It seemed that the Latins were being compared unfavorably with the Easterns, to the extent that they were not being given credit for anything. "Fuzzy" is not exactly an insult , but I still wouldn't have thought that anyone who preferred or identified with the Easterns would accept that term as applied to Eastern theologians.
As for my run-down of Constantinople II, maybe I laid it on a little too think about resistance to it in the West resulting from understandable resentment about the way in which the Roman Pontiff had been man-handled by the myrmidons of the Emperor. (And also because it was imagined -falsely, we are taught by the Council Fathers- that it was pointless to condemn dead heretics who had either never been censured by the Church (Theodore) or who had somehow pulled off an apparent rehabilitation (Theodoret). It was thought that condemning these Nestorian-type heretics was just a way to placate Monophysite heretics on the opposite side of the spectrum.)
In any case, I'd recommend reading not tendentious present day accounts of Constantinople II but the Acts of this supposedly "worthless" Council themselves. Just google up Constantinople II Acts. Note especially the holy horror with which the Fathers treat blasphemies against the Person of Jesus along the lines of what we read and see today. There is a great line such as "Reading such blasphemies we wondered that God had not sent fire from heaven to burn up the tongue that had uttered them. " Yet some authors persist in trying to rehabilitate Theodore and Theodoret even though Constantinople explicitly issues and anathema against those who attempt to do just that.
One of the reason I chose my avatar is that I read somewhere that it comes from that time period (middle 500s). There were no great Saints and Fathers active in that period in the midst of the great theological controversies. Constantinople II always makes me think of how it it Jesus Christ Himself Who controls thing relative to His Church. He somehow wanted to punish Theodore and Theodoret for what the had said against His Divine Dignity about His alleged "human passions" even though this did put the Fathers of Chalcedon and Pope Leo the Great himself in a rather awkward position.
It would be so much nicer to lead a Catholic life in which you never learn these things. But that ain't happening in our lifetime, so... We just should be on our guard against exaggerating such unfortunate embarrassments. What some people say about Chalcedon II is that it gave aid and comfort to the Monophysites: but they were expressly condemned as well as the Nestorian-style heretics.