I don’t think the same can be said for many Catholics
There's no doubt that the Novus Ordo loves them some Jєωs and some (not most) of the SSPX has softened towards the Jєωs. I've had many a Society Priest denounce Jєωs for what they are both privately and publicly. Yes, there are some Evangelicals that are waking up, but ay, not many at all. Most are Israel-loving to the core!
-
You two are obviously not following Trunews. Rick Wiles & Co are Evangelicals to the core. They are totally against Jєωry, and never let them up for air. Tell me, fellas, what Catholic news agency or blog, or Catholic social media platform attack the Jєωs and the Jєωιѕн agenda with the thoroughness displayed by Trunews?
Do Fellay & Co. (sspx) ever go after Jєωιѕн intrigue and mischief? I’ll say not! Fellay will tell you that Catholics and Jєωs share the Old Covenant together. The Jєωs are our “elder brothers” in that covenant
Then there’s that old dinosaur called the Novus Ordo. My goodness, the post-conciliar church, along with its ѕуηαgσgυє-visiting popes, have slobbered all over the Jєωs and Israel for decades. While it is true that many American Evangelicals love the Jєωs, the NO church provides a pretty good facsimile of love for the Jєωs in its own right.
I would say that many Protestant Evangelicals are waking up. I don’t think the same can be said for many Catholics.
Pope Francis, when he talked about outmoded traditions gave as his example the traditions of the Jєωs.
-
Pope Francis, when he talked about outmoded traditions gave as his example the traditions of the Jєωs.
Quite the contrary, Señor Bergoglio promotes the satanic traditions of the тαℓмυdic and Kabbalistic Jєωs.
“As regular readers of [Call Me Jorge (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/)] know, Francis is into all things Judaic, especially Chasidism. Their doctrines creep out here and there in Francis’ sermons and docuмents. One of the things which Francis does with regularity is to invert the teachings of the Church. An example of this is the use of the term ‘pharisee’ which he applies to his enemies, who are not open to тαℓмυdic Judaism and Francis’ anti-Catholic machinations. Another example is his favorite blasphemous painting, White Crucifixion (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.is/2014/05/update-on-white-crucifixion.html). Francis shows his hand, when he inverts Catholic doctrine, as a modernist change agent (https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2014/12/modernists-are-really-traditionalists.html) who is simply following the dictates of ‘The Rebbe’ to be (https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2012/03/noahide-proselytizing-rabbi-riskin.html), “modern on the outside and Chabad on the inside.” One of the most blatant examples is Francis teaching (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2015/01/where-francis-doctrine-originates.html) the тαℓмυdic formula: Yeridah Tzorech Aliyah (“descent for sake of ascent”). This teaching simply means that one has to descend into sin, which paradoxically has a positive status in Hasidism, in order to ascend to new heights. This is done because the god of тαℓмυdic Judaism is one of opposites — a hermaphrodite god (https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/06/vatican-instills-double-mind.html) of good/evil. In the Hasidic lore, tzaddiks (saints or righteous people) wrestle not with evil but with goodness as they descend into sin in this process in order to ascend into righteousness. Yeridah Tzorech Aliyah is one of the foundational beliefs of Orthodox тαℓмυdic Judaism along with Tikkun Olam. In the later belief the rabbis have the chutzpah to state that God made creation imperfect and the тαℓмυdic Jєωs are to correct his work.
“The Hasidism of Francis’ mind is also shown when he says such things as (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/04/francis-gnostic-gospel.html), “[Jesus] made himself the devil” and (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/03/another-day-another-blasphemous-joke.html) “the Holy Trinity [is] arguing behind closed doors but on the outside they give the picture of unity.” Who else sees Jesus as a devil or God as a bunch of arguing rabbis other than a тαℓмυdist? Whether he is parroting the ideas of Heschel (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2015/01/reading-francis-through-heschel.html), Levinas (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2016/03/the-hermeneutics-of-тαℓмυdic-alchemical.html), Buber (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/06/francis-kabbalistic-gnostic-god-man.html), Wiesel (https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2016/07/elie-wiesel-pope-francis-rich-orthodox.html), a dead rebbe from the Steppes (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2015/01/francis-hasidic-concept-of-god-of.html), or having over rabbis as guests (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/09/how-many-books-on-тαℓмυdic-judaism-does.html) who often gift him with books (Gluck (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/05/francis-adds-copy-of-mystic-tales-from.html) & Steinsaltz (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2016/12/guess-who-had-private-audience-with.html)) there’s an excellent chance it’s comes from the Baal Shem Tov and his cult in one manner or another.
“In the video clip below (http://www.chabad.org/multimedia/media_cdo/aid/1489509/Jєωιѕн/Moving-Back-to-Move-Forward.htm) the late Chabad Lubavitcher rabbi, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, explains why Hasids should descend (into sin) in order to ascend — they are hunters getting ready to kill their prey. Another late Chasidic rabbi, Abraham Heschel (of Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate), in a 1965 interview with Ma'ariv explained exactly whom the prey were (https://books.google.com/books?id=MYHmbLAm_csC&pg=PA272&lpg=PA272&dq=I+want+to+attack+their+souls.+Today,+there+is+no+longer+any+place+for+religious+wars+as+such.&source=bl&ots=UNNbhGeVdI&sig=YQlapT5ywlHGEbSM0bXgdN_MkaI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=9hGoVOLRJtWzyAT0yoCYAw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=I%20want%20to%20attack%20their%20souls.%20Today%2C%20there%20is%20no%20longer%20any%20place%20for%20religious%20wars%20as%20such.&f=false), “There are those who would like to attack [Christians’] bodies. I want to attack their souls.” The elevation which takes place is one which will incorporate the prey’s soul into the of cult тαℓмυdic Judaism and worship of their demonic hermaphrodite god. It’s a total inversion of Catholicism, the religion instituted by Jesus the Christ. So why is Francis teaching it (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2015/01/where-francis-doctrine-originates.html)?”
the Rebbe explains the Hasidic stratagem of “descent for sake of ascent”
https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-rebbe-explains-hasidic-stratagem-of.html (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-rebbe-explains-hasidic-stratagem-of.html)
тαℓмυdic zingers from the anti-Pope
“God is purifying the church with sin”
March 7, 2019 (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2019/03/francis-hasid-god-is-purifying-church.html)
“…the memory of him [Jesus] who has made himself sin, who has made himself the devil, the serpent, for us; he has humbled himself to the point of complete annihilation.”
April 4, 2017 (https://novusordowatch.org/2017/04/francis-christ-made-himself-devil/)
“Inside the Holy Trinity they’re all arguing behind closed doors but on the outside they give the picture of unity.”
March 17, 2017
See also:
Francis invokes Pius XII in the name of modernism (http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2014/12/francis-invokes-pius-xii-in-name-of.html)
Where Francis' doctrine originates (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2015/01/where-francis-doctrine-originates.html)
The good/evil god of Kabbalah is worshipped via observance/transgression (https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-goodevil-god-of-kabbalah-is.html)
Pope Francis teaches Hasidic doctrine of 'sinning in order to repent' (https://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2014/12/pharisee-pope-francis-teaches-for.html)
the power of the vav — sinning is merit (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/07/the-power-of-vav-sinning-is-merit.html)
the magic #6 at Yad Vashem (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2014/06/the-magic-6-at-yad-vashem.html)
six hands kissed for six million! (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2014/05/six-hands-kissed-for-six-million.html)
the тαℓмυdic origin of “Yeridah Tzorech Aliyah” — “descent for the sake of ascent” (https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/11/the-тαℓмυdic-origin-of-yeridah-tzorech.html)
-
Post-Resurrection, the Jєωs are active enemies of Our Lord. Make of that what you will.
-
There must be a reason why "poche" has not been banned. Matthew knows best. He is our leader. :)
The only reason for not banning poche is moral weakness.
-
Post-Resurrection, the Jєωs are active enemies of Our Lord. Make of that what you will.
The goal of evangelization is to make them followers of Our Lord.
-
The goal of evangelization is to make them followers of Our Lord.
Pope St. Pius X said, "I have always been."
-
Pope St. Pius X said, "I have always been."
He also said, "if you come to Palestine and settle your people there, we shall have churches and priests ready
to baptize all of you."
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
-
He also said, "if you come to Palestine and settle your people there, we shall have churches and priests ready
to baptize all of you."
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
Alas, I had hope you repented of your propensity for partial quotes.
Pope Gregory IX, “Epistle to the Hierarchy of Germany,” in 1233 A.D., Annales Ecclesiastici, Cardinal Caesar Baronius, ed. August Theiner, 1864, vol.I: “Ungrateful for favors and forgetful of benefits, the Jєωs return insult for kindness and impious contempt for goodness. They ought to know the yoke of perpetual enslavement because of their guilt. See to it that the perfidious Jєωs never in the future grow insolent, but that they always suffer publicly the shame of their sin in servile fear.”
Pope St. Leo the Great, Sermon CLXVIII; BVM vol.II, p.119: “So clearly was the transition then made from the ѕуηαgσgυє to the Church that, when the Lord gave up His soul, the veil of the Temple was rent in two.”
Pope Innocent IV, Letter to King Louis IX of France, May 9, 1244: “The ... Jєωs ... omitting or scorning the Mosaic law and the prophets, follow certain traditions of their seniors concerning which the Lord rebukes them in the Gospel, saying: ‘Why do you transgress the mandate of God and irritate Him by your traditions, teaching human doctrines and mandates?’ [Matthew 15;9] Upon this sort of traditions, which in Hebrew are called the тαℓмυd--and there is a great book among them exceeding the text of the Bible in length, in which are manifest blasphemies against God and Christ and the blessed Virgin, intricate fables, erroneous abuses, and unheard-of stupidities--they nourish and teach their sons and render them utterly alien from the doctrine of the law and the prophets ...”
Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, para. 29: “…the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished…but on the gibbet of His death Jesus made void the Law with its decrees fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the Cross.”
Pope Innocent III, “Epistle to the Hierarchy of France,” July 15, 1205, PL 215: “Crucifiers of Christ ought to be held in continual subjection.”
Pope St. Pius V, Hebraeorum gens: “The Jєωιѕн people fell from the heights because of their faithlessness and condemned their Redeemer to a shameful death. Their godlessness has assumed such forms that, for the salvation of our own people, it becomes necessary to prevent their disease. Besides usury, through which Jєωs everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians, they are accomplices of thieves and robbers; and the most damaging aspect of the matter is that they allure the unsuspecting through magical incantations, superstition, and witchcraft to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan and boast of being able to predict the future. We have carefully investigated how this revolting sect abuses the name of Christ and how harmful they are to those whose life is threatened by their deceit. On account of these and other serious matters, and because of the gravity of their crimes which increase day to day more and more, We order that, within 90 days, all Jєωs in our entire earthly realm of justice -- in all towns, districts, and places -- must depart these regions.”
Pope Pius VII: “For when the liberty of all ‘religions’ is indiscriminately asserted, by this very fact truth is confounded with error and the holy and immaculate Spouse of Christ, the Church, outside of which there can be no salvation, is set on a par with the sects of heretics and with Judaic perfidy itself.”
Pope Paul IV, cuм Nimis Absurdum: “Desiring firstly, as much as we can with [the help of] God, to beneficially provide, by this [our decree] that will forever be in force, we ordain that for the rest of time, in the City as well as in other states, territories and domains of the Church of Rome itself, all Jєωs are to live in only one [quarter] to which there is only one entrance and from which there is but one exit, and if there is not that capacity [in one such quarter, then], in two or three or however many may be enough; [in any case] they should reside entirely side by side in designated streets and be thoroughly separate from the residences of Christians... Moreover, concerning the matter that Jєωs should be recognizable everywhere: [to this end] men must wear a hat, women, indeed, some other evident sign, yellow in color... Moreover, these Jєωs are to be limited to the trade of rag-picking, and they cannot trade in grain, barley or any other commodity essential to human welfare.”
Pope Leo VII, REG. PONTIF., vol.I:3597, Jaffe, Leipzig: 1888: “Let the Gospel be preached to them and, if they remain obstinate, let them be expelled.”
-
Pope St. Pius X said, "And I have always been on good terms with Jєωs. Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. These we do not deny to the Jєωs. Indeed, we also pray for them: that their minds be enlightened."
Herzl said, "The Pope listened, now and then took a pinch of snuff, and sneezed into a big red cotton handkerchief. Actually, these peasant touches are what I like best about him and what compels my respect."
Pope St Pius X told the man who presented Herzl to him, "I am glad you brought me the Signor Commendatore."
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
This is supposed be the Society of St Pius X. I think we should follow the and study the thought and spirit of Pope St Pius X.
-
Like a rabbi, you have inverted the reality. With your partial quote of a nugatory phrase, you try to turn Pope St. Pius X's polite, but unequivocal refusal into a Bergoglian kumbayaa fest.
Herzl came to sell the Pope on Zionism. Consistent with 2,000 years of unchangeable and infallible Magisterium, the good Pope refused support to Herzl, to Zionism, to тαℓмυdic Judaism, but politely held open the door to conversion:
"…“we are unable to favor this [ʝʊdɛօ-Zionist] movement. We cannot prevent the Jєωs from going to Jerusalem but we could never sanction it. The Jєωs have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot recognize the Jєωιѕн people. If you come to Palestine and settle your people there, we will have churches and priests ready to baptize all of you.”
The most fundamental principles of тαℓмυdic Judaism are:
(1) Only Jєωs are human.
(2) Kill even the best of Gentiles.
Get the memo.
(http://judaism.is/images/bava%20metzia%20114b.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/full%20size%20kill550x648.jpg)
-
What Jєωιѕн Facial Features Reveal
___________________________________
(http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/crookedmouthJєω1.jpg)
IT”S A STRANGE PHENOMENA…
or perhaps better said, a peculiar physiognomy whereby the facial features of the Jєω reveals a particular character.
A cursory glance at celebrated Jєωs brings to the eye a frightful specter, that is, it brings into view a noxious inner personality and a degenerate spiritual condition.
One particular aspect exhibited in certain Jєωs is the fold and corners of the lips.
Take Ruth Bader Ginsburg for instance. Quite often a crooked mouth is on display.
What in her innermost being is manifested in her lower face?
Perhaps since she touted a pro-ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ line prior to the Supreme Court ruling that eviscerated (http://www.realJєωnews.com/?p=830Supreme)the Defense of Marriage Act, and had officiated (https://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/ruth-bader-ginsburg-same-sex-wedding-096119) at least one ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ wedding prior to the Court’s ruling that legalized same-sex ‘marriage,’ and yet did not recuse herself from both cases, thus her mouth exhibits a supplanted evenness of justice.
Why didn’t she do the just thing and recuse herself from both cases?
Because ‘justice’ means ‘just us’ for the litigating Jєω but contempt for the moral norms of prevailing opinion.
(http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/repulseJєω.jpg)
THEN YOU HAVE Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL, who along with Eileen Hershenov, ADL’s policy director (https://www.adl.org/who-we-are/leadership/staff/eileen-hershenov) monitoring ‘online hate,’ oversees (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-03/youtubes-new-adl-thought-police-punish-conservatives-while-giving-far-left-extremist) the censorship of YouTube.
While claiming to protect the defamation of Jєωs he uses his role at YouTube to restrict legitimate concerns of whites and valid opposition to the genocidal deeds of Israel.
Is this not a two-sided determination whereby Greenblatt’s crooked mouth reveals an uneven polarity?
As for Eileen Hershenov, her visage exhibits a fanatical viciousness, and sadly, this malignity is used to censure, restrict, and ban all opinions on Google and YouTube that Hershenov the Jєω disagrees with.
Is this why she looks so disagreeable?
This demonized fanatic sees everyone as a ‘nαzι’ except for the Jєωs.
(http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/hideousJєωface1.jpg)
EXAMINE THE FACE of Steven Mnuchin of US Treasury. Again, the outward man reveals a parasitic inner psyche with the spirit of a bottom-feeding carp.
Can anyone say Mnuchin really works for a living?
While pretending to protect the hard-earned money of US taxpayers he instead upends our overseas trade by heaping sanctions upon sanctions on viable trading partners abroad. Is this not a clear case of deception that creates a contrary jaw?
There is also a peculiar deformity in his facial features as it is with many other Jєωs.
TAKE ADAM SCHIFF and Jerry Nadler as examples. One winces upon gazing (who can do it for any length of time?) on their faces, and a certain repulsion is registered within.
With Nadler, a gruesome hideousness is manifest which brings to the fore his ugly political maneuverings.
As for Schiff, with his bulging eyes and martian-like shape of his head, a particular revulsion lights upon the senses. Who is not revolted at his appearance? Who is not repulsed by his slithery methods we’re subjected to day after day in his Russiagate bullsh#t?
As for Daniel Schulman, owner (https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/03/21/paypal-ceo-dan-schulman-explains-how-the-company-closed-the-pay-gap.html) of PayPal, who with his pinched, miserly facial features, he uses his payment services to ban those who don’t align with his promotion of sɛҳuąƖ deviancy—(Jєωs are the biggest pushers (http://www.realJєωnews.com/?p=894)of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, lesbianism, and trans-genderism so as to destroy Christian social responsibility and morality)—a crookedness appears on his lower lip that unveils the perversity of his trajectory.
I wish I could be lovey-dovey but I refuse to give Jєωs a free pass.
-
…I wish I could be lovey-dovey but I refuse to give Jєωs a free pass.
:applause:
…promulgating Jєωιѕн supremacis (http://judaism.is/who-is-human.html)m, instigating gentile-against-gentile wars (http://judaism.is/perpetrators.html), fomenting revolutions (http://judaism.is/perpetrators.html), suborning heresies (http://www.questia.com/library/book/Jєωιѕн-influence-on-christian-reform-movements-by-louis-i-newman.jsp), undermining Christian society (http://judaism.is/perversion.html), fαℓѕє fℓαgs (http://judaism.is/false-flags.html), big lies (http://judaism.is/big-lies.html), inflicting multiculturalism, and perpetrating vice (http://judaism.is/perversion.html), ritual murder (http://judaism.is/ritual-murder.html), genocide (http://judaism.is/genocide.html), slavery (http://judaism.is/Jєωs-and-blacks.html) and economic crimes against humanity, including usury (http://judaism.is/usury.html), fractional reserve banking, swindling, and tax farming (http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/03/tax-farming-тαℓмυdic-agriculture.html?zx=68be3c86abecebeb)…
-
What Jєωιѕн Facial Features Reveal
___________________________________
(http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/crookedmouthJєω1.jpg)
IT”S A STRANGE PHENOMENA…
or perhaps better said, a peculiar physiognomy whereby the facial features of the Jєω reveals a particular character.
A cursory glance at celebrated Jєωs brings to the eye a frightful specter, that is, it brings into view a noxious inner personality and a degenerate spiritual condition.
