I have one question: Vatican 1, read some where, that it was not finished. If that is the case, what needed to be done to finish it? Vatican 1 covered infallibility and BOD. BOD was also brought up in Council of Trent. There is no definition that I can find. It was said that there are 2 different infallibilities, one being ex cathedra (solemn) and ordinary/universal. The later is to mean that if some opinion or theology of a matter was brought up over the 2000 years of the church, like BOD, then it becomes infallible teaching, therefore doctrine. That was knew for me to learn just last week. So, now, is this why BOD has no definition? or maybe Vat. 1 would have taken it further? If Vatican 1 was not finished(?) why was it not finished.
Was there errors before Vat. 1? Pope Leo XIII thought so, called "Americanism". What was floating in the USA was to be sure religion was to be tolerated. Bishop Carroll our lst Bishop was to back this scheme. In 1940's the pope (Pius XII) put such a letter out to the USA, to warn against it and there were clergy already hoping not to see the letter. So, the USA has had hanky-panky.
When Fr. Leblanc was with us, books were mailed to him to store. One I did see with a picture of a new order mass (mess) in 1940 in Missouri or Minnesota, can't recall. So, the USA has pretty much set herself up, thanks to masons, infiltrators to see that the USA would tolerate religions. Won't work!! But I am sure the Muslims are liking it.