WHAT KIND OF SICK FREAK CULTURE BREEDS THINGS LIKE THIS?!  How can adult people, thousands of them, go into an office or a set each day and work together to create this INSANITY?  It is like they are part of some demonic mind-meld, no, it's not "like" they're part of one, they really are.

One day in the future, people will look back at America and think "freakshow."  But we're so deep into it that even we don't see it for the complete circus it really is.  

Something else I've noticed is that films, despite being often advertised as "the most expensive ever," look more and more cheap.  They are rubbing it in your face that they can pinch pennies, spend nothing, that these movies are now worthy of a banana republic, and yet get you to spend your money anyway.

Look at the cheap-o lens flare on these Hangover posters, the same lens flare in the same place in each poster, an "effect" that anyone with Photoshop can do in two seconds.  Pure contempt.

And this contempt of which you speak is of course always disguised as humanist and libertarian 'heroïsm', diabolically trying (and succeeding) to convince the cattle that they are the freethinking saviours liberating mankind from the 'tyranny of religion'. In reality they are simply leading more and more souls away from the true religion established by the Trinity, into the vile service of mammon and the great whore. From true liberty, into libertarian captivity.

not to mention that they are simply creating their own religion, rather than escaping its so-called tyranny.

Is it just me, or do these posters make you think that the Jєωs are openly mocking the goyim?

Of course they are and, now, we are going to get a show called "Good Christian Bitches."  No, I am not kidding.

Is it just me, or do these posters make you think that the Jєωs are openly mocking the goyim?  

Look at thier comediens, Sarah Silverman for example.  Look at their hate crimes laws,  Look at almost every food product which you purchase.....U....K .....Kosher....and you pay for it.     Oh, can't forget...look at Vatican II, how's that for mocking?  




JMJ

I blame it on Woodstock. :cool:

I'm well aware of this, Mrs. Z.  As a former artist and omnivorous bookworm, I know the ins-and-outs of how the devil used art to gradually break down morals over time.  The constant nudity in Renaissance art, not to mention the contradictory and ambiguous postures of Shakespeare, are bothersome to me, not just The Hangover Part II.  We're deep into the degradation now, the devil is reaping the rotten fruits of the seeds he planted yea, so long ago...

( By Shakespeare being contradictory, just as an example, take the way he glamorizes "young love" i.e. mortal sin in Romeo and Juliet, and then tacks on a little moral at the end that is easy to ignore and has been ignored, not to mention the filthy gutter-minded language that streams throughout his plays, just take a look at Troilus and Cressida ).

France was harsher on their artists and they were correct to be that way.  Actors in the time of Moliere, and this includes Moliere, were automatically excommunicated.  To be an actor or playwright was tantamount to Luciferian rebellion.  

As far as movies, of course, there's really no such thing as an "old" movie even if the technology becomes antiquated and black-and-white is no longer fashionable.  I tried to watch The Big Sleep with Bogart the other day, a safe old movie, right?  Well, it was so full of childish and miserable sɛҳuąƖ innuendo that I flipped it off.  It was written by two men considered great authors, Faulkner and Chandler, and here they are trying to work in clever little double entendres to get past the censors... Men who are supposed geniuses, they aren't even grown up.  Hollywood has always been run by Jєωs and it has always trafficked, not just in sex and sensationalism, but in spiritually destructive ideas, even if they are very subtle.  

Older is rarely better, just more elegant.  For instance, Jane Austen, so beloved by many women, is way off.  Those books plant fantasies in girls' heads. The message of all Jane Austen is that, whether she's poor, whether she's plain, a girl should never "settle" but should use her persistence, intelligence and personality to marry the rich hunk -- which of course breeds dissatisfaction, people who won't appreciate or even accept the good things that God gives them, but want some kind of harlequin romance.  It is nothing but Sex and the City of the 19th century written with more elegance, yet this is considered great art because its old.  What is there in Jane Austen to express Catholic morals?  Nothing.  It's pure romanticism but written in a dry style that makes it seem more realistic.  

