A friend (lawyer) of the Austrian SSPX district superior told me the quoted salary of then SSPX Jaidhof steward Mr Stadler. The source is solid, but only one. So Errors excepted. Even so the stated salary is not unusual for bloated lawyers' side jobs. Way too much for a priestly society of course. But such is the price for great ambitions.
Stadler's political party is just one of the many Jєωιѕн approved pseudo-rightists parties in the EU, see their "Jerusalem credo declaration". But that's part of the diabolic democratic show and soon obsolete anyway.
As for Dr Ewald Stadler and his salary, it was indeed not 'charity work' if he was paid 10,000 EUR. That's a lot, especially a month.
The combat term "antisemitism" is nonsense in several aspects, in particular for us Catholics. Firstly we are the enemies of the perfidious Jєωs because they're the enemies of Our Lord Jesus Christ, not because they're racially what-ever. Secondly and not so importantly there's much more Semites than just the Jєωιѕн ones. Ironically it's highly probable that most of today's Jєωs aren't Semites at all but descendants of some wild Black Sea folks.
Apart from the Khazar conversion to rabbinism, it is false to call "the" Jєωs "perfidious" in English. The correct word must be "unbelieving" (perfides), not perfidious or oath-breaking, as many of the Jєωs persecuting Christ (e.g. Saint Paul) did not even understand they were fighting the Divine Messiah and His followers.
Nobody said the Zionist Krah was a Mossad agent. Besides he's too fat for it! However Krah is the Mossad connection inside the SSPX. See Maurice Pinay's important research (partly published here on Cathinfo).
Is he a "Zionist" for being friends with an IDF officer and an Israeli American MBA former Harvard student? Guilt by association? Are we evil, because some traditional Roman Catholics are evil and committed grave sins (e.g. the adultery of Mel Gibson, widely reported - also by the Sulzberger media empire gratuitously).
Some photographs, pro-Fellay sympathy etc. does not mean "Mossad connection inside the SSPX". Is there any proof of Krah providing information to Mossad from SSPX interna, or of him being on a Mossad mission to destroy the SSPX?
The perfidious Jєωs as the oldest enemies of Our Lord Jesus Christ always fight against the Church. Archbishop Lefebvre knew it well. See his strong words against the Jєωs and their communistic and masonic puppets. However his disciples mostly forgot it.
Not perfidious, but unbelieving. This is the correct translation provided by the Holy Congregation of Rites in 1949 or 1948 I think to a Catholic Israeli association. So not perfidy or perjury or oath-breaking, but lack of Faith.
So in our time the Zionist Krah became a key figure in the takeover of the Catholic society named SSPX in order to destroy it. Other key figures are Krah's mentor Fr Pfluger. One part of that plot was to remove Bishop Williamson, by far the society's most battle-tried cleric and a main obstacle for any Sellout to Newrome and to the Jєωιѕн controlled NWO.
Nonsense.
Other persons I know (e.g. the Nantes sedevacantists) publish the Lancashire Red Rose in the coat of arms of Bp. Williamson as "proof" for His Lordship being a "Rosicrucian" on a secret mission to destroy the Roman Catholic resistance of the SSPX.
I agree with "Newrome" not with an (ethnic) "Jєωιѕн controlled NWO" theory.
Krah has never sworn loyalty to Zionism publicly, did he.
Fr. Pfluger comes from a very pious Roman Catholic family, and several of his family members oppose a compromise with the neo-Modernists.
Fr. Pfluger is not the mentor of Krah, I guess. Rather, Rev. Pfluger was impressed with Maximilian Krah being from the former GDR communist zone, and attending the SSPX chapel despite knowing the difficulties brought about by the German mind-control mentality which also permeates the CDU of Saxony probably.
Of course it is legitimate to criticize or even attack Krah's position on the agreement or sell-out (or whatever term you prefer) and his undue influence over Jaidhof Stiftung (ironically the Baroness Gutmann who donated the SSPX Austrian Chapel and Castle is of Jєωιѕн descent from the rich Oppenheim and Gutmann banking dynasties, converts like the paternal ancestors of Fr. Florian Abrahamowicz). Is this all a "Jєωιѕн conspiracy". Oh come on. I know very well about the Federal Reserve, international banking trillionaire families controlling the world's physical assets and commodities. But it is silly to allege every unpleasant and coincidentally pro-Israel-minded fellow Catholic is also "a Mossad agent" or "part of the Jєωιѕн conspiracy".
