and yet, each one is held rather dear by the conciliar church, n'est-ce pas?
Tisk - tisk! You haven't absorbed the deep secrets of the hermeneutic of continuity, I see.
Let me explain it in a few words (you can save all the misery of reading it).
The Syllabus was good FOR ITS TIME. But now, we know better.
Consequently,
the unclean spirit of Vat.II is understood as the equivalent for our time, as was the Syllabus for its time. The contradictions are only imaginary. We understand Vat.II and Newchurch as meaningful for us TODAY, while we still recognize the Syllabus as meaningful for people of THAT time in THOSE days.
Or, as a flaming liberal once said, "That was then and this is now."
.