Author Topic: Hate Crime At UofT (Read 2734 times)

littlerose · « **on:** December 23, 2009, 08:04:34 PM »

There is a sign attached to a waste bin at one of the busiest CapMetro bus stops in Austin on the university campus. It is a very professionally done enamel image of a baby's face with the letters "disposal bin for babies" stenciles in red. It is done in four colors of silk-screened enamel on metal and it appears to be the actual CapMetro sign that was covered over. I saw it this afternoon.

It is a clear message of hate. The baby is a healthy 3-4 month old in the image. It is a message of hate for all the young women at that university who might consider motherhood. It is a message of hate for all the young parents who might be working or studying there.

It is a message of hate for all young children.

I saw it and couldn't believe it. It does not look at all like graffitti. It looks like something the bus company put there. Several young people stood and sat around, taking no notice of it. I pointed it out to a young woman and she stared at it for a few seconds, and kind of shivered but said nothing as she got on the bus.

My own bus came up next and as I got on, I asked the driver to notice the sign and asked him if he could report it. He did not understand why the sign should be reported. I said it is a hate crime against babies. Vandalism of CapMetro property is a crime, and that vandalism is a hate crime.

Another young woman getting on behind me heard my remarks and berated me for having a "problem". I ignored her completely, She had a half-shaved head, a half-pound of Jєωelry pierced in her face, and a tattoooed arm.

She kept trying to engage me in an argument but I would not look directly at her and I went to sit in the middle of the bus while she sat with some other young people at the front.

It is winter break and so most of the students are gone, and the population on the bus right now is mostly the tatttooed and pierced street people. It was weird to realize I may have been the only non-altered person on that bus.

The young woman kept on with her anger at me while several young men tried to lighten the mood with jokes, jokes about hurting babies, tossing babies, etc. The young woman worked herself up to connecting my complaint with the apparently horrible injustice of gαy people not getting married ....

Finally my stop came up.

Tomorrow is Christmas eve. There is an image of another Babe to think about.

But I can't get that picture on that garbage bin out of my mind.

roscoe · « **Reply #1 on:** December 23, 2009, 08:32:01 PM »

There is no such thing as a 'sede vacanttist', a 'Free Church In A Free State', 'Scripture Alone', or a 'hate' crime.

It has also just occured to me that this could be the product of some one with a very dark sense of humor whom is trying shrewdly to bring attention to the barbarity of abortion.

littlerose · « **Reply #2 on:** December 23, 2009, 08:52:19 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

There is no such thing as a 'sede vacanttist', a 'Free Church In A Free State', 'Scripture Alone', or a 'hate' crime.

It has also just occured to me that this could be the product of some one with a very dark sense of humor whom is trying shrewdly to bring attention to the barbarity of abortion.

I don't see why you bring up the first three points at all, but my use of the phrase "hate crime" was a direct reference to local ordinances about crimes directed at particular categories of person.

If you think that is shrewd, then you must be one of the many supposedly pro-life extremists who are actually engaging in the full assault on motherhood that fuels abortion in the first place. Please don't attempt to address me further on this, I am a woman, and I do not care to converse with Satan's spawn, which is what the men who have squashed all intelligent discussion of this issue are. You are not prolife if you think that attacking women and babies will make your statement.

You are not a woman. You do not know how dangerous it is right now, for a woman to even appear to be pregnant in public. Women are verbally attacked by green-peacers, feminists, and others to an increasing degree. It is the same kind of attack former generations of African Americans endured on a daily basis if they ventured into a "whites only" lunch room: whispered epithets, hate stares, rude remarks and questions.

The genocide starts with the marking out of certain populations as open targets. Babies and young mothers are being marked out this way.

Every genocide starts with an attack on the weak, and extends from there to the young, then finally the men will be rounded up when it is in full swing.

That sign on that trash bin was exactly the same as the word "Juden" painted on store-fronts a few weeks before Kristallnacht. It is accomplishing the same task.

Except that right now white babies are the primary targets, and all babies are the secondary targets. Believe me, Satan is bringing Herod back. It is happening.

We are indeed moving from specific population genocides to preparation for a general genocide.

roscoe · « **Reply #3 on:** December 23, 2009, 09:12:01 PM »

I am an avid opponent of the satanic crime of abortion. I am only trying to relate that there is no such thing as an Orwellian 'thought crime'. 'Hate' legislation is very dangerous in and of itself.

I have not 'attacked' any women or babies and it was not my intention to offend.

roscoe · « **Reply #4 on:** December 23, 2009, 09:31:19 PM »

It might be interesting to track down who did the act and ask their motivation. It could very well be an attempt to induce shame.

littlerose · « **Reply #5 on:** December 23, 2009, 09:33:10 PM »

Orwell's thoughts have nothing to do with this. He was describing people being accused of thinking unpermitted thoughts.

This sign is a physical fact that was placed outside of the mind of the person who originally thought of doing it. It is an actual attack on the women and children of that neighborhood, not a potential thought inside someone's head.

Who cares if it was not your intention to offend? Haven't you ever seen any docuмentary footage of a mob, if you have not witnessed an actual mob? Very few of the participants in the attacks on the mob's targets actually "intend" harm.

They simply join the attackers, without caring or thinking of the results of their actions. Some of them may even believe they mock the attackers, but a mob is more than a collection of individuals. It is a creature of satanic origin and while it is preying on the weak, it is pulling individuals into its momentum towards genocide and they cannot seem to resist its momentum.

When the genocide goes into full swing, the attackers will include many prolife Catholic men, because many of them hate women in the first place and do not comprehend what they are doing. They are attacking targets, not human beings.

But we are human beings and our babies are human beings, and it does not matter if you believe you attack in the name of "choice" or in the name of George Orwell, you are attacking women and babies, just like an ape taking over leadership from another.

