Here we see the elevation of new hetero-praxis over doctrine, that leads the individual to think along the lines of heretical doctine.

This is the same tactic the progressivist employed at the recent Synod - advocating changing the practice of divorce and remarried receiving Communion, and then repeating only what the most naïve would accept: "but we haven't changed doctrine!"

Have we learned nothing over the past 50 years? The entire Vatican II revolution was based on the tactic of the elevation of the "pastoral" over the "doctrinal," without explicitly changing doctrine, but nonetheless creating a revolution in Catholic attitudes.

Pessimistic Voices

In the daily exercise of Our pastoral office, it sometimes happens that We hear certain opinions which disturb Us—opinions expressed by people who, though fired with a commendable zeal for religion, are lacking in sufficient prudence and judgment in their evaluation of events. They can see nothing but calamity and disaster in the present state of the world. They say over and over that this modern age of ours, in comparison with past ages, is definitely deteriorating. One would think from their attitude that history, that great teacher of life, had taught them nothing. They seem to imagine that in the days of the earlier councils everything was as it should be so far as doctrine and morality and the Church's rightful liberty were concerned.

We feel that We must disagree with these prophets of doom, who are always forecasting worse disasters, as though the end of the world were at hand.

Quote from: LaughingAmigo

Advocating sedevacantism automatically makes you suspect of being a Jew.

And this is due to that one line from the Protocols you post about?

And I continue to get reprimanded for making too much of the dogma EENS, when it's obvious to anyone who isn't willfully blind that the denial of EENS is the ROOT CAUSE of all the modern V2 errors.

The Real Purpose of Interfaith
(...)

http://www.fatherfeeney.org/point/56-nov.html

And I continue to get reprimanded for making too much of the dogma EENS, when it's obvious to anyone who isn't willfully blind that the denial of EENS is the ROOT CAUSE of all the modern V2 errors.

Quote from: Geremia

Yes, wasn't Arius a crypto-Jew?
But what's this to do with sedevacantism?

Sedevacantism is schism.  The Jews in the Protocols admit to promoting schism.  The Dimond Brothers have Jєωιѕн last names and promote schism.  They've been at it for years and have dedicated their entire lives to it.  They aren't total idiots, as proven by their research, so they know (at least by now) sedevacantism is a bogus theory, so they must be encouraging the lie on purpose while knowing it's a lie.  

The only people sufficiently motivated to do something like this are the Jews.

The Dimond Brothers' use of insulting propaganda (e.g. unfortunate photos of past popes) demonstrates skill.  The Jews are the masters of propaganda and insult by their own admission:

Protocol 17

Quote

... insult, the faculty of employment which is so well known to our race.

It's impossible to avoid the conclusion that the Dimond Brothers are Jews.