Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses  (Read 9509 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Luke3

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 57
  • Reputation: +8/-17
  • Gender: Male
Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2018, 09:35:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • He's not the anti christ because he's dead, and has been for more than a decade.  

    I never said I didn't know about the anti-christ...If you are seriously saying we need to still study whether or not JPII was the actual anti-christ, then you have a serious lack of knowledge of this topic.  This is crazy talk.  

    Could you please tell me about the Antichrist, then?  Do you know if he will be a political figure or religious figure?  Is it possible that the Antichrist has come and gone and what remains in place, is the destructive political/religious system, the eight beast?  I am not being random, there is a reason why I ask.  I'm trying to get you to lay your cards on the table because you sound so sure of yourself.  If so, please share your understanding with me?

    By the way, the Catholic church's teaching on the Antichrist is this:

    Definition of Antichrist:

    1.  Pope St. Pius X, E Supremi Apostolatus, Oct. 4, 1903: “While, on the other hand, and this according to the same apostle is the distinguishing mark of Antichrist, man has with infinite temerity put himself in the place of God.”

    2.  1 John 2:22 – “Who is a liar, but he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, who denieth the Father, and the Son.”

    3.  1 John 4:2-3 – “Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, is of God: And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus is not of God: and this is Antichrist, of whom you have heard that he cometh...”

    Have you ever heard of Bishop Nestorius of Constantinople 428 AD?


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10305
    • Reputation: +6215/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #16 on: February 16, 2018, 10:27:03 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Luke3, you need to read some of the Church Fathers.  There are a number of short pamphlets out there that give the 'nuts and bolts' of what the Church teaches on the subject...and JPII didn't come close to fulfilling any of it.  

    Where was the mark of the beast during JPII's reign?  Where were the 2 witnesses?  When did JPII try to ascend to heaven, and imitate Christ?  When did JPII work signs and wonders?  When did JPII setup his throne in Jerusalem?  When did he renew the sacrifice of the Jєωs?  When did he conquer armies and become ruler of the world?  When did he order the martyrdom of christians?  When did he outlaw the "true sacrifice" of the mass?  This is just a small list of things that will happen under the anti-christ, according to the Church and the Apocalypse.  

    Anyone who argued in the past that JPII was the anti-christ is uneducated.  Anyone who still argues it, since he's dead, is borderline insane.  


    Offline Luke3

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +8/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #17 on: February 17, 2018, 12:13:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Luke3, you need to read some of the Church Fathers.  There are a number of short pamphlets out there that give the 'nuts and bolts' of what the Church teaches on the subject...and JPII didn't come close to fulfilling any of it.  

    Where was the mark of the beast during JPII's reign?  Where were the 2 witnesses?  When did JPII try to ascend to heaven, and imitate Christ?  When did JPII work signs and wonders?  When did JPII setup his throne in Jerusalem?  When did he renew the sacrifice of the Jєωs?  When did he conquer armies and become ruler of the world?  When did he order the martyrdom of christians?  When did he outlaw the "true sacrifice" of the mass?  This is just a small list of things that will happen under the anti-christ, according to the Church and the Apocalypse.  

    Anyone who argued in the past that JPII was the anti-christ is uneducated.  Anyone who still argues it, since he's dead, is borderline insane.  
    By your own admission, you hold the position of the protestants.  For instance, you mentioned that the antichrist will setup his throne in Jerusalem.  This is very wrong, its not even close.  You are referring to this verse.

    2 Thessalonians 2:4 … so that he sitteth in the temple of God, …

    If the antichrist set up his own throne, it would not be God's throne, it would be the antichrist' throne.  No, the temple of God is St. Peter's Basilica in Rome.  You demonstrate that you don't know anything about scripture.  Church history clearly says that the antichrist will be a false bishop.  Bishop Arius, Nestorius, all the way to Judas Iscariot.  Judas betrayed and killed Jesus, the bridegroom.  In the end times Jesus will allow his bride to undergo persecution from a false bishop.

    In fact, St. Francis of Assisi prophesied that a man will be uncanonically elected to the Pontificate.

    The Prophecy of St. Francis About a Future Pope

    1. The time is fast approaching in which there will be great trials and afflictions; perplexities and dissensions, both spiritual and temporal, will abound; the charity of many will grow cold, and the malice of the wicked will increase.

    2. The devils will have unusual power, the immaculate purity of our Order, and of others, will be so much obscured that there will be very few Christians who will obey the true Sovereign Pontiff and the Roman Church with loyal hearts and perfect charity. At the time of this tribulation a man, not canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate, who, by his cunning, will endeavor to draw many into error and death.

    3. Then scandals will be multiplied, our Order will be divided, and many others will be entirely destroyed, because they will consent to error instead of opposing it.

    4. There will be such diversity of opinions and schisms among the people, the religious and the clergy, that, except those days were shortened, according to the words of the Gospel, even the elect would be led into error, were they not specially guided, amid such great confusion, by the immense mercy of God.

    5. Then our Rule and manner of life will be violently opposed by some, and terrible trials will come upon us. Those who are found faithful will receive the crown of life; but woe to those who, trusting solely in their Order, shall fall into tepidity, for they will not be able to support the temptations permitted for the proving of the elect.

