Michael Hoffman's view on this:
revisionistreview.blogspot.in/2013/09/pope-francis-reveals-his-true-face.html
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Pope Francis reveals his true faceBy Michael Hoffman
www.revisionisthistory.orgIn an interview filled with what we can only term theological
gobbledegook with nary a reference to the Bible, but loads
of mystical vertiginous malarkey, the pope of Rome, Francis the talking
mule, Baalam’s ass, has come out with unprecedented cold-hearted malice
toward defenseless, unborn children.
Let us anticipate the response of his mind-bombed defenders and rejoin in advance: no,
the pope was not quoted out of context, or misquoted. We’re going to
give you his quote in context; and it is said he was handed a copy of
his interview and allowed to check and edit it before its publication in the Jesuit magazine, America.
Here are the pontiff’s docuмented words, in context. First on ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity:
“We need to proclaim the Gospel on every street corner,” the pope
says, “preaching the good news of the kingdom and healing, even with our
preaching, every kind of disease and wound. In Buenos Aires I used to
receive letters from ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ persons who are ‘socially wounded’
because they tell me that they feel like the church has always condemned
them. But the church does not want to do this. During the return flight
from Rio de Janeiro I said that if a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ person is of good will
and is in search of God, I am no one to judge. By saying this, I said
what the catechism says. Religion has the right to express its opinion
in the service of the people, but God in creation has set us free: it is
not possible to interfere spiritually in the life of a person.
“A person once asked me, in a provocative manner, if I approved of
ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. I replied with another question: ‘Tell me: when God looks
at a gαy person, does he endorse the existence of this person with
love, or reject and condemn this person?’ We must always consider the
person. Here we enter into the mystery of the human being. In life, God
accompanies persons, and we must accompany them, starting from their
situation. It is necessary to accompany them with mercy. When that
happens, the Holy Spirit inspires the priest to say the right thing.” (End quote).
Where in the catechism does it say the pontiff has no right to judge a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ?
What is this pope babbling about when he says, “...it is not possible to interfere spiritually in the life of a person”?
Furthermore, what is “gαy” about sodomy? If God, as the pope claims,
“endorses the existence” of a person who practices sodomy, how could God
ever send that person to hell?
Nowhere does the pope mention a little something known as sin. He offers
no reasons for the sodomite to stop sodomizing. After all, God Himself
“endorses the existence” of the sodomite. So why not continue in one’s
sins? What is the impetus for change?
The pontiff’s docuмented words, in context, on abortion and contraception:
"We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gαy marriage
and the use of contraceptive methods. This is not possible. I have not
spoken much about these things, and I was reprimanded for that. But when
we speak about these issues, we have to talk about them in a context.
The teaching of the church, for that matter, is clear and I am a son of
the church, but it is not necessary to talk about these issues all the
time...The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the
transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed
insistently...We have to find a new balance; otherwise even the moral
edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing
the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel.” (End quote).
Perhaps someone should tell the pope it is not necessary for the
post-Vatican II Church to insist only on issues related to the nαzι
“h0Ɩ0cαųst," anti-semitism and the defense of тαℓмυdic Judaism as
possessing an unbroken covenant with God. "We have to find a new
balance." Does the pope agree? Would he be caught dead saying that the
pastoral ministry cannot be “obsessed” with the nαzι “h0Ɩ0cαųst”?
I don’t believe, short of a divine miracle, Francis would ever make such
a statement, for unlike the dehumanized and marginalized unborn
children awaiting the executioner’s invasion of their mother’s womb, the
nαzι “h0Ɩ0cαųst” lobby has enormous power on earth. Unborn babies have
no such earthly power.
Let us also not forget that this coffin rider who calls himself pope is
declaring that too much has been said against birth control
(contraception). The people who brought the Gospel to the world, who
inhabit the nations of Britain, Ireland, Europe, Canada, Australia and
the United States, are self-extinguishing due to contraception being
winked at by their religious leaders — and now it is minimized by the
pope himself. This is incredible. It is totally revolutionary. Even the
pope of Vatican II, Paul VI, devoted himself to composing the encyclical
Humane Vitae,
closing the door forever on artificial contraception. But Francis
declares, "We have to find a new balance.” Between what, life and death?
(Rev. 3:15)
According to fake prophecies cooked up during the Renaissance and
attributed to the medieval St. Malachy, the current Pope Francis is the
last pontiff, dubbed, in that phony prophecy, “Peter Romanus.”
We propose a new name for him, Diabolus Romanus.
Hoffman is the author of Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not.
***
Topic: Hey folks, we just need to stop obsessing! (Read 7512 times)