And today the same key figures officially try to enforce conformity with the heretical Newchurch. That would be the perfection of the plan, it seems.
Well, the modernist Krah played and plays his part well in the destruction of the SSPX. It's not an obsession but normal for Catholics to reveal his actions (most are done in the dark anyway), and in particular for the few Cathinfo users who speak German natively like Krah does.
Calumnious. Where did Maximilian Krah deny or relativize the content of a Roman Catholic dogma. I do not sympathize with Krah's opinion on the agreement and on his 'evolution hopes', but that does not mean one can anonymously label Krah a modernist here. Give proof. This is far worse than calling him a Zionist, which brought a smile upon my face (normally called an antisemite online for my criticism and openly state opinion).
Thanks to the English speakers who care about the Krahgate, like J.Paul and John Grace, to just name two.
So some Irish persons who do not know Krah think they can judge him a "modernist" and a "Zionist" and "Mossad connection" without any written proof. I wrote about the post-WW2 Soviet and Allied kangaroo courts recently, but this procedure of you also resembles such a false "court" (Fehmgericht in German).
Since Israel refused the true Messiah, it would give itself another messianism that is temporal and earthbound, dominating the world by money, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, Revolution, and social democracy.
We must not, however, forget that those Jєωs who were disciples of the true Messiah founded the true Israel, the spiritual kingdom, which prepares the heavenly kingdom.
The worldwide designs of the Jєωs are being brought about in our time, but they started with the foundation of Masonry and the Revolution which has decapitated the Church and set up worldwide socialist democracy.
("Marcel Lefebvre" by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, Angelus Press, Page 602-603)
Yes, I more or less agree with the Archbishop although the interbellum speech of "the" Jєωs is false. Many Rothschilds and former Oppenheim and Warburg descendants are now converted to Christianity, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is Kabbalah but is in contradiction with a lot of concept from Haredi "ultra-Orthodox" Judaism, and it is not like the atheist Bolshevik revolution was the work of rabbis. Rather, of post-rabbinic, post-Judaic secularized assimilatory materialistic mere 'ethnic' Jєωs - and non-Jєωs as well (remember the apostate Catholic noble Dzierzinski, founder of Cheka - later headed by Jєωs until 1939).
Of course the social and intellectual-academic dynamics of secularization of Jєωs, emancipation of the Jєωs, loss of the 'ultra-orthodox' rabbinic Judaism since 1750 (or since 1920 in Eastern Europe) brought about the consequences like seeking other forms of 'redemption' - be it Marxism or Zionism, or a combination.
However, I also know about Anton Graf Arco auf Valley. He murdered the socialist Jєωιѕн Bavarian president Kurt Eisner. His mother was from the rich Oppenheim banking dynasty, he a convert and fierce Bavarian monarchist and German nationalist. Later Graf Arco was attacked by the nαzι antisemitic (i.e. ethnic anti-Jєωιѕн racial theory) press.
Not to mention many Jєωιѕн converts to the Church in recent years and the last centuries.
There are also a lot of gentile non-Jєωιѕн conspirers against the Church, some of whom had nothing to do with the Jєωs - in whatever sense.
So an obsession with the Jєωιѕн people is not truthful.
Our struggle is a religious struggle. And Pope St. Pius X never tried to arrest or kill friendly Theodor Herzl on his Zionist initiative in 1907 audience. He showed respect, and respectful disagreement and religious Roman Catholic missionary zeals ("should you succeed to obtain permission to go to Palestine, we shall be there to baptism you" - especially clear as Herzl's own son had recently accepted Lutheran Christian baptism in the year before). The position and charitable orthodoxy must be our position in this regard too. His Holiness did not start a rant against Herzl's ethnicity or about the Rothschild control of money 'production' out of thin air. (Not that these topics are "forbidden". La Civiltà Cattolica in those years wrote a lot of Jesuit studies on the Jєωιѕн question and marxism and the banking families.)
Topic: Is there a way that smart SSPX boys can get their college tuition paid for (Read 5201 times)