    6. Those who preserve in their fervor and adhere to virtue with love and zeal for the truth, will suffer injuries and, persecutions as rebels and schismatics; for their persecutors, urged on by the evil spirits, will say they are rendering a great service to God by destroying such pestilent men from the face of the earth. but the Lord will be the refuge of the afflicted, and will save all who trust in Him. And in order to be like their Head, [Christ] these, the elect, will act with confidence, and by their death will purchase for themselves eternal life; choosing to obey God rather than man, they will fear nothing, and they will prefer to perish rather than consent to falsehood and perfidy.

    7. Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it under foot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days JESUS CHRIST WILL SEND THEM NOT A TRUE PASTOR, BUT A DESTROYER." [TAKEN FROM Works of the Seraphic Father St. Francis Of Assisi, Washbourne, 1882, pp. 248-250]

    John Paul II said every man is god.  John Paul II said Christmas is the feast of man.

    The Antichrist Has Come And Gone!

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10305
    • Reputation: +6215/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #18 on: February 17, 2018, 08:45:12 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    The Anti-christ has come and gone.

    You are absolutely crazy.  I can't believe I'm having this conversation with a 'catholic'.  You have no idea what you're talking about. 

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10305
    • Reputation: +6215/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #19 on: February 17, 2018, 09:06:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    By your own admission, you hold the position of the protestants.  For instance, you mentioned that the antichrist will setup his throne in Jerusalem.  This is very wrong, its not even close.  You are referring to this verse.

    2 Thessalonians 2:4 … so that he sitteth in the temple of God, …
    No I'm not referring to that verse.  And no, it's not a protestant position to hold that the anti-christ may setup his kingdom in Jerusalem.  See below quote from St Augustine.  It is possible that Jerusalem will be his kingdom center.

    Augustine of Hippo (354 – 430) wrote "it is uncertain in what temple [the Antichrist] shall sit, whether in that ruin of the temple which was built by Solomon, or in the Church."[30]

    I do admit that it's not a CERTAINTY that Jerusalem will be his temple, but that's besides the point.  My point is, that the Church Fathers wrote VOLUMES about the anti-christ and JPII fulfills NONE of what the Church teaches about the subject.  You picked 1 question out of 10 that I may be wrong about.  So what?  What about the other 9 questions that JPII does not fulfill?


    Offline St Ignatius

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1024
    • Reputation: +794/-158
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #20 on: February 17, 2018, 09:10:15 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • You are absolutely crazy.  I can't believe I'm having this conversation with a 'catholic'.  You have no idea what you're talking about.

    I think you are dealing with a recently banned individual... possibly Freedom?

    Offline Luke3

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +8/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #21 on: February 17, 2018, 11:29:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No I'm not referring to that verse.  And no, it's not a protestant position to hold that the anti-christ may setup his kingdom in Jerusalem.  See below quote from St Augustine.  It is possible that Jerusalem will be his kingdom center.

    Augustine of Hippo (354 – 430) wrote "it is uncertain in what temple [the Antichrist] shall sit, whether in that ruin of the temple which was built by Solomon, or in the Church."[30]

    I do admit that it's not a CERTAINTY that Jerusalem will be his temple, but that's besides the point.  My point is, that the Church Fathers wrote VOLUMES about the anti-christ and JPII fulfills NONE of what the Church teaches about the subject.  You picked 1 question out of 10 that I may be wrong about.  So what?  What about the other 9 questions that JPII does not fulfill?
    "When did he outlaw the "true sacrifice" of the mass?" 

    The Catholic Mass ceased when the false altar, the new Missal, and the changing of the words of consecration of the wine portion of the Holy Sacrifice was brought in by "Paul VI".  Its all there in the Book of Daniel and supported by the Book of the Machabees and many other places.  

    Daniel 9:26-27 … And a people with their leader that shall come, shall destroy the city and the sanctuary: and the end thereof shall be waste, and after the end of the war the appointed desolation. [27] And he shall confirm the covenant with many, in one week: and in the half of the week the victim and the sacrifice shall fall: and there shall be in the temple the abomination of desolation: and the desolation shall continue even to the consummation, and to the end.

    Daniel 11:31-32 And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall defile the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the continual sacrifice, and they shall place there the abomination unto desolation. [32] And such as deal wickedly against the covenant shall deceitfully dissemble: *but the people that know their God shall prevail and succeed.*

    1 Machabees 1:57, 62 On the fifteenth day of the month Casleu, in the hundred and forty-fifth year, king Antiochus set up the abominable idol of desolation upon the altar of God, and they built altars throughout all the cities of Juda round about: … And on the five and twentieth day of the month they sacrificed upon the altar of the idol that was over against the altar of God.

    The abomination of desolation is a false altar brought over and against the true altar of God.

    Josue 22:19, 29 …  only depart not from the Lord, and from our society, by building an altar beside the altar of the Lord our God. … God keep us from any such wickedness that we should revolt from the Lord, and leave off following his steps, by building an altar to offer h0Ɩ0cαųsts, and sacrifices, and victims, beside the altar of the Lord our God, which is erected before his tabernacle.

    Marie Julie Jahenny, who was a Third Order Franciscan, prophesied that there would be a cessation of the Catholic Mass.  Pope Leo XIII also alluded to the same thing in a vision that he had.

    Marie Julie Jahenny, the famous Briton stigmatist, heard Satan say to Christ, “For a time I will be Master of all things, everything will be under my control, even your temple and all your people.” A few further excerpts from Marie, “and will continue implacably to obtain the cessation of Holy Mass” On March 29, 1879: “the abandoned Church will be without its Supreme Head who governs and directs it.”