One particular aspect exhibited in certain Jєωs is the fold and corners of the lips.
Take Ruth Bader Ginsburg for instance. Quite often a crooked mouth is on display.
What in her innermost being is manifested in her lower face?
Perhaps since she touted a pro-ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ line prior to the Supreme Court ruling that eviscerated (http://www.realJєωnews.com/?p=830Supreme)the Defense of Marriage Act, and had officiated (https://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/ruth-bader-ginsburg-same-sex-wedding-096119) at least one ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ wedding prior to the Court’s ruling that legalized same-sex ‘marriage,’ and yet did not recuse herself from both cases, thus her mouth exhibits a supplanted evenness of justice.
Why didn’t she do the just thing and recuse herself from both cases?
Because ‘justice’ means ‘just us’ for the litigating Jєω but contempt for the moral norms of prevailing opinion.
(http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/repulseJєω.jpg)
THEN YOU HAVE Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL, who along with Eileen Hershenov, ADL’s policy director (https://www.adl.org/who-we-are/leadership/staff/eileen-hershenov) monitoring ‘online hate,’ oversees (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-03/youtubes-new-adl-thought-police-punish-conservatives-while-giving-far-left-extremist) the censorship of YouTube.
While claiming to protect the defamation of Jєωs he uses his role at YouTube to restrict legitimate concerns of whites and valid opposition to the genocidal deeds of Israel.
Is this not a two-sided determination whereby Greenblatt’s crooked mouth reveals an uneven polarity?
As for Eileen Hershenov, her visage exhibits a fanatical viciousness, and sadly, this malignity is used to censure, restrict, and ban all opinions on Google and YouTube that Hershenov the Jєω disagrees with.
Is this why she looks so disagreeable?
This demonized fanatic sees everyone as a ‘nαzι’ except for the Jєωs.
(http://www.trueorthodox.com/pictures/hideousJєωface1.jpg)
EXAMINE THE FACE of Steven Mnuchin of US Treasury. Again, the outward man reveals a parasitic inner psyche with the spirit of a bottom-feeding carp.
Can anyone say Mnuchin really works for a living?
While pretending to protect the hard-earned money of US taxpayers he instead upends our overseas trade by heaping sanctions upon sanctions on viable trading partners abroad. Is this not a clear case of deception that creates a contrary jaw?
There is also a peculiar deformity in his facial features as it is with many other Jєωs.
TAKE ADAM SCHIFF and Jerry Nadler as examples. One winces upon gazing (who can do it for any length of time?) on their faces, and a certain repulsion is registered within.
With Nadler, a gruesome hideousness is manifest which brings to the fore his ugly political maneuverings.
As for Schiff, with his bulging eyes and martian-like shape of his head, a particular revulsion lights upon the senses. Who is not revolted at his appearance? Who is not repulsed by his slithery methods we’re subjected to day after day in his Russiagate bullsh#t?
As for Daniel Schulman, owner (https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/03/21/paypal-ceo-dan-schulman-explains-how-the-company-closed-the-pay-gap.html) of PayPal, who with his pinched, miserly facial features, he uses his payment services to ban those who don’t align with his promotion of sɛҳuąƖ deviancy—(Jєωs are the biggest pushers (http://www.realJєωnews.com/?p=894)of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, lesbianism, and trans-genderism so as to destroy Christian social responsibility and morality)—a crookedness appears on his lower lip that unveils the perversity of his trajectory.
I wish I could be lovey-dovey but I refuse to give Jєωs a free pass.
I think this 'facial features' thing is nonsense. St Teresa of Avila, a great saint of the Catholic Church was the descendant of the Jєωs. That you would stoop to this nonsense means that you would insult her also and all of the other converts to the Catholic Faith.
-
I think this 'facial features' thing is nonsense. St Teresa of Avila, a great saint of the Catholic Church was the descendant of the Jєωs. That you would stoop to this nonsense means that you would insult her also and all of the other converts to the Catholic Faith.
Not only is listening not one of your strong suits, but critical reasoning isn't either. I implore you to get out and maybe go outside.
-
I think this 'facial features' thing is nonsense.
This whole thread has turned into nonsense.
-
Jєωιѕн Ritual Murder
repeatedly disappeared from YouTube and Vimeo, now here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7F1EcZqFicSX/ (https://www.bitchute.com/video/7F1EcZqFicSX/)
-
Jєωιѕн Ritual Murder
repeatedly disappeared from YouTube and Vimeo, now here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7F1EcZqFicSX/ (https://www.bitchute.com/video/7F1EcZqFicSX/)
Wasn't that something that caused the first deportation?
-
Wasn't that something that caused the first deportation?
Are you asking about the 733 BC expulsion of the Jєωs from Samaria by King Tiglath-Pileser III ?
Although this list refers to the exodus from Egypt as a myth and as an expulsion, it references 1,029 expulsions:
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12596 (https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12596)
(http://judaism.is/images/Jєω%20expulsions%20explained.jpg)
-
And the red is what you hope happens? Towards the most recent dates?
-
St. John Chrysostom aptly calls Jєωs "pests of the universe"
-
St. John Chrysostom aptly calls Jєωs "pests of the universe"
That type of name calling is not conducive to evangelization. It is also contrary to the spirit of Pope St Pius X.
-
It's not name-calling. It's the truth. Truth is conducive to evangelization and survival of people against adversaries to all men (1 Thessalonians 2:14-15)
-
And the red is what you hope happens? Towards the most recent dates?
Well, memes are also supposed to be funny.
BTW, on precisely this topic, there is a new page: http://judaism.is/expulsions.html (http://judaism.is/expulsions.html)
-
That type of name calling is not conducive to evangelization. It is also contrary to the spirit of Pope St Pius X.
Baloney.
It's not name-calling. It is truth.
Pope St. Pius X told Herzl to go fly a kite until he converted.
We follow the Councils, Doctors, Popes, and Saints: http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html (http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html)
Get back to us after you tally as many conversions as St. John Chrysostom and you are canonized.
-
Baloney.
It's not name-calling. It is truth.
Pope St. Pius X told Herzl to go fly a kite until he converted.
We follow the Councils, Doctors, Popes, and Saints: http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html (http://judaism.is/the-church-on-the-Jєωs.html)
Get back to us after you tally as many conversions as St. John Chrysostom and you are canonized.
You are still in contradiction to Pope St Pius X. He said, "I have always been on good terms with Jєωs" and also "Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. These we do not deny to the Jєωs. Indeed, we also pray for them: that their minds be enlightened."
He also expressed a sincere fondness for Herzl. He said, "On the contrary, I am glad you brought me the Signor Commendatore."
As to the тαℓмυdic Judaism that only a minority read and ascribe to Herzl was not in that group of lunatics. He was described as having expressed himself appreciatively on Jesus Christ's noble qualities.
At the end of the audience he also said that he felt compelled to respect Pope St Pius X.
This idea of name calling and the manifestation of gratuitous hostility is contrary to the spirit and the attitude of Pope St Pius X.
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
-
Do you understand the word "nugatory"?
nugatory | ˈn(y)o͞oɡəˌtôrē |
adjective
of no value or importance: a nugatory and pointless observation.
Do you understand the word "gravamen"?
gravamen | ɡrəˈvāmən |
noun (plural gravamina | -ˈvamənə | ) chiefly Law
the essence or most serious part of a complaint or accusation.
Do you understand that "Magisterium" is the infallible, unchangeable, and perennial teaching authority of the Church?
Politeness does not overturn Magisterium. You may repeat endlessly your selective half-quote of the Pope's polite remarks, but that will never overturn Magisterium. The Pope's polite, but nugatory preface to his remarks to Herzl does not overturn Magisterium. The gravemen of his remarks are consistent with Magisterium.
Even your Judaizing Council of Centers on Jєωιѕн Relations also notes that Pope St. Pius X said: “We cannot give approval to this movement. We cannot prevent the Jєωs from going to Jerusalem—but we could never sanction it. The soil of Jerusalem, if it was not always sacred, has been sanctified by the life of Jesus Christ. As the head of the Church I cannot tell you anything different. The Jєωs have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot recognize the Jєωιѕн people.”
"As to the тαℓмυdic Judaism that only a minority read and ascribe to Herzl was not in that group of lunatics."
You might re-compose that remark into a comprehensible sentence.
"…name calling and the manifestation of gratuitous hostility…"
Who did that?
-
Do you understand the word "nugatory"?
nugatory | ˈn(y)o͞oɡəˌtôrē |
adjective
of no value or importance: a nugatory and pointless observation.
Do you understand the word "gravamen"?
gravamen | ɡrəˈvāmən |
noun (plural gravamina | -ˈvamənə | ) chiefly Law
the essence or most serious part of a complaint or accusation.
Do you understand that "Magisterium" is the infallible, unchangeable, and perennial teaching authority of the Church?
Politeness does not overturn Magisterium. You may repeat endlessly your selective half-quote of the Pope's polite remarks, but that will never overturn Magisterium. The Pope's polite, but nugatory preface to his remarks to Herzl does not overturn Magisterium. The gravemen of his remarks are consistent with Magisterium.
Even your Judaizing Council of Centers on Jєωιѕн Relations also notes that Pope St. Pius X said: “We cannot give approval to this movement. We cannot prevent the Jєωs from going to Jerusalem—but we could never sanction it. The soil of Jerusalem, if it was not always sacred, has been sanctified by the life of Jesus Christ. As the head of the Church I cannot tell you anything different. The Jєωs have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot recognize the Jєωιѕн people.”
