Author Topic: Father Z Trashes Bishop Williamson Again (Read 1695 times)

Augstine Baker · « **on:** January 26, 2012, 08:46:46 AM »

“I’d rather be in the ditch off the left side of the road than off the right side!”, quoth Jackson.*

Noooo, Dear Jackson. You can also stop swerving around, avoid both ditches, and drive responsibly according to the law given for our safety and the safety of others.

The money line from SSPX Bp. Williamson this time is:

“Dear friend of mine, I would rather be a schismatic sedevacantist than a Roman apostate. With the grace of God, neither!”

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2012/01/sspx-bp-williamson-says-i-would-rather-be-a-schismatic-sedevacantist-than-a-roman-apostate/

Telesphorus · « **Reply #1 on:** January 26, 2012, 12:28:42 PM »

Moral equivalency, but of course, it goes beyond that. It's just a slight modification of the "no enemies to the Left" rule that anyone who wants to be "respectable" follows. No matter how liberal or anti-Christian a nominal Catholic leader is, you must not treat them as deadly enemies. No matter how Christian, no matter what the faith of someone on the true right, you must not cease to disparage them as a dangerous enemy.

Caraffa · « **Reply #2 on:** January 26, 2012, 04:19:21 PM »

I have one of my own: I'd rather be a sedevacantist than a somewhat effeminate pop-traditionalist.

MyrnaM · « **Reply #3 on:** January 26, 2012, 04:51:14 PM »

I would rather be a sedevacantist who retains the Faith than be in communion with Rome who lost the keys to heaven.

PartyIsOver221 · « **Reply #4 on:** January 26, 2012, 07:08:27 PM »

I would rather be a sedevacantist than a deceived, spiritually malnourished and gullible follower of the VatII Counterchurch.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #5 on:** January 26, 2012, 07:17:16 PM »

Fr. Z is unfortunately a Neo-Cath who happens to say the TLM.

Sigismund · « **Reply #6 on:** January 26, 2012, 08:58:38 PM »

Many would describe me in similar terms. However, this was a pretty astoundingly stupid comment from Fr. Z.

Augstine Baker · « **Reply #7 on:** January 26, 2012, 11:33:18 PM »

Wow man, all the labels.

You guys are bringing me down with your linear thinking.

PartyIsOver221 · « **Reply #8 on:** January 27, 2012, 04:16:36 AM »

Quote from: Augstine Baker

Wow man, all the labels.

You guys are bringing me down with your linear thinking.

Sorry dude. Labels are what run the world. Maybe in free-thinking hippie new age land do labels get thrown out the window, but not in Catholicism. Pope Eugene IV "labelled" very succinctly that all pagans Jєωs, heretics, and schismatics will go the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels unless they are in the gates of the Catholic Church before their deaths.

And your online handle "Augstine Baker" is a label.

Time to revolt!

John Grace · « **Reply #9 on:** January 27, 2012, 06:49:40 AM »

It's ages since I heard Fr Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz mentioned.

Augstine Baker · « **Reply #10 on:** January 27, 2012, 07:11:04 AM »

Quote from: PartyIsOver221

Quote from: Augstine Baker
Wow man, all the labels.

You guys are bringing me down with your linear thinking.

Sorry dude. Labels are what run the world. Maybe in free-thinking hippie new age land do labels get thrown out the window, but not in Catholicism. Pope Eugene IV "labelled" very succinctly that all pagans Jєωs, heretics, and schismatics will go the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels unless they are in the gates of the Catholic Church before their deaths.

And your online handle "Augstine Baker" is a label.

Time to revolt!

At least make the labels accurate and reasonable.

I don't think he's effeminate, for example.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #11 on:** January 27, 2012, 07:42:38 AM »

Fr. Z once called the SSPX notion of supplied jurisdiction for their confessions and marriages as "canonical fandancing."

Augstine Baker · « **Reply #12 on:** January 27, 2012, 08:53:38 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

Fr. Z once called the SSPX notion of supplied jurisdiction for their confessions and marriages as "canonical fandancing."

I think he goes too far in his, frankly childish, imprecations against the Society.

Augstine Baker · « **Reply #13 on:** January 27, 2012, 09:07:15 AM »

Quote from: Augstine Baker

Quote from: stevusmagnus
Fr. Z once called the SSPX notion of supplied jurisdiction for their confessions and marriages as "canonical fandancing."

I think he goes too far in his, [sometimes infrequent] frankly childish, imprecations against the Society.

CalCal · « **Reply #14 on:** February 03, 2012, 05:11:39 PM »

Why does Zuhlsdorf not have a parish? A diocese?
Why does he post pictures of his extravagent meals (sometimes during Lent) and webcams of birds on his 'Sabine Farm' in Wisconsin?
How does he have such fine tastes, his own house, propert and chapel?
Reminds me of Corapi.

Is it proper for him to ask people for money? He has an Amazon wishlist on his blog, you can purchase things to be sent to him - exotic 40$ cans of tomatoes, for example, or one of several Mac Laptops.

I do not want to talk bad of anyone, but how does he get away with all of this?
Not to mention his catty speech.