Excerpts from the speech of Dr. Robert Faurisson at the Iran conference. The speech in its entirety can be found here:
http://www.rense.com/general74/revis.htmIn France it is perfectly lawful to proclaim unbelief in God but it is forbidden to say that one does not believe in the "h0Ɩ0cαųst", or simply that one has doubts about it.
This prohibition of any kind of disputing became formal and official with the law of July 13, 1990. The said law was published in the Journal officiel de la République française on the next day, that is, the 14th of July, day of commemoration of the Republic and of Freedom.
It states that the punishment may run to as much as a year's imprisonment and a fine of up to ¤45,000, but there may also be orders to pay damages and the considerable costs of judicial publication.
Relevant case law specifies that all this applies "even if [such disputing] is presented in veiled or dubitative form or by way of insinuation" (Code pénal, Paris, Dalloz, 2006, p. 2059).
Thus France has but one official myth, that of the "h0Ɩ0cαųst", and knows but one form of blasphemy, that which offends the "h0Ɩ0cαųst".
To President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
To our prisoners of conscience Ernst Zündel, Germar Rudolf, Horst Mahler To Arthur Butz, Fred Leuchter, Barbara Kulaszka, Ahmed Rami, Gerd Honsik, Heinz Koppe.
At the Nuremberg trial (1945-1946), a tribunal of the victors accused a defeated Germany notably
1) of having ordered and planned the physical extermination of the Jєωs of Europe;
2) of having, to that end, designed and used certain weapons of mass destruction, in particular those that it called "gas chambers;"
3) of having, essentially with those weapons but also through other means, caused the death of 6 million Jєωs.
President Ahmadinejad has used the right word: the alleged "h0Ɩ0cαųst" of the Jєωs is a "myth", that is, a belief maintained by credulity or ignorance.
In France it is perfectly lawful to proclaim unbelief in God but it is forbidden to say that one does not believe in the "h0Ɩ0cαųst", or simply that one has doubts about it.
This prohibition of any kind of disputing became formal and official with the law of July 13, 1990. The said law was published in the Journal officiel de la République française on the next day, that is, the 14th of July, day of commemoration of the Republic and of Freedom.
It states that the punishment may run to as much as a year's imprisonment and a fine of up to ¤45,000, but there may also be orders to pay damages and the considerable costs of judicial publication.
Relevant case law specifies that all this applies "even if [such disputing] is presented in veiled or dubitative form or by way of insinuation" (Code pénal, Paris, Dalloz, 2006, p. 2059).
Thus France has but one official myth, that of the "h0Ɩ0cαųst", and knows but one form of blasphemy, that which offends the "h0Ɩ0cαųst".
On July 11, 2006 I personally was once more summoned to appear before a Paris court on the grounds of that special law.
The presiding judge, Nicolas Bonnal, had recently attended a training course on the means of cracking down on revisionism over the Internet, a course organised by the European office of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, in Paris, under the auspices of the Conseil représentatif des institutions juives de France (CRIF) (Representative Council of Jєωιѕн Institutions of France)!
In a release triumphantly headed "The CRIF plays an active part in the training of European judges" this Jєωιѕн body,whose political force is exorbitant, was not afraid of announcing urbi et orbi that it listed Nicolas Bonnal amongst its pupils or trainees (
http://www.crif.org/?page=articles_display/detail&aid=7222&artyd=2&stinfo=297.376.1467).
And that is not all.
At my trial, for good measure, the State prosecutrix happened to be a Jєωess by the name of Anne de Fontette; in the closing words of her talk requesting conviction and sentencing, she, although supposedly speaking in the name of a secular State, called for the vengeance of "Yahweh, protector of his chosen people" against "the lying lips" of Faurisson, guilty of having granted a telephone interview of revisionist character to an Iranian radio and television station, Sahar 1.
The findings of revisionist research
The Germans of the Third Reich wanted to extirpate the Jєωs from Europe but not to exterminate them. They sought "a definitive or final - territorial solution of the Jєωιѕн question" and not a "final solution" in the sense of any physical suppression (to want a "final solution of unemployment" is not to desire the death of the unemployed).
The Germans had cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs but not "Extermination Camps" (an expression forged by Allied propaganda). They used disinfection gas chambers operating notably with an Insecticide called Zyklon-B (the active ingredient of which was hydrogen cyanide) but never had any homicidal gas chambers or homicidal gas vans.
