Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Introduce yourself!  (Read 899730 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Creation of COVID-19 sub-forum
« Reply #1095 on: May 27, 2020, 04:50:16 PM »
I agree.  COVID 19 does not fit under General Discussion (which has no "New Post" button),
nor does it fit under "Catholics living in the Modern world",
nor does it fit under "Health and Nutrition",
nor does it fit under "SSPX Resistance".
.
It might fit under a new category, "Medical Tyranny".

Is it good enough to make the request here?

Re: Creation of COVID-19 sub-forum
« Reply #1096 on: May 28, 2020, 06:55:14 AM »
I agree.  COVID 19 does not fit under General Discussion (which has no "New Post" button),
nor does it fit under "Catholics living in the Modern world",
nor does it fit under "Health and Nutrition",
nor does it fit under "SSPX Resistance".
.
It might fit under a new category, "Medical Tyranny".
I think it fits quite well under:
Fighting Errors in the Modern World
Catholics resisting errors, cօռspιʀαcιҽs (Liberalism, Zionism, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, ʝʊdɛօ-Masonry, Communism, Modernism) and evil men who conspire against mankind (Neo-cons, Bilderburgers, nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr, Big Pharma, Media, Globalists, Bankers, etc.)

The majority of the posts approach Covid 19 from the perspective that it involves a conspiracy against mankind and includes Big Pharma, Media and other bad actors.

If there were some advantage to giving it a dedicated area, I would expect Matthew to create a child board in the Fighting Errors sub-forum.  I personally don't see any advantage, but I'm not an admin so what do I know? 


This ain't the place/Re: Creation of COVID-19 sub-forum
« Reply #1097 on: May 28, 2020, 05:17:14 PM »
Well, hey-ell!   I had considered the length of my draft reply, and the fact that I  am completely lacking authority in CathInfo, plus your status as a newbie, and the sensible reply by ‘JayneK’.  So I started to draft a brief intro for sending this message to you via C.I.'s private-message feature, instead of posting it in any C.I. subforum.  Then as I was about to send it, you replied with this rationalization:

The reason is because COVID-19 and the lockdown is a TIME-SENSITIVE issue that if not taken care of REALLY soon, will be a disaster of no-return for the nation. [....] We have a chance now, but we need to group better and have some plans. That cannot be effectively done mixing it with all those other issues.

Sez the newbie?  Uh, huh.  So in replying to that also, my posting grew to even greater length.  More importantly for you, your latest reply could be interpreted as willful rejection of rules recently restated by Matthew about how he insists that C.I. members use his Web site [†] [‡].  Calling them "terms of service" might not be too much of a stretch.  "Mixing it" is a fundamental characteristic of nearly any Internet forum, and before that, nearly any dial-up bulletin boards.

So I've redecided to post my draft reply here, where none of this discussion belongs.

I didn't see any button to open a new post [...]

That's completely correct: There isn't one.  It's absent because so many CathInfo members were cluttering the "General Discussion" subforum with topics that, to a logically thinking person like Matthew, obviously didn't belong there.  But they were an adequate fit to at least 1 of the subforums he's created over the years.  So it seems that he finally hit the limit of his congenial tolerance.  I'm completely sympathetic to that, because I  was increasingly & repeatedly wasting lots of time trying to find postings I'd read long enough ago to forget where they were posted, because they were posted in what was obviously a wrong subforum.  Matthew specifically mentioned member "laziness" in the title of his topic.  The result was very similar to what we'd likely see if members just created their new topics in whatever subforum they read last in their previous browsing session.  I thought that Matthew was being quite charitable in writing "it's not rocket science", because I'd begun to doubt whether certain frequently offending members were suffering, um, persistent mental difficulties.  Be that as it may, Matthew shut off creation of new topics in the "General Discussion".

You needn't take my word for it: Not only because I  am completely lacking authority in CathInfo, but also because Matthew posted his own explanation less than 2 months ago, and it still appears on the 1st page of topics listed under "General Discussion".  I guess he thought that its newsworthiness to C.I. members could not have been any more obvious: "General Discussion closed to new topics, due to laziness and abuse" [†].  In it, he mentioned "COVID" twice.  As he also did in a closely related topic: "PLEASE RESPECT the sub-forums! Not everything goes in General!", esp. his addendum less than a day later [‡].  Yes, I am strongly recommending that you read them both real soon, where now would not be too soon.

[...] so I am posting here.
Can we have a new sub-forum created dedicated to COVID-19?  Looks like this is going to be a major topic for quite some time.

Ah!  So you didn't rummage around for an appropriate COVID-19 topic in some other subforum, and instead indulged yourself in the same kind of laziness for which Matthew had already hit his limit.  What a clever way for a newbie with fewer than 30 posts to get the attention of the CathInfo owner-operator-moderator himself!  In particular, "Introduce yourself" is quite obviously not a place for replies whose sole purpose is to request organizational changes to CathInfo's software, e.g., that Matthew create a new subforum.  I have no special knowledge of Matthew's browsing habits, but it seems to me that posting it in that long-stretched topic is an excellent way to post it where he's unlikely to ever see it.  What you should do instead in such circuмstances is send a private-message to him.  Perhaps you don't realize that you can still do that, even after this newbie faux pas.  Or if that's too confusing, then at least post your request in whichever CoVID-19-titled topic has sprawled over the most pages, which is also where many other members will see it, and likely discuss it.  Because CathInfo is a service implemented as computer software physically hosted by Matthew, he might have considered the "Computers and Technology" subforum not to be an intolerably bad choice.

-------
Note †: April 02, 2020, 19:49:09: <https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/general-discussion-closed-to-new-topics-due-to-laziness-and-abuse/>.

Note ‡: April 03, 2020, 15:05:18: <https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/please-respect-the-sub-forums!-not-everything-goes-in-general!/msg693657/#msg693657>.

Re: This ain't the place/Re: Creation of COVID-19 sub-forum
« Reply #1098 on: May 29, 2020, 04:16:12 PM »
Well, hey-ell!   I had considered the length of my draft reply, and.....
That is one of the most annoying, verbose, pedantic posts I have ever seen.

Re: This ain't the place/Re: Creation of COVID-19 sub-forum
« Reply #1099 on: May 29, 2020, 04:53:22 PM »
That is one of the most annoying, verbose, pedantic posts I have ever seen.
Personally I like his style, but de gustibus non est disputandum. Whether you liked the style or not, you should pay attention to the content. AlligatorDicax has been on this forum a long time and has a very good idea of how it functions.