    On May 10, 1904, Marie Julie Jahenny was told: “I give you a warning. The disciples who are not of My Gospel are now working hard to remake according to their ideas, and under the influence of the enemy of souls, a Mass that contains words which are odious in My Sight. When the fatal hour arrives where the Faith of my priest is put to the test, it will be these texts that will be celebrated, in the second period. The first period is the one of my priesthood, existing since me. The second is the one of the persecution, when the enemies of the Faith and of the holy religion will impose their formulas in the book of the second celebrationMany of my holy priests will refuse this book [Missal], sealed with the words of the abyss. Unfortunately, amongst them are those who will accept it.” On the say day she was told: “the dispersion of the pastors…who will be replaced by others, formed by hell, initiated in all vices, all iniquities, perfidious,….new preachers of new sacraments, new temples….”

    I'm not trying to hurt you but only help, I don't know why you would deny these truths.  Unfortunately, you are relying on fallible saints and theologians concerning the antichrist.  You seem obstinate in your own ideas.  So I won't continue with you, regarding this matter.  I hope that you change?

    But there is something that I wanted to say to you because you mentioned that you can't believe that you are talking to a catholic like me.  You seem to imply that Catholics don't go to hell.  Actually most Catholics do go to hell.  This is supported all over the bible.  For instance with Moses.  Out of all the Judeans of the first generation, who came out of Egypt, only two men made it into the Promised Land.  It was Josue and Caleb.  The rest, God killed off, in the desert for their sins and obduracy.

    Numbers 14:29-30  In the wilderness shall your carcasses lie. All you that were numbered from twenty years old and upward, and have murmured against me, [30] Shall not enter into the land, over which I lifted up my hand to make you dwell therein, except Caleb the son of Jephone, and Josue the son of Nun.

    Saint Leonard of Port Maurice [A.D. 1676-1751], on the fewness of the saved: “After consulting all the theologians and making a diligent study of the matter, he [Suarez] wrote, ‘The most common sentiment which is held is that, among Christians [Catholics], there are more damned souls than predestined souls.’  Add the authority of the Greek and Latin Fathers to that of the theologians, and you will find that almost all of them say the same thing. This is the sentiment of Saint Theodore, Saint Basil, Saint Ephrem, Saint John Chrysostom. What is more, according to Baronius it was a common opinion among the Greek Fathers that this truth was expressly revealed to Saint Simeon Stylites and that after this revelation, it was to secure his salvation that he decided to live standing on top of a pillar for forty years, exposed to the weather, a model of penance and holiness for everyone.  Now let us consult the Latin Fathers. You will hear Saint Gregory saying clearly, “Many attain to faith, but few to the heavenly kingdom.” Saint Anselm declares, “There are few who are saved.” Saint Augustine states even more clearly, “Therefore, few are saved in comparison to those who are damned.”  The most terrifying, however, is Saint Jerome. At the end of his life, in the presence of his disciples, he spoke these dreadful words: “Out of one hundred thousand people whose lives have always been bad, you will find barely one who is worthy of indulgence.

    I wanted to point out what St. Francis of Assisi prophesied concerning the end times and the false bishop usurping the chair of St. Peter and those who hold to the truth.  They will be accused as being rebels and schismatics.

    The Prophecy of St. Francis About a Future Pope
    6. Those who preserve in their fervor and adhere to virtue with love and zeal for the truth, will suffer injuries and, persecutions as rebels and schismatics; for their persecutors, urged on by the evil spirits, will say they are rendering a great service to God by destroying such pestilent men from the face of the earth. but the Lord will be the refuge of the afflicted, and will save all who trust in Him. And in order to be like their Head, [Christ] these, the elect, will act with confidence, and by their death will purchase for themselves eternal life; choosing to obey God rather than man, they will fear nothing, and they will prefer to perish rather than consent to falsehood and perfidy.  [TAKEN FROM Works of the Seraphic Father St. Francis Of Assisi, Washbourne, 1882, pp. 248-250]

    You should start saying the rosary everyday, in a selfless and devoted way. 


    Recitation Of The Rosary Is Necessary For Salvation

     I am not your enemy but a friend.  If there is something that you specifically think what I provided is wrong, please specifically point it out?  Thank you.

    Offline Luke3

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +8/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #22 on: February 17, 2018, 01:25:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Sedevacantist quote.
    "First of all, it’s believed that Enoch and Elijah have never died; and since everyone born from Adam (excepting Christ and His Mother) is under the curse of death, it’s only natural to assume Enoch and Elijah MUST die someday. Ergo, it’s maintained that they will return as the Witnesses, fulfill their mission, and then perish as everyone else. And so, the belief that they haven’t died yet is one of the reasons this position has prevailed as the majority opinion for so long. 

    Then there’s the statement from the Book of Ecclesiastes which says that Enoch was translated to Paradise “to await the conversion of the nations.” (Eccl. 44:16) This statement has been interpreted as referring to the time when Enoch will return as one of the Witnesses and fulfill his mission of evangelizing. The third reason these two ancient prophets are regarded as the Witnesses is based upon the prophecy of Elijah’s return prior to the coming of the Messiah. This was foretold in the Old Testament Book of Malachy, and has been common knowledge among the Jєωs ever since. Christ Himself even confirms this view, adding that when the prophet returns, he will “restore all things”. Even today, the Jєωs are so sure of Elijah’s return, that they traditionally set a place for him at their annual Passover meal. All this to say, everyone knows Elijah will come back. The prophecy is unquestionable. As to why God would refrain from mentioning him by name in the Book of the Apocalypse, who knows?"