"As to the тαℓмυdic Judaism that only a minority read and ascribe to Herzl was not in that group of lunatics."
You might re-compose that remark into a comprehensible sentence.
"…name calling and the manifestation of gratuitous hostility…"
Who did that?
No one is disputing Pope St Pius not supporting the Zionist cause. However the fact that he didn't support this politiccal movement doesn't mean that we have to be nasty to those people who we disagree with. He did say, "I have always been on good terms with Jєωs."
-
Poche, you continue to preen your feminized subjectivity in dialog, the eighth "sacrament" of the neo-Pharisaical Novus Ordo sect. Meanwhile Catholics strive to emulate the Popes, Saints, Doctors, Councils, and GOD HIMSELF in "Yes, yes; No, no" clarity.
"But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil." Matthew 5:37
Consider GOD's "name-calling":
(http://judaism.is/images/god-s%20judgments.jpg)
-
“The declared enemies of God and His Church, heretics and schismatics, must be criticized as much as possible, as long as truth is not denied. It is a work of charity to shout: 'Here is the wolf!' when it enters the flock or anywhere else.”
St. Francis de Sales, Doctor of the Church, Introduction to the Devout Life, Part III, Chapter 29
-
“The declared enemies of God and His Church, heretics and schismatics, must be criticized as much as possible, as long as truth is not denied. It is a work of charity to shout: 'Here is the wolf!' when it enters the flock or anywhere else.”
St. Francis de Sales, Doctor of the Church, Introduction to the Devout Life, Part III, Chapter 29
No one is saying not to warn about the wolf when/if it enters the flock. However it is not just what you say. It is also how you say it.
-
How we say it is truthfully, precisely as the Doctor advises. His sole criterion is truth. He defines the criticism as charity.
“The declared enemies of God and His Church, heretics and schismatics, must be criticized as much as possible, as long as truth is not denied. It is a work of charity to shout: 'Here is the wolf!' when it enters the flock or anywhere else.”
St. Francis de Sales, Doctor of the Church, Introduction to the Devout Life, Part III, Chapter 29
God calls them swine, dogs, murderers, agents of the devil, etc., so we are in the very best company when we say the same.
Get over yourself.
-
By the way poche, do you believe in the 6 million Jєωιѕн h0Ɩ0cαųst narrative?
-
...do you believe in the 6 million Jєωιѕн h0Ɩ0cαųst narrative?
By law, doesn't one have to?
???
-
By the way poche, do you believe in the 6 million Jєωιѕн h0Ɩ0cαųst narrative?
That number is only an estimate. The number I heard is higher. It is 12 million. The 6 million also represent a number of Catholics of Jєωιѕн descent who either themselves converted or were descended from others who had converted. There were other people who were also put to death. There were Gypsies. The number of Poles (a predominantly Catholic people) who were killed was estimated to be 3 million. The largest cemetery for priests in the world is at Dachau.
Jєωs were not to only people that Hitler despised. When he invaded the Ukraine, the people at first greeted the German soldiers as heroes. However they soon learned that they too were on the list of those to be treated as sub-human.
-
By the way poche, do you believe in the 6 million Jєωιѕн h0Ɩ0cαųst narrative?
Actually I believe the number is closer to 12 million. Among the "Jєωs" put to death were a number of Catholics who were either themselves converts or were the descendants of those who had converted. Among those killed were Gypsies. Among those killed were a approximately 3 million Poles.
When the Germans invaded the Ukraine they were greeted at first as heroes. But that was short lived as they considered all Slavs as subhuman.
By the way, the largest cemetery in the world for Catholic priests is at Dachau.
-
Just to clarify Poche -- do you believe that the Third Reich exterminated (mostly in gas chambers) 6 million or more Jєωs? Also, could you state for the record what the word h0Ɩ0cαųstianity means to you?
-
Just to clarify Poche -- do you believe that the Third Reich exterminated (mostly in gas chambers) 6 million or more Jєωs? Also, could you state for the record what the word h0Ɩ0cαųstianity means to you?
I don't know that that number were all exterminated in gas chambers. The nαzιs used other methods of killing. This number is not an exact number. It is an estimate. The Jєωs weren't the only people killed. There were Gypsies and Slavs also.
I am unfamiliar with the word "h0Ɩ0cαųstianity."
-
I see. Simple question. Evasive answer.
-
I don't know that that number were all exterminated in gas chambers. The nαzιs used other methods of killing. This number is not an exact number. It is an estimate. The Jєωs weren't the only people killed. There were Gypsies and Slavs also.
I am unfamiliar with the word "h0Ɩ0cαųstianity."
Poche, do you think even one Jєω was exterminated in a gas chamber by a nαzι?
If so, who, by whom, when, and where?
-
Poche, do you think even one Jєω was exterminated in a gas chamber by a nαzι?
If so, who, by whom, when, and where?
Perhaps, even a better way to frame the question: In what year did the gas chamber industry commence? Followed by: Where were these gas exterminations located, and what solid forensic evidence do we have for their existence. With a follow up question: Where do we find the tons and tons of ashes and visible remains, which this huge industry must certainly have generated?
I've read quite a bit of material on this subject, but am not satisfied that any of the questions posed above have been satisfactorily answered. Because so-called 'extermination camps,' according to my reading anyway, have never been conclusively proven.
-
Perhaps, even a better way to frame the question: In what year did the gas chamber industry commence? Followed by: Where were these gas exterminations located, and what solid forensic evidence do we have for their existence. With a follow up question: Where do we find the tons and tons of ashes and visible remains, which this huge industry must certainly have generated?
I've read quite a bit of material on this subject, but am not satisfied that any of the questions posed above have been satisfactorily answered. Because so-called 'extermination camps,' according to my reading anyway, have never been conclusively proven.
Precisely. The answer to the question I posed to Poche is this: He cannot identify even one person killed in a gas chamber by nαzιs. The Auschwitz, Majdanek, and Dachau "gas chambers" were built AFTER the war by the Commies and US Army. http://judaism.is/h0Ɩ0cαųst.html#gaschambers (http://judaism.is/h0Ɩ0cαųst.html#gaschambers)
(http://judaism.is/images/gas%20chamber%20door.jpg)
-
I doubt poche will go on record as unequivocally admitting even the possibility of one less than 6 million Jєωs exterminated by the Third Reich since the 6 million figure is like a sacred line in the sand which one dares not cross. Even admitting to the possibility of anything less than the 6 million puts you in the category of "αnтι-ѕємιтє h0Ɩ0cαųst denier" by the "chosen ones." I was trying to get him to go on record regarding this, but my attempt has apparently failed. Poche, if you are still out there please call home.
-
Even admitting to the possibility of anything less than the 6 million puts you in the category of "αnтι-ѕємιтє h0Ɩ0cαųst denier" by the "chosen ones."
That is simply because facts and the overwhelming accuмulation of evidence do not determine historic truth. Truth can never win out over legions of court historians and the relentless drumming of the media, and lying portrayals of the entertainment industry, most in the hands of the Jєωs. Lies, if repeated often enough and long enough, become a kind of new truth for the masses. The h0Ɩ0cαųst is a lie. But that lie prevails, because, momentarily anyway, the lie is greater, (and stronger) than the truth.
-
When I was a bit younger than I am today, I once took a trip to Europe. This lead me to Munich, which in turn lead me Dachau cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρ(tm).
While touring Dachau, we had the opportunity to walk on the grounds. From what I recall, most of the barracks had been destroyed long ago, with only their foundations remaining. One or two barracks had been rebuilt, so as to give the visitor an idea of what they looked like.
One of the buildings we came across, which I recall being towards the back of the property, contained two brick ovens. Both ovens looked quite clean, neither containing any soot or other indications that there had been any fires within. Our tour guide told us that these were ovens in which the Jєωs were burned to dispose of their bodies.
As we walked away from that building, I distinctly recall an elderly gentlemen passing out flyers. Our guide told us to ignore him... he was a h0Ɩ0cαųst denier (the belief of which I think is now illegal in Germany). The man did not speak a lot of English, but the pamphlets he was handing out did contain portions written in English. The pamphlets said that there were no "ovens" ever found at Dachau, and the ones we just saw were fake. When we pressed our guide on this, she reluctantly admitted that, yes, there were no ovens found at Dachau, and that the ones we just saw were put in as representative of what ovens looked like at other cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs.
What?
Thus began my education on the h0Ɩ0cαųst.
-
I doubt poche will go on record as unequivocally admitting even the possibility of one less than 6 million Jєωs exterminated by the Third Reich since the 6 million figure is like a sacred line in the sand which one dares not cross. Even admitting to the possibility of anything less than the 6 million puts you in the category of "αnтι-ѕємιтє h0Ɩ0cαųst denier" by the "chosen ones." I was trying to get him to go on record regarding this, but my attempt has apparently failed. Poche, if you are still out there please call home.
The number 6,000,000 is only an estimate. It could have been 5,999,999. This also includes the various extrajudicial massacres carried out in different places where the Germans had invaded. It also includes a number of Catholics who were converts themselves and the descendants of converts.
-
God calls them swine, dogs, murderers, agents of the devil, etc., so we are in the very best company when we say the same.
God also called them LIARS, John 8:44, 55; Apocalypse 3:9, 22:16, as indeed they are.
The International Red Cross visited all the German camps and estimated 271,501 deaths total.
