Author Topic: Graz Bishop Wages Total War on Behalf of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity (Read 718 times)

Augstine Baker · « **on:** April 26, 2012, 12:59:46 PM »

In the Diocese of Graz-Seckau every erroneous teaching is welcome. Actually, if a priest criticizes the moral and anti-Church ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ ideology, the current hireling Bishop will become brutal and abusive.

(kreuz.net, Sankt Veit am Vogau) The Old Liberal Bishop Egon Kapellari (76) of Graz-Seckau ridicules the Catholic Faith.

At the same time he defends the immoral ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ ideology as if it were a Dogma of the Church.

Recently, he threatened the pastor of Sankt Veit am Vogau, Fr. Karl Tropper (75) with "ecclesiastical consequences".

This happened according to reports from Ex-Reichsender [nαzι Radio in Vienna] Vienna (ORF) to Austrian journalistoids.

http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2012/04/graz-bishop-wages-total-war-on-behalf.html

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #1 on:** April 26, 2012, 02:05:42 PM »

The sheer numbers of bad bishops has me concerned that B XVI is ok with all of this.

s2srea · « **Reply #2 on:** April 26, 2012, 02:10:27 PM »

Quote from: Capt McQuigg

The sheer numbers of bad bishops has me concerned that B XVI is ok with all of this.

Well, given how collegiality was promoted via VII, he can't really do much. We need someone who will roll into the papacy, and get heads to roll and a helluva lot of this: :heretic: :heretic: :heretic:

Augstine Baker · « **Reply #3 on:** April 26, 2012, 02:25:47 PM »

Anthony Taylor, +Wuerl and El Paso Diocese most recently...

s2srea · « **Reply #4 on:** April 26, 2012, 02:29:33 PM »

Quote from: Augstine Baker

..El Paso Diocese most recently...

This is the one which really riles me up. They would be first if I was pope. Wuerl next.

TraditionalistThomas · « **Reply #5 on:** April 26, 2012, 08:46:30 PM »

I could be wrong, but can't the Pope just use his supreme authority over the entire Church to fire every heretical/modernist Bishop and replace them all?

Emerentiana · « **Reply #6 on:** April 26, 2012, 09:00:43 PM »

Quote from: TraditionalistThomas

I could be wrong, but can't the Pope just use his supreme authority over the entire Church to fire every heretical/modernist Bishop and replace them all?

Benedict is in the same category with the other heretic bishops. Why would he replace them? :heretic:

TraditionalistThomas · « **Reply #7 on:** April 26, 2012, 09:47:39 PM »

But he's not, that's the difference. He may not be a 'trad', but he sure is conservative, which is an obvious juxtaposition to the majority of the heirachy. His concessions for the Traditional Latin Mass would have been unthinkable for most Catholic Bishops today.

TKGS · « **Reply #8 on:** April 27, 2012, 07:06:56 AM »

Quote from: TraditionalistThomas

But he's not, that's the difference. He may not be a 'trad', but he sure is conservative, which is an obvious juxtaposition to the majority of the heirachy. His concessions for the Traditional Latin Mass would have been unthinkable for most Catholic Bishops today.

Conservative? He is most certainly conservative in that he likes the pagentry and symbolism and beauty of many old things and ways.

But he is far from conservative in regards to doctrine. Consider the books he's written while pope. Consider the remarks he makes concerning intrinsic evils being a first step towards good.

He is conservative in that he wants to conserve the Modernist gains in the Conciliar church--and he has protected them very diligiently--since his baby, the Vatican II revolution, came into being.

The fact is, TraditionalistThomas, is the Emerentiana is absoutely correct. Benedict 16 would never replace these bishops because their theology, the doctrine they teach, everything about them, is virtually identical to his own. They are his soul-mates.

Further discussion of this matter is forbidden on the "General Discussion" forum.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #9 on:** April 27, 2012, 10:59:46 AM »

The mainstream media sure likes to portray Benedict XVI as conservative, that alone should be a red flag to anyone.

Assisi goes on as always.

Ecuмenism isn't receding - the protestant heretics are our separated brethren - while the SSPX is accused of "schism".

The introduction of EF / OF as if these two "forms" are equally valid and "legitimate expressions of the latin rite"

Never any disciplinary action taken against openly heretical bishops.

And this is all without looking carefully at his writings which often make the Traditional Catholic say to himself "Did the pope actually write that or is this a bad translation".