They used crematory ovens to incinerate corpses and not to throw living beings into them. After the war, the photographs purportedly exposing "nαzι atrocities" showed us camp inmates who were either sick, dying or dead, but not killed. What with the Allies' blockade and their "area" bombing of Germany, and the apocalypse experienced by the latter towards the end of a nearly six-year long conflict, famine and epidemics, notably of typhus, had ravaged the country and, in particular, the camps in the western regions, overwhelmed by the arrivals en masse of detainees evacuated from the camps in the East, and thus severely lacking in food, medicine and the Zyklon-B needed for protection against typhus.
In the butchery that is a war,people suffer.In a modern war,the belligerent nations' civilians at times suffer as much if not more than their soldiers.
During the conflict that, from 1933 to 1945, pitted them against the Germans, the European Jєωs thus had occasion to suffer but infinitely less so than they dare to assert with such a nerve. Certainly the Germans treated them as a hostile or dangerous minority (there were reasons for that), and against these people the Third Reich authorities were led to take, due to the war, more and more coercive police or military security measures.
In certain cases those measures amounted to placement in internment camps or indeed to deportation to concentration or forced labour camps. Sometimes Jєωs were even executed for sabotage, spying, terrorism and, especially, for guerrilla activities in favour of the Allies, mainly on the Russian front, but not for the simple reason that they were Jєωιѕн.
Never did Hitler order or permit the killing of a person because of his or her race or religion. As for the figure of six million Jєωιѕн deaths, it is a pure invention that has never been substantiated despite the efforts in that regard by the Yad Vashem Institute of Jerusalem.
In the face of the formidable accusations thrown at a defeated Germany the revisionists have said to the accusers: 1) Show us one single docuмent that, in your view, proves that Hitler or any other National-Socialist ordered and planned the physical extermination of the Jєωs;
2) Show us that weapon of mass destruction which, as alleged, was a gas chamber; show us a single one of them, at Auschwitz or elsewhere; and if, by chance, you claim that you cannot show us any because, according to you, the Germans destroyed the "murder weapon", provide us at least with a technical drawing representing one of those slaughterhouses which, as you say, the Germans destroyed and explain to us how that weapon with such a fabulous killing performance had been able to work without bringing on the death of either those who ran it or their helpers;
3) Explain to us how you have arrived at your figure of 6 million victims. However,in 60+ years, Jєωιѕн or non-Jєωιѕн accusing historians have shown themselves to be incapable of offering response to these requests.
Thus they have been accusing without any evidence.
That is what is called slander.
But there is something yet more serious: the revisionists have set forth a series of established facts proving that the physical extermination, gas chambers and six million in question cannot have existed.
1) The first of these facts is that, for the entire duration of the war, millions of European Jєωs lived, plain for all to see, amidst the rest of the population, a good part of them being employed in factories by the Germans who were cruelly short of manpower, and those millions of Jєωs were therefore not killed.
Better still: the Germans stubbornly offered to hand over to the Allies, up to the last months of the conflict, as many Jєωs as they might want on the express condition that they must NOT Subsequently send them to Palestine; this proviso was made out of respect for "the noble and valiant Arab people" of that region, already violently beset by Jєωιѕн colonists.
2) The second fact, which is carefully hidden from us, is that excesses which might be committed against Jєωs could well bring on the severest sanctions: the killing of a single Jєω or Jєωess could get the perpetrator, although he be a German soldier, sentenced to death by court martial and shot. In other words, the Jєωs under German rule continued to enjoy, if they observed the regulations in place, the protection of penal law, even in the face of the armed forces.
3) The third of these facts is that the alleged nαzι gas chambers of Auschwitz or elsewhere are quite simply inconceivable for obvious physical and chemical reasons; never after the purported hydrogen cyanide gassing of hundreds or thousands of persons in a closed space could others have soon entered in a veritable bath of that poison and proceeded to handle and remove so many corpseswhich, steeped with cyanide gas on both outside and inside, would have become untouchable.
Hydrogen cyanide adheres firmly to surfaces; it penetrates even cement and bricks and is very difficult to remove from a room by ventilation; it penetrates the skin, it settles within the body, mixing with its fluids. In the United States it is precisely this poison that is used still today in an execution chamber to kill a condemned prisoner, but that precise chamber is of steel and glass and is equipped with machinery which is, of necessity, quite complex, calling for extraordinary precautions in its use; it is enough to see an American gas chamber designed for putting to death a lone individual to realise that the alleged Auschwitz gas chambers, which supposedly served to kill crowds of individuals, day after day, can neither have existed nor functioned.
