Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: For Laramie Hirsch  (Read 1881 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 9526
  • Reputation: +6247/-940
  • Gender: Male
For Laramie Hirsch
« on: November 22, 2015, 08:45:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Laramie, you mused: "Myself, I'd like to know if there is a recorded history of how Jєωιѕн women are trained to despise submitting to anything reasonable. I think at this point, the characteristic is genetically ingrained. "

    Since the Library brooks no discussion, I thought to answer here.

    Interesting consideration.  I think that Jєωιѕн women are subjected to so many unreasonable rules,*** that they develop a reflexive pattern of opposition to anything that is not of their own making.


    *** For example, see the thread Torah on Women—"a sack of excrement with a bleeding hole":
    judaism101 dot pro boards dot com/thread/9/torah-on-women


    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1341
    • Reputation: +594/-596
    • Gender: Male
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #1 on: November 28, 2015, 09:01:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Orthodox Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Orthodox Jєωιѕн men. Feminist (Marxist) Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Jєωιѕн feminist (Marxist) men. Women are always obedient to men, but they vary as to what type of man they're obedient to. The female saints were obedient to men who served Christ, and flouted men who didn't serve Christ. Women have free will, and can choose which type of man they look to for for navigation.
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #2 on: November 28, 2015, 09:08:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Women are always obedient to men, but they vary as to what type of man they're obedient to.

    I have known women who are obedient to husbands, only not to their own husband.

    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #3 on: November 29, 2015, 05:00:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How could I have missed this thread?  

    Okay, my reply is:

    Unreasonable rules?  

    I'm not so sure.  I think the Jєωιѕн culture actively seeks to train its women to subvert authority.  I mean, what could be more Jєωιѕн than the refusal to submit to something?

    Often, I see similarities between black women and Jєωιѕн women.  Both groups do not submit to either men or any kind of a reasonable system.  The connection in my mind goes back to when I heard E. Michael Jones once comment about how the Negroes in this country have become Judaized, which I sincerely believe.  



    Quote from: rum
    Orthodox Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Orthodox Jєωιѕн men. Feminist (Marxist) Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Jєωιѕн feminist (Marxist) men. Women are always obedient to men, but they vary as to what type of man they're obedient to. The female saints were obedient to men who served Christ, and flouted men who didn't serve Christ. Women have free will, and can choose which type of man they look to for for navigation.


    I dunno, rum.  This seems like some sort of an idealistic thing to think.  If the Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit is a real phenomenon, then I imagine that it's a bit more complicated than that.  

    Then again, I've never admitted to being an expert or an authority on this subject.  

    Mark79, go ahead and bring your thoughts about this into the thread.




    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle

    Offline alaric

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3139
    • Reputation: +2280/-386
    • Gender: Male
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #4 on: November 29, 2015, 06:55:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    "Myself, I'd like to know if there is a recorded history of how Jєωιѕн women are trained to despise submitting to anything reasonable. I think at this point, the characteristic is genetically ingrained. "




    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1341
    • Reputation: +594/-596
    • Gender: Male
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #5 on: December 01, 2015, 02:40:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LaramieHirsch

    Quote from: rum
    Orthodox Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Orthodox Jєωιѕн men. Feminist (Marxist) Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Jєωιѕн feminist (Marxist) men. Women are always obedient to men, but they vary as to what type of man they're obedient to. The female saints were obedient to men who served Christ, and flouted men who didn't serve Christ. Women have free will, and can choose which type of man they look to for for navigation.


    I dunno, rum.  This seems like some sort of an idealistic thing to think.  If the Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit is a real phenomenon, then I imagine that it's a bit more complicated than that.  

    Then again, I've never admitted to being an expert or an authority on this subject.  


    It's the opposite of idealistic. Just reality. What does E. Michael Jones write that makes you think it's more complicated than that?
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.

    Offline Croixalist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1480
    • Reputation: +1056/-276
    • Gender: Male
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #6 on: December 01, 2015, 03:18:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well, there's always that pesky "His blood be upon us and our children." I think there's an added layer of spiritual resistance and generational demonic influence even when compared to other ethnic or religious groups. Even for the best of these people, Catholicism is but a variety of belief that ought to be "tolerated". In the relatively few cases they do accept Christ to some degree, they've invented the whole "Messianic Jєω" business.

    Back to Jєωιѕн women in particular, I think it's fair to say that they are one of the most manipulative and materialistic specimens on the planet who are demonically designed to push their men to new depths of Mammon worship.
    Fortuna finem habet.

    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #7 on: December 04, 2015, 01:06:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: rum
    Quote from: LaramieHirsch

    Quote from: rum
    Orthodox Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Orthodox Jєωιѕн men. Feminist (Marxist) Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Jєωιѕн feminist (Marxist) men. Women are always obedient to men, but they vary as to what type of man they're obedient to. The female saints were obedient to men who served Christ, and flouted men who didn't serve Christ. Women have free will, and can choose which type of man they look to for for navigation.


    I dunno, rum.  This seems like some sort of an idealistic thing to think.  If the Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit is a real phenomenon, then I imagine that it's a bit more complicated than that.  

    Then again, I've never admitted to being an expert or an authority on this subject.  


    It's the opposite of idealistic. Just reality. What does E. Michael Jones write that makes you think it's more complicated than that?


    Orthodox goes with orthodox.  Marxists with Marxists.  Red with red.  Blue with blue.  Ken with Barbie.

