Always nice to see P.T. Barnum vindicated, isn't it?
Zeitun, if you want to read sci-fi, fine. But you're much better off with Ray Bradbury than the fever swamp prophets at Traditio.
Maybe you would likewise scoff at
this article in the NY Times?
"Catastrophe" ... "several million dollars’ worth of damages" ...
"natural disaster" ... "quite traumatized" ... "floodwaters had
swelled to “centennial” levels" ... "filled with as much as five
feet of water" ... “The damage is much more significant than
in 2012.”
So which part is "sci-fi?" Or, is it just the source you're all
worked up over? When the Times writes it, it's not "sci-fi,"
but if Traditio writes it then it suddenly becomes "sci-fi?"
I wonder what the Lourdes flooding means.
You can wonder away, but WHATEVER YOU DO, don't think about
what Traditio said because then you're a conspiracy theorist, or
a tinfoil hatter! :tinfoil: