.

Our Lady came 97 years ago yesterday to tell us that the errors of Russia would become spread all over the world:  why didn't she say the errors of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ?  Remember, the town where she said this (Fatima) was at the time under political leadership of a Freemason mayor (of Ourem), who in one month would KIDNAP these 3 children, threatening to kill them if they didn't tell him the "Secret."  And later, Our Lady told the children that the Miracle (of the Sun) would still be given to the people that they would believe, however, it would not be as GREAT of a miracle as it would have been had the Freemason mayor not kidnapped the children.

One is left wondering just how much "greater" the Miracle of the Sun could have been!  As it was, the most overwhelmingly prominent public prophetic grace-filled miracle in the history of the world.  It puts to shame every other prodigy in human history with its beneficence, grace and beauty.

All this occurred before Communism took hold of Russia, for the October Revolution was as yet to come (it happened AFTER October 13th, 1917).


(Referring to links below)

This 4-video series appears fairly accurate from the standpoint of protestants criticizing Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.  But it is deficient from the standpoint of Catholic criticism of same.

For example, when a Freemason would advance from the 12th Degree to the 13th in the Scottish Rite, he is given the test of spitting on a crucifix lying on the floor, and then stepping on it, etc.  But protestants won't mention that because they despise crucifixes anyway, you know?  Furthermore, in the 3rd video the narrator says that "works" are of no value, and so on, but that is false, for that is one of the errors of Luther which all protestants still share, so that explains why it's one of their criticisms of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.

This is similar to how sedevacantists share errors of protestants and Eastern Orthodox, even while they disagree with them and would claim they have nothing to do with them.

This is how protestants might claim, they are Christian and Freemasons are opposed to Christianity, when in fact, protestants are also enemies of Christianity as it exists in the mind of God, that is, objectively.

Therefore, the fact that Freemasons place a value on "works" and protestants don't does not prove that it's wrong to say "Faith without works is dead."  The mutual contradiction of protestantism and Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is a conflict entirely outside the Church (where there is no salvation).  The protestants are wrong, and the Freemasons (while they assert a half-truth in their recognition of the value of works) are also wrong (because they value works that serve the devil and they do not value works that are holy in the eyes of God).


These 4 videos seem to be credible inasmuch as the interviews with former Masons appear to be genuine.  But none of these people are overtly Catholic on the recordings.  I have known Catholics who left the Masons, and there are materials available written by Catholic priests on the subject - from a Catholic perspective.

It might be difficult for one to undertake a study regarding which has been more destructive of the Church, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ or Communism, without comparing the two outlooks (protestant criticism of Masonry vs. Catholic criticism of same), and it will be up to you to discern where the protestant view is less than adequate (an example of which I provided, above).

As for the difference between Masons' and Communists' work, one might be well-advised to consider how the latter has roots in the former, and so it might be a waste of effort trying to decide which is "worse" or "more destructive."  

The principles of Communism come from the objectives and plans of Freemasons in the world.  And they both have roots in the тαℓмυdic Jєωs whose ancestors lived contemporaneously with Our Lord on earth.



(Links):










.