That's like saying "if the Communists were really involved in some kind of organised communist conspiracy, why did Joseph Stalin kill other Communists in the Great Purge?"  

If the Jєωs and Bilderbergers are running the show as the cօռspιʀαcιҽs theorists would have you believe and the opposing forces of democracy are just a sham, then why are they prosecuting one of their own for corruption?

He must have done something one of his cohorts didn't like.

Quote from: ggreg

If the Jєωs and Bilderbergers are running the show as the cօռspιʀαcιҽs theorists would have you believe and the opposing forces of democracy are just a sham, then why are they prosecuting one of their own for corruption?

He must have done something one of his cohorts didn't like.

Plenty of Presidents and Heads of State do that.  How often do they get prosecuted?  It's reasonably rare in democratic states.  Some countries, like Russia, even have laws specifically giving immunity to former heads of state for anything they did in office.

Heads of State usually don't prosecute former heads of state, precisely because it sets a dangerous precedent and they don't want to find themselves hoisted on their own petard when the new guy comes along.

Presumeably, as president of France, Sarkozy would know enough about the names and activities of cohorts to expose them to public scrutiny.  How would it be possible to negotiate deals, agree plans etc without some sort of evidence or paper trail which, as President, Sarkozy would be able to access and copy?

Mandleson a completely bent (in SO many ways) MP + President of the international think tank Policy Network - UK Westminster hanger-on has been forced to resign in total disgrace at least twice to my knowledge.

But Mandleson has not been prosecuted.

Again, I would ask, why, if these "cohort" people have to be co-opted, trusted at least to some extent with some part of the "illuminati's" plan, are they then hung out to dry.

Why don't the illuminati simply make a phone call to the judges, media editors, prosecutor's office and tell them not to publish the story or continue with the prosecution?

Surely a Sarkozy in jail and under prosecution is far more risky and uncontrollable than one who is earning a fat salary from book tours and speaking engagements and living a comfortable life with his attractive paramour Carla Bruni, is he not?

Sarkozy is being prosecuted for "peddling influence" essentially a brand of corruption that 95% of politicos engage in; and a very subjective action.  I would understand if his friends in high places decided not to protect him against child porn being found on his hard drive or drink driving in as much as they would not be directly to blame or in anyway associated with his personal weaknesses.  He would be less likely to blame them for his downfall.

But "peddling influence" is surely the illuminati's stock in trade and all of their cohorts and minions must by definition be doing it in order to carry out their masterplan because the whole point of the conspriracy surely is that backroom deals and faustian bargains are made.

Would the other cohorts/minions not wonder whether if the former Presdient of France could be hung out to dry (or not protected) by the illuminati men behind the curtain, that they themselves were not safe?

Why did Bernie Maddoff get prosecuted and convicted? Because many other Jєωs besides the goyim were hurt by his grand scheme. If the Jєωs had not been hurt, then he would not have been prosecuted. Sarkozy must have done something to hinder or offset the goals of the Christ-haters. $63 million stolen from Gaddafi for campaign expenses is a mickey mouse crime compared to the many BILLIONS of $ stolen from Gaddafi's accounts and gold reserves once he was deposed and murdered. Sounds like Sarkozy is being scapegoated (albeit, he is guilty for complicity of such war crimes and corruption) as a diversion from the deeper financial corruption linked to targeting Gaddafi. As InfiniteFaith said:

But the people behind all of this (if this is whats going on) are not stupid. Maybe they thought that they needed to do something to keep the "game" believable.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand".

Is that moronic too?

So they could not possibly have known whether his fund was stuffed with Jєωs or had no Jєωιѕн clients at all.

But before they brought a case against Maddoff, many Jєω clients were making complaints against Maddoff to authorities. True, no proof at that time, but they were being alerted to Maddoff by Jєωs (as well as goyim).

In fact in seven prior years a trader had sent a mathematical (statistical) proof that Madoff MUST be running a pyramid scheme and the SEC ignored it (FOUR TIMES!!!).

Quote

Exactly, because during those years, the Jєω clients were still living large under the deception that their investments were yielding them "profits". It wasn't until the scam ran its course, and the Jєωs started realizing their money was being stolen, did they begin demanding evidence of their so called "returns", thus, they began making complaints.

Quote

Seems pretty risky "scapegoating" the former President of a G7 country; if a conspiracy exists.

Not if this diabolical cabal threatens to kill his whole family- spare none - and everyone for whom he cares. Maybe even incorporate torture on some of the most innocents. These Global Chess Players are demonic. That's how they operate.

Example: Ted Kennedy knew there was more to his brothers' assassinations and it was covered up by the government. He was not a stupid person. But he knew if he demanded further investigations, and publicly expressed the bogus details in the Warren Report, then his (Ted's) deeper skeletons-in-the-closet would have been exposed (far worse than Chappaquiddick) by the same cabal who killed JFK (and maybe Robert), and perhaps, even him being αssαssιnαtҽd along with his whole family; or his family's money seized by the government for trumped up charges of corruption while Ted rotted in jail. Look at what happened to JFK Jr. That was not a simple plane crash due to his piloting errors. LOL. The ѕуηαgσgυє knew he was not going to be their puppet in the future and play ball with them. They knew he was an inevitable hindrance to their agenda. Maybe it was just something as simple as him being against the Zionist occupation of Palestine (just one possible example), and as a very popular public figure, he could have influenced a lot of people's attitudes and beliefs about what is happening in Palestine, much to the chagrin of the Christ-haters.