    More lies and distortions.  With the sin of Adam, the gates of heaven were closed until after the death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ.  Your reference to paradise, does not mean that Enoch went to heaven.  In fact, on Good Friday, Jesus told the good thief that he will be with HIM in paradise.

    Luke 23:41-43 And we indeed justly, for we receive the due reward of our deeds; but this man hath done no evil.  And he said to Jesus: Lord, remember me when thou shalt come into thy kingdom.  And Jesus said to him: Amen I say to thee, this day thou shalt be with me in paradise. 

    Jesus descended into hell to preach the gospel to those that were in Abraham's Bosom, on Good Friday.

    Luke 16:22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom. And the rich man also died: and he was buried in hell.

    1 Peter 3:18-19  Because Christ also died once for our sins, the just for the unjust: that he might offer us to God, being put to death indeed in the flesh, but enlivened in the spirit,  In which also coming he preached to those spirits that were in prison:

    It is an infallible fact, that Jesus ascended into heaven on the third day, Sunday [Easter] the first day of the week.  Jesus ascended early Sunday and then visited the Apostles, late that same day!

    John 20:1,16-20  And on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalen cometh early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre; and she saw the stone taken away from the sepulcher. …  Jesus saith to her: Mary. She turning, saith to him: Rabboni (which is to say, Master).  Jesus saith to her: Do not touch me, for I am not yet ascended to my Father. But go to my brethren, and say to them: I ascend to my Father and to your Father, to my God and your God.  Mary Magdalen cometh, and telleth the disciples: I have seen the Lord, and these things he said to me.  Now when it was late that same day, the first of the week, and the doors were shut, where the disciples were gathered together, for fear of the Jєωs, Jesus came and stood in the midst, and said to them: Peace be to you.  And when he had said this, he shewed them his hands and his side. The disciples therefore were glad, when they saw the Lord.

    Athanasian Creed.
    … Who suffered for our salvation, descended into Hell, rose again the third day from the dead. He ascended into Heaven, He sitteth on the right hand of the Father, … 

    Your reference to Elihah's return prior to the coming of Jesus is again distorted and erroneous.  You mentioned Malachias.  Elijah was a man but there are also types of Elijah, just like there are many types of Mary, the mother of God, in the old testament.

    Malachias 3:1-4  Behold I send my angel, and he shall prepare the way before my face. And presently the Lord, whom you seek, and the angel of the testament, whom you desire, shall come to his temple. Behold he cometh, saith the Lord of hosts.  And who shall be able to think of the day of his coming? and who shall stand to see him? for he is like a refining fire, and like the fuller's herb:  And he shall sit refining and cleansing the silver, and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and shall refine them as gold, and as silver, and they shall offer sacrifices to the Lord in justice.   And the sacrifice of Juda and of Jerusalem shall please the Lord, as in the days of old, and in the ancient years.

    Malachias 4:5-6  Behold I will send you Elias the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord.  And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers: lest I come, and strike the earth with anathema.

    St. John the Baptist, was a type of Elijah.  

    Matthew 11:13-15   For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John:  And if you will receive it, he is Elias that is to come.  He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.

    But concerning the angel of the testament [angel of the Apocalypse] that Jesus will send for the conversion of the Judeans, it was St. Vincent Ferrer, as a type of Elias.  Many people think that the Apocalypse will happen at once, at the very end.  Yes, some things will be like that but many things of the Apocalypse will and have happened over time and many people have not recognized it.  Concerning the Apocalypse, St. Vincent Ferrer and the Judeans:

    Apocalypse 7:1-4 After these things, I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that they should not blow upon the earth, nor upon the sea, nor on any tree.  And I saw another angel ascending from the rising of the sun, having the sign of the living God; and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea,  Saying: Hurt not the earth, nor the sea, nor the trees, till we sign the servants of our God in their foreheadsAnd I heard the number of them that were signed, an hundred forty-four thousand were signed, of every tribe of the children of Israel.

    ST. VINCENT FERRER The Angel of the Judgment by Fr. Andrew Pradel, O.P. Published by R. Washborne, London in 1875; Ch. 8, Pages. 80-81 

    St. Vincent's mission was no less fruitful among the Jєω's than among the hereticsHe converted incalculable number of themGod seemed to have accorded a special grace for the conversion of the people who are proverbially hostile to the christian name.  There was at that period a population of Jєωs both numerous and powerful in Spain.  The process of his canonization shows that in the space of thirteen months he converted twenty thousand in Castile alone; that in the year 1415, within six months, more than fifteen thousand were led to embrace the true faith in Aragon and Catalonia, and that on another occasion in the same country over thirty thousand were baptized at the close of his preaching.  

    The historians of the sect [Jєωs] do not hesitate to confirm these facts by their own testimonyIn the work entitled "Juehasin", it is related that in the year 1412, a Friar named Brother Vincent, having preached to the Jєωs, the latter renounced their law to a number of more than two hundred thousand

    The Saint had an ardent zeal and tender love for these unhappy wanderers.  In the cities where he found them, he took care that a place should always be reserved for them, and after his exhortations he treated them with much consideration.  These acts full of sweetness gained their hearts  The learning of the great preacher completed their conviction, and they presented themselves in a body to receive Holy Baptism.  Thus, at Perpignan seventy families embraced the Christian Faith.  In other places whole ѕуηαgσgυєs abjured their errors.  Their places of meeting was changed into a church.  In Castile, they were so unanimously converted that none remained, and the Bishop of Palencia saw himself deprived of a large revenue, produced by a special impost on them.  Among the Jєωs whom St. Vincent brought to the Divine Messias, many of them in their turn became apostles of their co-religionist.  Thus, one of them, who was afterward raised to the Episcopate, had the satisfaction of making forty thousand proselytes among his fellow countrymen.   