(http://judaism.is/images/red%20cross%20count.jpg)
Remember that Satan's tribe claimed 4 BILLION Jєωs killed by the Romans
[Gittin 57b claims Vespasian killed “four hundred thousand myriads” = 400,000 x 10,000 = 4 BILLION]
and 64 MILLION Jєωιѕн children skewered and burned in scrolls by the Romans in one city alone
[Gittin 58a claims “400 ѕуηαgσgυєs” each with “400 teachers” and “400 pupils” for each teacher” = 400 x 400 x 400 = 64 million].
The Jєωs were claiming that “6 million” Jєωs were killed in World War One!
“The Crucifixion of the Jєωs Must Stop,” The American Hebrew, October 31, 1919, p. 582.
(http://judaism.is/images/crucifixion%20of%20Jєωs%201919.jpg)
“9 million” (1955)..... ooops.... “4 million” (1989).... oops again... “perhaps 1 million” (1990)... ummm... errrr.... maybe... “470 thousand” (1994)
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v21/v21n3p24_weber.html (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v21/v21n3p24_weber.html)
(http://judaism.is/images/gas_chamber_h0Ɩ0cαųst_counter.jpg)
-
240 instances of “6 million Jєωs” hysteria from 1900-1945
Six Million Open Gates* by S.A.R. Lynch
https://archive.org/details/SIXMILLIONOPENGATESByS.A.R.Lynch271 (https://archive.org/details/SIXMILLIONOPENGATESByS.A.R.Lynch271)
* “Six million open gates” is a reference from the Kaballistic Zohar Hadash, Yitro 38d
The Six Million Myth—Zion’s Big Lie
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=24369 (http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=24369)
Wilhelm Höttl and the Elusive ‘Six Million’
by Mark Weber
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n5p25_Weber.html (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n5p25_Weber.html)
145 references to “6 million” from 1900-1945,
78 of the references before the outbreak of World War 2:
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/?zx=bff7ab91b4b883b0 (http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/?zx=bff7ab91b4b883b0)
245 references to “6 million” from 1900-1945:
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/02/145-references-to-6000000-Jєωs-prior-to.html?zx=8241c8a854e0e272 (http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/02/145-references-to-6000000-Jєωs-prior-to.html?zx=8241c8a854e0e272)
Lots of 6,000,000 Jєωs stories prior to World War ONE
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2011/05/lots-of-6000000-Jєωs-stories-prior-to.html (http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2011/05/lots-of-6000000-Jєωs-stories-prior-to.html)
(http://judaism.is/images/nyt%206000000%20big.jpg)
…and the psychopaths’ obsession continues…
Netanyahu Warns Putin That Iran Wants to Destroy 6 Million Jєωs
by Henry Meyer, Andrey Biryukov, and David Wainer, Bloomberg News, May 9, 2018
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-09/netanyahu-meets-putin-as-russia-debates-deal-for-syrian-missiles (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-09/netanyahu-meets-putin-as-russia-debates-deal-for-syrian-missiles)
No kidding! He really said it! Check it out!
(http://judaism.is/images/6%20million%20netanyahu.jpg)
-
That new age witch, Oprah Winfrey, really paraded the fake "h0Ɩ0cαųst survivor" Elie "The Weasel" Wiesel around on a series of her brainwashing show.
-
Elie Wiesel—a confessed prominent liar
“I describe incidents which may or may not have happened but which are true.”
Elie Wiesel in Elie Wiesel: conversations By Élie Wiesel, Robert Franciosi, (1970), p 33.
Professor David O’Connell also published a well-docuмented study of Elie Wiesel’s “eyewitness” lies. For his effort, the h0Ɩ0cαųst promoters attempted to have him fired.
David O’Connell, “Elie Wiesel and the Catholics,” Culture Wars magazine, Nov. 2004.
archived at http://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres6/OConnellWiesel.pdf (http://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres6/OConnellWiesel.pdf)
A Prominent False Witness: Elie Wiesel
by Robert Faurisson, October 17, 1986
http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/1986/10/a-prominent-false-witness-elie-wiesel.html (http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/1986/10/a-prominent-false-witness-elie-wiesel.html)
(http://judaism.is/images/elie%20weisel.jpg?crc=252835895)
[/font][/size][/color]
(http://judaism.is/images/elie-wiesel-quote.jpg?crc=529486481)
[/font][/size][/color]
Is Elie Wiesel A Fraud?
repeatedly “disappeared” by YouTube, no longer available as video, but we have the transcript:
Perjury is a punishable crime in America carrying with it up to five years imprisonment and the disgrace that it brings upon the offender. In a recent California court case, Elie Wiesel, a self-styled eyewitness of the so called h0Ɩ0cαųst, stated UNDER OATH that while at Auschwitz he was tattooed on his left arm with the number: A7713. Wiesel added that his father’s tattooed number was: A7712. But, according to a former prisoner at Auschwitz, Hungarian Jєω Miklos Gruner, who was at the camp the same time claimed by Elie Wiesel, the number A7713 was assigned to a very different person, Gruner’s friend: a Lazar Wiesel, NOT Elie Wiesel. The first names “Elie” and “Lazar” are diminutives of the Hebrew name, Eleazar. Thus, Gruner contends, Elie Wiesel has committed a crass deception and imposture by pretending to be Gruner’s friend and former fellow prisoner, Lazar Wiesel.
First of all, let’s take a close look at Elie Wiesel’s left arm. And while we’re at it, at his right arm as well. Evidently, no sign of an imprinted tattoo can be seen.
Second, Gruner – who in his book “Identity Theft” sets out to prove that Elie Wiesel is a fraud – received a letter from the Auschwitz Museum in October of 2003, affirming that the number, A7713, claimed by Elie Wiesel as his, was indeed in fact assigned to Gruner’s friend, Lazar Wiesel, recorded as being born on September 4 1913, NOT September 30 1928, the birth date of Elie Wiesel.
The Auschwitz Museum Letter also affirmed to Gruner that the number, A7712, which Elie Wiesel attributes to his father Shlomo, was actually given to Abraham Wiesel, Lazar’s older brother.
In his book, Night, Elie Wiesel opens with the statement that upon arriving at Auschwitz-Birkenau in June of 1944 when Wiesel was only 15, he saw before him: “Gigantic flames leaping up from a ditch into which Jєωιѕн babies were thrown.” Gruner calls this an outright lie, asserting in his book, Identity Theft: “I had never seen ditches with open fire where children were burning.” This was later verified in 1988 by American Federal Court expert in execution technology, Fred Leuchter, who reported that Auschwitz, being built upon a swamp with a high water table, made it impossible for bodies to be burned in ditches.
In January of 1945, the Auschwitz prisoners, which included Miklos Gruner and his friend, Lazar Wiesel, were transferred to Buchenwald. Liberated by the Americans that spring, a photo was taken by a US soldier that was later entitled, “Crowded Bunks in the Prison Camp at Buchenwald.” Elie Wiesel has referred to this photo as proof of his internment, and has pointed to a man on the second row as being himself. Again, Gruner says “No!” noting that the man Wiesel claims to be himself was a man in his thirties and not a boy of 16, the age Elie Wiesel would have been at the time. Notice that the man has an aquiline nose and has full lips while the teenage Wiesel’s nose is obviously concave and his lips, thin. The thirty-year-old looking man also has a receding hair line while the hairline of Wiesel when a teen is well up to the base of his forehead.
In 1986, Miklos Gruner was invited to meet Elie Wiesel in Stockholm. The Swedish hosts informed him that this was the same person he knew in the camps under the name Lazar Wiesel. Upon meeting Elie Wiesel, Gruner said afterward: “I was stunned to see a man I didn’t recognize at all – he was certainly not my friend and fellow prisoner.” Gruner also recalled that he was surprised that Wiesel could not speak Hungarian but spoke English with a strong French accent even though Elie Wiesel claims he grew up in Sighet, Hungary.
Gruner and all the other evidence makes a strong case that the Nobel Prize Laureate Wiesel is nothing less than an impostor!
-
Why would Bibi make it seem like Israel is in any danger from Iran? It would probably spark World War III, but they could flatten Tehran in about 30 minutes.
-
Why would Bibi make it seem like Israel is in any danger from Iran? It would probably spark World War III, but they could flatten Tehran in about 30 minutes.
A sort of reverse psychopathic/pseudo-victimhood posturing? At any rate, I think he knows full well that if he ever pushed the zap button on Iran, Iran would immediately return the favor and that is what keeps him from doing it. Nevertheless, the power of pride to blind can become so strong, that the mad butcher of Israel might indeed eventually push that button. If the CIA was doing its best to prevent WWIII, I think the madman would have been gone a long time ago.
-
Poche: The number 6,000,000 is only an estimate. It could have been 5,999,999. This also includes the various extrajudicial massacres carried out in different places where the Germans had invaded. It also includes a number of Catholics who were converts themselves and the descendants of converts.
h0Ɩ0cαųst FAQ taken from http://www.auschwitz.dk/holofaq.htm
What is the h0Ɩ0cαųst?
The h0Ɩ0cαųst was the systematic annihilation of six million Jєωs by the nαzι regime during World War 2. In 1933 approximately nine million Jєωs lived in the 21 countries of Europe that would be occupied by Germany during the war. By 1945 two out of every three European Jєωs had been killed. The European Jєωs were the primary victims of the h0Ɩ0cαųst. ….
How many Jєωs were murdered during the h0Ɩ0cαųst?
While it is impossible to ascertain the exact number of Jєωιѕн victims, statistics indicate that the total was over 5,830,000. Six million is the round figure accepted by most authorities....
One could quote from any number of similar sources. But the FAQ partially cited above summarizes Jєωιѕн lies pretty well. Like “systematic annihilation” “two out of three European Jєωs,” etc. Most of the well traveled buzz phrases are found in this FAQ.