But then, as people will ask, what became of all those Jєωs concerning whom we revisionists have concluded from our research that they were never killed? The answer is already there, right before our eyes and within everyone's grasp:
A part of the Jєωιѕн population of Europe died, like tens of millions of non-Jєωs, due to the war and to hunger and disease, and another part plainly and simply survived the war in their millions. These latter fraudulently had themselves dubbed "miraculous" survivors. In 1945 the "survivors" and "miraculous escapees" were there to be counted by the million and they spread throughout the world to fifty or so countries, beginning with Palestine.
How could an alleged decision of total physical extermination of the Jєωs have so engendered millions of "miraculous" Jєωιѕн survivors? With millions of "miraculous survivors" there is no longer any miracle: it is a false miracle, a lie, a fraud.
For my part, in 1980, I summed up, in a sentence of 60 French words, the findings produced by revisionist research:
The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jєωs form one & the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political & financial swindle whose beneficiaries are the state of Israel & International Zionism and whose main victims are the German people - but not their leaders - and the Palestinian people in their entirety.
Today, in 2006, that is, 26 years later, I maintain that sentence in full. It had not been inspired by any political or religious sympathy or antipathy whatsoever. It had its ground in certified facts that had begun to be brought to light, on the one hand, by Maurice Bardèche in 1948 and 1950 in his 2 books on the Nuremberg trial and, on the other hand, by Paul Rassinier who, also in 1950, published his Le Mensonge d'Ulysse (Ulysses's Lie) (See The h0Ɩ0cαųst Story and the Lies of Ulysses, Costa Mesa, California, Institute for Historical Review, 1990, XVIII-447 p.).
From 1951 onwards, year after year, our adversaries, so rich, so mighty, so bent on practising all possible forms of repression against historical revisionism, have found themselves progressively forced to admit that we are right on the technical, scientific and historical levels.
The victories achieved by Second World War revisionism are many and significant, but, as must sadly be recognised, they still remain, in our day, almost wholly unknown to the greater public.
The mighty have done everything to conceal these Victories from the World. That is understandable: their domination and sharing of the world between them are in a way grounded in the religion of the alleged "h0Ɩ0cαųst" of the Jєωs.
Calling the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" into question, publicly disclosing the Extraordinary Imposture of it all,
Pulling the masks off the politicians, journalists, historians, academics and people of the churches, clans and coteries who, for more than 60 years, have been preaching falsehoods whilst all the time casting Anathema on the Unbelievers, amounts to a perilous adventure.
But, as will be seen here, despite the repression, time seems in the end to be on the revisionists' side. Examples of revisionist victories I shall recall here just 20 of these victories:
Then, first in France and later in a number of other countries in Europe, these accusers have called for the passing of special laws to silence the revisionists. Here they have sealed their doom. To resort to special laws, to the police and prisons is to admit one's utter inability to use the arguments of reason, history and science.
A hundred other arguments again could be recalled here to prove that, on the plane of history and science, the immense edifice of lies put up by the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" or "Shoah" sect has been thrown down, with not one stone left upon another. In contrast to this expanse of ruins, we have seen the construction of a whole revisionist literature. In it can be discovered a profusion of docuмents, photographs, expert studies, trial transcripts, technical and scientific reports,testimonies, statistical studies, all of which bearing on a hundred aspects of the history of the Second World War that show what the lot of the European Jєωs was in reality, and demonstrate in striking manner that the Jєωιѕн version of that war is largely of the order of myth.
From the myth, the Jєωs have gone on to mythology and from mythology on to religion or, rather, to a semblance of religion. Today the servants of that false religion appear more and more like priests who carry on officiating and turning over the hallowed phrases but, manifestly, no longer have the faith. They seem no longer really to believe in their "credo". So it is, for instance, that for about the last ten years they have been seen advising their flocks to observe the greatest possible discretion on the subject of the gas chambers.
General Conclusion
We are granted the privilege of witnessing, in this beginning of the 21st century, a serious calling into question one of the greatest lies in history. The myth of the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" may well be aglow with a thousand lights:
In reality it is burning itself out. It has served to justify the creation in the land of Palestine of a warlike colony that has taken the name of "Jєωιѕн State" and endowed itself with a "Jєωιѕн Army". It imposes on the Western world the yoke of a Jєωιѕн or Zionist tyranny bringing itself to bear in fields of intellectual, academic & media activity.
