Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Hyp-Mo-Tized!  (Read 5541 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Raoul76

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4803
  • Reputation: +2007/-6
  • Gender: Male
Hyp-Mo-Tized!
« on: June 10, 2009, 08:45:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Deleted by author's request
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.


    Offline Classiccom

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 768
    • Reputation: +0/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #1 on: June 10, 2009, 09:46:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  You are a riot. !  :dancing:

        I think you are right. He understands the Hegelian mechanics

      Felllay (paraphrase) - "Your are here because you have been shocked.

    Boy do they have all the mechanics and routines set up.! Reagan, John Paul II, and now it looks like Fellay are all conservative mouse traps How about that Malachi Matin, JPII's cheerleader. Remember Martin used to say what a great conservative JPII was and his fight with all the liberals in the Church.  Hard to believe acting had reached such an instense level of depravity.

     


    Offline Classiccom

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 768
    • Reputation: +0/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #2 on: June 10, 2009, 10:06:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • No surprise to Cathinfo

    EXCLUSIVE: Voight calls Obama 'good actor'

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/10/voight-obama-is-a-good-hollywood-actor/

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #3 on: June 10, 2009, 11:17:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "Hard to believe acting had reached such an intense level of depravity."  :ready-to-eat:

    Yes!  Exactly!  This is a theme that fascinates me because I was once an aspiring actor and writer, the consummate artiste, and I remember I was very Machiavellian.  I didn't just plot out my film scripts, I would plot out how I was going to act and do press interviews once I got famous, how I would maintain the interest of the public... I'm pretty sure that I was not the only one like that.  This is a symptom of a narcissistic age.  Somehow Jesus talked me down from the ledge.  I was making myself sick.

    Because of this though I do see actors everywhere.  I see these actors not only in Hollywood but in the Vatican and in the Church.  Many of them do not really care about their parishioners, but only about being talked-about, even if if they are seen as the villain.  They are just playing roles.  What they love is the SPOTLIGHT.

    My dad was a lawyer and he would always mock other lawyers and judges for trying to get into the papers.  He'd call them "stars," as opposed to the "real" lawyers, those who do the grunt work and keep their noses to the grindstone.  Lefebvre was most certainly a "star."  Thuc was a real lawyer, quietly and brutally martyred -- so it seems to me anyway.

    As you say, it is unbelievable how subtle people can be in their acting.  It has reached a point where "even the elect would be deceived if it were possible."  But Christ is always fair.  He showed us the way.  And when you read the words of Jesus, or the Apostles, or the heretic-fighters of early Church history, these words are always clear and direct.  No obfuscation.  What could be more clear than the language of St. Chrysostom?  This is how truth-tellers always talk, but we have lost sight of that today.  We want the warm fuzzies, we want to hear whatever reassures us.  We deserve these double-minded creeps.

    That kind of "itching ear," only wanting to hear what is pleasant, got us to where we are today, which is right in the thick of an unbelievable, magical, occultic nightmare, where witchcraft has swept the earth from end to end.  We could have nipped it in the bud at the time of the French and American  Revolutions, said "We will not accept democracy" or "We will not accept to be financially ruled by Jєωs."  Too late.  Now the truth is SO far-fetched that it's even more impossible for most to believe.  That is why there are about six or seven of us on this board and even we don't see eye-to-eye on everything.  The Catholic Church has been ravaged nearly to death by witchcraft.   But it still lives!

    This is the reverse of the Middle Ages.  Back then the majority were Catholics and there were scattered witches to make people scared; now the vast majority are witches , even if they don't know it.  I'd like to think they are a bit scared of us, but they probably aren't.  They should certainly be scared of Christ who will utterly obliterate them on the Day of Wrath.

     
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #4 on: June 10, 2009, 11:21:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Oh yeah, and Malachi Martin... People in my sede Church were speaking about him in positive tones.  I said bluntly "Marrano" and they all got quiet.  That even made me paranoid about them.

    The book Windswept House is like you said, Malachi pretends as if John Paul II was trying to fight off all the modernists, ha ha.
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.


    Offline obediens

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 209
    • Reputation: +84/-8
    • Gender: Male

    Offline Dawn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2439
    • Reputation: +46/-1
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #6 on: November 11, 2010, 04:33:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Oh my  here we go again. Are there any priests or Bishops that are not on your list?

    Offline Roman Catholic

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2679
    • Reputation: +397/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #7 on: November 11, 2010, 08:44:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Dawn
    Oh my  here we go again. Are there any priests or Bishops that are not on your list?


    Vezelis and Giles are not on his list.  :smirk:

    I wonder if some people credit Giles with now being the Ordinary Of The World.  :wink:


    Offline obediens

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 209
    • Reputation: +84/-8
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #8 on: November 16, 2010, 01:35:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "Roman Catholic" your obvious lack of respect for Successors of the Apostles is disgusting although not unexpected.

    Bishop Louis Vezelis, OFM continues to be the shepherd of those Catholics east of the Mississippi River. You can see Bishop Louis' blog here: www.bishoplouisofm.blogspot.com

    Bishop Giles Butler, OFM is the shepherd of the Catholics west of the western part of the United States. You can see Bishop Giles' blog here: www.friarsminor.blogspot.com.

    Bishop Luis Madrigal is the successor of Bishop Martinez, and is the Bishop of the true Catholics in Mexico.  You can see his apostolate here: www.rexsumego.org.mx

    Offline Emerentiana

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1420
    • Reputation: +1194/-17
    • Gender: Female
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #9 on: November 16, 2010, 04:06:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: obediens
    "Roman Catholic" your obvious lack of respect for Successors of the Apostles is disgusting although not unexpected.

    Bishop Louis Vezelis, OFM continues to be the shepherd of those Catholics east of the Mississippi River. You can see Bishop Louis' blog here: www.bishoplouisofm.blogspot.com

    Bishop Giles Butler, OFM is the shepherd of the Catholics west of the western part of the United States. You can see Bishop Giles' blog here: www.friarsminor.blogspot.com.

    Bishop Luis Madrigal is the successor of Bishop Martinez, and is the Bishop of the true Catholics in Mexico.  You can see his apostolate here: www.rexsumego.org.mx


    How truly stupid is their thinking!  There are many validly consecrated bishops in the world that represent the authority of the fragmented true Catholic Church in the world.
    Seems like some bishops today get the "pope) syndrone!

    Offline Roman Catholic

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2679
    • Reputation: +397/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #10 on: November 16, 2010, 06:20:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: obediens
    "Roman Catholic" your obvious lack of respect for Successors of the Apostles is disgusting although not unexpected.

    Bishop Louis Vezelis, OFM continues to be the shepherd of those Catholics east of the Mississippi River. You can see Bishop Louis' blog here: www.bishoplouisofm.blogspot.com

    Bishop Giles Butler, OFM is the shepherd of the Catholics west of the western part of the United States. You can see Bishop Giles' blog here: www.friarsminor.blogspot.com.

    Bishop Luis Madrigal is the successor of Bishop Martinez, and is the Bishop of the true Catholics in Mexico.  You can see his apostolate here: www.rexsumego.org.mx


    Nice try obediens. But I have great respect for the true Successors of the Apostles.

    Do you have any respect for any of the traditional bishops who are not associated with Vezelius, Giles or Madrigal??


    Offline obediens

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 209
    • Reputation: +84/-8
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #11 on: November 16, 2010, 10:34:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 'Roman Catholic' first of all, please refer to Bishops with their proper title. Secondly, if you're going to use the last name of Bishop Giles it is Butler not his religious name of Giles. Also, what's so hard about spelling Bishop Vezelis' last name correctly?

    No, I do not have any respect for the "traditional bishops" besides these three because quite simply there aren't any who even have valid consecration, and even those who might are schismatic.

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #12 on: June 30, 2012, 12:03:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I apologize to Bp. Vezelis for this thread, I have no proof that Bp. Vezelis hypnotized any of his priests and shouldn't have irresponsibly spread a rumor on the Internet.  While I don't agree with all he does, he did help me to understand and accept the sedevacantist position.



    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.

    Offline theology101

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 327
    • Reputation: +109/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #13 on: July 02, 2012, 10:24:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I would suggest doing some research on NLP (Neuro-linguistic Programming). It is used ALL THE TIME, not only in media, but in the courtroom and anywhere else one wants to convince others. Some very good speakers do it without realizing it.

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Hyp-Mo-Tized!
    « Reply #14 on: July 03, 2012, 02:14:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm not saying he doesn't hypnotize his priests, I have no idea.  That's the point, I shouldn't have spread a rumor.  Even if I had proof that he hypnotized his priests, it would perhaps be questionable to repeat it on the Internet, though it could be argued people deserve warning.  

    It is better to stick with what I know, which is that Bp. Vezelis and his priests believe their group has the only true bishops in North America, or at least they did at the time I was dealing with them.  To believe such a thing, it is not surprising that some traces of a cult mentality exist, because they are a cult.  A literal or figurative hypnotism is certainly necessary to make people believe such rot.  

    They were, at the time I was a catechumen there, either schismatic or borderline schismatic and this should be public knowledge, so if anyone else is in that situation they can ask what they currently believe.  Their priest Father Joseph outrageously did not tell me they were going to make me sign a paper before I was baptized showing my adherence to their cult.  Imagine if I had done the full six months or more only to find out at the end of it that they were going to make me sign a paper saying Bp. Vezelis and Bp. Giles were the only true bishops!  They also told me outright I couldn't go to CMRI and had no good reason, which began to tip me off.  

    I had written to Fr. Dominic, my current priest, before ever meeting with these Franciscans, but I think the webpage had a glitch and he never wrote me back.  Otherwise the whole fiasco could have been avoided, but maybe it was another test of God.

    So, although my priest told me to make reparation about the hypnotism thing, it is fully okay for me to say that no one should set a foot near Bp. Vezelis or his priests without asking first whether they will have to sign this paper.
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.