Roscoe, you hate that I spoke up at all. There is no rational explanation for your post of things about sedvacantism that obviously have nothing to do with that sign at UT. You posted thoughtlessly to pretend I am ignorant and should not have complained. You posted thoughtlessly, but with hate. Intellectual aloofness is no excuse. There surely were some befuddled young german intellectuals who had the same contempt for those who objected to their having a little fun painting all those shop windows. What was the fuss, after all? Was it months, or weeks, between the painting on the windows and the smashing?

Woman cannot talk about the attacks on us, and the infanticides, because we are shouted down by Catholic men who care more about their weird esoteric ecclesiastic disputes than about the fact of genocidal abortion.

You people, you Catholic men, my own brothers in Christ, don't even know what women are facing. You are too busy supporting the enemy's attacks on your own sisters with your legalistic nonsense.

roscoe · « **Reply #6 on:** December 23, 2009, 09:53:44 PM »

Orwellian theory has every thing to do with human free expression. There is no such thing as a 'hate' crime and a person has the Divine Right to HATE whatever he wants. Additionally, it is also POSSIBLE that you do not understand the psychology of whoever put the sign up-- another very good reason why there is no such thing as a hate crime.

I am going to call the Ut tomorrow and try to find out more. I suggest U do the same. I have apologised for anything that might have been perceived as offensive. If that is not good enough, there is nothing I can do.

I am 'attacking women and babies' ????

I would also suggest that you read Ingrid Weckert's Flash Point because you do not understand Crystal Night.

roscoe · « **Reply #7 on:** December 23, 2009, 10:03:54 PM »

Here is the link on I Weckert

http://judicial-inc.biz/n.,iight_of_broken_glass.htm

littlerose · « **Reply #8 on:** December 23, 2009, 10:07:33 PM »

You might be better to caol Cap Metro, the bus company, although I can tell you thre technique of the sign shows very high skill in silk-screen and knowledge of applying enamel paint to metal. It had to have been done vertically and on the spot, but it appeared heat-treated, which would have required removing the riveted sign and then replacing it after making it in a printing studio.

I don't think you can remove and replace rivets without bending and damaging the sign.

Regardless of our disagreement, it will be very interesting to hear what you find out, roscoe.

I will see what I can find out about the artists. I do know that there have been incidents of skilled stencil graffitti around town that have, to me, appeared to be coming out of the same group that addressed the City Council with a veiled threat of violence the week the molotov cocktail was thrown into the governor's mansion.

They referred to graffiti messages in their speeches, I was attending City Hall on other business at the time.

There is a recording of that meeting available from the Austin Historical archives.

If this sign is coming out of the same group, they are moving forward from general displays to targeted aggression and they are displaying their target: white children. They are speeding up.

They are white, themselves, BTW. The gαy/WASP Feminist front that has controlled federal education and arts policies for the past 20 years. They are attacking whites first so that we will attack the other races in misdirected self-defense.

They believe they will float above the carnage and remain as supreme ruling class in the end.

littlerose · « **Reply #9 on:** December 23, 2009, 10:15:33 PM »

roscoe, that link is pure nonsense. You are a neo-nαzι? That's what that link is.

I'm no zionist, I have healthy disgust for what the American Jєωιѕн community has been doing in its paticipation in the very genocide that I see emerging in the USA, but roscoe, if you believe that nonsense in that link, then you are playing right along with them.

Just the same, I still would like to hear what you find out about the sign.

roscoe · « **Reply #10 on:** December 23, 2009, 10:31:26 PM »

Here is what I will do: because of your neo- nαzι crack I'm not going to tell u anything. If someone wants to know what I find out, they can PM me and I will let them know. If whomever did this cannot be found, it will be presumptuous to say what the motive was.

It is entirely poss that someone is crazy like a fox and is using reverse psychology on the unenlightened. Do us all a favor and stay off jury duty.

I think Cathinfo may have attracted another Jansenist.

St Jude Thaddeus · « **Reply #11 on:** December 23, 2009, 10:34:48 PM »

littlerose, I hate to play the contrarian here, but I have to ask: could that sign have been referring to disposal of babies' diapers? Maybe it was just poorly worded. These days nothing would surprise me, but suggesting that actual babies be tossed into a trash can seems a little over the top even for these crazy times...

littlerose · « **Reply #12 on:** December 23, 2009, 11:10:13 PM »

Quote from: St Jude Thaddeus

littlerose, I hate to play the contrarian here, but I have to ask: could that sign have been referring to disposal of babies' diapers? Maybe it was just poorly worded. These days nothing would surprise me, but suggesting that actual babies be tossed into a trash can seems a little over the top even for these crazy times...

No, it was clearly not intended for diapers.

St Jude Thaddeus · « **Reply #13 on:** December 23, 2009, 11:32:32 PM »

littlerose,

Is there any way you could take a photo of the display? We have some computer-savvy types on this forum. Maybe they could get the pictures to one of our Senators or put them on YouTube or something. This is so heinous I don't think even most liberals would find it funny.

Or maybe they would... :really-mad2:

St Jude Thaddeus · « **Reply #14 on:** December 23, 2009, 11:37:14 PM »

Quote from: littlerose

Woman cannot talk about the attacks on us, and the infanticides, because we are shouted down by Catholic men who care more about their weird esoteric ecclesiastic disputes than about the fact of genocidal abortion.

You people, you Catholic men, my own brothers in Christ, don't even know what women are facing. You are too busy supporting the enemy's attacks on your own sisters with your legalistic nonsense.

OUCH! :boxer:

Maybe you could tell us a little bit about this. I see so many married couples with no or just one child. I always assumed it was mostly because of economic reasons; it never occurred to me that bullying by peers might be involved.