Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Symbols of a millennia-dead religion are of no harm or relevance to anyone.
Well either the popes in the late middle ages to the early modern period were secret occultists. Or just some busybodies in the Vatican government liked obelisks...It goes far deeper than obelisks though, there were pagan symbols erected throughout Europe during this time period. The Vatican spent serious money patronizing some of these pagan symbols. Though are no answers, only speculation, it is a true rabbit hole. I went down it years ago and I haven't really though about it since.
Examples? The vast majority of pagan symbols around the place are ones that predate Christianity(in the region at least) and just got re-purposed or kept for historical value. There are probably Freemasonic pagan symbols put up around the place that know one even knows are there/are pagan, but this idea of the Church and Catholic governments secretly being pagan occultists is just silly. If you believed the Church was corrupted that long, you might as well join Ibranyi in declaring the last 1,000 years of Popes as anti-Popes. That'd be the logical conclusion to such a bizarre theory.
that know one even knows are there
We too have seen these obelisks, and asked the same question. They are, I think, phallic symbols. Why have they been moved and re-erected in Rome at great effort and expense? Some of the answers may be found in Michael Hoffman's latest book, The Occult Renaissance of Rome.
Dustin Hoffman used to deny he was Jєωιѕн.
The Popes did not seek them out but merely discovered and displayed them. That still doesn’t answer the “Why?”. If they were occultist / phallic as many have suggested then why did many good and holy Popes allow them to stand? (Rhetorical question).