Thanks for citing that 6 mil. is “only an estimate.” That is hardly a concession, especially if that estimate is actually only off by 1. lol.
I wouldn’t bother answering the likes of poche under most circuмstances. But sometimes people, who are looking for h0Ɩ0cαųst truth online, will venture across posts like mine on their search engines. So I insert these short comments, hopefully for their edification
Since it is impossible to ascertain the “exact number of Jєωιѕн victims,” one has to wonder why so many historians, including, of course, Jєωιѕн historians, parrot the 6-million-Jєωιѕн-victims line. Jєω lies seem to have a life of their own. They never die.
As for “extrajudicial massacres,” are we honestly going to let the Jєωs, i.e. the poches tell us that only the Germans were involved in carrying them out? BTW, what is an ‘extrajudicial massacre?’
-
God also called them LIARS, John 8:44, 55; Apocalypse 3:9, 22:16, as indeed they are.
The International Red Cross visited all the German camps and estimated 271,501 deaths total.
(http://judaism.is/images/red%20cross%20count.jpg)
Remember that Satan's tribe claimed 4 BILLION Jєωs killed by the Romans
[Gittin 57b claims Vespasian killed “four hundred thousand myriads” = 400,000 x 10,000 = 4 BILLION]
and 64 MILLION Jєωιѕн children skewered and burned in scrolls by the Romans in one city alone
[Gittin 58a claims “400 ѕуηαgσgυєs” each with “400 teachers” and “400 pupils” for each teacher” = 400 x 400 x 400 = 64 million].
The Jєωs were claiming that “6 million” Jєωs were killed in World War One!
“The Crucifixion of the Jєωs Must Stop,” The American Hebrew, October 31, 1919, p. 582.
(http://judaism.is/images/crucifixion%20of%20Jєωs%201919.jpg)
“9 million” (1955)..... ooops.... “4 million” (1989).... oops again... “perhaps 1 million” (1990)... ummm... errrr.... maybe... “470 thousand” (1994)
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v21/v21n3p24_weber.html (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v21/v21n3p24_weber.html)
(http://judaism.is/images/gas_chamber_h0Ɩ0cαųst_counter.jpg)
Josephus said that in his opinion Vespasian was the messiah. He also said that the cause of the destruction of the Temple was on the disorganized and impious leadership of the Jєωs who revolted.
-
When I was a bit younger than I am today, I once took a trip to Europe. This lead me to Munich, which in turn lead me Dachau cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρ(tm).
While touring Dachau, we had the opportunity to walk on the grounds. From what I recall, most of the barracks had been destroyed long ago, with only their foundations remaining. One or two barracks had been rebuilt, so as to give the visitor an idea of what they looked like.
One of the buildings we came across, which I recall being towards the back of the property, contained two brick ovens. Both ovens looked quite clean, neither containing any soot or other indications that there had been any fires within. Our tour guide told us that these were ovens in which the Jєωs were burned to dispose of their bodies.
As we walked away from that building, I distinctly recall an elderly gentlemen passing out flyers. Our guide told us to ignore him... he was a h0Ɩ0cαųst denier (the belief of which I think is now illegal in Germany). The man did not speak a lot of English, but the pamphlets he was handing out did contain portions written in English. The pamphlets said that there were no "ovens" ever found at Dachau, and the ones we just saw were fake. When we pressed our guide on this, she reluctantly admitted that, yes, there were no ovens found at Dachau, and that the ones we just saw were put in as representative of what ovens looked like at other cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs.
What?
Thus began my education on the h0Ɩ0cαųst.
h0Ɩ0cαųst FAQ taken from http://www.auschwitz.dk/holofaq.htm
What is the h0Ɩ0cαųst?
The h0Ɩ0cαųst was the systematic annihilation of six million Jєωs by the nαzι regime during World War 2. In 1933 approximately nine million Jєωs lived in the 21 countries of Europe that would be occupied by Germany during the war. By 1945 two out of every three European Jєωs had been killed. The European Jєωs were the primary victims of the h0Ɩ0cαųst. ….
How many Jєωs were murdered during the h0Ɩ0cαųst?
While it is impossible to ascertain the exact number of Jєωιѕн victims, statistics indicate that the total was over 5,830,000. Six million is the round figure accepted by most authorities....
One could quote from any number of similar sources. But the FAQ partially cited above summarizes Jєωιѕн lies pretty well. Like “systematic annihilation” “two out of three European Jєωs,” etc. Most of the well traveled buzz phrases are found in this FAQ.
Thanks for citing that 6 mil. is “only an estimate.” That is hardly a concession, especially if that estimate is actually only off by 1. lol.
I wouldn’t bother answering the likes of poche under most circuмstances. But sometimes people, who are looking for h0Ɩ0cαųst truth online, will venture across posts like mine on their search engines. So I insert these short comments, hopefully for their edification
Since it is impossible to ascertain the “exact number of Jєωιѕн victims,” one has to wonder why so many historians, including, of course, Jєωιѕн historians, parrot the 6-million-Jєωιѕн-victims line. Jєω lies seem to have a life of their own. They never die.
As for “extrajudicial massacres,” are we honestly going to let the Jєωs, i.e. the poches tell us that only the Germans were involved in carrying them out? BTW, what is an ‘extrajudicial massacre?’
God also called them LIARS, John 8:44, 55; Apocalypse 3:9, 22:16, as indeed they are.
The International Red Cross visited all the German camps and estimated 271,501 deaths total.
(http://judaism.is/images/red%20cross%20count.jpg)
Remember that Satan's tribe claimed 4 BILLION Jєωs killed by the Romans
[Gittin 57b claims Vespasian killed “four hundred thousand myriads” = 400,000 x 10,000 = 4 BILLION]
and 64 MILLION Jєωιѕн children skewered and burned in scrolls by the Romans in one city alone
[Gittin 58a claims “400 ѕуηαgσgυєs” each with “400 teachers” and “400 pupils” for each teacher” = 400 x 400 x 400 = 64 million].
The Jєωs were claiming that “6 million” Jєωs were killed in World War One!
“The Crucifixion of the Jєωs Must Stop,” The American Hebrew, October 31, 1919, p. 582.
(http://judaism.is/images/crucifixion%20of%20Jєωs%201919.jpg)
“9 million” (1955)..... ooops.... “4 million” (1989).... oops again... “perhaps 1 million” (1990)... ummm... errrr.... maybe... “470 thousand” (1994)
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v21/v21n3p24_weber.html (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v21/v21n3p24_weber.html)
(http://judaism.is/images/gas_chamber_h0Ɩ0cαųst_counter.jpg)
You realize that Dachau has the largest cemetery for priests.
-
You realize that Dachau has the largest cemetery for priests.
A quintessentially rabbinical non-response—"When cornered by the evidence, change the subject."
-
A quintessentially rabbinical non-response—"When cornered by the evidence, change the subject."
While I join you in your theological disagreements with the Jєωιѕн religion, your approach demonstrates a direct contradiction to the attitude and approach of Pope St Pius X.
-
While I join you in your theological disagreements with the Jєωιѕн religion, your approach demonstrates a direct contradiction to the attitude and approach of Pope St Pius X.
I side with Mark 79 far more than I do with you and your pope Francis.
-
While I join you in your theological disagreements with the Jєωιѕн religion, your approach demonstrates a direct contradiction to the attitude and approach of Pope St Pius X.
How about joining God in His approach?
"swine," "dogs," "murderers," "liars," "children of hell," "haters of God," "serpents," etc.
-
I side with Mark 79 far more than I do with you and your pope Francis.
Yes, but you are in contradiction with Pope St Pius X.
-
Yes, but you are in contradiction with Pope St Pius X.
And you contradict GOD!
"swine," "dogs," "murderers," "liars," "children of hell," "haters of God," "serpents," etc.
-
And you contradict GOD!
"swine," "dogs," "murderers," "liars," "children of hell," "haters of God," "serpents," etc.
Do you mean to say that Pope St Pius X contradicts God?
-
Do you mean to say that Pope St Pius X contradicts God?
You, Poche, contradict God with your fake kumbaya gospel of Poche.
-
Do you mean to say that Pope St Pius X contradicts God?
And your dubious partial quote utterly misrepresents the content and tenor of Pope St. Pius X's stance.
Theodor Herzl's Report on the Meeting with Pope Pius X in 1904
On the 1st of July 1956 in the journal La Terre Retrovée a text of Theodor Herzl was published about his meeting with Pope Pius X on January 26, 1904:
Yesterday I was with the Pope. The route was already familiar since I had traversed it with Lippay several times. Past the Swiss lackeys, who looked like clerics, and clerics who looked like lackeys, the Papal officers and chamberlains.
I arrived 10 minutes ahead of time and didn't even have to wait. I was conducted through numerous small reception rooms to the Pope. He received me standing and held out his hand, which I did not kiss. Lippay had told me I had to do it, but I didn't. I believe that I incurred his displeasure by this, for everyone who visits him kneels down and at least kisses his hand.
This hand kiss had caused me a lot of worry. I was quite glad when it was finally out of the way. He seated himself in an armchair, a throne for minor occasions. Then he invited me to sit down right next to him and smiled in friendly anticipation.
I began: "Ringrazio Vostra Santità per il favore di m'aver accordato quest'udienza" [I thank Your Holiness for the favor of according me this audience]." "È un piacere [It is a pleasure]," he said with kindly deprecation. I apologized for my miserable Italian, but he said: "No, parla molto bene, signor Commendatore [No, Commander, you speak very well]." For I had put on for the first time—on Lippay's advice—my Mejidiye ribbon.
