Linked Here:

http://traditionalcatholic.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=vatican2&action=display&thread=105

Are you serious?

Spiritus Sanctus = Holy Spirit

"Ghost" is an Anglo-Saxon word

There is nothing wrong with using both terms. This is the fight people are taking in the name of Traditional Catholicism?

Meanings of words have changed over time, due to Free Masonic corruption.
See the link.

Holy Spirit is used in Masonic initiations.  This became an innovation in our Church after Protestants, by the urging/approval of Sodomite Queer King James, published a Bible in the vernacular, with well over 150 Mistranslations.

Changing a word, or letter can alter entire meanings. Any linguist knows this.
In English, the word Holy Day was altered by changing the y for an i.
Now its Holiday. Its entire meaning is thus changed.

I am curious with the post-Vatican II disappearance of "Holy Ghost".

Well done, grasshopper.



Below are quotes written by high level Masons praising Lucifer with references:

"The Mysteries Of Magic' by Eliphas Levi "What is more absurd and more impious than to attribute the name of Lucifer to the devil, that is, to personified evil. The intellectual Lucifer is the spirit of intelligence and love; it is the paraclete, it is the Holy Spirit, while the physical Lucifer is the great agent of universal magnetism." page 428.





'The Secret Teaching Of All Ages' by Manly Palmer Hall 33°
 "I hereby promise the Great Spirit Lucifuge, Prince of Demons, that each year I will bring unto him a human soul to do with as as it may please him, and in return Lucifuge promises to bestow upon me the treasures of the earth and fulfil my every desire for the length of my natural life. If I fail to bring him each year the offering specified above, then my own soul shall be forfeit to him.
Signed.....  { Invocant signs pact with his own blood } " page CIV.

Are you serious?

Spiritus Sanctus = Holy Spirit

"Ghost" is an Anglo-Saxon word

There is nothing wrong with using both terms. This is the fight people are taking in the name of Traditional Catholicism?

It's JohnChrysostom, same fellow who posted the same nonsense in April.

Are you serious?

Spiritus Sanctus = Holy Spirit

"Ghost" is an Anglo-Saxon word

There is nothing wrong with using both terms. This is the fight people are taking in the name of Traditional Catholicism?

This.

It's obvious that a major change occurred after Vatican II, where "Holy Spirit" replaced "Holy Ghost" almost completely.

But, looking at the facts, I'm forced to admit that it's one of those innocent changes that was thrown at us to get us accustomed to change -- like the Dialogue Mass, adding St. Joseph's name to the Canon in 1962, etc.

What do I mean by "innocent"?

I mean that, if you take all the innocent changes and put them together, you wouldn't have a reason to leave your parish, disobey your priest, disobey the Pope, go off on your own, etc.

I'm not avoiding my local parish because they read the Gospel only in English, because they stand during the Sanctus, or because I don't personally get along with the priest there. I'm a Traditionalist because the Catholic Faith has been changed, as well as the Mass and the Priesthood.

There is a bona-fide conspiracy at work -- the Alta Vendita -- to infiltrate the Catholic Church and turn it into a Freemasonic institution. And the proof is everywhere -- everything in the Novus Ordo religion is man-centered instead of God-centered. THAT is the problem. THAT is why I drive 45 minutes to Mass every Sunday, and why we don't get to attend daily Mass. THAT is why we stand aloof from the official Church structure.

Anyhow, now that I've sufficiently explained the issue, there is really nothing more to add. I'm going to lock this thread.