The distinction you're missing is that we should not comment on whether or not INDIVIDUALS are damned, but Fr. Feeney didn't do that. He never said "Abdul Ibn Whatever specifically is damned", he said "Non-Catholics are damned." The former is wrong(but Fr. Feeney never did it), the latter we are REQUIRED to do by order of Pope St. Pius X.
I was about to post that.
It's not registering to him that there is a change from adhering to a non-Catholic sect to now adhering to the Catholic faith.
Q. Is it then right for us to say that one who was not received into the Church before his death, is damned?
The point being made is that we don't know if someone had a conversion at the hour of death. CONVERSION. Augustinus21, you're so focused on Baptism of Desire that you're missing the necessity of the Catholic faith. Fr. Mueller's position is akin to Baptism of Desire for catechumens.