First of all, I'm assuming everyone is familiar with the Papal Prophecies of St. Malachy, therefore I'm not going to spend time on an explanation of their composition. Nor am I going to argue with those who refuse to acknowledge their Divine origin, which is beyond dispute. That being said, let me get started…
No doubt everyone will claim that Francis I succeeded Benedict XVI (“Glory of the Olive”) and therefore, he must be “Peter the Roman”. First of all, Francis fails to fulfill the second half of the prophecy – that is, the title of “Roman”. No one seems to pay any attention to this peculiar anomaly. Secondly, as I will explain later, there was nothing coincidental in his choice of names, as he was ordered to take the name “Francis” by the ʝʊdɛօ/Masonic Puppetmasters – and this, long before his sham election. And so, his choice of a name is nothing to wonder at. But more on this subject later. The point being, Francis is NOT the real Peter the Roman, even though he succeeded Benedict XVI. And the reason? The reason is because something highly significant occurred during the reign of Benedict XVI that forever disrupted this order. This is why Benedict IS included in the prophecy, but Francis is not. That event was the formal condemnation of the Novus Ordo. That’s right, the Novus Ordo was formally condemned as the apostate religion that it is. And this, during the reign of Benedict XVI.
As a result of this condemnation, not only did the Catholic Church and the Novus Ordo become two separate entities, but future “popes” of the Novus Ordo were forever separated from the Papal Prophecy of St. Malachy. This is why Benedict XVI was included in those prophecies, but Francis was not (as I will prove). Neither Francis, nor any of his future successors, have any part whatsoever in the prophecies of St. Malachy. And mark my word, he will have successors. In fact, their very existence will prove the truth of what I’m telling you here today.
So who condemned the Novus Ordo? Certainly it wasn’t Benedict XVI. He was one of the Founding Fathers of the Vatican II religion. So who was it? The answer is the real “Peter the Roman”. That’s right, the real “Peter the Roman” condemned the Novus Ordo. And this, during the reign of Benedict XVI. In fact, this long-awaited condemnation was the very first act he performed following his election.
So who is the real “Peter the Roman”? And how do we know for sure that he's the one who fulfills the prophecy instead of Francis? The answer is simpler than you think. You see, in his infinite care for us, God has made deciphering this final clue the easiest of them all; and with such clarity that even a child could recognize the true claimant. In fact, given enough bananas, I think a monkey could recognize him – despite the fact that the interpretation of the final prophecy is the most elaborate of all the clues. In short, the identity of the final claimant is the simplest, most clear-cut, unambiguous, and idiot-proof of all 112 prophecies. And why? Because the entire prophetic composition leads up to, and centers around, “Peter the Roman”. It’s all about him. He is the central focus of the whole prophecy. This is so true that all 111 clues leading up to the final one are specifically designed to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the prophecies are absolutely true, 100% accurate, and of Divine origin – and this, in order to solidify the credibility, and subsequent Papal authority, of the final claimant.
So who is he?
As to his personal identity, I'm not going to mention his name quite yet (suffice it to say, he's already come and gone). First, I want to give you a little background... Born here in the United States, he began his career as a police officer, and continued for many years under this profession. Law being one of his passions, he also became a member of the International Bar Association, and eventually gained a Master’s Degree in Canon Law. Following his ordination to the priesthood, he took upon himself the daunting task of becoming an Exorcist - a decision fueled by continual demonic attacks upon his person since childhood. In this office, he traveled the country taking on many cases, typically for little or no money save travel expenses. Soon he was offered the position of pastor of the oldest traditional Catholic chapel in North America, which he gladly accepted, while continuing his nationwide ministry. Before long, he became this country's foremost Catholic Exorcist, having been given his immense caseload (amounting to several hundred) by another bishop who had become too old to continue his own exorcism ministry. Keep these facts in mind, as it is primarily the future pope's office as “Exorcist” which links him to the prophecy's final clue. This is the identifying link.
