Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => General Discussion => Topic started by: sedetrad on June 19, 2012, 09:49:45 AM

Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: sedetrad on June 19, 2012, 09:49:45 AM
Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator? He has his tone. His defense of fellay and hatred of Mr. Heiner also seems similar.
Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: Thorn on June 20, 2012, 12:46:03 PM
huumm ---- Maybe that explains why he never answered me when I asked him to tell us something about himself when he first came here & posted in Introduce Yourself.  Nothing but complete silence.  I thought it rather odd.  Most people love talking about themselves.  Did he have something to hide?
Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: Tomas de Torquemada on June 20, 2012, 04:49:46 PM
Quote from: sedetrad
Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator? He has his tone. His defense of fellay and hatred of Mr. Heiner also seems similar.


This is funny stuff.  I like you guys.  Creative.

I already answered this in the other thread.  Just to re-cap that edge of the seat conversation:  no.  I am not now, nor have I ever been affiliated in any way shape or form with Angelqueen.

Can you provide one quote where I defended Bishop Fellay's policies?   You may want to go back and re-read my posts.  And hatred of Mr. Heiner? So being critical of one's public statements implies hatred of that person?  Really?



Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: Tomas de Torquemada on June 20, 2012, 05:03:03 PM
Quote from: Thorn
huumm ---- Maybe that explains why he never answered me when I asked him to tell us something about himself when he first came here & posted in Introduce Yourself.  Nothing but complete silence.  I thought it rather odd.  Most people love talking about themselves.  Did he have something to hide?


Actually, I never went back to that thread.  I didn't see the point.  But it's a nice theory when that is what you would like to believe.  

A little about myself: I was born in 1420 in Valladolid Spain.  I entered the Dominican monastery of San Pablo when I was quite young.  After being made prior of the monastery of Santa Cruz I served as confessor to Princess (and then Queen) Isabella I.   I served as Grand Inquisitor of Spain from 1483 until my death in 1498.    I am, unfortunately, one of the most maligned figures in Church history.  But that's ok.  I can take it.

I like good beer, fine tobacco, and long walks on the beach.

What else can I provide for you fine gentlemen?
Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: TraditionalistThomas on June 21, 2012, 09:24:40 AM
Quote from: Tomas de Torquemada
Quote from: sedetrad
Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator? He has his tone. His defense of fellay and hatred of Mr. Heiner also seems similar.


This is funny stuff.  I like you guys.  Creative.

I already answered this in the other thread.  Just to re-cap that edge of the seat conversation:  no.  I am not now, nor have I ever been affiliated in any way shape or form with Angelqueen.

Can you provide one quote where I defended Bishop Fellay's policies?   You may want to go back and re-read my posts.  And hatred of Mr. Heiner? So being critical of one's public statements implies hatred of that person?  Really?





You pretty much sum up the reasons why I don't often visit this forum in a single post. So many accusations, so much slander, so much bitter hatred and nothing but ad-hominems.

 :ready-to-eat:
Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: Tomas de Torquemada on June 21, 2012, 09:27:39 AM
Quote from: TraditionalistThomas
Quote from: Tomas de Torquemada
Quote from: sedetrad
Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator? He has his tone. His defense of fellay and hatred of Mr. Heiner also seems similar.


This is funny stuff.  I like you guys.  Creative.

I already answered this in the other thread.  Just to re-cap that edge of the seat conversation:  no.  I am not now, nor have I ever been affiliated in any way shape or form with Angelqueen.

Can you provide one quote where I defended Bishop Fellay's policies?   You may want to go back and re-read my posts.  And hatred of Mr. Heiner? So being critical of one's public statements implies hatred of that person?  Really?





You pretty much sum up the reasons why I don't often visit this forum in a single post. So many accusations, so much slander, so much bitter hatred and nothing but ad-hominems.

 :ready-to-eat:


Where did I make an ad hominem attack?
Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: TraditionalistThomas on June 21, 2012, 09:46:41 AM
Quote from: Tomas de Torquemada
Quote from: TraditionalistThomas
Quote from: Tomas de Torquemada
Quote from: sedetrad
Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator? He has his tone. His defense of fellay and hatred of Mr. Heiner also seems similar.


This is funny stuff.  I like you guys.  Creative.

I already answered this in the other thread.  Just to re-cap that edge of the seat conversation:  no.  I am not now, nor have I ever been affiliated in any way shape or form with Angelqueen.

Can you provide one quote where I defended Bishop Fellay's policies?   You may want to go back and re-read my posts.  And hatred of Mr. Heiner? So being critical of one's public statements implies hatred of that person?  Really?





You pretty much sum up the reasons why I don't often visit this forum in a single post. So many accusations, so much slander, so much bitter hatred and nothing but ad-hominems.

 :ready-to-eat:


Where did I make an ad hominem attack?


I was describing a lot of people on this forum, not you. I sympathise with you.
Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: Tomas de Torquemada on June 21, 2012, 10:15:24 AM
Quote from: TraditionalistThomas
Quote from: Tomas de Torquemada
Quote from: TraditionalistThomas
Quote from: Tomas de Torquemada
Quote from: sedetrad
Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator? He has his tone. His defense of fellay and hatred of Mr. Heiner also seems similar.


This is funny stuff.  I like you guys.  Creative.

I already answered this in the other thread.  Just to re-cap that edge of the seat conversation:  no.  I am not now, nor have I ever been affiliated in any way shape or form with Angelqueen.

Can you provide one quote where I defended Bishop Fellay's policies?   You may want to go back and re-read my posts.  And hatred of Mr. Heiner? So being critical of one's public statements implies hatred of that person?  Really?





You pretty much sum up the reasons why I don't often visit this forum in a single post. So many accusations, so much slander, so much bitter hatred and nothing but ad-hominems.

 :ready-to-eat:


Where did I make an ad hominem attack?


I was describing a lot of people on this forum, not you. I sympathise with you.


Oh.  Thank you!
Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: Lighthouse on June 21, 2012, 03:29:09 PM
Just a bit curious.  Why Lee and ?Stonewall?
Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: Neil Obstat on June 21, 2012, 04:48:00 PM
Quote from: Lighthouse
Just a bit curious.  Why Lee and ?Stonewall?


Why, Lee and Stonewall! (http://www.hmdb.org/Photos/4/Photo4401.jpg)

Zoom back, it looks like : (http://www.hmdb.org/Photos/4/Photo4402.jpg)
Title: Is Tomas de Torquemada the angelqueen moderator?
Post by: Tomas de Torquemada on June 21, 2012, 06:24:11 PM
Quote from: Neil Obstat
Quote from: Lighthouse
Just a bit curious.  Why Lee and ?Stonewall?


Why, Lee and Stonewall! (http://www.hmdb.org/Photos/4/Photo4401.jpg)

Zoom back, it looks like : (http://www.hmdb.org/Photos/4/Photo4402.jpg)


Neil,  

What are you trying to say?  Come out with it.