    Lets, for a moment, go back to chapter three in Malachias.  It states that the sons of Levi will be purified and they will start to sacrifice according to the new testament covenant, the Catholic Mass, just as in the days of old.  

    Malachias 3:3-4 … and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and shall refine them as gold, and as silver, and they shall offer sacrifices to the Lord in justice.  And the sacrifice of Juda and of Jerusalem shall please the Lord, as in the days of old, and in the ancient years. 

    The animal sacrifice of the old testament, was a foreshadow of the true lamb, Jesus Christ, being sacrificed in the perfected new testament.

     Hebrews 8:6-9 [6] But now he hath obtained a better ministry, by how much also he is a mediator of a better testament, which is established on better promises. [7] For if that former had been faultless, there should not indeed a place have been sought for a second. [8] For finding fault with them, he saith: Behold, the days shall come, saith the Lord: and I will perfect unto the house of Israel, and unto the house of Juda, a new testament: [9] Not according to the testament which I made to their fathers, on the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt:

    Apocalypse 3:12 He that shall overcome, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God; and he shall go out no more; and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God, and my new name.

    Again, let me extract from the book of St. Vincent's work among the Jєωs and how they became priests and bishops.

    "Among the Jєωs whom St. Vincent brought to the Divine Messias, many of them in their turn became apostles of their co-religionist.  Thus, one of them, who was afterward raised to the Episcopate, had the satisfaction of making forty thousand proselytes among his fellow countrymen."   

    Concerning numbers and windows of time, many times, they are not exact but just a number given in the bible.  This is where people get into trouble, concerning the bible.

    More to come, regarding Sedevancantist's thread.


    Offline sedevacantist

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 140
    • Reputation: +48/-101
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #23 on: February 17, 2018, 02:06:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • An Even Seven,

    I never said that Enoch ascended to Heaven. The Book of Ecclesiasticus refers to Eden as "Paradise". I've said this before in my response to the thread on Eden ("The Garden of Eden", by MyrnaM). The thread is found on page 2 of the General Discussions. 

    Eden is also where Elijah was taken after his disappearance. 

    Offline sedevacantist

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 140
    • Reputation: +48/-101
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #24 on: February 17, 2018, 02:12:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Luke,

    Moreover, had you read my thread on the Dimonds more carefully, you would have seen where I said that Elijah may be taken in a metaphorical sense, just as "Enoch". You could save yourself a lot of useless writing by actually reading what I've written:

    "This, however, would certainly not disqualify him from returning in a metaphorical sense. And, of course, the same holds true for Elijah."

    Offline sedevacantist

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 140
    • Reputation: +48/-101
    • Gender: Male


    Offline Luke3

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +8/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #26 on: February 17, 2018, 02:12:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • FYI, Jesus did not ascend into heaven on the Third Day, Easter. Jesus resurrected from the dead on Easter. Not sure ascended would be the right word to describe his resurrecting from the dead either in your second sentence.
    Probably just a simple mistake. Just a little more proofreading perhaps. Let me know if I'm wrong and/or missed something.

    Yes, in charity, you did miss something.  Please read carefully the verses below.  Jesus, early in the morning, still dark, tells Mary Magdalen, go and tell my brethren that I ascend to my father.  Jesus also tells Mary Magdalen, in the other three gospels, tell the disciples to go to Galilee, where Jesus will meet them and this is late in the day, Sunday, the same day.  

    John 20:1,16-20  And on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalen cometh early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre; and she saw the stone taken away from the sepulcher. …  Jesus saith to her: Mary. She turning, saith to him: Rabboni (which is to say, Master).  Jesus saith to her: Do not touch me, for I am not yet ascended to my Father. But go to my brethren, and say to them: I ascend to my Father and to your Father, to my God and your God.  Mary Magdalen cometh, and telleth the disciples: I have seen the Lord, and these things he said to me.  Now when it was late that same day, the first of the week, and the doors were shut, where the disciples were gathered together, for fear of the Jєωs, Jesus came and stood in the midst, and said to them: Peace be to you.  And when he had said this, he shewed them his hands and his side. The disciples therefore were glad, when they saw the Lord.

    Let me isolate the verses:

    John 20:1 And on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalen cometh early, when it was yet dark, … 

    John 20:19 Now when it was late that same daythe first of the week … 


    Offline sedevacantist

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 140
    • Reputation: +48/-101
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #27 on: February 17, 2018, 02:19:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Regarding the Dimonds’ claim that John Paul II is the Antichrist: Is there any merit to it, or is it just another one of their attempts to reconcile present events with those of the Apocalypse? Let’s see. 

    The first and most obvious question is this: Did John Paul II fulfill the Scriptural prophecies regarding the Antichrist? If so, which ones? As far as I can tell, the Dimonds’ claim is based primarily upon the supposed fulfillment of two prophecies: They claim that John Paul II declared himself to be God; and that he incurred a “deadly wound” and survived.

