Williamson on God's Grandeur; Hoffman on Williamson
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/02/williamson-on-gods-grandeur-hoffman-on.htmlAs some of you may know, Bishop Richard N. Williamson has a weekly blog,
"Dinoscopus." His latest entry is very moving. Warning: it contains no
polemics or historical controversy of any kind. It is a purely
contemplative rumination on western literature at a high order of
magnitude. Here one discerns that Bishop Williamson is a culture-bearer.
We need not comment on the characteristics of those of his adversaries
who wish to cast him into a German dungeon on a European Union warrant.
O Tempora! O Mores!
You can read his Feb. 28 entry here:
http://dinoscopus.blogspot.com/Finally, after we published a column in our "On the Contrary" blog about
the bishop apologizing for the truth
ionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/02/bishop-williamson-apologizes-for.html)
earlier this week, we received a tsunami of mail casting him into outer
darkness, along with a few defenses in his favor.
My opinion is that Bishop Williamson's second apology was for the
benefit of alleviating the pressure brought to bear against Benedict XVI
by the forces arrayed against the pope as a result of his having lifted
the excommunication of R.W.
Furthermore, if God is using Bishop Williamson to expose the venality
and errors of Judaism and h0Ɩ0cαųstolatry, then Bishop Williamson will
indeed be able to defend himself and even to prevail. Fiat voluntas tua
sicut in caelo et in terra.
For example, since the controversy exploded on the world stage, I have
been contacted by a prominent theologian formerly renowned for his
defense of Pope John Paul II, and by a professor for a high profile
conservative Catholic college. Both of these men were eager to obtain
information about Judaism and about the homicidal gas chamber fraud. I
have also been contacted by dozens of other new people, not so renowned,
but just as interested in forbidden truths.
This is a small scale illustration of what happens when leadership takes
responsibility for speaking truth to earthly power. What Catholics have
been saddled with these many years in the post-Conciliar Church, is the
most extraordinary display of craven groveling to that terrestrial
power, and this has demoralized and defeated countless souls who felt
that if the popes do not have the courage to confront the heirs of the
Pharisees, why is it their duty to do so.
Though Bishop Williamson's second apology was in my view a setback, it
was not a recantation or a betrayal of the truth he spoke about the
Auschwitz execution gas chamber hoax. It was, rather, a diplomatic and
charitable move and by that I do not suggest mental reservation or
equivocation, or any other stratagem, but an attempt by Bishop
Williamson to declare to persons of good will inside the Vatican, that
he is not a stubborn or proud man. But that in so far as no man can be
commanded to tell a lie in the name of Jesus Christ, Bishop Williamson
will do all he can, short of lying, to assist the pope in getting the
Zionists and rabbis off his back.
This is quite a vote of confidence in the pope and the people around
him, which has thus far not been reciprocated, at least not publicly.
What is transpiring through diplomatic channels behinds the scenes is
another matter.
Due to my own grave doubts about the morality and ethics of the Vatican
and this pope, if I were in the bishop's shoes, I would not have
apologized the second time. However, it would be good if we all had a
little humility and realized that we are not in Bishop Williamson's
shoes. Some of those who are crying to the housetops in anonymous e-mail
about how loathsome his apology is, might very well be the first to
capitulate if the shoe were on the other foot.
Michael Hoffman
Hoffman is the author of "Judaism Discovered: A Study of the
Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit"
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html