I could go on and on but there is very little in literature that is fitting for Catholics to read, nor is there any need for literature, in my opinion.  We have the lives of the saints, the Bible, theology for those who are so inclined, history, the essentials for all Catholics to get their bearings in this world.  And then science or math or entomology or whatever it is that interests us personally on the side -- that is plenty.  Literature right from the Middle Ages has always been associated with leisure and frivolity and women, you can see it with Eleanor of Aquitaine and the "courtly love" movement, the cult of woman, which was always associated with belles lettres.  Basically I'm saying it's effeminate.  Having spent so long as a wannabe artist, I feel like I have this stain of softness and effeminacy that I have to somehow overcome.  Guys come over to work on my house, which I'm selling, and do this real work, and I can barely hammer in a nail... It doesn't feel good.  I am a sort of blazing romantic Percy Shelley trying to transform myself into a down-to-Earth St. Joseph, ha ha.

I'm well aware of this, Mrs. Z.  As a former artist and omnivorous bookworm, I know the ins-and-outs of how the devil used art to gradually break down morals over time.  The constant nudity in Renaissance art, not to mention the contradictory and ambiguous postures of Shakespeare, are bothersome to me, not just The Hangover Part II.  We're deep into the degradation now, the devil is reaping the rotten fruits of the seeds he planted yea, so long ago...

( By Shakespeare being contradictory, just as an example, take the way he glamorizes "young love" i.e. mortal sin in Romeo and Juliet, and then tacks on a little moral at the end that is easy to ignore and has been ignored, not to mention the filthy gutter-minded language that streams throughout his plays, just take a look at Troilus and Cressida ).

France was harsher on their artists and they were correct to be that way.  Actors in the time of Moliere, and this includes Moliere, were automatically excommunicated.  To be an actor or playwright was tantamount to Luciferian rebellion.  

As far as movies, of course, there's really no such thing as an "old" movie even if the technology becomes antiquated and black-and-white is no longer fashionable.  I tried to watch The Big Sleep with Bogart the other day, a safe old movie, right?  Well, it was so full of childish and miserable sɛҳuąƖ innuendo that I flipped it off.  It was written by two men considered great authors, Faulkner and Chandler, and here they are trying to work in clever little double entendres to get past the censors... Men who are supposed geniuses, they aren't even grown up.  Hollywood has always been run by Jєωs and it has always trafficked, not just in sex and sensationalism, but in spiritually destructive ideas, even if they are very subtle.  

Older is rarely better, just more elegant.  For instance, Jane Austen, so beloved by many women, is way off.  Those books plant fantasies in girls' heads. The message of all Jane Austen is that, whether she's poor, whether she's plain, a girl should never "settle" but should use her persistence, intelligence and personality to marry the rich hunk -- which of course breeds dissatisfaction, people who won't appreciate or even accept the good things that God gives them, but want some kind of harlequin romance.  It is nothing but Sex and the City of the 19th century written with more elegance, yet this is considered great art because its old.  What is there in Jane Austen to express Catholic morals?  Nothing.  It's pure romanticism but written in a dry style that makes it seem more realistic.  

I could go on and on but there is very little in literature that is fitting for Catholics to read, nor is there any need for literature, in my opinion.  We have the lives of the saints, the Bible, theology for those who are so inclined, history, the essentials for all Catholics to get their bearings in this world.  And then science or math or entomology or whatever it is that interests us personally on the side -- that is plenty.  Literature right from the Middle Ages has always been associated with leisure and frivolity and women, you can see it with Eleanor of Aquitaine and the "courtly love" movement, the cult of woman, which was always associated with belles lettres.  Basically I'm saying it's effeminate.  Having spent so long as a wannabe artist, I feel like I have this stain of softness and effeminacy that I have to somehow overcome.  Guys come over to work on my house, which I'm selling, and do this real work, and I can barely hammer in a nail... It doesn't feel good.  I am a sort of blazing romantic Percy Shelley trying to transform myself into a down-to-Earth St. Joseph, ha ha.

Your post is very interesting.  Some of what you've said I've read about myself.  And, as much as I hate to admit it, I have always questioned the lack of Christian morals in Jane Austen books.  I guess due to the the residual Christianity in the culture, people were mostly restrained in their behavior and marriage and family was the focus.  However, your point about the emphasis on romantic love and wealth is true.  It took a normal desire for affection and security and twisted it taking the wholesomeness out of it.