    According to the Dimonds, these two events perfectly coincide with prophecies specific to the Antichrist. But do they? Did John Paul II ever declare HIMSELF God? Granted, he said numerous times in rather vague and ambiguous ways that EVERYONE is Christ – in fact, he said this to the crowd in the inaugural homily following his election. Even so, this is not what Scripture says. Scripture clearly says that he will publicly declare HIMSELF God. It states that the Antichrist will exalt himself above every “god”, and above all that is worshiped; that he will stand in the Temple of God and declare himself to be God; that ALL of the inhabitants of the world who are not written in the Lamb's Book of Life WILL WORSHIP HIM AS GOD – and that they will do so under pain of death. That’s what Scripture says. And again, it’s very clear about this.

    As is painfully obvious, John Paul II never once declared himself to be God in the manner indicated by the clear testimony of Scripture. Nor has a single solitary human being on the face of this earth ever worshiped him as a "god". Not one. Nor has any so-called “False Prophet” ever required a single person to worship John Paul II as a "god" under pain of death, as Scripture clearly says he will do. 

    And what about the Antichrist's “deadly wound” that caused the entire world to admire him? Did John Paul II really fulfill this prophecy? Was his wound really deadly? Which one? The finger? The shoulder? The gut? Far from deadly, the gut wound was taken care of with no problems at all. The doctor even said JPII’s blood pressure was slightly higher than normal when he arrived at the hospital – hardly evidence of a dangerous amount of blood loss. In fact, the lack of blood loss (not even a drop on his vestments in the original photos), along with numerous other inconsistencies, has caused many to question whether the man was even shot at all. Some say it was just a staged event, designed to make him look like “Mary's Pope”. Of course, the photos of him doling out Masonic handshakes to those involved (including the “assassin”) doesn’t help his case either. But even if he was actually shot, his gut wound could hardly have been considered “deadly”.

    Nor was his recovery worthy of any special admiration – certainly nothing that would cause astonishment, or the entire world to wonder at him, as Scripture says. Doctors have performed far more astounding surgical procedures than this. In fact, sewing up a tiny gut wound is a relatively simple procedure for today's doctors. In contrast, Scripture says the ENTIRE WORLD will be in great admiration of the Antichrist’s recovery. And so once again, the Dimonds have nothing whatsoever to support their position – neither in Scripture, nor in reality. It’s just another desperate attempt to reconcile their false position with the Scriptures. That’s all.
    They err on this point because (aside from their foundation being built upon a lie) they have no conception of the meaning of the deadly wound/healing scenario. The Antichrist’s “Deadly Wound” and amazing recovery (read “resurrection”) are a necessary ploy of the Devil meant to bolster the Antichrist’s claims of Divinity. That’s what the deadly wound and astonishing recovery are all about. This is what the Dimonds fail to understand. All they see is a wound and a healing. That’s it. No. The Devil NEEDS the world to believe the Antichrist is God. The best way to prove this is the death and “miraculous” resurrection of the Antichrist.
    Lucifer is merely copying what he witnessed the Son of God do 2000 years ago. The reason being, he KNOWS the convincing power of a resurrection event. The miracle of Christ’s Resurrection was the single greatest proof of His Divinity. If you recall, the Old Testament prophets performed many of the same miracles which Christ performed, though far less in number. They multiplied food. They healed the sick and the lepers. They gave sight to the blind. Elijah even raised the dead to life. Eliseus raised two people to life – one of them by a simple contact with the prophet’s bones. Yes, the prophets of old performed the same types of miracles which Christ performed – that is, with the exception of the Resurrection. This was something they could not do. No one but Almighty God can raise HIMSELF from the dead. Ergo, this was the single greatest proof of Christ’s Divinity. This is why, if you remember, when the scribes and Pharisees asked Him for a sign, He replied that no “sign” would be given them but that of the Resurrection (Matt. 16:4). The miracles of Christ were not infallible proof of his Divinity. But the Resurrection was. This was THE SIGN He would give the world as proof of His Divinity.

    And so, knowing the convincing force of such an act, Lucifer will attempt the same (with God’s permission, of course). Granted, the Antichrist cannot possibly raise himself from the dead. Nevertheless, God will allow the world to be deceived into believing he has. And this is how the Devil will fool the world into believing the Antichrist is God. This, then, is the reasoning behind the death and “resurrection” scenario of the Antichrist – as the Dimonds massacre another prophecy.

    And what can be said of the numerous other Scriptural prophecies regarding the Antichrist which the Dimonds completely ignore? How about those we glean from the prophecies of Daniel… Did John Paul II emerge from a confederation of 10 kings, supplanting three of them on his rise to the top? Was he denied the honor of the kingdom, only to win it through flattery and deception? Was his predecessor known as a "raiser of taxes"? Did John Paul II have anything whatsoever to do with a 7-year covenant with Israel? Or put an end to the continual sacrifice? Or set up the Abomination of Desolation? Or worship the “God of Forces” with gold and silver and Jєωels? Did he establish his palace between the seas on the Glorious Holy Mountain (which is Jerusalem, by the way)?

    And what about some of those prophecies from the New Testament? Was his reign after the working of Satan with all power and lying signs and wonders? Did he reign supreme for 42 months? Did he ever send out an evil miracle-working frog-like spirit to gather the kings of the earth together for the final battle of Armageddon? And what about his death? Was he destroyed with the brightness of Christ's coming, as St. Paul says? Or cast alive into a lake of fire along with the False Prophet, as Scripture clearly says will happen? And what of the other two-dozen or so prophecies the Dimonds ignore? Which ones did John Paul II actually fulfill? Any of them? Even one?