    This is a naieve thought.

    The Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit is an ongoing battle against all right and just authority, as it was with Lucifer against God.

    I imagine that someone under the wing of this spirit--the wing of this dragon--will rebel against anything or anyone that represents the true Logos of the Cosmos.






    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle


    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1341
    • Reputation: +594/-596
    • Gender: Male
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #8 on: December 04, 2015, 08:49:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    Quote from: rum
    Quote from: LaramieHirsch

    Quote from: rum
    Orthodox Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Orthodox Jєωιѕн men. Feminist (Marxist) Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Jєωιѕн feminist (Marxist) men. Women are always obedient to men, but they vary as to what type of man they're obedient to. The female saints were obedient to men who served Christ, and flouted men who didn't serve Christ. Women have free will, and can choose which type of man they look to for for navigation.


    I dunno, rum.  This seems like some sort of an idealistic thing to think.  If the Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit is a real phenomenon, then I imagine that it's a bit more complicated than that.  

    Then again, I've never admitted to being an expert or an authority on this subject.  


    It's the opposite of idealistic. Just reality. What does E. Michael Jones write that makes you think it's more complicated than that?


    Orthodox goes with orthodox.  Marxists with Marxists.  Red with red.  Blue with blue.  Ken with Barbie.

    This is a naieve thought.

    The Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit is an ongoing battle against all right and just authority, as it was with Lucifer against God.

    I imagine that someone under the wing of this spirit--the wing of this dragon--will rebel against anything or anyone that represents the true Logos of the Cosmos.


    I think we're at cross-purposes.
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.

    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #9 on: December 04, 2015, 11:47:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: rum


    I think we're at cross-purposes.


    What do you mean?



    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle

    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1341
    • Reputation: +594/-596
    • Gender: Male
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #10 on: December 05, 2015, 08:50:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    Quote from: rum


    I think we're at cross-purposes.


    What do you mean?



    I don't know what you're talking about. I asked you to give me excerpts from E. Michael Jones' book that contradicts my observation.
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.


    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 9526
    • Reputation: +6247/-940
    • Gender: Male
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #11 on: December 05, 2015, 07:06:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    How could I have missed this thread?  

    Okay, my reply is:

    Unreasonable rules?  

    I'm not so sure.  I think the Jєωιѕн culture actively seeks to train its women to subvert authority.  I mean, what could be more Jєωιѕн than the refusal to submit to something?

    Often, I see similarities between black women and Jєωιѕн women.  Both groups do not submit to either men or any kind of a reasonable system.  The connection in my mind goes back to when I heard E. Michael Jones once comment about how the Negroes in this country have become Judaized, which I sincerely believe.  



    Quote from: rum
    Orthodox Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Orthodox Jєωιѕн men. Feminist (Marxist) Jєωιѕн women are obedient to Jєωιѕн feminist (Marxist) men. Women are always obedient to men, but they vary as to what type of man they're obedient to. The female saints were obedient to men who served Christ, and flouted men who didn't serve Christ. Women have free will, and can choose which type of man they look to for for navigation.


    I dunno, rum.  This seems like some sort of an idealistic thing to think.  If the Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit is a real phenomenon, then I imagine that it's a bit more complicated than that.  

    Then again, I've never admitted to being an expert or an authority on this subject.  

    Mark79, go ahead and bring your thoughts about this into the thread.



    Since you mentioned it....

    Have you read the "Torah on Women—'A sack of excrement with a bleeding hole'" thread on my website?  (judaism101 dot proboards dot com) I think the thread tallies a long list of unreasonable/insane rules, so I postulate that Satan's females develop a pattern of resistance to everything that is not of their own making. Satan's males develop the same resistance to everything that is not of their own making, but for a different reason. Judaism is derivative of the Original Sin, "that we may be as gods." The pervasive thread that runs through Judaism is that the Judaic male IS god (see the megalomania section on my site), so the "Oral Torah"(тαℓмυd and Kabbala) is from start-to-finish a nullification of God's Law and the deification of the Judaic male.

    So, Judaic males and females both end up resistant to all that is Godly in the world, but they take different "paths" to get to that immutable (excepting those who accept God's graces) behavior.

    As for negroes... when they threw off Marcus Garvey and embraced W.E.B. du Bois, they did indeed meld with Judaic "command and control," a point I learned from Jones. Now, negroes are certainly NOT taught that they "will be as gods," but the negro male is certainly taught a lack of responsibility and a lack of culpability that ends up looking like they make up their own rules, including promiscuous irresponsibility that leaves negro women angry and diseased in the dirt. I think that resentment makes many of their females vicious and resistant.

    Different paths, same sinful outcome. As Jesus observed, the road to hell is broad. There is only one way to decency and salvation—and that road is narrow, God's way, not "my" way, eh?

    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    For Laramie Hirsch
    « Reply #12 on: December 05, 2015, 09:15:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: rum
    Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    Quote from: rum


    I think we're at cross-purposes.


    What do you mean?



    I don't know what you're talking about. I asked you to give me excerpts from E. Michael Jones' book that contradicts my observation.


    I would if I could, but I can't. Two problems:

    1. Don't got the time
    2. Don't got the book.  When I read through Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit, I ended up stopping in the John Dee chapter, primarily because it was time to return the book.  

    So, now you know what to get me for Christmas.



    Mark 79, I'll simply have to head over to your place and check out what you're talkin' about.  Might not be tonight, though.




    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle