Are you serious?
Spiritus Sanctus = Holy Spirit
"Ghost" is an Anglo-Saxon word
There is nothing wrong with using both terms. This is the fight people are taking in the name of Traditional Catholicism?
This.
It's obvious that a major change occurred after Vatican II, where "Holy Spirit" replaced "Holy Ghost" almost completely.
But, looking at the facts, I'm forced to admit that it's
one of those innocent changes that was thrown at us to get us accustomed to change -- like the Dialogue Mass, adding St. Joseph's name to the Canon in 1962, etc.
What do I mean by "innocent"?
I mean that, if you take all the innocent changes and put them together, you wouldn't have a reason to leave your parish, disobey your priest, disobey the Pope, go off on your own, etc.
I'm not avoiding my local parish because they read the Gospel only in English, because they stand during the Sanctus, or because I don't personally get along with the priest there. I'm a Traditionalist because the Catholic Faith has been changed, as well as the Mass and the Priesthood.
There is a bona-fide conspiracy at work -- the Alta Vendita -- to infiltrate the Catholic Church and turn it into a Freemasonic institution. And the proof is everywhere -- everything in the Novus Ordo religion is man-centered instead of God-centered. THAT is the problem. THAT is why I drive 45 minutes to Mass every Sunday, and why we don't get to attend daily Mass. THAT is why we stand aloof from the official Church structure.
Anyhow, now that I've sufficiently explained the issue, there is really nothing more to add. I'm going to lock this thread.