Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Jesus was not a Jєω?  (Read 550 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Raoul76

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4803
  • Reputation: +2007/-6
  • Gender: Male
Jesus was not a Jєω?
« on: June 13, 2009, 10:39:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Jesus was of the tribe and/or Kingdom of Judah as the second article states.  The other opposing Kingdom of Jєωs, from the north, was called Israel and I believe they died out between the Egyptian and Babylonian occupations.  But don't quote me on that.  I'm slowly going through the Old Testament.

    Jesus was certainly a Jєω.  I guess it's true that back then they didn't call themselves "Jєωs," they were known by their tribe, their ancestry.  But Jesus was of the Old Testament chosen people who worshipped the One True God and today we call those Jєωs.

    Today there are two types of Jєωs, αѕнкenαzι Jєωs, who are Eastern European barbarians that converted to Judaism -- and they have nothing to do with the Bible.  It is said that Bram Stoker's Dracula was written about the influx of such Jєωs into London, and today they thoroughly dominate Hollywood.  Look at someone like Ben Mankiewicz on Turner Classic Movies, he looks like Genghis Khan.  They often have ridged foreheads and dark, piercing owl-like eyes, with a permanent sardonic expression.  They actually look like Klingons from Star Trek but the irony of that is that the fleet of the Enterprise, the supposed good-guys ( Nimoy and Shatner ) were real-life Jєωιѕн Klingons... These are also the ones who control banking and have given rise to the stereotype of the hook-nosed loathsome Jєω with the little glasses.

    Then there are the Sephardic Jєωs, who tend to look Middle Eastern, the ones who are almost physically indistinguishable from Palestinians.  These are the descendants of the Old Testament chosen people.

    But don't be fooled by people with names like "Freedman" who will tell you the Sephardic Jєωs are all good and the αѕнкenαzι Jєωs are all bad.  The illegal terrorist state of Israel is Sephardic.  Anyone who rejects Jesus and His Church of course cannot act in accordance with God's will, and both types of "Jєω" have rejected Him.  

    It seems most Jєωιѕн converts to the Catholic Church are Sephardic though.  The αѕнкenαzιs may be exceptionally evil, bloodless beings.  Imagine a tribe of Huns who converted to a religion that has been cursed since the death of Christ and you'll get the picture.
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.


    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Jesus was not a Jєω?
    « Reply #1 on: June 13, 2009, 10:40:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Let me try that again.

    "Today there are two types of Jєωs.  The first are the αѕнкenαzι Jєωs, who are Eastern European..."
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.