Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No, I think it is utter nonsense made up after the fact to simplify an otherwise very complex world which dim people find it stressful to deal with.There's zero evidence for it other than some photographs taken years apart. If they "prove" anything then macro evolution is proven by the scant fossil record. Let's at least be consistent here.Nobody has ever credibly explained how Sister Lucia's fellow cloistered nuns, confessor, close family members were fooled into believing the imposter was the original sister Lucy.If they replaced your brother or uncle in a monastery and you went for a visit, don't you think you might notice when you talked about the number of strawberries you grew that very hot summer or the name of the cat with one eye they used to feed. How would the imposter be able to know this?
There's absolutely no doubt that the "Sister Lucy" of the year 2000 is a completely different woman. Anthropologists, maxillofacial surgeons, forensic scientists and other people whose work involves the analysis of the human facial structure have various methods of discerning the identity of an individual on the basis of their facial structure. There are certain points of reference, spatial relationships etc that serve as indentifying marks. "Sister Lucy" 2000 is not Sister Lucy. A simple point: Sister Lucy 2000 has what is called a class III bite, or an underbite, where the lower jaw protrudes beyond the upper jaw. The original Sister Lucy had a class II bite, the opposite condition, where the lower jaw is recessed in relation to the facial structure.
Here is one explanation.Her diet changed in the Convent.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15823276
leaving aside conspiricy theorys, i don't believe she's the same woman...... oh wait, that mean's........ :tinfoil:
If you believe that she is the real one, then you believe that one of the most Holiest of people, whom the BVM appeared to, approves on the NO, JPII, Communion in hand, and the NO version of Third Secret......I don't think so...