    Honestly, how anyone could be suckered into believing the brothers' claim here is beyond me. Thank you, Pax Vobis, for displaying some sanity here. God gave us very specific prophecies with which to identify the Antichrist – lots of them. John Paul II can barely be said to fulfill one or two of the 40 or more given to us; and even these two apparent interpretations are borderline worthless. Once again, in their futile attempt to legitimize their agenda, Fred and Bob have created an Apocalyptic Fantasy Land with absolutely no basis in Scripture or reality.

    No less absurd is their allegation that Joseph Ratzinger is the False Prophet. Here we have a claim that is so baseless and void of proof that the Dimonds don't even attempt to justify it. They just state their case and run, hoping no one will look any closer. So, let's have a closer look. Did Ratzinger deceive the entire world by performing great lying signs and wonders, as Scripture plainly says the False Prophet will do? Did he ever make fire come down from Heaven in the sight of men? Did he ever “force all, both little and great, rich and poor, freemen and bondmen, to have a Mark in their right hand or in their forehead – that no man might buy or sell without it?” Did he set up an image of John Paul II, making it come alive and speak? Did he order the world to worship it under punishment of death? Did he, along with John Paul II, have anything to do with the gathering of the kings of the earth together for the final Battle of Armageddon? And did he descend alive into the lake of fire along with John Paul II? No he didn't. He didn't fulfill any of these. Not one. Not a single word. This is why the Dimonds are ominously silent about him. He never once fulfilled a single prophecy regarding the False Prophet. He didn’t even come close. In fact, the Dimonds were so desperate to find something prophetic in his actions that they attributed the bonfire image of John Paul II to Ratzinger - remember that one? The Dimonds claimed Ratzinger was responsible for it, and that this was how he fulfilled the "calling down fire from Heaven in the sight of men" (Apoc. 13:13). Now that's a stretch.

    The ONLY reason the Dimonds continue to maintain such a baseless absurdity regarding Ratzinger is because he was John Paul II’s right hand man. That's it. That's the basis of their entire claim. If John Paul II was the Antichrist, then Ratzinger MUST have been the False Prophet. Who else could it have been?

    In the end, their claim regarding Ratzinger has absolutely no foundation at all. Zero. It’s just another worthless, desperate attempt to justify an unjustifiable fantasy. I'll say it again: The Dimonds' entire edifice is built upon a lie. Ergo, everything that emanates from that foundation is necessarily false – as anyone can see.

    Scripture, on the other hand, leads to the conclusion that the Antichrist will be a Jєω. This is what the early Church Fathers: St. Irenaeus, St. Hippolytus of Rome, St. Ambrose, and Lactantius taught; as well as later writers such as St. John Damascene. Moreover, he will claim to be the Messiah; and the Jєωs WILL ACCEPT HIM AS THEIR MESSIAH, as Christ Himself teaches (John 5:43). In full agreement with this, St. Ambrose said the Antichrist would even use Scripture to prove he’s the Messiah. Moreover, the renowned Didache (also known as the “Teaching of the Twelve Apostles”) says the Antichrist will claim to be the Son of God. Mind you, this was written by FIRST CENTURY Jєωιѕн CONVERTS who learned firsthand from the Apostles and their immediate successors.

    The prophet Daniel tells us the Antichrist will establish his palace on Mount Zion (Dan. 11:45). Wonder of wonders. Of course he will – he’s a Jєω. St. Paul says he will sit in the very Temple of God and actually declare himself to be God. Behold the “Abomination of Desolation” spoken of by Daniel – foreshadowed in the actions of the Greek Emperor Antiochus IV who placed a statue of the “god” Jupiter in the Temple in Jerusalem in 167 B.C. Following on the path of this most heinous blasphemy, though to a greater extent, the Antichrist will place HIMSELF in the Temple and declare himself “God”.

    Again, it all revolves around Israel. Yes, the Antichrist – the future leader of the world – will be a Jєω. Nor should this be any cause for surprise. Anyone privy to what’s going on behind the world scene (that is, anyone who knows who the Puppetmasters are) should have absolutely no trouble with this position. The future ruler of the world will be a Jєω.

    On a sidenote, against those such as the Dimonds who claim the “Temple” spoken of in the Book of the Apocalypse couldn't possibly be the coming 3rd Temple in Jerusalem, consider well that anything properly consecrated to God belongs to Him. It makes absolutely no difference who builds the Temple, nor what goes on inside (read Ez. 8 ). If the coming third Temple is properly consecrated to God, then it is God’s Temple. It’s that simple. The same principle is true of the bread and wine consecrated by a heretical priest during Mass. The consecration is perfectly valid despite the heretical state of the priest, since the power to consecrate is intrinsic to the priesthood itself.

    In the same way, the Temple in Jerusalem belongs to God if it’s properly consecrated to Him by a true priest of Israel. And it will be. Ergo, you can rest assured that the coming third Temple in Jerusalem is PRECISELY the temple spoken of in these prophecies. This is where the Antichrist will put an end to the daily sacrifices. This is also where he will stand and proclaim himself to be Almighty God. This is precisely why Christ tells the Jєωs that when they see the Abomination of Desolation, they must flee Judea.
    Finally, as mentioned in another thread, the Antichrist's sidekick (the False Prophet) will be hailed by the Jєωs as Elijah. To confirm the deception, Satan will give him power to perform all kinds of deceptive lying signs and wonders. He will even give him the power to call down fire from heaven, just as the real Elijah did in the Old Testament (2[4] Kings 1:10).

