Author Topic: Here is my response to those who would αssαssιnαtҽ my character (Read 7240 times)

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #1 on:** February 28, 2009, 07:45:42 PM »

By coming down in so heavy-handed a manner, the desired effect, with respect to the shell-shocked flock who read the email (at least 11 of them), was, in the main, achieved. One friend did step in to say, publicly, that I am not mentally ill (and he has studied psychology at the graduate level). He and his poor wife (whose involvement is still less than clear to me at this point) were dragged into a meeting, the man was told to sign papers disowning what he had previously said and knew to be true, or NEITHER could come back to SGG (although police involvement was not mentioned).

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #2 on:** February 28, 2009, 07:54:43 PM »

This is a brief response I sent to several people, letting Father know the state of affairs at that time.
Dear Father Cekada,

Although your impressive, virtuoso usage of every communist smear tactic in the book has likely shocked and/or frightened many of those who read your attempted character assassination (annihilation?) of me, I thought you might like to know that I have already been told by some that they not only do not believe your claim/s, they think your actions were completely over the top (and this is not getting into the number of those who agree with my assessment of your school and staff, mind games, etc.).

I have sent this email to six people, BCC (you will have to take my word, as an honest, although mentally ill, man). Three people flatly deny your claim about my mental state, and one expressed uncertainty (which is not surprising, as he is a kind and obedient soul who wants to believe his priest, and we have spoken for a total of 30 seconds or so during our lives) - while a total of ZERO (0) have affirmed your assessment. Something tells me no one will - just a hunch, though. Further, one of the other two is, I know for a fact, certain that your claim is absurd. Now, you could take the list of people to whom you sent your email, do a little math, and ascertain the probability that certain individuals are on my BCC line. Then, you could call them into your office, give them 'the business' in person, and hope they will be sufficiently intimidated to follow your instructions. That failing or seeming inefficient, you could call them all in, and do the same. Finally, you could just go 'straight up cult', and tell everyone, from the pulpit or another way of your choosing, that all contact with me, whether on or off SGG property, personal or professional, indoors or out, in fair weather or foul, by phone or email, hook or crook, is most strictly verboten. "Heil...!" As it is such a popular and effective tool these days for intimidating the sheep, you could, if necessary, employ the Sacraments as weapons - pretending, of course, that you are only safe-guarding the other sheep. If you would like any more tips as to how to go about exerting maximum, cult-like control, you know how to reach me. God speed.

Eamon 'the looney loon' Shea

If you need to discuss these matters over the phone, my number is...

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #3 on:** February 28, 2009, 08:20:30 PM »

Matthew, if you need me to show you the proof that Fr.'s email was sent to 11 others, please let me know. Did you happen to notice the kindly, shepherd-like instructions on how to handle detracting emails, "brilliantly" inserted after the mother of them all?

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #4 on:** March 01, 2009, 02:03:11 PM »

Quote

PS to parishioners:

...

-- Fr. Cekada

This line alone ought to make it plain that this was sent to more than just myself.

Let us pretend every single line of his "history" is true. So what? It would still be detraction of a most grave variety.

Why do I make it known to others? Not to clear my name, as I could care less what a psychopath says about me. It IS important, however, that others learn that he IS a psychopath. That is why, as the days roll forward, I will share the real facts where the incidents he mentions are concerned. What is REALLY embarrassing is how easy it will be to show that his "history" is rather out of touch with reality.