Consequently the Pope always addressed me as Commendatore. He is a good, coarse-grained village priest, to whom Christianity has remained a living thing even in the Vatican. I briefly placed my request before him. He, however, possibly annoyed by my refusal to kiss his hand, answered sternly and resolutely: "Noi non possiamo favorire questo movimento. Non potremo impedire gli Ebrei di andare a Gerusalemme—ma favorire non possiamo mai. La terra di Gerusalemme se non era sempre santa, è santificata per la vita di Jesu Christo (he did not pronounce it Gesu, but Yesu, in the Venetian fashion). Io come capo della chiesa non posso dirle altra cosa. Gli Ebrei non hanno riconosciuto nostro Signore, perciò non possiamo riconoscere il popolo ebreo [We cannot give approval to this movement. We cannot prevent the Jєωs from going to Jerusalem—but we could never sanction it. The soil of Jerusalem, if it was not always sacred, has been sanctified by the life of Jesus Christ. As the head of the Church I cannot tell you anything different. The Jєωs have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot recognize the Jєωιѕн people]."
Hence the conflict between Rome, represented by him, and Jerusalem, represented by me, was once again opened up. At the outset, to be sure, I tried to be conciliatory. I recited my little piece about extraterritorialization, res sacrae extra commercium [holy places removed from business]. It didn't make much of an impression.
Gerusalemme, he said, must not get into the hands of the Jєωs. "And its present status, Holy Father?"
"I know, it is not pleasant to see the Turks in possession of our Holy Places. We simply have to put up with that. But to support the Jєωs in the acquisition of the Holy Places, that we cannot do." I said that our point of departure had been solely the distress of the Jєωs and that we desired to avoid the religious issues. "Yes, but we, and I as the head of the Church, cannot do this. There are two possibilities. Either the Jєωs will cling to their faith and continue to await the Messiah who, for us, has already appeared. In that case they will be denying the divinity of Jesus and we cannot help them. Or else they will go there without any religion, and then we can be even less favorable to them.
"The Jєωιѕн religion was the foundation of our own; but it was superseded by the teachings of Christ, and we cannot concede it any further validity. The Jєωs, who ought to have been the first to acknowledge Jesus Christ, have not done so to this day." It was on the tip of my tongue to say, "That's what happens in every family. No one believes in his own relatives." But I said instead: "Terror and persecution may not have been the right means for enlightening the Jєωs."
But he rejoined, and this time he was magnificent in his simplicity:
"Our Lord came without power. Era povero [He was poor]. He came in pace [in peace]. He persecuted no one. He was persecuted. He was abbandonato [forsaken] even by his apostles. Only later did he grow in stature. It took three centuries for the Church to evolve. The Jєωs therefore had time to acknowledge his divinity without any pressure. But they haven't done so to this day."
"But, Holy Father, the Jєωs are in terrible straits. I don't know if Your Holiness is acquainted with the full extent of this sad situation. We need a land for these persecuted people."
"Does it have to be Gerusalemme?"
"We are not asking for Jerusalem, but for Palestine—only the secular land." [An outrageous lie on Herzl's part!]
"We cannot be in favor of it."
-
And your dubious partial quote utterly misrepresents the content and tenor of Pope St. Pius X's stance.
I think you left out an important part.
And I have always been on good terms with Jєωs. Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. - Pope St Pius X
There is also this;
"On the contrary, I am glad you brought me the Signor Commendatore."
In spite of being refused, Herzl also said that he felt compelled to respect Pope St Pius X.
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
-
I doubt poche will go on record as unequivocally admitting even the possibility of one less than 6 million Jєωs exterminated by the Third Reich since the 6 million figure is like a sacred line in the sand which one dares not cross. Even admitting to the possibility of anything less than the 6 million puts you in the category of "αnтι-ѕємιтє h0Ɩ0cαųst denier" by the "chosen ones." I was trying to get him to go on record regarding this, but my attempt has apparently failed. Poche, if you are still out there please call home.
Among those killed by the Third Reich were a group of nuns;
Today is also the feast day of Bl. Mary Stella and Her Ten Companions (Martyrs of Nowogrodek), a group of Holy Family of Nazareth sisters. This feast is an Obligatory Memorial in Poland except in provinces or convents of CSFN, for whom this is a Patronal Feast. it is celebrated as a Feast. In the winter of 1943 the Germans made repeated roundups of Poles, including several of priests. When the Sisters of the Holy Family of Nazareth learned that the Germans planned to execute dozens of Poles they offered themselves as sacrifices, saying "My God, if sacrifice of life is needed, accept it from us and spare those who have families. We are even praying for this intention." The Germans decided then to enslave the Polish prisoners but still kill the nuns. They drove the nuns to an isolated spot in the woods and then murdered eleven, burying the bodies in a shallow grave. Sr. Stella and her 10 companions were beatified by Pope John Paul II on March 5, 2000.
https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/liturgicalyear/calendar/day.cfm?date=2019-09-04 (https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/liturgicalyear/calendar/day.cfm?date=2019-09-04)
-
I think you left out an important part.
And I have always been on good terms with Jєωs. Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. - Pope St Pius X
There is also this;
"On the contrary, I am glad you brought me the Signor Commendatore."
In spite of being refused, Herzl also said that he felt compelled to respect Pope St Pius X.
https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904 (https://ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/primary-texts-from-the-history-of-the-relationship/herzl1904)
No. I quoted the entire article as I found it. You deceitfully left out all the important parts, the stern and resolute opposition of the good Pope to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan.
The Novus Ordo has followed the Gospel of Poche and look where such dialogue finds them—utterly lost and submissive to those that God Himself calls "swine," "dogs," "murderers," "liars," "children of hell," "haters of God," "serpents," etc.
You are an acolyte of Judas.
-
Among those killed by the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan. Wojtyla the Second Worst and Bergoglio the Worst have done nothing to help innocents like these, instead they follow the Gospel of Poche:
(http://judaism.is/images/fetus%20head%20shot.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/sabra%20-%20shatila%202.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/mass%20graves%20in%20lebanon.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/14066843743f023e_l.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/head%20palestinian-dead-children-by-israel-gaza-2009.jpg) (http://judaism.is/images/burnt_palestinian_child.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/ap_alihussein_080430_main.jpg) (http://judaism.is/images/remains-of-mohammed-abu-khdeir-tortured-and-murdered-by-Jєωs-crop-u8288.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/palestinian-children-killed-by-israel02.jpg)
(http://judaism.is/images/deadpalestinianchildhead.jpg)
-
(http://judaism.is/images/israelis%20target%20children.jpg)
-
Among those killed by the Third Reich were a group of nuns;
Today is also the feast day of Bl. Mary Stella and Her Ten Companions (Martyrs of Nowogrodek), a group of Holy Family of Nazareth sisters. This feast is an Obligatory Memorial in Poland except in provinces or convents of CSFN, for whom this is a Patronal Feast. it is celebrated as a Feast. In the winter of 1943 the Germans made repeated roundups of Poles, including several of priests. When the Sisters of the Holy Family of Nazareth learned that the Germans planned to execute dozens of Poles they offered themselves as sacrifices, saying "My God, if sacrifice of life is needed, accept it from us and spare those who have families. We are even praying for this intention." The Germans decided then to enslave the Polish prisoners but still kill the nuns. They drove the nuns to an isolated spot in the woods and then murdered eleven, burying the bodies in a shallow grave. Sr. Stella and her 10 companions were beatified by Pope John Paul II on March 5, 2000.
https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/liturgicalyear/calendar/day.cfm?date=2019-09-04 (https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/liturgicalyear/calendar/day.cfm?date=2019-09-04)
So what is your point? I think something called WW II was going on at the time. Can you tell me how many innocent Catholic civilians including Catholic nuns, brothers and clerics were fire/carpet bombed (read major sustained war crimes) to death by Allied aircraft during that time? As far as JPII goes can you cite how many Catholic clerical and religious sɛҳuąƖ abuse cases he ignored or covered up?
P.S. After Harry the 33rd Freemason dropped Little Boy on Hiroshima he dropped Fat Boy on Nagasaki. Did you know that dropping Fat Boy on Nagasaki wiped out two thirds of the Catholic population of Japan?
-
So what is your point? …
P.S. After Harry the 33rd Freemason dropped Little Boy on Hiroshima he dropped Fat Boy on Nagasaki. Did you know that dropping Fat Boy on Nagasaki wiped out two thirds of the Catholic population of Japan?
By now it is perfectly clear that Poche ignores honest history, cherry-picks half-quotes, and derogates even the Word of God to pimp Jєωιѕн fables (Titus 1:14).
