Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Hoffman on Williamson  (Read 388 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sedetrad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1585
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Hoffman on Williamson
« on: March 01, 2009, 02:10:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Williamson on God's Grandeur; Hoffman on Williamson
    http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/02/williamson-on-gods-grandeur-hoffman-on.html


    As some of you may know, Bishop Richard N. Williamson has a weekly blog,
    "Dinoscopus." His latest entry is very moving. Warning: it contains no
    polemics or historical controversy of any kind. It is a purely
    contemplative rumination on western literature at a high order of
    magnitude. Here one discerns that Bishop Williamson is a culture-bearer.


    We need not comment on the characteristics of those of his adversaries
    who wish to cast him into a German dungeon on a European Union warrant.
    O Tempora! O Mores!

    You can read his Feb. 28 entry here:  http://dinoscopus.blogspot.com/

    Finally, after we published a column in our "On the Contrary" blog about
    the bishop apologizing for the truth
    ionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/02/bishop-williamson-apologizes-for.html)
    earlier this week, we received a tsunami of mail casting him into outer
    darkness, along with a few defenses in his favor.

    My opinion is that Bishop Williamson's second apology was for the
    benefit of alleviating the pressure brought to bear against Benedict XVI
    by the forces arrayed against the pope as a result of his having lifted
    the excommunication of R.W.

    Furthermore, if God is using Bishop Williamson to expose the venality
    and errors of Judaism and h0Ɩ0cαųstolatry, then Bishop Williamson will
    indeed be able to defend himself and even to prevail. Fiat voluntas tua
    sicut in caelo et in terra.

    For example, since the controversy exploded on the world stage, I have
    been contacted by a prominent theologian formerly renowned for his
    defense of Pope John Paul II, and by a professor for a high profile
    conservative Catholic college. Both of these men were eager to obtain
    information about Judaism and about the homicidal gas chamber fraud. I
    have also been contacted by dozens of other new people, not so renowned,
    but just as interested in forbidden truths.

    This is a small scale illustration of what happens when leadership takes
    responsibility for speaking truth to earthly power. What Catholics have
    been saddled with these many years in the post-Conciliar Church, is the
    most extraordinary display of craven groveling to that terrestrial
    power, and this has demoralized and defeated countless souls who felt
    that if the popes do not have the courage to confront the heirs of the
    Pharisees, why is it their duty to do so.

    Though Bishop Williamson's second apology was in my view a setback, it
    was not a recantation or a betrayal of the truth he spoke about the
    Auschwitz execution gas chamber hoax. It was, rather, a diplomatic and
    charitable move and by that I do not suggest mental reservation or
    equivocation, or any other stratagem, but an attempt by Bishop
    Williamson to declare to persons of good will inside the Vatican, that
    he is not a stubborn or proud man. But that in so far as no man can be
    commanded to tell a lie in the name of Jesus Christ, Bishop Williamson
    will do all he can, short of lying, to assist the pope in getting the
    Zionists and rabbis off his back.

    This is quite a vote of confidence in the pope and the people around
    him, which has thus far not been reciprocated, at least not publicly.
    What is transpiring through diplomatic channels behinds the scenes is
    another matter.

    Due to my own grave doubts about the morality and ethics of the Vatican
    and this pope, if I were in the bishop's shoes, I would not have
    apologized the second time. However, it would be good if we all had a
    little humility and realized that we are not in Bishop Williamson's
    shoes. Some of those who are crying to the housetops in anonymous e-mail
    about how loathsome his apology is, might very well be the first to
    capitulate if the shoe were on the other foot.

    Michael Hoffman

    Hoffman is the author of "Judaism Discovered: A Study of the
    Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit"
    http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31171
    • Reputation: +27088/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Hoffman on Williamson
    « Reply #1 on: March 01, 2009, 02:15:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is another good article on Bishop Williamson's 2nd apology (from another forum):


    I seems apparent to me at least, that +W said exactly what he meant, i.e. his info was from the 80's, he's not a professional historian, it is his private opinion, and he'll check to see what the latest info (from the 80's until present I presume) indicates, since he has been asked to 'recant' his position.  Something, of course, he can only do in the facts bear that out, and all he preciously read were utter lies.

    The truth is, of course, that there will be amplifying info, it will show that there were mass murders under the nαzιs of many groups in general, but that the history as written by the тαℓмυdist/Zionists is flawed in the extreme, intentionally to further their nefarious ends.

    It is quite clear to me from even my limited research into the question, that with regard to the Judaics, the Zionists specifically played a very active and damning role in the persecution of their brethren, whether the number of murdered victims is 300,000 to 6 million. All in an effort to steal Palistnine from its inhabitants and get as many Judaics to that land as possible to further their plans.  Remember!  Zionism is far older that nαzιsm.

    It is clear that the Judaics supported National Socialism financially in many ways, it is clear that the created the revolutionary trends of the last 300 in particular, and are particularly responsible for the rise in atheistic Capitalism, Communism, and the various flavors of socialism that include National Socialism.

    They were major players in the decadence and financial ruin of the Weimar period, and were the agitators that created the anarchic social circuмstances that helped the nαzιs to power.

    These are some of the central issues that hinge on the exploitation of the so-called 'h0Ɩ0cαųst.'  That is why any deceit connected with this issue is important to uncover.

    It is NOT to take away from the suffering of ANY of the victims of WWII, nαzιsm, Communism, war crimes committed by all sides, etc., be the numbers low or high or in the middle!

    The issue is to uncover the Truth, for the truth shall set you free!  Why?  Because no one from the individual to the nation state can make good informed decisions based on bosh and lies!  History matters!  We'll never get the full truth in this fallen world, but we ought to try to at least clear out the propaganda and lies to the maximum extent possible.

    What is happening now, the dark, evil, and steam-rolling satanic push for world domination at the expense of the individual soul is directly and profoundly connected to the the events of the 20th century...duh, a statement of the obvious I know, but the irony is that it needs to be stated!

    As to +W's apology --  To cut to the core, he is really only apologizing for a lapse in judgement, as well he should, he is a bishop and must take the Field Marshal's view of his words and actions.  What was the core of his lapse?  To wit-- he allowed the enemy to chose the place, time, and manner of the battle.  And any mention of the problems of the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst' is verily to engage in a battle.  There are many responses he could have given that would have sidestepped the trap and put the ball back in the enemy's court.  Our Lord did this with the Pharisees.  So tactically, yes he blew it.  He knows it, he admits it, and he apologizes for the trouble that caused, just as a general might apologize for undertaking a just battle in a poorly thought-out manner, which caused more casualties that it ought to have had..

    That's it and that's all...

    W.B.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8017
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Hoffman on Williamson
    « Reply #2 on: March 01, 2009, 02:28:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    But that in so far as no man can be commanded to tell a lie in the name of Jesus Christ, Bishop Williamson will do all he can, short of lying, to assist the pope in getting the Zionists and rabbis off his back.


    This is why I still do not understand why Bp. Williamson has bothered, as BXVI is the crypto-rabbi par excellence.  If you do not know who is, and who is not, the enemy, how will you gain any real ground?  Time will tell; I wish him well.
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."