Mandleson a completely bent (in SO many ways) MP + President of the international think tank Policy Network - UK Westminster hanger-on has been forced to resign in total disgrace at least twice to my knowledge.
But Mandleson has not been prosecuted.
Again, I would ask, why, if these "cohort" people have to be co-opted, trusted at least to some extent with some part of the "illuminati's" plan, are they then hung out to dry.
Why don't the illuminati simply make a phone call to the judges, media editors, prosecutor's office and tell them not to publish the story or continue with the prosecution?
Surely a Sarkozy in jail and under prosecution is far more risky and uncontrollable than one who is earning a fat salary from book tours and speaking engagements and living a comfortable life with his attractive paramour Carla Bruni, is he not?
Sarkozy is being prosecuted for "peddling influence" essentially a brand of corruption that 95% of politicos engage in; and a very subjective action. I would understand if his friends in high places decided not to protect him against child porn being found on his hard drive or drink driving in as much as they would not be directly to blame or in anyway associated with his personal weaknesses. He would be less likely to blame them for his downfall.
But "peddling influence" is surely the illuminati's stock in trade and all of their cohorts and minions must by definition be doing it in order to carry out their masterplan because the whole point of the conspriracy surely is that backroom deals and faustian bargains are made.
Would the other cohorts/minions not wonder whether if the former Presdient of France could be hung out to dry (or not protected) by the illuminati men behind the curtain,
that they themselves were not safe?