Author Topic: Has anyone read the "Humanist Manifesto" ? (Read 2073 times)

Elizabeth · « **on:** July 28, 2009, 12:15:52 AM »

I can't sleep.

No, I couldn't plow through the 100+ pages of the B16 'Caritas' business.

It's kind of beyond Resistance if it's a global one-world government B16 is all on about.

It looks like the Great Apostacy, the La Sallette "Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Antichrist"

:light-saber: :light-saber: :light-saber: :light-saber:

Dawn · « **Reply #1 on:** July 28, 2009, 05:41:49 AM »

Is there a link?

Elizabeth · « **Reply #2 on:** July 28, 2009, 08:39:49 AM »

Sorry I can't do links, but it's at AQ.

Tick Tock

clare · « **Reply #3 on:** July 28, 2009, 08:58:22 AM »

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/docuмents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html

Elizabeth · « **Reply #4 on:** July 28, 2009, 09:33:00 AM »

Thanks you for the link to the Original dread, Clare.

Fr. Scott says:

" [/b]ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT

The most shocking and long-reaching conclusion of this

positive promotion of globalisation on a human and cultural

level is the call for an international authority to impose it

legally, to enforce in an obligatory manner the dialogue

between economies, cultures, religions and peoples as

promoted by this intergral humanism....."

This is Fr. Scott at his best.

God bless you, dear Fr. Scott

Dawn · « **Reply #5 on:** July 28, 2009, 10:34:18 AM »

Quote from: Elizabeth

I can't sleep.
It's kind of beyond Resistance if it's a global one-world government B16 is all on about.

It looks like the Great Apostacy, the La Sallette "Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Antichrist"

Indeed. BTW, have you read Msgr. Robert Hughes Benson "Lord of this World"? Uncanny how accurate he is eventhough it was written in 1907-10.

I saw one of our members once again defending what is undefendable. Bending himself over backward to not see the obvious. Ask yourselves one question. Are those words Catholic, YES or NO. There is no inbetween.

Vladimir · « **Reply #6 on:** July 28, 2009, 10:41:26 AM »

Quote

Indeed. BTW, have you read Msgr. Robert Hughes Benson "Lord of this World"? Uncanny how accurate he is eventhough it was written in 1907-10.

I have read that, and I did a report on it for school last year (public school unfortunately). It is quite unsettling how accurate his almost prophetic novel is.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #7 on:** July 28, 2009, 10:44:02 AM »

Dawn, for various practical reasons I had no idea of who o bam a was until right before the elections -even still I was not interested.

Then I happened upon his gig in Germany, the NYTimes photo essay and his speech about president of the World. I immediately thought of Msr. Benson's classic.

Tick tock.

hey no wonder the kids are freaked out when they see a photo of B16. (bwahahahah)

Elizabeth · « **Reply #8 on:** July 28, 2009, 11:05:55 AM »

Ah, at last the disinfo chimps have arrived to subtly undermine Fr. Scott's very clear words. (at AQ)

There is nothing nebulous or hazy about what Fr. Scott wrote.

He just took a scalpel and got right down to the point.

Anyway, it's a lot easier to go after Fr. Scott than it is to suffer the brain haemmorage of reading the Encyclical from the Dark Side. Fr. Scott is clear and simple, B16 is using sorcery.

Dawn · « **Reply #9 on:** July 28, 2009, 11:36:46 AM »

Yes, that is what I caught as well. All of the sudden Fr. Scott does not know what he is speaking of.
I just read today where Julian Felsenburg, the anti_christ in this book is a young man from Vermont. He came from nowhere and rose to the United States Senate. Benson points out that no one seemed to have any biography on Felsenburg before he took the world by storm. How? Stop me if you have heard this before, but with his force of personality and gift of oratory. YIKES!

sedetrad · « **Reply #10 on:** July 28, 2009, 11:45:42 AM »

Obama is not he Anti-Christ, he is an anti-christ.

Dawn · « **Reply #11 on:** July 28, 2009, 01:54:42 PM »

Yes, I know, it is strange how his character written so long ago is like Obama. Obama could not put together a square dance at this point he is tanking fast.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #12 on:** July 28, 2009, 02:01:46 PM »

I tend to think that Fr. Scott left the prez out of this because it was about the new form of charity and truth, coming right out of Rome.

The so-called "institutional church" has the largest, oldest infrastructure on Earth. This entity is what the Antichrist wants to mimic.

This encylical (can I even spell??) MIMICS and MOCKS, if I take Fr. Scott's analysis of it to heart. Relying on a trustworthy priest to read and understand what the warlocks are up to.

Dawn · « **Reply #13 on:** July 28, 2009, 05:45:13 PM »

You are right Elizabeth, and it provides further winnowing as we see from those on Angelqueen who are jumping through mental hoops to explain why they think Benedict did not mean what Fr. Scott has rightfully shown Benedict to mean.
No, I confused things, I mentioned the book because it shows how the humanist manifesto was in full effect for this Felsenburg to take his seat. Big difference thought, the two popes in this book are REAL CATHOLICS. I especially loved the ending when the Pontiff defeats the anti-Christ during a procession of the Eucharist.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #14 on:** July 28, 2009, 06:46:41 PM »

I read Lord of the World like 15 years ago-

does it actually have the Humanist Manifesto???????

because if it does and Fr. titled his analysis the same

:faint:

:faint:

We were made for this, right?

Author Topic: Has anyone read the &quot;Humanist Manifesto&quot; ? (Read 2073 times)

Author Topic: Has anyone read the "Humanist Manifesto" ? (Read 2073 times)