Author Topic: N.O. Wedding  (Read 1154 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cassini

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1291
  • Reputation: +649/-70
  • Gender: Male

Offline TKGS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4255
  • Reputation: +3631/-203
  • Gender: Male
N.O. Wedding
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2014, 06:52:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: cassini
    http://m.christianpost.com/news/see-this-priests-amazing-surprise-that-stunned-a-wedding-and-left-the-bride-in-tears-video--117573/cpt

    Don't know what to say!


    Every time I think I can't be shocked anymore, something like this appears.


    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1406
    • Reputation: +2074/-14
    • Gender: Male
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #2 on: April 09, 2014, 06:59:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Isn't this the epitome of the NOM, though? The President of the Assembly says, "Don't focus on the Sacrifice [sic]. Look at me!" At least he didn't start twirling around the altar singing, "I Feel Pretty."
    "Kindness is for fools! They [modernists] want to be treated with oil, soap, and caresses, but they ought to be beaten with fists. In a duel, you don't count or measure the blows, you strike as you can. War is not made with charity. It is a struggle, a duel." -- Pope St. Pius X

    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1998
    • Reputation: +581/-333
    • Gender: Male
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #3 on: April 09, 2014, 09:48:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The frankly bizarre contemporary regalia that people these days like to implement in their weddings these days should be left for the reception.
    BTC wallet:

    bitcoin:3Mf1HjVe3fnfy3ab2NkxnXMnnuT1CqxnP7

    Offline Mabel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1893
    • Reputation: +1379/-0
    • Gender: Female
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #4 on: April 09, 2014, 10:27:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It is all about the performance and being entertained, no need to be bored by the legal stuff.


    Offline stgobnait

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1332
    • Reputation: +936/-23
    • Gender: Female
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #5 on: April 10, 2014, 03:31:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :facepalm:

    Offline Ursus

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 317
    • Reputation: +137/-1
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #6 on: April 10, 2014, 03:50:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The song in question was written and sung by a jew and made popular by the Jewish cartoon story Shrek.

    Has no place in a Catholic Church.

    Even the NO music directors are smart enough to NOT use this song even though the ignorant request it. Well now they have a priest setting precedent.

     :applause:


    Offline Stubborn

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8426
    • Reputation: +3114/-621
    • Gender: Male
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #7 on: April 10, 2014, 04:04:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • "Some may say, you are identifying the abuses with the "New Mass" itself. I am saying that the "New Mass" IS the abuse of the True Mass! I am saying that, with the jettisoning of both the law and the spirit of Quo Primum, by that very Act, the Pope has not only substituted something totally different from the Mass, but that it is of the very essence of the "New Mass" to permit every form of profanation, because the "New Mass" makes the good pleasure of the people its "liturgy." - Fr. James Wathen 1971 (The Great Sacrilege)
    I say that it is licit to resist the Roman Pontiff by not doing what he orders and by impeding the execution of his will; it is not licit, however, to judge, punish or depose him, since these are acts proper to a superior." St. Robert Bellarmine


    Offline stgobnait

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1332
    • Reputation: +936/-23
    • Gender: Female
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #8 on: April 10, 2014, 04:26:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • wasnt there a directive that no profane songs could be used at church services? i know this priest would probably say the 'liturgy' was finished at that stage....(sic) :guitar:

    Offline Coin

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 2
    • Reputation: +10/-0
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #9 on: April 10, 2014, 08:49:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, yet another example of the sacred being removed from the Church.

    Offline glaston

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 384
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #10 on: April 10, 2014, 09:43:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stgobnait
    wasnt there a directive that no profane songs could be used at church services? i know this priest would probably say the 'liturgy' was finished at that stage....(sic) :guitar:


    Saw this by a poster

    Martin Grossman said...

    Quote
    The key to understanding Cohen's position on Jesus is that he admires him as as a Jewish teacher, not G-d.
    He has never abandoned his essential Judaism .
    His interested in Buddhism has not changed his commit to his commitment to Judaism or Jewish ideas either. He once said he sees Christianity as having brought many Jewish ideas to the world and quotes Maimonides as having seen Christianity similarly. He is also critical of the failings of the Church's anti Judaic history in many poems and comments.


    To my knowledge, the 'Cohens' (Kohanim) were one of the hereditary Hebrew Priest families who served the sacrifices/lit fires at the inner Temple Altar.

    I think his hat wearing band members (live in london concert) are Hassidim

    Underlaying Clue maybe in O'KANE couple!


    Offline glaston

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 384
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #11 on: April 10, 2014, 09:57:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ursus
    The song in question was written and sung by a jew and made popular by the Jewish cartoon story Shrek.

    Has no place in a Catholic Church.





    Quote
    The name "Shrek" is derived from the Yiddish Schreck (Yiddish שרעק) meaning "fear" or "fright." The book served as the basis for the popular Shrek film series

    Numbers 22:21-39

    Balaam’s talking Donkey

    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1998
    • Reputation: +581/-333
    • Gender: Male
    N.O. Wedding
    « Reply #12 on: April 10, 2014, 10:26:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: glaston
    Quote from: stgobnait
    wasnt there a directive that no profane songs could be used at church services? i know this priest would probably say the 'liturgy' was finished at that stage....(sic) :guitar:


    Saw this by a poster

    Martin Grossman said...

    Quote
    The key to understanding Cohen's position on Jesus is that he admires him as as a Jewish teacher, not G-d.
    He has never abandoned his essential Judaism .
    His interested in Buddhism has not changed his commit to his commitment to Judaism or Jewish ideas either. He once said he sees Christianity as having brought many Jewish ideas to the world and quotes Maimonides as having seen Christianity similarly. He is also critical of the failings of the Church's anti Judaic history in many poems and comments.


    To my knowledge, the 'Cohens' (Kohanim) were one of the hereditary Hebrew Priest families who served the sacrifices/lit fires at the inner Temple Altar.

    I think his hat wearing band members (live in london concert) are Hassidim

    Underlaying Clue maybe in O'KANE couple!


    There's no weird Zionist conspiracy here, man. It's just a (grave) liturgical abuse that went viral. God help us all.
    BTC wallet:

    bitcoin:3Mf1HjVe3fnfy3ab2NkxnXMnnuT1CqxnP7

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16