Welcome Cody. How can your family stuation bar you from the priesthood? Who have you tried asking?
Parents are baptized Catholics. They cohabitted, got married in Vegas away from their families, and were not open to life. Their marriage is invalid by three measurements. That technically makes me an illegtimate.
Talked to my pastor. Bastards can't be priests. Deuteronomy 23:2. Catechism of Council of Trent and the SSPX doesn't allow it. End of story. Besides, I never had a desire to be a priest so no harm for me.
Hello!
Just for the record, none of the measurements you listed would invalidate a marriage. If two baptized people marry, even outside the Church, the marriage is valid. It is unlawful in this case (because as baptized Catholics, they had an obligation to marry in the Church) but it is valid.
That's incorrect. It is invalid. By traditional standard AND by Novus Ordo standards which is pathetic. You know you're in a bad situation if you don't even follow the new doctrines. If baptized Catholics get married in front of a heretical minister that is a mortal sin and excommunication.
Check the Catechism of the Council of Trent for that and under cladestine marriage. My pastor has confirmed all of that his and I have no reason to believe he is wrong.
Where are you getting your doctrines from?
Cody,
If Catholics get married outside of the church, then it is a mortal sin. I don't recall whether or not an excommunication follows, but even if it does, that doesn't make it invalid. It is an excommunicable offense,
latae sententiae, to consecrate without an apostolic mandate, but consecrations made without such a mandate are not invalid. Ditto marriage.
Something can be bad without being invalid.
Anyways, in the case you're describing, and with the information you've provided, I don't see why one should conclude that the marriage is invalid. I am "getting my doctrines" from pre-conciliar canon lawyers, who, when listing the diriment impediments to marriage, do not list "getting married outside the church."
If it was truly clandestine, i.e., without witnesses, then that's a different story, or at least COULD be a different story, since the marriage would lack the canonical proof to be considered valid (though don't get upset at me, since you didn't use the word "clandestine" until now, and I'm not even sure that you're using it correctly-- it means that there's no proof that the marriage was attempted). However, I'm sure a certificate with witnesses exists. Besides, marriage enjoys the favor of the law; it is a unique sacrament in that it is assumed valid even in the face of doubts, unless it is proven invalid.