This is a hot-button issue for me.
The NO Church is weird as hell about Baptism anyway, with infant Baptisms regularly delayed weeks or months at all the NO parishes I've ever been part of. Traddy priests I know, all of them, have a real sense of urgency about Baptizing infants.
Now, on conditional Baptisms, the NO Church is just crazy IMO. Catholic priests are almost never experts in Protestant praxis, certainly not in historical Protestant praxis. Despite not knowing anything about recent Protestant history, NO priests, instructed (pressured) by NO diocese, accept Protestant Baptisms from anyone, anytime, with very little proof. I was Protestant in the 70's and 80's. I can tell you from experience that there is no guarantee, NONE, that any Protestant Baptism was done validly.
Presbyterians experimented with different Trinitarian formulations (Creator, Redeemer, Sanctifier - or- Father, Mother, Son). All kinds of mainline Protestants were infected with one-ness pentecostalism and Baptized solely in Jesus' name for years. Nobody really knows!
In this environment, Trad priests rightly Baptize all converts conditionally. The NO Church refuses to Baptize conditionally under almost all conditions (I went through NO RCIA. My family did too. I have had these fights) as part of their bizarre ecuмenical surrender to Protestantism.
This policy is bad. Wrong. Evil, I think. Just Baptize conditionally! It costs nothing! So it offends a Protestant somewhere. WTH cares? Not me.