So, in deciphering the final clue, we first need to find out what St. Malachy means by this mysterious phrase, "Peter the Roman". Is it a proper name? Did such a man exist in the past? Is it meant to be taken in a metaphorical sense? What does the clue refer to? Actually, there was such a man in Church history. And yes, the clue is meant to be taken in a metaphorical sense. So who is this mysterious character? Well, as it turns out, of the 140 or so "St. Peters" canonized by the Catholic Church, only ONE of them is from Rome. That's right, only one. Strange coincidence. Many are from Italy, but only one is from Rome. This Roman Peter was martyred in the year 304 A.D. under the reign of Diocletian, and was quite famous in the early centuries of Christianity. As proof of his popularity, Pope Damasus himself composed the martyr's eulogy. Moreover, the Roman Emperor, Constantine, had a basilica built in his honor; and even had his own mother (St. Helena) buried there. Years later, the saint's name was included in the sacred Canon of the Mass alongside a number of the early Church's greatest martyrs. It can be found among the list of saints within the prayer "Nobis Quoque Peccatoribus".
In other words, this same "Peter the Roman" whom St. Malachy refers to, is memorialized every single day in every single Latin Mass said throughout the world - and has been for some 1500 years. All this to say, this is no obscure saint whom no one knows. On the contrary, he's quite famous. Nor can there be any question that this is precisely the Roman Peter whom St. Malachy makes reference to in his prophecy. And how can we be sure? The proof is in the fulfillment of the clue, for this particular saint is more popularly known by another name - a name which links him PRECISELY to the final Pope of the Catholic Church. You see, "Peter the Roman" is otherwise known in Church history as "Peter the Exorcist".
Like I said... idiot-proof.
God has purposefully designed the final clue to be the simplest, most unambiguous, and most easily decipherable of all the clues. And with good reason. The true identity of "Peter the Roman" is absolutely paramount to the salvation of souls. The Catholic world NEEDS TO KNOW who the true Pope is. And why, you ask? Because it’s precisely the final claimant to the Papacy who will dispel the errors, deceptions, and lies plaguing today’s Catholics. In fact, this is the WHOLE PURPOSE for the Papal Prophecies: To dispel the fog of error and confusion brought on by the present-day Masonic takeover of the hierarchy. That’s right, the whole purpose of the St. Malachy Prophecy is to guide you and me through this chaotic, disheveled mess. This is precisely the reason why God gave the Catholic Church this wonderful prophecy.
And should we be surprised? After all, God gave Catholics the Papacy in order to preserve the Faith and the Church from corruption. Above everyone else, the Pope is the one appointed by God to safeguard the sacred doctrines from alteration, and to guide the faithful to the harbor of truth and salvation (something you’re definitely NOT getting from your Masonic antipopes). And so, it is perfectly in line with our Heavenly Father’s paternal care for us that He would raise up a REAL Catholic Pope in these days to guide the faithful through the spiritual chaos and doctrinal deceptions plaguing the Elect. This is what the prophecy is all about: Guiding today’s Elect through this ominous fog of lies and deception.
As for one of these deceptions, what can be said in regard to Francis I? In a nutshell, his election, his choice of names, and his whole identity is nothing but a charade. It’s all fake, from beginning to end. As I said already, he was forced to assume the name “Francis” by the Puppetmasters. You see, although Joseph Ratzinger is a highly intelligent man, he was doing a pathetic job of filling John Paul II’s shoes (what can we expect from a man dubbed “God’s Rottweiler”). No, the Puppetmasters wanted someone more like JPII on the Throne – someone with an innocent-looking smile and a grandfatherly demeanor. They wanted Bergoglio. They were well acquainted with him as Argentina is one of the world's havens for the αѕнкenαzι "Jєωs". Moreover, Bergoglio proved his loyalty to the Cabal during its murderous takeover of that country - an event known as Argentina's "Dirty War". Yes, they were well aware of Bergoglio's loyalties, and his innocent looking grandfatherly smile. At all cost, they wanted him on the Throne. The trouble was, they needed to turn him into “Peter the Roman”. They knew well that the entire Catholic world was going to be looking for the fulfillment of St. Malachy's prophecy. Everyone was curiously anticipating it. Even Protestants were weighing in on the issue. The whole world was watching. And so the Puppetmasters had to be careful – and cunning.
While considering the matter, someone learned that St. Francis of Assisi’s middle name was Peter; and came up with a plan: If Bergoglio would assume the name "Francis", and (to make the choice more believable) feign a devotion to the Saint, and to the poor, then the Puppetmasters could pass him off as “Peter the Roman”. Evidently, they weren’t too concerned about the “Roman” part of the clue, as they didn’t even attempt to explain it – or perhaps they couldn’t. But no big deal, they had the “Peter” half covered, and that was all that mattered.
And so, after approving the plan, and with Lord Rothschild’s permission, the Cabal ordered Benedict XVI to step down – which he promptly did. My guess is, they decided against killing him (as they did to John Paul I) because they still needed someone around with some theological sense; an adviser, if you will. And that’s how it happened. God's Rottweiler relinquished his crown, and grandpapa Bergoglio became the new "Pope". Planned from the very beginning. Again, completely fake. Bergoglio is no more “Peter the Roman” than the man on the moon. His name was decided upon long before the election; his devotion to St. Francis and to the poor is nothing more than a charade; and to this day, there is still no answer to the “Roman” half of the clue. And now you know why.
On the other hand, Peter the Exorcist fulfills the prophecy down to the very letter. Like I said, it’s idiot-proof. Again, as the whole purpose behind St. Malachy’s Papal Prophecies is to guide the Elect through the lies, errors and deceptions brought on by the ʝʊdɛօ/Masonic take-over of the hierarchy, the Catholic world needs to know who the real Pope is. His true identity is absolutely paramount. And so, God has designed the final clue to be so simple that a child could decipher it.
So then, with these considerations in mind, we have to ask the inevitable question: Exactly what lies, errors and deceptions are in view? Well, for starters, there’s the matter of union with the Novus Ordo. This is Error #1: Allegiance to the Masonic hierarchy of the Novus Ordo. Without delving into the reckless insanity of such an allegiance, or the Church’s teaching in this regard (“cuм Ex Apostolatus Officio”), all one needs to know is that the Novus Ordo sect has been formally condemned by a true and valid Catholic Pope. This is all you need to know. The sect has been condemned. Ergo, no one is permitted to have anything further to do with the Novus Ordo in sacred matters. The same holds true for any religious sect condemned by the Church. Catholics are absolutely forbidden to take part in any religious services of condemned non-Catholic sects. Period.
Now, whereas I fully understand that separating oneself from the Novus Ordo is a monumental decision; nevertheless, we have prayer at our disposal. This is our refuge and our guide. Prayer is the key. In fact, Catholics have a moral obligation to pray in circuмstances such as this. As St. Thomas Aquinas teaches: when faced with a question that bears upon the salvation or damnation of a soul, one is required under pain of mortal sin to pray for guidance. So again, I encourage you to pray. At the same time, consider how perfectly “Peter the Exorcist” fulfills the prophecy; and how Francis “The Roman” fails to answer it. Consider further that it was precisely the condemnation which effected the separation of Francis from the prophecy. This is crucial to realize. The effectiveness of the condemnation proves that it was both valid and real – something only a true Catholic Pope could accomplish. That is to say, had Peter the Exorcist not been a valid pope, the condemnation would have been useless, and Francis would have fulfilled the prophecy to a "T", just as all of his predecessors did. But as it is, the condemnation was effective – and so Francis was severed from participation in the prophecy. This is absolute proof that Peter the Exorcist was a true and valid Catholic pope. These considerations, along with prayer, should help greatly in making a decision.
As for the other errors, I’m not going to get into them here. If anyone is interested in going further, they can let me know via a personal message on this site. Please understand though, I’m not going to argue these points. Frankly, I’ve put up with enough arguments already. I’m not trying to be rude, or uncharitable. I’m just taking this matter seriously, as it should be taken. This subject directly involves the eternal salvation or damnation of your soul. This is not a joke. Any half-wit can discern the identity of the final claimant to the Papal Throne. If you can’t, it’s because you don’t want to. It’s as simple as that. I’m not going to argue with such people. It’s a waste of time.
Once again, the ENTIRE PURPOSE of the St. Malachy Prophecy is to guide the Elect through this fog of deception and lies. This is the WHOLE REASON why God gave us the prophecy. As such, it is meant to be taken very seriously. Heed its warning, and you just might save your soul. Ignore it, and I promise you will suffer the consequences. If you genuinely care for the salvation of your soul, and want to know more, then send a personal message to my inbox.
Topic: Francis is NOT Peter the Roman (and I can prove it) (Read 1373 times)