Author Topic: I Decided to Post on Catholic Answers and I....... (Read 1615 times)

Truth is Eternal · « **on:** July 01, 2013, 05:02:10 PM »

Someone on here wrote about Catholic Answers being quick to ban true Catholics. I finally decided to find out how well they know the Catholic faith, only to get banned in less than 15 minutes.

My screen name was FATHER WATHEN.

Here is the question and poll I posted.

Quote

Is Denial of God's Revealed Truth, Denial of Jesus?

If a person who says, “I believe in Jesus as my personal Lord and Savior”, yet, knowingly denies God's revealed truth, is this denial of God's revealed truth, denial of Jesus?

The purpose of this poll is not a theological debate on who's right and who's wrong. I am interested in finding out, do many people believe people are denying Jesus when they knowingly deny any part of God's revealed truth?

Yes!
No!
Unsure!

[31] Fear not therefore: better are you than many sparrows. [32] Every one therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in heaven. [33] But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven. [Matthew 10:33] [34] Do not think that I came to send peace upon earth: I came not to send peace, but the sword. [35] For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

came to set a man at variance: Not that this was the end or design of the coming of our Saviour; but that his coming and his doctrine would have this effect, by reason of the obstinate resistance that many would make, and of their persecuting all such as should adhere to him.

Matto · « **Reply #1 on:** July 01, 2013, 05:04:23 PM »

Quote from: Truth is Eternal

My screen name was FATHER WATHEN.

No wonder they banned you from a Novus Ordo website if your screen name was that of one of the more famously anti-Novus Ordo priests.

Truth is Eternal · « **Reply #2 on:** July 01, 2013, 05:06:47 PM »

Quote from: Matto

Quote from: Truth is Eternal
My screen name was FATHER WATHEN.

No wonder they banned you from a Novus Ordo website if your screen name was that of one of the more famously anti-Novus Ordo priests.

They should at least have shown me where they think I have gone astray. :dancing:

Frances · « **Reply #3 on:** July 01, 2013, 05:13:44 PM »

The answer is a simple "yes." A person may be UNAWARE that his "personal Lord and Savior"
talk makes him a heretic, nonetheless, denial of Christ is the ultimate conclusion, the OBJECTIVE REALITY, the TRUTH of any dogma except for that taught by the Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ. Whether a person is formally or materially a heretic, and how he will fare at his particular judgment are separate issues from the question you posed. Are you surprised you were dismissed by disciples of the greatest super-heresy, Vatican II?

Truth is Eternal · « **Reply #4 on:** July 01, 2013, 05:24:16 PM »

Quote from: Frances

The answer is a simple "yes." A person may be UNAWARE that his "personal Lord and Savior"
talk makes him a heretic, nonetheless, denial of Christ is the ultimate conclusion, the OBJECTIVE REALITY, the TRUTH of any dogma except for that taught by the Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ. Whether a person is formally or materially a heretic, and how he will fare at his particular judgment are separate issues from the question you posed. Are you surprised you were dismissed by disciples of the greatest super-heresy, Vatican II?

I was not surprised I was dismissed by disciples of the greatest super-heresy, Vatican II. I was surprised I was banned in less than 15 minutes. I have posted on Protestant, Progressive, Atheist, Feminist and a Republican Forum and Catholic answers in the only forum I have been banned on in less than 15 minutes. :shocked:

Zeitun · « **Reply #5 on:** July 01, 2013, 05:28:46 PM »

Next time play it safe with "Schlomo Newburger" or "Khalid Ebrahim".

Sigismund · « **Reply #6 on:** July 01, 2013, 05:33:45 PM »

Actually, if you really want to try again, pick some name of someone canonized since 1969 and see how long it takes you to get banned again.

Frances · « **Reply #7 on:** July 01, 2013, 05:53:08 PM »

Certainly the screen name you chose was a setup for banishment! Another factor that played into your swift dismissal is that liberals lack ability to reason. They are incapable of making distinctions such as I proposed in my first post.
"Their minds have turned to mush."~Bp. Williamson

MiserereMeiDeus · « **Reply #8 on:** July 01, 2013, 06:49:49 PM »

Quote from: Sigismund

Actually, if you really want to try again, pick some name of someone canonized since 1969 and see how long it takes you to get banned again.

UNLESS you choose Edmund Campion or Margaret Clitherow, or one of the other 40 Martyrs of England and Wales who Paul VI amazingly enough canonized in 1970!

Spork · « **Reply #9 on:** July 01, 2013, 06:58:25 PM »

So you claimed to be someone you weren't. You went in with an antagonistic and disingenuous ethos, and you are surprised your were banned. Maybe if you used your real name, things could have turned out differently. I don't think Our Lord and Our Blessed Mother were well pleased with your actions.

Frances · « **Reply #10 on:** July 01, 2013, 07:01:36 PM »

Ah! The joys of the internet! :dancing-banana:

Zeitun · « **Reply #11 on:** July 01, 2013, 07:08:41 PM »

Quote from: Spork

So you claimed to be someone you weren't. You went in with an antagonistic and disingenuous ethos, and you are surprised your were banned. Maybe if you used your real name, things could have turned out differently. I don't think Our Lord and Our Blessed Mother were well pleased with your actions.

Is Spork your real name?

Frances · « **Reply #12 on:** July 01, 2013, 07:15:55 PM »

Avatar? What Avatar? That's his photo!
:smoke-pot:
(Just joking!)
Okay, before I lose my fine CI reputation, here's my photo.
:dancing-banana:

Spork · « **Reply #13 on:** July 01, 2013, 07:19:40 PM »

Quote from: Zeitun

Quote from: Spork
So you claimed to be someone you weren't. You went in with an antagonistic and disingenuous ethos, and you are surprised your were banned. Maybe if you used your real name, things could have turned out differently. I don't think Our Lord and Our Blessed Mother were well pleased with your actions.

Is Spork your real name?

Good question, good point. No. It is a silly name I thought if when I signed up to defend FE. Yes, I admit it. Terrible mistake. BEEEE OOOOOO BEEEEE OOOOOO--ERROR! ERROR! ERROR! Think of me what Thou wilt. I have apologized for my original intentions here.

But now I have do not have antagonistic intentions nor do I post to get banned. So,

Santo Subito · « **Reply #14 on:** July 01, 2013, 09:47:22 PM »

Your original post title is humorous.

I got banned there as well and my screen name is Santo Subito!

I'm not even sure why I was banned.

I posted something. I came back and didn't see it. I thought it didn't go through.

I posted it again. I got permanently banned for "circuмvention"!

:confused1: