Climax, you're a newbie here, and late in the game on this forum.
Uh, huh. And
you, ‘Incredulous’, you're far from being a newbie here, having leveraged an excess of postings (4641 as of July 16) into
CathInfo's exalted rank "
hero member".
Some samplings on him are below, for your reading enjoyment
No, there's
no "reading enjoyment" at all.
You still can't seem to resist
hijacking a
topic that's plenty
interesting on its own merits. Your 1 Reply #25 (July 15, 2019, 22:32:24) consumed 1/2 the space on its page, but it's easy to verify that in all that space,
you completely
failed to mention the
topic-
Subject word "
obelisk".
So yet another of your
hijackings indulged in
reader-hostile habits that readers of
CathInfo are accustomed to seeing from you, notably obnoxiously
oversized text, which doesn't make your posting any more
true nor
trustworthy.
Hey How's 'bout you, ‘Incredulous’, find those old
CathInfo postings that attack the reputation of Michael Hoffman, whether fairly or unfairly, then create an
original posting that contains links to the most
credible of the attacks, and petition ‘Matthew’ to ‘pin’ your new
topic to 1 of his subforums? So instead of arrogantly
hijacking interesting
topics, you could humbly submit a brief posting that mostly simply
links to your (potentially) pinned
topic?
Then if you have nothing (more) to offer
CathInfo readers about "
obelisks", then just
go away.