Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: FE deletes the "Why was ChantCd deleted" thread  (Read 2148 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CampeadorShin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 824
  • Reputation: +12/-0
FE deletes the "Why was ChantCd deleted" thread
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2007, 02:46:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So, it was deleted, and then put back into a different subforum.  Am I correct Chant?
    Catholic warriors:
    http://www.angelusonline.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=490&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
    My older avatar of Guy Fawkes that caused so much arguing, made by peters_student:
    http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/6007

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22951
    • Reputation: +20088/-243
    • Gender: Male
    FE deletes the "Why was ChantCd deleted" thread
    « Reply #16 on: January 15, 2007, 03:01:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, it was.

    It was deleted at one point, because I did a search for it. Then somehow it came back from the dead.

    Matthew
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!


    Offline clare

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2268
    • Reputation: +886/-34
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    FE deletes the "Why was ChantCd deleted" thread
    « Reply #17 on: January 15, 2007, 03:19:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: ChantCd
    Yes, it was.

    It was deleted at one point, because I did a search for it. Then somehow it came back from the dead.

    Matthew

    Perhaps you clicked on search at the very moment it was being moved! And it was in limbo at that point!


    Clare.

    Offline Quo Vadis Petre

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1227
    • Reputation: +1176/-0
    • Gender: Male
    FE deletes the "Why was ChantCd deleted" thread
    « Reply #18 on: January 15, 2007, 03:57:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Vox explained more her actions, saying that because of several threads that Matthew (ChantCd) participated in, that there was quite a bit of flak, and she thought that he knew he was in hot water. I'll try to find out more, since I don't know what recent threads you participated in, Matthew.
    "In our time more than ever before, the greatest asset of the evil-disposed is the cowardice and weakness of good men, and all the vigour of Satan's reign is due to the easy-going weakness of Catholics." -St. Pius X

    "If the Church were not divine, this

    Offline Dawn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2439
    • Reputation: +44/-0
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    FE deletes the "Why was ChantCd deleted" thread
    « Reply #19 on: January 15, 2007, 04:08:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is similiar to what they did to Gladius. Never where there two more charitable defenders of the truth than Gladius and Matthew. Now, the simple fact is that the truth resonates with some and makes them uncomfortable. It means that there must be changes in lifestyles. There lies the rub. It is far easier to lash out at the messenger rather than examine your life. It must be understood that so many simply do not  know or have never heard the words of Truth as taught by Holy Mother the Church for 1,965 years. Certainly not the lay people and sad to say now atlest three to four generations of priests. Take heart Matthew, Bishop Williamson is getting roasted on FE again.


    Offline Quo Vadis Petre

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1227
    • Reputation: +1176/-0
    • Gender: Male
    FE deletes the "Why was ChantCd deleted" thread
    « Reply #20 on: January 15, 2007, 05:19:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is what Vox posted as her last post on your thread, Matthew:

    ONCE AND FOR ALL: ChantCD's banning had nothing -- that is nada, niente, rien, zilch -- to do with the thread everyone keeps going back to. I did not read the thread and go ban him for it. Get it? Got it? Good! I very clearly stated the reasons for the ban. Those are the reasons.

    This thread will not turn into a bash-someone-else thread. It simply will not. Comments about ChantCD would not have been allowed either if he, himself, had not initiated this thread and demanded a public explanation for the ban.

     

    Also, by the way, "we" do not bash AQ or Phatmass at the forum; some posters have, and I ask people to lay off (if I see it). I don't see the need for bashing other Catholics myself as it makes enemies for no gain, comes off as bitter and mean, is divisive, and doesn't serve Christ or His Tradition. I'd rather focus mostly on the positive around here and not dwell too long or unnecessarily on what non-trads or trads-with-different-styles than I might be doing. Trad X doesn't like my "style" or doesn't even consider me a trad? Fine. He can do what he wants in his forum, but not in mine. And vice versa. Meanwhile, let's try to be a little kind. So, I am closing and locking this thread. If ChantCD or Carole want to make a rebuttal to anything written above in order to defend themselves, I will post it (mail me). I wish both peace.
    "In our time more than ever before, the greatest asset of the evil-disposed is the cowardice and weakness of good men, and all the vigour of Satan's reign is due to the easy-going weakness of Catholics." -St. Pius X

    "If the Church were not divine, this

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16