Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Feeney's take on "Jesus was a Jєω."  (Read 861 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rum

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1341
  • Reputation: +594/-596
  • Gender: Male
Fr. Feeney's take on "Jesus was a Jєω."
« on: February 11, 2018, 08:30:53 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • A REPLY TO LADY ABRAHAMS

    https://fatherfeeney.wordpress.com/2009/08/22/the-point-june-1954/

    We have lately received a note from a reader in London, a Jєωιѕн lady, who, by the grace of God and the politics of empire, now finds herself a Catholic and a member of the lesser peerage. Lady Abrahams, as our correspondent signs herself, spoke out against The Point ’s “virulent anti-Semitism.” Her Ladyship bade us be mindful of “the charity of Jesus Christ,” Whom she called, in a rhetorical finale meant to wither us, “the greatest Jєω of all time!”

    Lady Abrahams’ evaluation of the adorable Word-made-flesh is, we cannot deny, arresting. We wonder just how such a judgment was arrived at, and we are tempted to envision her Ladyship lining up the contenders for her title of “greatest Jєω.” One by one, with much deliberation, Philo Judaeus, Rabbi Hillel, Benjamin Disraeli, and Bernard Baruch, all get eliminated — and Jesus of Nazareth wins the contest.

    In justice to our Catholic reader, in England, we must make it clear that by no means does The Point find Lady Abrahams guilty of originality in this matter; we do not accuse English Catholics of harboring a new Judaeo-heresiarch in their midst. Her Ladyship is but following the fashion, so tragically unprotested of late, by which converts from Judaism try to give the impression that their previous attendance at the ѕуηαgσgυє is an enhancement to their current Christianity, since, after all, Christ was a Jєω, too.

    Christ, indeed, was a Jєω. But anyone who is making an appeal to Christians to go all out for the Jєωs, would do well to leave Christ out of the argument. Christ was a Jєω Who claimed to be God, and thereby so outraged His fellow-Jєωs that they had Him put to death. Christ was the rightful King of the Jєωs, Who dared to defy the religious tyrannies of the Jєωιѕн Pharisees. Christ was the Divine Jєω Who got spat upon by His own people, and was labeled a “blasphemer” by the Jєωιѕн high priest.

    In introducing the fact that Christ was a Jєω, Lady Abrahams’ chief purpose was, clearly, to imply that Christ was the kind of Jєω she knew, a fact which would bear with it such religious consequences as: going to Sabbath services and reading, not from the Old Testament, but from the тαℓмυd; scoffing at the idea of a Jєωιѕн virgin being the Mother of God; believing that the Messias-to-come was not a Divine Person, but an era of Jєωιѕн prosperity.

    Without further illustration, we may conclude that, in the matter of belief, Christ was a Jєω of the kind that ceased to exist nineteen hundred years ago.

    The unanswered question in all of the foregoing is, of course, how about Lady Abrahams’ indisputably Jєωιѕн blood? Doesn’t that give her, through race and ancestry, a privileged relationship to Our Lord?

    The sacredness of Jєωιѕн blood throughout the Old Testament, and its jealous preservation, was for the one sublime purpose of keeping clear the human route by which the Word of God was to “become flesh and dwell amongst us.” That is why the Gospel writers take such care to present to us the genealogical blood-line of Our Lord — Saint Matthew recording it from Abraham down to Joseph, and Saint Luke retracing it from Bethlehem back to Eden. Once Good Friday has occurred, however, and Our Lord’s Precious Blood has been shed to its redemptive purpose, Jєωιѕн blood, as a Divine interest, is finished.

    All that was promised to the House of David, all that was awaited from the tribe of Juda, is gathered in the Precious Eucharistic Blood on our Catholic altars. It is not Lady Abrahams’ ancestral connection with the Temple of Jerusalem that counts now with God. It is her Ladyship’s proximity to an altar rail in London, where she, and the gentiles kneeling beside her, become, through Holy Communion, the true fulfillment of Our Blessed Lady’s Magnificat prophecy, “To Abraham and to his seed forever.”

    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.


    Offline Merry

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 628
    • Reputation: +362/-99
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Feeney's take on "Jesus was a Jєω."
    « Reply #1 on: February 11, 2018, 08:46:11 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thank you, Rum.  And Fr. Leonard.  And our Sweet Jesus!  
    If any one saith that true and natural water is not of necessity for baptism, and on that account wrests to some sort of metaphor those words of Our Lord Jesus Christ, "Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost...,"  Let Him Be Anathama.  -COUNCIL OF TRENT Sess VII Canon II “On Baptism"


    Offline 1st Mansion Tenant

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1765
    • Reputation: +1446/-127
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Feeney's take on "Jesus was a Jєω."
    « Reply #2 on: February 13, 2018, 08:13:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That was remarkable. Thanks for posting, rum.

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Feeney's take on "Jesus was a Jєω."
    « Reply #3 on: February 13, 2018, 09:02:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Bravo Rumster!  :applause:




     Father Leonard Feeney 1897 ~ 1978

    What a mind... what a white martyr... what priestly gift we had in our midst.
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1341
    • Reputation: +594/-596
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Feeney's take on "Jesus was a Jєω."
    « Reply #4 on: February 22, 2018, 08:49:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  

    I did a little digging on the "Lady Abrahams" The Point is addressing. It appears to be Lady Luisa Abrahams (1910-2007), who would have been in her early 40s when she wrote to The Point.

    Spectator makes a correction to the claim that she participated in a fund-raising effort for the Yom Kippur war.

    JєωιѕнCurrents lists her as one of the tribe.

    A radio interview:

    What first brought you to England?

    "I came to England...actually England and golf saved my life, because I came to England in February '39 to play golf with Henry Cotton, who was the golf champion then, British golf champion, whom I met in '38 in Marianske lazne.
    "He thought I was very talented and he invited me to come to England to play golf and I came and stayed with him when Hitler marched into Prague. Hitler killed my entire family but I stayed in England and therefore I survived."

    Her husband, Sir Charles Abrahams is listed in Palmgrave's Dictionary of Anglo-Jєωιѕн History.

    Everything I can dig up on her suggests she was a garden-variety fake convert.

    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.


    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2624/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Feeney's take on "Jesus was a Jєω."
    « Reply #5 on: February 22, 2018, 01:38:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for the good work, Rum. 

    Even among the most reform-minded Jєωs, as casual as casual can be, to convert out of the race is something which will cause someone to be rejected vociferously by all.  If a Jєω converts and their family is "cool" about it and "accepting" then the family and friends know it is just a fad or part of some form of organized mischief.