Hellstorm Exposing The Real Genocide of German people during World War Two
https://archive.org/details/HellstormExposingTheRealGenocideOfGermanPeopleWorldWarTwo (https://archive.org/details/HellstormExposingTheRealGenocideOfGermanPeopleWorldWarTwo)
The Morgenthau Plan • Eisenhower’s Death Camps • “A Forgotten Genocide”
9-15 Million Germans Killed 1945 – 1953 after WW2
http://truedemocracyparty.net/2014/01/german-h0Ɩ0cαųst-german-genocide-9-to-15-million-germans-killed-1945-1953-the-morgenthau-plan-eisenhowers-death-camps-a-forgotten-genocide/ (http://truedemocracyparty.net/2014/01/german-h0Ɩ0cαųst-german-genocide-9-to-15-million-germans-killed-1945-1953-the-morgenthau-plan-eisenhowers-death-camps-a-forgotten-genocide/)
https://h0Ɩ0cαųst-of-world-war-two.blogspot.com/2014/11/a-real-h0Ɩ0cαųst-eisenhowers-death.html (https://h0Ɩ0cαųst-of-world-war-two.blogspot.com/2014/11/a-real-h0Ɩ0cαųst-eisenhowers-death.html)
Eisenhower's Rhine-Meadows Death Camps - Docuмentary
a chronicle of atrocities ordered by “the terrible Swedish Jєω” Eisenhower
https://youtu.be/hbp61fOVFaE (https://youtu.be/hbp61fOVFaE)
Peace for Germany (synopsis of the book "Other Losses")
another chronicle of atrocities ordered by “the terrible Swedish Jєω” Eisenhower
https://www.moddb.com/groups/government-corruption/videos/peace-for-germany-other-losses (https://www.moddb.com/groups/government-corruption/videos/peace-for-germany-other-losses)
-
"The Jєωs are born spies." - President Richard Nixon
-
No. I quoted the entire article as I found it. You deceitfully left out all the important parts, the stern and resolute opposition of the good Pope to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan.
The Novus Ordo has followed the Gospel of Poche and look where such dialogue finds them—utterly lost and submissive to those that God Himself calls "swine," "dogs," "murderers," "liars," "children of hell," "haters of God," "serpents," etc.
You are an acolyte of Judas.
Yes there was a stern and resolute opposition to the movement of Zionism. But that did not include the hostility which you seem to exude. He said no to Zionism but he expressed friendship with the Jєωs. In fact he said that the other day he had received two for dinner.
-
No. I quoted the entire article as I found it. You deceitfully left out all the important parts, the stern and resolute opposition of the good Pope to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan.
The Novus Ordo has followed the Gospel of Poche and look where such dialogue finds them—utterly lost and submissive to those that God Himself calls "swine," "dogs," "murderers," "liars," "children of hell," "haters of God," "serpents," etc.
You are an acolyte of Judas.
-
So what is your point? I think something called WW II was going on at the time. Can you tell me how many innocent Catholic civilians including Catholic nuns, brothers and clerics were fire/carpet bombed (read major sustained war crimes) to death by Allied aircraft during that time? As far as JPII goes can you cite how many Catholic clerical and religious sɛҳuąƖ abuse cases he ignored or covered up?
P.S. After Harry the 33rd Freemason dropped Little Boy on Hiroshima he dropped Fat Boy on Nagasaki. Did you know that dropping Fat Boy on Nagasaki wiped out two thirds of the Catholic population of Japan?
That the Germans would involve themselves in the slaughter of nuns demonstrates that they are no friends to Catholic civilization.
-
That the Germans would involve themselves in the slaughter of nuns demonstrates that they are no friends to Catholic civilization.
What an incredibly preposterous, ridiculous, and slanderous extrapolation you make!
-
What an incredibly preposterous, ridiculous, and slanderous extrapolation you make!
How is it ridiculous and slanderous to describe those who would deliberately slaughter a group of nuns as being done by anybody other than enemies of Catholic civilization?
-
Yes there was a stern and resolute opposition to the movement of Zionism. But that did not include the hostility which you seem to exude. He said no to Zionism but he expressed friendship with the Jєωs. In fact he said that the other day he had received two for dinner.
You continue to evade acknowledging that every criticism we have made matches precisely what God Himself has said about them.
You behave as just one more rabbi "defeating (http://judaism.is/torah.html#defeatinggod)" God, "perfecting" God's "imperfections" with your tikkun olam presumptions, an accomplice of the Master Race genocidalists.
Your subjective emotionalism reeks of effeminacy. Objectively you ignore the balance of history, cherry-pick half-quotes to match your womanly concern about tone over content, and derogate even the Word of God to pimp Jєωιѕн fables (Titus 1:14).
(http://judaism.is/images/god-s%20judgments.jpg)
-
How is it ridiculous and slanderous to describe those who would deliberately slaughter a group of nuns as being done by anybody other than enemies of Catholic civilization?
It is preposterous that, in failing to criticize them, you make yourself an accomplice of the worst mass murderers in history:
ʝʊdɛօ-Communism's genocide of over 60 million Christians
the Jєωιѕн instigation of both World Wars
Jєωιѕн post-war genocide of Germans
Zionist genocide in the Holy Land.
While you assist their whataboutism deceits and swooning emotionalism, they/you continue their/your genocide and soul-killing destruction of every remnant of Christendom.
You are an accomplice.
-
Yes there was a stern and resolute opposition to the movement of Zionism. But that did not include the hostility which you seem to exude. He said no to Zionism but he expressed friendship with the Jєωs. In fact he said that the other day he had received two for dinner.
God loves them and he criticizes them:
"swine," "dogs," "murderers," "liars," "children of hell," "haters of God," "serpents," etc.
Complain to God about His "hostility." See how far you get with that.
-
You continue to evade acknowledging that every criticism we have made matches precisely what God Himself has said about them.
You behave as just one more rabbi "defeating (http://judaism.is/torah.html#defeatinggod)" God, "perfecting" God's "imperfections" with your tikkun olam presumptions, an accomplice of the Master Race genocidalists.
Your subjective emotionalism reeks of effeminacy. Objectively you ignore the balance of history, cherry-pick half-quotes to match your womanly concern about tone over content, and derogate even the Word of God to pimp Jєωιѕн fables (Titus 1:14).
Excellent response, Mark. May God bless you for defending His Holy Name!
-
How is it ridiculous and slanderous to describe those who would deliberately slaughter a group of nuns as being done by anybody other than enemies of Catholic civilization?
The problem is (and it should be obvious to anyone taking an honest look at what you actually said) is that you conflated the alleged act of certain individuals to the German people as a whole. That is why I called your assertion preposterous, ridiculous and slanderous which it most certainly is.
-
The problem is (and it should be obvious to anyone taking an honest look at what you actually said) is that you conflated the alleged act of certain individuals to the German people as a whole. That is why I called your assertion preposterous, ridiculous and slanderous which it most certainly is.
Yeah, it should be obvious, Klaus. But you and Mark79 fall for poche's moronic shtick over and over again. Why? I don't know how many times this guy has mentioned Pius X' alleged friendly relationship with the Jєωs. But as many times as he does it, you guys react. You attempt to set him straight. You try to correct him. You provide countervailing information. Yet to what avail?
Obviously, poche is a very low level, not very bright provocateur, whose posts should be laughed off and not given a minute's attention. He having a bit of fun with you. Don't you see that? But you fellows seem to take the bait every time.
This is what is wrong with CI. The moderator allows these kinds of nonsensical threads to go on endlessly. He rarely locks them out. I'll bet this one goes on for another ten pages at least.
-
Thanks for the advice. I will try to stay as far away from him as I can from now on.
-
This is what is wrong with CI. The moderator allows these kinds of nonsensical threads to go on endlessly.
Why the hell the moderator would enable a Judaizer to continue to post here is beyond me.
Poche stands with slayers of Our Lord.
Real Catholics stand with Our Lord.
-
Why the hell the moderator would enable a Judaizer to continue to post here is beyond me.
Poche stands with slayers of Our Lord.
Real Catholics stand with Our Lord.
I agree. What is more, poche isn't really that clever. His remarks are inane for the most part. His historical perspective is non-existent. He should be ignored. But no, 'Charlie Brown' just keeps trying to put the ball through the uprights, and 'Lucy' just keeps pulling it away. Charlie never seems to learn.
-
God loves them and he criticizes them:
"swine," "dogs," "murderers," "liars," "children of hell," "haters of God," "serpents," etc.
Complain to God about His "hostility." See how far you get with that.
You realize that your overt hostility could create an invisible wall of invincible ignorance that could make you responsible for their failure to convert. If an unbeliever blasphemes God because of you then you are responsible for that blasphemy.
-
The problem is (and it should be obvious to anyone taking an honest look at what you actually said) is that you conflated the alleged act of certain individuals to the German people as a whole. That is why I called your assertion preposterous, ridiculous and slanderous which it most certainly is.
It was the German army acting in the name of the German government at that time. They were not too embarrassed to slaughter nuns.
-
It was the German army acting in the name of the German government at that time. They were not too embarrassed to slaughter nuns.
Again, this is just 'Lucy' placing the football down again, and goading 'Charlie Brown' into taking still another whack at it. I am proud of forum members, thus far anyway, for refraining from the temptation. Just leave the field. Let poche continue to hold it in place until the sun goes down.
-
Interesting observation about the meaning of "Shoah". I thought about the similarity of the word Shoah to "show". As in "there's no business like show business". I did not know the meaning of the actual word "Shoah". I always thought the word "h0Ɩ0cαųst" was problematic because Jesus Christ was the one true h0Ɩ0cαųst so the Jєωs were trying to make themselves to be Jesus. Would that make Hitler the high priest and Auschwitz to be the Temple of Solomon? But perhaps I am thinking too much into it. I also thought it strange that the wailing wall was still there. I heard that it was actually an old Roman fort and not the Temple as the prophecy stated that not one stone of the Temple would remain after its destruction. Or perhaps I am being too literal.
-
One thing about Judaism is that it prefigures Christianity. For example the last time that Hannakah fell on December 8, Rosh Hoshanna was on September 8. That is the rededication of the Temple and the miracle of light prefigures the Immaculate Conception while Rosh Hoshanna, which is the Jєωιѕн new year prefigures the birth of she, whose Fiat would bring about our salvation.