It poisons the very soul of a great country, Germany. It has allowed the extortion from the latter, as well as from a good number of other Western countries, of exorbitant sums in marks, in dollars or in euros. It overwhelms us with films, with museums, with books that keep the flame of a тαℓмυdic-style hatred burning.
It makes it possible to call for an armed crusade against "the axis of evil" and, for this, to fabricate, on demand, the most shameless lies precisely in the pattern of the Great Lie of the "h0Ɩ0cαųst", for there is no difference between Adolf Hitler's "weapons of mass destruction" and those of Saddam Hussein. It makes it possible to accuse nearly the whole world and to demand "repentance" and "reparations" everywhere, either for alleged actions directed against
"Yahweh's chosen people", an alleged complicity in the crime, or an alleged general indifference to the fate of the Jєωs during the Second World War. Under its belt it has a glut of rigged trials, beginning with the loathsome Nuremberg trial. It has sanctioned thousands of hangings of defeated soldiers, an atrocious post-war Purge, the deportation of millions of civilians chased from their ancestral homelands, indescribable pillaging, tens of thousands of scandalous legal proceedings, including those carried out today against octogenarians or nonagenarians, attacked by "miraculous" Jєωιѕн survivors giving their false testimony.
These abominations, this outrage of lies and hatred, this hubris that one day or another destiny always comes to punish, in short, all these excesses must end. No nation has shown more patience with this Jєωιѕн or Zionist hubris than the Arab nation; however we see that this nation itself has now run out of patience.
It is going to throw off the Israeli yoke and have the West understand that the time has come to seek real peace instead of supporting and arming an artificial State that maintains itself only by force. Even in the West, even in the United States, the scales are falling off some people's eyes and there is now a certain awareness of the hazards imposed on the international community by such prolonged submission to the false religion of the "h0Ɩ0cαųst", no. 1 weapon, sword and shield of the State of Israel.
Practical Conclusion
There exist some practical means to launch a real action against this false religion with its sanctuary located at Auschwitz.
As is known, in the heart of Auschwitz there is an emblematic gas chamber. Up to now thirty million tourists have visited it. It is an imposture; all the historians are aware of this, as the authorities of the Auschwitz State Museum know better than anyone.
Yet UNESCO (the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), on October 26, 1979, at the request of the Polish government, put this camp on its list of World Heritage and Cultural Property Sites, thus assuming the duty of preserving its authenticity.
For my part, I suggest therefore that the matter of this fraud be formally referred to UNESCO, as it constitutes an offence against education, science and culture. In a more general manner, we could take up the words of Jean-Gabriel Cohn Bendit in 1979: "Let us fight for the destruction of those gas chambers they show tourists in the camps where there were none, as we now know" (Libération, March 5, 1979, p. 4).
There exist other practical means to fight the tyranny of the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" myth, first amongst which is to announce to the whole world these "revisionist victories" which have thus far been kept hidden from it. I trust the revisionists present at this gathering will suggest other means and discuss them with us.
Practising mendacity on a grand scale, the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" religionists have made themselves, little by little, the enemies of the human race. For more than sixty years they have progressively been putting the whole world, or just about, under indictment. Their main target has, of course, been Germany and all those who, alongside that country, had thought it their duty to fight against Stalin in the same way that others, in the opposing camp, believed they must fight against Hitler.
But, in their accusatory frenzy, Jєωιѕн organisations have gone so far as to rebuke the wartime Allies for an alleged criminal "indifference" to the lot of the European Jєωs. They have attacked Roosevelt, Churchill, De Gaulle, Pope Pius XII, the International Committee of the Red Cross and numerous other personalities, official bodies or countries for not having denounced the existence of the "gas chambers".
But how could what was so obviously just a grotesque war rumour have been considered verified? It is enough to read the book by the Jєω Walter Laqueur, The Terrible Secret (London, Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1980, 262 p.), to gather thirty or so references to the widespread and thoroughly justified scepticism in the Allied camp before the flood of rumours originating from Jєωιѕн sources. Inquiries were carried out enabling officials to conclude that the rumours were unfounded.
It was thus clear-sightedness and not indifference that the Allies and others charged showed. It was that same clear-sightedness which, after the war, in their speeches or in their memoirs, Churchill, De Gaulle and Eisenhower showed as they avoided mentioning, even so much as once, the said "gas chambers".
War and war propaganda need lies just as crusades and the crusader spirit are fuelled by hatred. On the other side, peace and friendship between peoples can only gain from care being taken to achieve exactitude in historical research, research that all must be able to carry out in complete freedom.
Topic: Iran Holocult Conference (Read 1845 times)