    In  the end, the advent of the false Messiah and the false Elijah, with the accompanying lying signs and wonders, is nothing but Satan's last ditch effort to thwart the return of God's beloved Israel. The Apocalypse is all about the return of Israel. Until you comprehend this fact, you will be just as lost as the Dimonds. 

    Offline sedevacantist

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 140
    • Reputation: +48/-101
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #28 on: February 17, 2018, 02:36:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "Sedevacantist" you cited the magazine "A Voice Crying In The Wilderness", can you tell me the issue number and the page number that supports what you are saying?  If you are going to present what appears to be a forensic presentation against Brother Michael and Brother Peter, it is only fair to be able to provide the facts and the evidence, so that others can independently verify what your poorly present.  

    And just as another reader commented, its not about the prophecies, its about the Catholic Faith itself, for which they defend vigorously!  I intend to carefully read this thread because the bias stinks to high heaven.  

    And by the way, the Brothers would never back down from a debate, you are a liar, in that regard.

    Regarding the Antichrist, Pax Vobis, can you tell me the definition of Antichrist and who it will be?  You seem to know?
    They only put out two issues, from what I remember. They could tell you which one it was. I kept my copies around for several years, but couldn't tell you where they are today. I've moved many times since then. Like I said, ask them. They could tell you.

    Yes, the bias stinks. I'll give you that. This is why I started another thread to apologize. 

    And yes, doctrines are vitally important. And I do agree with them on doctrinal matters, with the exception of the Birth Control issue, which they are clearly in heresy about. However, I cannot agree with your (implied) position that prophetic interpretation of the Apocalypse is unimportant. God certainly doesn't think so. Anyone who takes away ANYTHING of the words of the Apocalypse is under threat of eternal damnation. This is no small matter. And might I remind you, you are supporting the very same corruption of Scripture as the Dimonds are putting out there.

    And regarding the debate issue, the Dimonds most certainly DID refuse to debate me. Sorry. However, I never said they "backed down", only that they refused. To say they "backed down" implies they cowered. In truth, I don't know why they refused.

    Offline Luke3

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +8/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Exposed and Refuted: The Dimond Brothers believe they are the Two Witnesses
    « Reply #29 on: February 17, 2018, 02:44:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Dude, in charity, Our Lord did not ascend into heaven the third day after Good Friday. Our Lord resurrected from the dead on this day. It was not until the fortieth day after Easter that He ascended into Heaven.

    You said "it is an infallible fact, that Jesus ascended into heaven on the third day". It NOT an infallible fact that Jesus ascended into heaven on the Third Day. When refuting someone please pay attention to the actual words you are using.
    "When refuting someone please pay attention to the actual words you are using"

    Yes, truthfully, I am paying attention to the words that I am using, the bible is infallible.

    The Council of Trent Pope Paul III, Session IV, Celebrated on the eighth day of the month of April, in the year 1546: …  the Holy Ghost dictating, have come down even unto us, transmitted as it were from hand to hand; (the Synod) following the examples of the orthodox Fathers, receives and venerates with an equal affection of piety, and reverence, all the books both of the Old and of the New Testament--seeing that one God is the author of both --as also the said traditions, as well those appertaining to faith as to morals, as having been dictated, either by Christ's own word of mouth, or by the Holy Ghost, and preserved in the Catholic Church by a continuous succession.

    And it has thought it meet that a list of the sacred books be inserted in this decree, lest a doubt may arise in any one's mind, which are the books that are received by this Synod. They are as set down here below: of the Old Testament: the five books of Moses, to wit, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy; Josue, Judges, Ruth, four books of Kings, two of Paralipomenon, the first book of Esdras, and the second which is entitled Nehemias; Tobias, Judith, Esther, Job, the Davidical Psalter, consisting of a hundred and fifty psalms; the Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, the Canticle of Canticles, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Isaias, Jeremias, with Baruch; Ezechiel, Daniel; the twelve minor prophets, to wit, Osee, Joel, Amos, Abdias, Jonas, Micheas, Nahum, Habacuc, Sophonias, Aggaeus, Zacharias, Malachias; two books of the Machabees, the first and the second.

    Of the New Testament: the four Gospels, according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John; the Acts of the Apostles written by Luke the Evangelist; fourteen epistles of Paul the apostle, (one) to the Romans, two to the Corinthians, (one) to the Galatians, to the Ephesians, to the Philippians, to the Colossians, two to the Thessalonians, two to Timothy, (one) to Titus, to Philemon, to the Hebrews; two of Peter the apostle, three of John the apostle, one of the apostle James, one of Jude the apostle, and the Apocalypse of John the apostle. But if any one receive not, as sacred and canonical, the said books entire with all their parts, as they have been used to be read in the Catholic Church, and as they are contained in the old Latin vulgate edition; and knowingly and deliberately contemn the traditions aforesaid; let him be anathema.

    Why can't you see what is being said in John's Gospel?  Jesus ascended to the Father and then, after, late in the day, Jesus met the disciples at Galilee and spent forty days with them.  Why is that hard to understand?  You seem mad and frustrated.  Tell me what I am not seeing in John's Gospel?  But look at the words being said though.